Let's assume a form view with field A and B (a one2many list), with
a column with attrs column_invisible depending on A.
If the user sets A manually, everything works fine (the column is
hidden/shown directly). However, if A is updated by an onchange
(e.g. depending on the number of rows in B), it doesn't. This
rev. fixes that issue.
Related to Issue: 1851451
Co-authored-by: Priyanka Kaakdiya <pka@odoo.com>
payment_term.id, creates a tuple wich works if payment_term.id is set
in case payment_term.id is False this creates the tuple (False,) which
is then converted by the Odoo ORM to a account.payment.term(False, )
record set, which in term may cause weird behaviour as this value does
not eval to false in cases like `if self.payment_term_id:`
Closesodoo/odoo#28397
Before that, when reversing an account.move, if two lines of the move shared the same account, we tried reconciling them once for each line: it worked the first time but triggered an error message the second, since the lines had already been reconciled.
On the BoM structure report the price on line with a
child BoM is inchoerent. Also the sum of all lines in
the report is not always equals to the total of the parent
line.
For the first issue, it happens due to commit 17b6256955
that use the number of operation cycle as quantity.
The second issue happens because sometimes the rounding is not done
at the smallest level and thus the rounding of the sum is different than
the sum of the rouding.
Fix translation placeholders in invite wizard, to make them easier to
understand for translators. Also rework the message generation code
to ensure proper XML structure.
Fix translation placeholders in invite wizard, to make them easier to
understand for translators. Also rework the message generation code
to ensure proper XML structure.
Before that, taxes were only applied with the most recent currency rate, which caused problems in multi currencies, when reconciling statement lines made in the past with invoices, causing the amount currencies in the payment account.move to be wrong.
//Scenario to reproduce the issue (from customer ticket 1903497):
(for a company with USD as base currency)
1. Create a new bank journal for EUR payments
2. Create a new customer invoice for 90€
3. Create a new tax for the reconciliation model, price-included and amounting to 15%
4. Create a new reconciliation model using this tax
5. Use the currency rates from the demo data, add one that is closer to current date than the most recent one.
6. Create a new bank statement for the created EUR bank journal. Make sure that the transaction is less than the actual amount due on the invoice so that we can apply the reconciliation model. Also make sure to set a date on the transaction that lies in the past at some point when the currency rate was (significantly) different.
7. Hit the reconcile button, select the amount due from the invoice and apply the discount reconciliation model(take note of the amount on the created tax move line). Now reconcile.
What is the current behavior that you observe?
Now go back to the bank statement and check the created journal entries. You will see a difference in the amount currency values of the payment and the tax account move line. This difference should not exist.
Revert commits da2140b726, e65c8826ef and 06cd145a79. They
introduce an incorrect UOM.
The original issue was an `AccessError` due to the fact that the
employee chosen was not in the same company than the user. Therefore,
instead of changing the logic of the UOM selection, we make sure to
select the employee in the appropriate company first, then fall back on
any company then.
opw-1888299
Due to the implementation of PEP-475[1] in Python 3.5, revision
e98e8e9b1b used the recommended technique
of wakeup file descriptors in order to detect interruption of sleep() and
select() by signals, when running in multi-process mode (workers > 0).
The technique works well, however the initial patch never bothered to
read the byte that is written to the wakeup pipe when a signal is
processed. This does not matter when the signal is meant to shut down
the server, but it matters when the signal is SIGQUIT: it simply prints
thread dumps, and continues operating normally.
As a consequence, that byte remains in the wakeup pipe forever, causing
all the subsequent select/sleep calls to return immediately because
the wakeup fd *is* already ready. The symptom was that worker
processes would start cycling their main run loop very fast after
receiving a SIGQUIT signal, eating 100% CPU.
This patch ensures we always empty the wakeup pipe after an interruptible
call, to avoid this effect. It also refactors another occurrence of the
"empty pipe" pattern, in the PreforkServer, and incidentally uses readable
aliases for the file descriptors bound to the ends of the wakeup pipe
(wakeup_fd_r / wakeup_fd_w).
[1] https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0475closesodoo/odoo#28356
This commit tackles the issue of having the pseudo-object 'parent' in the
invoice lines views
In the regular o2m, parent refers to the current invoice
From commit eca030cc38
we learn that parent.get() is not a valid field according to python
From OPW 1912243, we learn that:
- when the invoice line form view is standalone (not popped from the o2m)
'parent' is not what we expect (in this case it will refer to the record list of all invoice lines, NOT the invoice)
- parent.type in that case is undefined and makes the JS crash
So, to make sure we retrieve the right field and value, we retrieve them through
related fields pointing to the invoice
closesodoo/odoo#29074
Have an expense product with a supplier tax on it
Write an email to be caught by the thread model to create an expense for that product
Before this commit, the tax was not set up on the expense
After this commit, it is
OPW 1908596
closesodoo/odoo#29061
Have a form record with a progress bar
Modify the max_value of the progress, as well as the current_value bar through an onchange
Before this commit, the new max_value was not taken into account
After this commit, it is.
closesodoo/odoo#29056
Have a sales team without a target in the kanban view
click on define a target
Before this commit, the veiw wasn't rerendered, so the change apparently did not happen
(while the write was triggered)
Also, the Enter key did not work to validate the input
After this commit, the view is refreshed and the enter key works
OPW 1906938
closesodoo/odoo#29055
Send a message using the popup editor.
Drag and drop an image into the message content.
It will create an attachment for the inlined image.
To generate the values for the attachment, a regex is used to parse the content.
Besides summoning Eldritch abominations, it didnt't take into account the
original filename, whereas the default one (image) would have no extension.
We extend the regex to capture the filename and use it.
opw 1903194
closesodoo/odoo#28527
Send a message using the popup editor.
Drag and drop an image into the message content.
It will create an attachment for the inlined image.
However it did give a res_model value of mail.message but no res_id;
add_missing_default_value would fill in the res_id from the _context, which is
not the mail_message but the current object on which it applies
(e.g. helpdesk.ticket).
We put the correct res_model along with the res_id.
opw 1903194
closesodoo/odoo#28526
When creating a SO line and clicking on search more for product_id
Before this commit, every user had the button "Create" to create a product.product
After this commit, only user in groups that actually can create a product have the button
OPW 1910371
closesodoo/odoo#28924
When creating a mail for a user in an other company then the
record, the "send" button fails with a traceback because on
specific template try to access the company.id of the user
which is not accessible due to the access controle.
This PR fixes the problem by sudoing the access to company id.
The mail now sends without problem.
Step to reproduce:
1. Use two companies (comp1 and comp2)
2. Use 3 users (user1, user2, user3)
3. Be sure every user has a confirmed account
4. Change the users to set both company as allowed.
5. Set the current company of the users as follow:
user1: comp1
user2: comp2
user3: comp2
6. Install the project module
7. In `settings > security > record rules`, archive the rules named:
- `Project: multiple-company`
- `Project/Task: multiple-company`
- `user rule`
8. Using user1, create a new project and a new task.
9. Using user2, go to `Project module > Search`, remove `My tasks` filter,
select the task created by user1, in the chatter add user3 as follower.
10. Send the mail => access error.
The `AccessError` is due to user2 trying to access comp1, in particular
`company.name`.
By adding a `sudo`, we also make sure that the template rendering won't
fail bacause of a similar `AccessError`.
opw-1907844
closesodoo/odoo#28710
Define a x2m tree view with a default_sort including more than 1 field to order the list against
Before this commit, the second field was never used
After this commit, it is used
OPW 1909785
closesodoo/odoo#28840
When opening the Manual Reconciliation widget, all partners with opened
invoices and payments are fetched.
In some cases, the database might contain a lot of partners without any
reconciliation suggestion; therefore, the partners with suggestions are
'lost' in the view.
This commit sorts the data: we first display the parters with a
suggestion, then the others. This should improve the usability of the
view.
opw-1903575
closesodoo/odoo#28958
Consider a many2one field `foo_id` on model `bar`, with an inverse one2many
field `bar_ids` on model `foo`. During an onchange, the statement
bar.foo_id = foo
puts a special value in cache to add `bar` to the value of `foo.bar_ids`
without explicitly reading `foo.bar_ids`.
Executing the above statement a second time, the cache of `foo.bar_ids` is no
longer empty. This causes the actual value of `foo.bar_ids` to be read and
updated. The issue is that this can be slow for large values of `foo.bar_ids`.
Avoid reading the value of the one2many field by handling the case where the
cache contains the special value: simply update the special value to take into
account the second assignment.
closesodoo/odoo#28982
Embedding a video can't work because it embeds an iframe, which is not supported
by most email clients for security reasons.
(What happens when Gmail shows embedded videos in displayed emails, is that you
send a link in the email body, and it is at rendering that Gmail adds the iframe
into the page.)
So the bugfix solution is to hide the button.
Since there is an option "res_model" that allows us to know when we are in that
case, we remove the video option.
opw 1905497
closesodoo/odoo#28911
In the case of calculating payroll, we don't want to convert the
datetimes using the timezone of the user as we really want to see what
the employee has done from one date to another (usually from the start of
the month to end of the month)
Closes#26256closesodoo/odoo#28977
Fine-tuning of commit: o50f77ba091189bd785d459c042a6cec04a125fdb
When costing is in FIFO mode, product price can be updated whereas the current
user doesn't have the right to modify the products.
It therefore introduced a sudo() to make this computation;
however since this is modifying a company-dependent field,
a force_company was missing to update the correct one.
Closes#28487
opw 1907377
closesodoo/odoo#28662
This commit extend commit https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/ef48b81ab127dd717a4a9d106edd5c51121bc8f7
When you have a cart on multiple session and confirm the card in one of them,
you could still access your cart from other session (note that you could not do
anything with it as it would be reset when adding product or changing qty).
Closes#28210
This is necessary to get --dev=xml working on windows, because the xml
import uses normcase in file_open and the case normalized filename is
then used to find the addon path (which was not found before on windows)
With this fix arch_fs is now correctly filled in windows and --dev=xml
works.
closesodoo/odoo#28331
Usecase to reproduce(or any other way to lower initial demand on move):
- Build a MO with 5 products to do
- Produce 3
- Update the quantity on the mo to 3
-> All the consumed quantity on move lines is dropped.
It happens because lowering the initial demand on a move
will call unlink on its move lines. (increase it will
update the move's state and reassign if it comes from a supplier)
Instead of dropping and reassign the move in order to change
the reservation, it is possible to directly write the new
reserved quantity on the move lines and that will update the
reservation on qaunt directly. Also we don't want move lines
without reserved quantity and quantity done thus we drop them.
closesodoo/odoo#29941
Add a check to see if we're in test mode that returns an InsufficientCreditError to avoid failing other tests if partner_autocomplete server fails
closesodoo/odoo#28324
web_editor dirty elements are saved by calling the ir.ui.view `save()` method.
As this method is called through call_kw _rpc on the ir.ui.view model, self
is binded to the view which has the `id` sent in the request.
In some cases, when editing a field for example, the id sent is the id of the
field's record (eg: product.template for price field).
In that case, the view binded on self will be the view with the id of the
field's record being edited.
If there is no ir.ui.view with the same ID as the field's record, self won't
exists.
This misbehavior resulted in no error luckily since we only use self to call
ir.ui.view methods without ever using self properties.
Since multi-website 47b00c5d53 overrided the `save()` method and used self.key
it was crashing when the self record did not exists.
This commit will fix that by doing the multi-website check only when it is a
view and not a field that is being edited. (We know that if xpath is set)
opw-1904637
Step to reproduce:
- Go to a product on ecommerce, eg product.template 13013
- Edit the product price field, the oe-id attribut is 13013
- Delete the ir.ui.view that has the same ID than the product (13013)
- Save -> It will crash since self is binded to "ir.ui.view(13013,)" but it
does not exists and we try to access key
closesodoo/odoo#28469
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Let's consider three products P1(in Unit), P2(in kg), P3(in Unit)
- Create a BOM kit for P1 whit 1kg of P2 and 1 Unit of P3 as components
- Create a SO with P1 and validate it
- Go to the shipment and validate
Bug:
An error was raised saying:
The unit of measure kg defined on the order line doesn't belong to the same
category than the unit of measure Unit defined on the product. Please
correct the unit of measure defined on the order line or on the product,
they should belong to the same category.
PS: The quantity delivered on a SO line must only be computed for the product
defined on the SO line. Otherwise with a BOM kit, the sum of all its components
was done instead.
opw:1905223
closesodoo/odoo#28460
* web, web_editor
The logic which chose if the user text color was supposed to be used as
bootstrap "dark" text color or bootstrap "light" text color
(https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/8b2dbd1441d6713d9072db03e8d3cb6c2246410f)
was fine when using the default theme with default bootstrap but was not
working as intended in some themes.
This commit also introduces a more accurate and complex method to
determine the correct contrasted color in most cases.
closesodoo/odoo#28468
When a user accesses a PO through the portal thanks to an access token
(without being connected), the product image on each order line is
rendered using the image placeholder with a size of 48x48.
This raises a 403 Forbidden at image retrieval since the access token is
not passed as a parameter. This commit corrects that behavior by sending
the resized image along with the rendering of the template instead of an
url.
Another solution could be to generalize the access token check to any
model in:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/12.0/odoo/addons/base/models/ir_http.py#L303-L311
But this seems overkill regarding this specific error.
opw-1902741
closesodoo/odoo#28479
- Configure custom payment instructions
- Create a SO, send it by email to the client (do not validate)
- As the client, open the link received by email and 'Accept & Sign'
- Click on 'Pay Now', choose 'Wire Transfer'
The page reloads and shows the message:
> Pending... The order will be validated after the payment.
along with the custom payment instructions. However, no communication is
provided for the payment.
First, the `reference` is never set when calling the
`payment_confirmation_status` template, as it is done in
`portal_invoice_page_inherit_payment`. Moreover, in this workflow, the
reference is never set on the SO because of an incorrect filtering in
`_set_transaction_pending`.
opw-1906464
closesodoo/odoo#28466
Following commit b43151c11c
The order of the pricelist items on the interface was made deterministic, but
there was still a problem with the actual computation because the SQL was
created manually and used a different order than the _order of the model.
Moreover, it is better to use id DESC instead of ASC to make sure the
automatically created default rule matching everything is actually applied last.
PR: #28476
Christophe Simonis