- The module 'website_quote' inherit the CustomerPortal class defined in 'portal/controllers/portal.py'.
It does this to override a single method, namely 'portal_order_page'.
The issue here is that 'portal_order_page' is not defined in the module portal, but in sale.
This causes random issues where the inheritance was not done in the correct order.
Which means the original portal_order_page was sometimes called before its child.
Calling the original portal_order_page first means the child is never called.
This commit change the imported CustomerPortal class to the one defined in the module sale.
Have a list with readonly modifiers on at least one column.
Have the first record of the list be readonly as computed by the modifier
Create and edit a second record
Enter a value in the cell and hit TAB
Before this commit:
The focus on the targetted cell was lost and the rendering of the cell was in mode readonly
This was because the baseMode of the modifier dict was applied to one and only one node (== one column) and hence to *all* the records
After this commit:
The rendering and keyboard TAB navigation works as expected in the list editable
The baseMode concept has been sharpened and each cell now has one
OPW-1816569
OPW-1824979
closes#23809closes#22859closes#23436
When hitting the picking button in the valuation report, there was a
"form view could not be loaded" error. This is because we try to
open a picking with a stock move id.
master bug 1817491
Fixes#17226
- Activate anglo-saxon accounting
- Create an invoice with a line without product but a UOM
- Validate
A traceback arises since `_compute_price` is called on an empty
recorset.
opw-1830042
* [FIX] web: Make accessible with keyboard the delete button on o2m fields
Currently, the delete button in one2many fields (trash icon) is not
reachable when using the keyboard, because it's neither a link, nor a
button or any other interactable HTML element, but a `<span>`.
This change causes that button to be an actual HTML button keeping the
same appearance, so it may be reached when using the keyboard.
* [FIX] web: Modify test to expect button instead of span as o2m trash icon
Since buttons to delete records in o2m fields (the trash icon) were
changed from `<span>` to `<button>` to be able to access them with the
keyboard, the test need to be modified so it expect the new element
type and doesn't break.
- With the removal of the password field on the sessions (https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/da1f153d61d747d9357694382fe04f96c0ca886a) the non qweb reports going through the route '/web/report' were not able to be generated.
We address this issue by avoiding to call dispatch_rpc and by using the functions to generate the report directly.
This doesn't cause any security issue because the route '/web/report' is callable only by logged in user.
Meaning that the session is already validated.
Before this commit, search was broken because containsLike was searching on
the innerHtml. (3dd93ed129)
Settings use _wordHighlighter to change the background of the matching text
into the label, so the label was not only text, but html.
<label><span class="highlighter">Mul</span>ti-company</label>
: looking for (mul)
After this commit, the match is based on the text content and not on the html.
Continue work of 6292600b85 for languages not published on Transifex too
Remove en_GB file that was containing too many errors (e.g. 'PoS Order'
translated 'Sale Order')
Fixes#19661
Bug introduced by https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/cdca5d4751a979f6b694f02d88160843f81a77f5
There is two problems:
- The payment difference is the difference between what you need to pay and what you pay.
=> The compute does the opposite.
- When the payment type is outbound, the payment amount is never negative.
=> Need to inverse the payment amount in the compute in this case.
E.G.
Suppose A a customer invoice of 25 and B a vendor bill of 50:
Payment on A will compute:
payment_type = 'inbound'
amount = 25
If you pay 20, the payment_difference computed was 20 - 25 = -5
It should be 25 - 20 = 5 instead.
Payment on B will compute:
payment_type = 'outbound'
amount = 50 (not -50!)
If you pay 40, the payment difference computed was 40 - (-50) = 10
It should be -50 - (-40) = -10 instead.
Steps to reproduce:
- Create a sale order and add sale order lines(Not Inline) without saving the sale order.
- Edit any of the existing sale order line and hit on "Save & New" on the sale order line.
- Add another sale order line and hit on "Save & Close"
Bug:
A validation error was raised.
opw:1829723
When an unread message contains conditional html statements, clicking on
the discuss tray icon produces a JS traceback. This is due to
`node.tagName` being undefined.
When inlining, there is no need for these comments.
opw-1829641
This fix avoids wild prefetching when serializing
onchange results.
We fell on a strange situation in method `onchange`, where
some data was missing from cache when serializing the
result. In that case, the prefetching overwrites so
many stuff in cache that the results of the onchanges
are lost.
Don't let that happen.
This is a backport of 5f660cd, with rco-odoo's blessing.
A use case this commit solve is
- Install the sale app.
- Create new quotation and assign new partner
- From inline editable listview add a new order line
(created the product inline) then directly save.
- Click on the order line (NOT IN EDIT MODE). This opens
the order line in a popup.
- Close the popup.
- Click edit again.
- Now change the order line description.
When unfocusing order line field, the description is reset
to previous one.
Closes#23276Closes#23277
Make sure the user id received by the RPC call is an integer
Avoids errors like #23534
Crash early in case of bad uid format instead of propagating another value
Commit c06f0f3a35 changed the base navbar zindex.
But the navbar of the translation mode still had old zindex values making the
navbar invisible, in fact under the base navbar.
task-1804662
Before this commit, discount was never displayed in the portal.
So if you bought 1 iPad at 1800$ with 50% you see in your poral:
Product Unit P. Qty Subtotal
[photo] Ipad $1800 1.0 $900
Now, similarly to the report pdf, we show discount if at least
one line contains a discount.
This commit closes#11305
Before this patch, when a user searched something in the shop and no results were yielded, there was no clue that the problem might be the search query itself.
After this patch, this UX becomes more obvious:
- *(0 found)* appears next to search button.
- _No results found for **"search term"**_ appears clearly in the middle of the page.
This commit closes#14359
the "company_id" value wasn't declared explicitly in the "_prepare_procurement_values" method, wich caused the procurement "run" method to set a company by default regardless of the company associated to the orderpoint.
this caused issues in a multi-company config. ( see #23764 )
the only goal of this change is not to use a jquery selector on the
body of the document.
Jquery adds an ID attribute to all the nodes it selects. This in turn
triggers the attribute change debugger in chrome, and creates a lot
of noise while debuging.
When a user imports a file with a datetime field set to a blank space,
the value is computed as 1900-01-01 00:00:00. However, when converted in
the user's TZ, this can lead to a value < 1900-01-01, which is not
recognized at the JS level as a valid value.
This makes the access to the record impossible, and possibly makes the
access to an app impossible. It is for example the case with Purchase,
where the order date is displayed on the default's action view (list
view).
We strip the value before testing if the value exists to avoid this
case.
opw-1826344
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- create an invoice
- add one line without product but with a uom
- validate it
Bug:
A traceback was raised because no product was set on the invoice line.
opw:1825464
Commit e011d58bee add the possibility to unselect images on the media dialog.
But it introduced a collateral bug preventing double click to set the image.
Indeed, double click event triggers not only the double click event but also
twice the single click event.
Before commit e011d58bee, it would work fine and as intented on double click:
1. It would trigger twice the single click, selecting twice the image.
2. Then, it would trigger the double click that would save the selected image.
But after the commit:
1. It triggers twice the single click, selecting and then deselecting the image.
2. Then, it triggers the double click that saves nothing since the image got
unselected on second single click event.
Now, before saving on double click event, we select the image.
task-1815165
Commit 34da40a44d improved all activities filters used through various
apps. However in maintenance model maintenance equipment model was forgotten.
This commits fixes that in order to have same filters on all models using
activities.
Without this commit, a valid route /web/content with an extra
params eg utm or adwords will return a 500 with:
TypeError: content_common() got an unexpected keyword argument 'extra_param_name'
This commit closes#21221
Task-32836 should fix for all routes in a future version
Customers without an user account can do nothing with the button
in the notification, so it's better they don't have it.
partial backport of #4732a1
This commit closes#22487
When a portal user changes his account details and presses the 'Save' button
when a mandatory field is not set, the selected country will be reset even when
the user did change the country in the form. This fix prevents this from
happening and leads to an improvement for the end user.
This commit closes#22439
- Create a picking to deliver 10 units, save
- Edit and change to 12 units
- Print the Delivery Slip => the qty is 10
- Validate the picking with 12 units
- Print the Delivery Slip => the qty is still 10
The use of `ordered_qty` is misleading, since it corresponds to the qty
ordered at creation.
Backport of 0a2999cdd9
opw-1825396
- Create a customer, set an address
- Create an opportunity from the kanban view
The address fields are not filled in in the opportunity.
We add all fields filled in by `_onchange_partner_id_values`
Complement of commit e2bbee6df5
opw-1816438
opw-1826859
Commit 78ac6de52d refactored methods checking alias security on the
routing found for a given destination address. Indeed if a routing is found
linked to an alias a security check is performed according to the restriction
defined on the alias itself.
HR module adds the 'employees only' restriction. A bug has been introduced
in the mentioned commit concerning employees-based aliases. Indeed a condition
on having a recordset has been added (self.ids, changed to record.ids at
20d8025036). This condition is actually not necessary as checking the
email author is linked to an existing employee has nothing to do with the
alias being linked to a record or creating new record.
This may causes issues notably using employees-restricted aliases in
expense application. Indeed you could use aliases to create new expenses
for employees and you could have issues with this condition.
This commit is linked to task ID 1829860 and ID 35093. Closes#22960 .
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Create a customer credit note
- Add a new item
- Don't input Product, input Description and Unit of Measure
- Click on Validate
Bug:
A traceback was raised because no product was set on the invoice line.
opw:1825972
- Create a SO for a customer of 100 $
- Create Invoice for the Sales Order and Register the payment
- Create a Refund Invoice, Validate it and keep it in "Open" state
- Create a second SO for 5 $
- Create an invoice for this order and validate it
- It will show you outstanding payments
- Apply the credit and the invoice will be fulfilled => Now you have a
credit left for 95 $
- Create a third Sales order for the same customer for 5 $
- Create an Invoice for it
- It will show you outstanding credit (95 $)
- Apply the credits
- Now 90 $ are left
- In the same invoice, the credit which you applied, Unreconcile it
- It should have shown you 95 $, but it shows you 100 $ which means it
removed the credit which we applied to second SO
The unreconcile process does not filter the partial reconciliations of
the selected invoice. All partial reconciliations on the AML are
removed instead.
opw-1819602
Christophe Simonis