Traceback generated when trying to pass a datetime object into a function tag
in xml.
<function name="action_name" model="model_name" eval="datetime.date.today"/>
Used to fail.
With this commit now one can pass time, datetime, timedelta, relativedelta,
version, ref, pytz in function tag in xml
Task-id: 1772614
Closesodoo/odoo#29212
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Dhaval Limbuwala <dli@odoo.com>
When multiple emails (`mail.mail`) are linked
to the same message (`mail.message`),
all the message notifications were being marked as sent
as soon as one of the mail was sent, and not all of them.
This is indeed possible to have multiple emails linked to a single
message, for instance when there are employees and customers in
the followers of a thread, and some must therefore have
the buttons meant for the employees ("Assign me") and some not.
In other words, it was possible notifications were marked
as sent while their associated email was not sent yet.
This revision also comes as an addition to
5d6656d739
as it was possible to receive a bounce coming from
the previous mail sent which wrote on the same notifications `email_status`
than the current message being sent before we could acquire the lock on
them (see commit message of the above mentioned revision),
as it was writing the `email_status` on more notifications that it
should have, including notifications of the previous email.
e.g
- Mail 1
- Message 1
- Recipient A, B, C
- Mail 2
- Message 1
- Recipient D, E
Let's say recipient A bounces
If the email notifying the bounce arrives during the processing of the "Mail 1",
it will be blocked until we release the lock on the `mail.notification` `email_status`
we acquire thanks to having written `exception` on `email_status` before sending the email.
But, as soon as it is unblocked (after the `cr.commit()`),
it will immediately re-attempt the delivery of the bounce email,
therefore writting "bounced" in `email_status` of recipient A,
while the transaction of the second email already began.
When the second email sending will try to write the `email_status`
of recipient A as well
(as it used to write the `email_status` on all the message notifications,
not just the one related to the current email),
it raised a concurrent update.
Therefore:
1. Interrupting the loop, as psycopg2 exceptions are raised and not passed,
2. Replay the sending of the second email a second time.
opw-1984293
closesodoo/odoo#33431
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux <beledouxdenis@users.noreply.github.com>
When website_customer is not installed, some endpoints are not handled
by the router, causing the following tests to fail:
- test_10_crawl_public
- test_20_crawl_demo
- test_30_crawl_admin
Those tests were failing due to /customers responding with 404.
Indeed, the route /customers is defined in website_customer, but had
some usage within website_crm_partner_assign, causing tests to fail when
the former module is not installed.
The new behavior can be explained as follows:
- module website_crm_partner_assign on its own will lose the hyperlink.
- module website_customer will now inherit the view definition in order
to wrap the targeted HTML text elements with an anchor tag.
Closes#33344
Signed-off-by: Christophe Simonis <chs@odoo.com>
Putting *args and **kwargs confuses the function `odoo.api.split_context`.
This causes that a call to `search` via XMLRPC gets the wrong argument: takes
the first argument of ``args`` as the context.
Example which ignores the `count=True`::
```
api.call_kw(self.env['product.product'], 'search', (
[], False, False, None, True, {'lang': 'en_US'}
), {})
```
would ignore the `count=True` and use the wrong argument for context.
Issue introduced in commit 15ea753a.
Since:
`def search(self, model=None, *args, **kwargs)`
is equivalent to:
`def search(self, args, offset=0, limit=None, order=None, count=False):`
because the call to the super will anyway call the parent method, we can
change the method arguments.
note: this is only for [10.0,saas-14] where 15ea753a is.
closes#33147
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicolas Lempereur <nle-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Rounding each element of the sum decrease the
precision and prevent to reconcile large recordset.
closesodoo/odoo#33100
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <smetl@users.noreply.github.com>
With some escpos printers the cash drawer did still not open after
previous fixes. One of the problemetic printers is the Epson TM-m30.
This fix will check the status of the drawer and try to open it up to 5
times. The fix is successfully tested with the TM-m30.
closesodoo/odoo#33328
Signed-off-by: pimodoo <pimodoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Following the fix in 4c35983d0, it appears that the excludes and
packages options are conflicting. py2exe seems smart enough to include
jinja2 package without the explicit include via the 'package' options.
closesodoo/odoo#32991
Signed-off-by: Christophe Monniez (moc) <moc@odoo.com>
Prefetching it triggers its translation, which quickly becomes most of
the overhead of /jobs despite the field not being displayed on that
page: an empty /jobs takes ~150ms, a /jobs with 99 jobs takes ~2000ms,
>70% of which are spent in html_translate and ultimately
translate.py:process (14600 calls, 60% of runtime, 40% own).
Removing prefetching lowers the runtime to ~700ms.
closesodoo/odoo#32985
Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
Make a PO then an invoice with a product that will create an asset
cancel the invoice
Open the Assets Analysis report
Before this commit, the asset lines corresponding to the invoice
are shown
After this commit, they are not shown (only non archived assets are by default)
OPW 1974344
closesodoo/odoo#32955
Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
Since 78ba90d5, when building the windows package, py2exe fails to
compiles jinja2 asyncsupport module. Even tough jinja detects the
environement, py2exe tries to compile the async part. The problem comes
from the fact that async keyword was introduced in python 3 and we use
py2exe with python 2.7.
With this commit the async part of jinja is execluded from py2exe.
closesodoo/odoo#32913
Signed-off-by: Olivier Dony (odo) <odo@openerp.com>
Because of c56b746221
server action "state" (what it should execute) defaults to
Update a record
This commit corrects the check printing action accordingly
OPW 1972938
closes#32928
Have a SO with a quotation template and some optional products set
Display it on the portal
On an optional product, click on the cart icon
to add it to the SO
Modify the quantity of the optional product
Before this commit, the feature was barely working:
- the total price of the optional product did not change
- negative quantities were allowed
- there was no reaction when directly putting a number in the input
- when decrementing the quantity, it crashed
- untaxed and tax amounts were not dynamic
After this commit:
- the total price of the optional product changes as a function of the quantity input
- negative quantities are not allowed
- it is not possible to manually input the quantity with a keyboard
only +/- buttons are used to change the quantity
- decrementing the quantity works
- untaxed and tax amounts are dynamic
OPW 1947769
closesodoo/odoo#32715
Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
Recommended by GitHub's repository alerts.
We normally stick as close as possible to the version we depend
on in the official DEB packages. This in turn depends on the version of
Debian stable at the time of release - for 10.0 that would be Debian 8
(jessie) and thus Jinja 2.7.3 (albeit with security backports).
However Jinja2 before 2.10.1 suffers from a few issues that could lead
to crashes of Odoo processes.
It seems it's worth an exception to our rule for pip users, similarly to
previous bump up at d2605bccdb.
closesodoo/odoo#32602
Signed-off-by: Christophe Simonis <chs@odoo.com>
This revision is similar to
605b94e64c
except that instead of an OperationalError
(e.g. a conccurent update),
this is an IntegrityError which is raised,
an sql constraint which is not met,
e.g. a unique or required constraint.
In the case of this opw,
this is the picking name unique constraint
which was not met,
the picking sequence number has somehow been re-used.
Both
`psycopg2.OperationalError`
and
`psycopg2.IntegrityError`
inherits from
`psycopg2.DatabaseError`
We therefore choose to use this Exception class,
to include all kind of psycopg2 exceptions that prevent
the transaction to be committed.
opw-1965679
closesodoo/odoo#32577
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux <beledouxdenis@users.noreply.github.com>
In mass mailing access to partners when performing a mass mailing has been
done in batch to speedup computation [1]. Emails are put into a dictionary
allowing to find back the email based on partner_id.
However the matching between the partner and its emails is done using a
shortcut using the current document ID as partner ID. It works when performing
a mass mailing on partners but fails when performing a mass mailing on models
having message_get_default_recipients not returning only emails. Currently
in saas-14 main models return only emails (crm, event, mailing contacts) but
other models may encounter issues (applicants, tickets).
This commit fixes it by correctly matching partner id and its found email.
[1] See 65ed4553a5
_compute_website_url can only be called on singletons
It should not be called with self but the record we are iterating on
closesodoo/odoo#32369
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
For existing installations, creating indices might not always be
possible, e.g. if you have a Text/Char field that has an index=True
set on it in a field override and pre-existing rows longer than
the pg supported size , the index creation will fail.
Instead of failing miserably during the schema modification, simply
log the problem instead and keep going.
closesodoo/odoo#32442
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
When a asset is confirmed, it's not allowed to link it to an invoice.
Side effect, it recomputed the depreciation lines of the confirmed asset.
opw:1961468
closesodoo/odoo#32388
Signed-off-by: Simon Goffin (sig) <sig@openerp.com>
Since 79af654fc61 if we had unexpected configuration of usage such as
being in HTTPS, having a POS hardware in HTTPS but an error is received
(eg. the device is closed) => the POS interface can't be opened being
blocked on an error:
Https connection to IoT Box failed
Make sure you are using IoT Box v18.10 or higher.
Navigate to {proxy_ip} to accept the certificate of your IoT Box.
With this changeset, we have a popup that does not prevent to open the
point of sale interface (and the red disconnected status in the top
left allow to retry connection as before) on first load.
opw-1934413
closes#32306
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
- Create 2 companies A & B
- For a product P, create a supplier info for each company using the
same partner, with a different price and delay.
- Order the supplier so that the one for A has a higher priority than
the one for B.
- Create a reordering rule for P in company B.
- Run the scheduler as admin (e.g. thanks to the cron).
The price taken is the price for company A instead of B.
`_select_seller` is not company-aware, therefore the first matching
supplier is chosen.
opw-1959263
closesodoo/odoo#32328
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Christophe Simonis