In the first attempt at #26134, the pot_targets was cleared after creating
the pot_rows object.
Since the rows not present in the pot_targets are now skipped, clearing the pot
should not be done.
Still use a temporary list pot_rows to avoid modifying the list we are iterating
on.
Update the .po test file to match the new file format
Closes#26881
cherry-pick of 428fbd0381 that was reverted at 737ba55e1e as it was making
tests fail
The following commit will correct the tests
This commit only reverts the revert
Remove part in service_mixins who hide this error. Queries must be able
to be canceled for better performance. Also in the case of longpolling,
if the request is not canceled, wait for a server message or the maximum
time (30 sec) to add or delete channels.
Purpose
=======
The reified view removal makes sense from a functional point of view
as it allows to customize the res.users configuration view.
But this PR is also impossible to migrate efficiently as all the custom
groups that are not defined on the res.users model and that are not included
in the res.users view wont be displayed anymore.
It is still possible to add the group by hand in debug mode, but actually it is
not the clean workaround.
This could be done again in a better way, for example by defining a new field
like "UserGroup" and by allowing a easy customization with the Odoo Studio feature
Specification
=============
- Remove the generic methods to define the user's group computed fields
- Reintroduce the reified view
- Keep the main interesting feature of the original PR: Display the user's type
(Internal User, Public, Portal) as a selection field.
The override of fields_get adds "virtual" fields corresponding to
groups.
If for example we make "res.users" have inherit "mail.thread", we get
these "virtual" field as if they had "track_visibility", since we do a
"fields_get" with fields having track_visibility expecting to only get
back "track_visibility" ones.
So the system would then fail trying to track visibility on fields like
"in_group_5" and for example a res.users could not be created anymore.
With this fix, we fix the fields_get so it respect the fields we ask of
it.
fixes#22332
opw-1878654
closes#22338closes#26705
Co-authored-by: Wolfgang Pichler <wpichler@callino.at>
- We extract some code logic to methods to allow to override them.
This is needed for the subscription module where a payment token need
to be copied from a transaction to a subscription.
The subscriptions is created from a sale order and before the
payment.transaction holding the payment.token id is validated.
Since the payment.transaction is not validated, the subscription
module doesn't find the correct transaction.
By extracting this code logic, we can override exactly when it should
be.
- When creating a transaction on the payment page of the portal, the
transaction reference returned was incorrect.
This commit return the newly created transaction's reference.
Before this rev., there was a crash when a FieldDomain was reset
with a new domain (e.g. coming from an onchange). For instance, it
crashed in Email Marketing > create new Mass Mailing > select
mailing lists. Introduced by 68332a01.
opw-1882850
Following CDN expansion (d98b262398)
portal attachment links now go through the CDN, which is an issue for
restricted-access attachments e.g. attachments bound to specific objects
(such as support tickets).
Add an access token to the attachment links in the /my/task template.
Cf OPW-1882014 (fixed ad-hoc by editing the relevant view on odoo.com)
…eduler"
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Let's consider P a product with routes "buy" and "mto" and with
purchase_requistion = 'Propose a call for tenders'
- Let's consider a BOM B with P as component
- Create a MO for B
- Run the scheduler two times
Bug:
Two purchase agreements have been created for the the same MO.
opw:1882280
- The method to compute the reference of a payment.transaction and avoid
duplicate was missing some edge cases (for example if there was a '-'
in the reference).
- The creation of transactions in the route /website_payment/pay was not
checking for duplicate payment.transaction.
- When creating an invoice created after a payment, we need to force the
company to the transaction's company.
This avoid to create move lines with different companies (Administrator's
company because of the payment processing done by the admin and the
sale order/transaction company).
- Set up a tax as 'Based on Payment'
- Create an invoice at date D with this tax
- Pay the invoice at date D+1
- Unreconcile
A reversal entry is made at the current date, while it should be at the
payment date D+1.
We make sure to use the payment date only if the payment period has not
been locked.
Fixes#25738
opw-1870467
When bundle contains both, sass and less, the unlink on old_attachments
will be called twice and thus results in MissingError.
This commit closes#26110
Since march 2015, using in a domain "relativedelta(months=X)" with
X being bigger than 11 or lower than -11 would result in an error.
This is because in the refactoring adding modules (e8a00bc50d) the two
functions divmod and utils.divmod with different implementation in
pyeval.js were replaced by one function divmod in web.utils module.
But there was still an usage of the removed implementation.
opw-1880766
closes#26816
We need to know if a notification is in failure by
displaying the red envelope in even if all partner are inactive.
This commit also fix the filter in order to display notification
of all active partners if there is an exception.
The user right to edit partners was handled in order to set email fields as readonly
If a user is in the failed recipient, we need to check that the urrent user also has
right to write on users
Raphael Collet