Install the accounting module, create a new payment for a customer
go to payment matching, reconcile the payment for the account
'Account recievable' and select a tax. There is a traceback
because of a incomplete implementation of the tax computation.
This commit complete the implementation and add the missing tests.
opw-1903172
closesodoo/odoo#28591
As of 12.0, the `parent_left` and `parent_right` special fields previously
used to store the tree structure have been replaced with a single
`parent_path` field. See also PR #22558.
This merge fixes a crash in discuss, in addition to re-introduce some _quality of life_
features that have been mistakenly removed from the chatter and from chat windows:
### 1. No crash when searching messages
This was caused by the addition of moderated channels. In short, fetching twice
the same message was performing a re-render of the thread due to a mis-consideration
of a moderation status change. When the fetch reaches the fetch limit, the re-render is
considered as a "load more" fetch, which only works when there is at least one message
registered for the current search.
This is fixed by re-render when there is a change of moderation status only.
Task-ID 1910180
### 2. Easily mention followers and employees in chatter
When mentioning a user from the chatter in a document, it was always
fetching all partners in a arbitrary order. As a result, it was hard to mention
followers and employees.
This is fixed by re-introducing the previous behaviour on mentions, which
groups them by followers, then employees, then all partners.
Task-ID 1910111
### 3. Show message document link in chat window
When a message is linked to a document, it usually shows a
link next to the message. This still works in the Discuss app,
but not in chat windows.
This erroneous regression was caused by a refactoring.
This is fixed by re-introduced document links on messages in chat
windows.
Task-ID 1910119
closesodoo/odoo#28744
For a SO of 300 lines, when confirmed, it takes 195s to process stock
moves for the SO, which is an insane amount of time for any kind of
process in Odoo.
This happens because stock.move is a heavy model with lots of fields,
prefetching all these fields at once can hinder performance when
processing a lot of stock.moves.
To reduce the processing time, the prefetching is disabled in the
specific scenario of processing stock moves and pickings on SO
confirmation.
This patch increases the performance of SO validation (with stock
installed) by ~30%.
Pre-patch: 195s (300 SOL)
Post-patch: 135s (300 SOL)
closesodoo/odoo#28835
With the purchase module, when you create a new vendor, you can
select what variant of the product the vendor sells. The droplist
has the "Create & Edit" button to quickly create/edit variants.
This is not the wanted behavior. This PR removes the "Create & Edit"
suggestion.
opw-1909009
closesodoo/odoo#28845
related to: #28446
On a pure list view, click on a column to sort the records by that field.
Save the filter as favorite
Reload, now apply the filter
Before this commit, there were two issues:
1. The order of the list was never propagated to search view, which couldn't save
the filter with its attribute "sort"
2. There was no mechanism to load the attribute sort from a loading Filter
After this commit, those two issues are corrected
Unfortunately, complex search view flows are not testable in v11.0
OPW 1906968
closesodoo/odoo#28766
The POS js tests expect the "Public Pricelist" when
selecting a lambda customer in the pos interface.
Nevertheless, when installing a localization
with a specific currency,
other than the currency of the public pricelist,
it creates a new pricelist called
"Default %(currency)s pricelist for %(company)s"
and sets it by default for the customers sale pricelist.
See
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/787e1037cdca48fe361ae65d790056a3d57e6b67#diff-840bfc6fc7a986fbf0e248c83d2ac1d5R57
Therefore, in the POS js tests, the pricelist selected
when selecting a lambda user was no longer
'public pricelist' but the one mentioned above,
and the tests therefore failed.
The issue is solved by creating a dedicated "Public Pricelist"
for the purpose of these tests, and sets it by default
for the customer sale pricelist,
as well as for the pos config default pricelist.
The test case was to install `l10n_pe` with `point_of_sale`
while activating the test.
e.g. `-i l10n_pe,point_of_sale --test-enable`
opw-1890928
opw-1910249
closesodoo/odoo#28839
- Configure the company in USD
- Set-up the POS in EUR:
Pricelist in EUR
Payment journal in EUR
Sales journal in EUR
- In the POS, sell a product (in EUR)
- Validate the session and post entries
The entry amounts are the EUR amounts, but they are posted in USD.
Long story short: nothing was foreseen to convert the amounts in the
appropriate currency.
Fixes#27175
opw-1904146
opw-1910248
closesodoo/odoo#28785
Implement the getter method in plain SQL. This makes reading company-dependent
fields 33% faster (on 20000 partners, reading 'property_product_pricelist'
takes 3700ms instead of 5500ms.)
closesodoo/odoo#28769
In the case of a One2many list view in a `<group>` tag, the 'External
Link' button of a Many2one field (which allows opening the form view) is
not visible.
The `flex: 1 0 auto;` should not be applied in the list view.
Corresponding PR in v12: #28741
opw-1903158
closesodoo/odoo#28812
Steps:
- open a modal form view from tree view first line and make a change
- open a modal from the second line and make a change
- open the second line back: the change were lost
In a given number of conditions (a many2one inside the form view, there
is a one2many in the form view not inside the tree view, ....) this
happened because:
- when we save the first line, we get onchange data for the second one
- this onchange data can't be applied before second line is loaded, but
it is saved so it can be applied if second line is ever opened
- when the second line is opened the saved change is applied => OK
- when the second line is opened a second time the saved change is
applied again, possibly overwriting posterious change => BAD
With this changeset, when the record with unapplied onchange is loaded
for the first time, the unapplied onchange is applied only once.
Added test without the change failed with:
- only 1 turtle for second partner (result: 0 not 1)
- second partner turtle is Michelangelo (result: "" not "Michelangelo")
opw-1846820
closes#28644
Revision on https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/299ebb2cdf63de2e3967da0d2f3e7effd239812b
The commit above added the notion of moderation, which
requires re-rendering the thread when a message has its
moderation changed (i.e. the message is deleted on reject
or is no longer marked as 'pending moderation').
However, this condition was triggered even when the
moderation status on the message has not changed.
This introduced a crash when using the search in discuss:
- Access a channel with more than 30 messages, so that
not all messages have been fetched.
- Search messages in this thread so that it displays more
than 30 messages, and the last message of those has already
been fetched.
> It crashes with "Cannot read property 'getID' of undefined".
The bug comes from re-fetching messages: it behaves as a
"load more" fetch, although no message has been stored yet.
A "load more" fetch requires at least one message in order to
determine the minimum message ID to fetch, thus the crash due
to having no message to get such an ID.
Here's the explanation why it fetches with load more:
when performing the search and fetching the same last message,
it will detect that it has already been fetched. Its moderation
status is 'accepted', and it will assume a change of moderation
status. This will trigger a fetch and render of the thread.
At this moment, if the search exceeds the fetch limit, not all
messages will be fetched, so that this fetch is considered as a
"load more" fetch.
This commit fixes the issue by only re-rendering the thread
when there is a change of the moderation status on an already
fetched message. Since changes of the moderation status are
handled by means of the longpolling, it should be rare to run
into the case of having a change of moderation status on a
message while using the search on a thread.
Task-ID 1910180
Revision on https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/cd34f6de727d5b3858420cff3c9d3c5995c4e75c
The commit above consisted of refactoring the JS mail module.
A small regression was introduced on messages linked to a document
from a chat window: it was no longer displaying the link to redirect
to the document that this message originates from. This issue was
only isolated to chat windows: it was working fine in the Discuss app.
This commit re-introduces the displaying of the document link on
messages from chat windows.
Task-ID 1910119
Revision on https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/cd34f6de727d5b3858420cff3c9d3c5995c4e75c
Resulting of the mail JS refactoring, the list of prefetched suggestions
has been changed as follow:
- before: list of list of mention suggestions `{Array<Object[]>}`
- after: list of mention suggestions `{Object[]}`
The change resulted in wrongly thinking that wrapping the list of
suggestions in a list was pointless, thus simplifying it as a simple
list of mention suggestions.
However, because of this change, it has become much harder to
mention employees and followers of documents from the chatter:
it now always fetches all partner suggestions at all time, whereas
before it was suggesting followers, then employees, and finally all
partners based on the input of the user.
In fact, there was a purpose of using a list of list of prefetched
mention suggestions, which is to group suggestions by "priority":
followers first, then employees, and all partners as a last resort.
This commit re-introduces prefetched mention suggestions as a list
of list of partners, so that it re-becomes easier to mention
followers and partners of a document from the chatter.
Task-ID 1910111
- Suppose a bank statement line with partner_name = x and partner = None.
- Create a reconciliation model with write-off suggestion and auto-validate = True.
- Open the reconciliation Widget.
- Check the lines created automatically: The partner_id is missing.
- Suppose a bank statement line with partner_name = x.
- Create a partner with name = x.
- Open the reconciliation widget: The partner is set by default thanks to this commit.
- This commit prevent to send notifications to inactive users.
- This fixes a bug where two partners have been merged and one of its
users is archived.
If one of the two users is inactive the code might use its `notification
type` preferences instead of the active user's one.
closesodoo/odoo#28730
The query was computing the count for all mailing lists, not just the
one being requested. This prevents optimizing the SELECT with indexes.
In addition, using a subselect for the blacklist forced a full table
scan on the contacts - switching to a LEFT JOIN avoids that.
With a blacklist of a few hundred thousand entries, and a table of
mailing list contacts in the same order of magnitude, this brings the
SELECT from 3+ seconds down to 3 milliseconds - with the same result.
Bonus: no need to perform the regexp extraction of emails to test for
NULL values -> substring(x) is NULL iff x is NULL.
When a bounce is received, we look for matching partners in order to
increment the bounce counter. However by using [`ilike','email`] we carry
the risk of matching emails that contain the bounce email:
['email', 'ilike', 'john@hitmail.com´]
will also match 'random.john@hitmail.com' for example.
Using strict equality is safer, and the worst that can happen is that
we fail to count one bounce.
This field is a dependency of some computed fields, and has to be searched on
for triggering recomputations. Without the index, the creation of stock moves
becomes slower as the table grows.
closesodoo/odoo#28757
Before this commit, when enabling a generic view from a specific website
context and that view already had a specific view for this website, the
view was duplicated again instead of writing on the already existing
specific one.
This is because we did not consider inactive views when checking if a
view that is being written already has a website-specific view.
closesodoo/odoo#28743
When using the media dialog, when uploading an image, the image list
refreshes itself properly. This was not the case for documents as it
was... refreshing the image list too instead of the document list. Also,
when uploading a document, it is supposed to be added in the page
directly and the media dialog is supposed to close. This feature was
broken for the same reason: the iframe system of both tabs which were
using the same name.
Bug introduced with https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/abde8bddf8ec45cf12aab59e95c330321158cfba
(even though is was technically wrong for the same reason before).
Closes https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/28722
On firefox if we do for example:
ALT+GR + [ALT+GRable ´ key]
Firefox may send keys "AltGr" and "Dead" instead of just "AltGr".
This was possibly causing caret to go a position too low when writing
speedily with diacritical marks.
opw-1903865
closes#28739
This PR fixes some miscellaneous issues:
- performance issue in read_progress_bar
- performance issue in activity view
- crash in ungrouped kanban view with progress bar
closesodoo/odoo#28715
The progressbar widget is not supposed to be displayed in non grouped
mode. Before this commit, this situation resulted in a traceback. For
example, if the user has an activity on the subscription model, and
tries to open it, it will open an ungrouped kanban view.
With this commit, we check first that the kanban view is in grouped
mode, before loading the progress bar data.
Fun fact: for the subscription model in odoo production database, the
get_activity_data rpc takes 36s, and transfer 420mb (non gzipped) of
data (when looking at all subscriptions).
The main reason for that is that the get_activity_data method create a
domain with all the res_ids (so, if you have 20k subscriptions, the
domain will look like (res_id, in, [...20k ids]). This domain is given
to read group, and the resulting groups (each with a domain key which
includes those res_ids) will be sent back to the web client.
As far as I can tell, the domain key is not used by the web client, so
we send (number of groups)*(number of records) of useless data.
This commit improves the situation in two different ways:
- we only generate the domain if there is a domain at the beginning.
This should greatly improve the performance when there is no current
domain
- we do not transfer the data to the web client
The tests have been detroyed while merging a refactoring for 12.0.
This commit reintroduces unit tests to checks each business cases from
"The Flow" into python tests.
closesodoo/odoo#28323
The read_progress_bar method is incredibly not efficient. It is also
wrong in other ways (for example, if 2 groups have same labels, there is
a collision). But let us talk about efficiency: it iterates on each
records on the domain, then, it computes some information. It is really
worse for selection fields: it performs a fields_get for each iteration.
This commit improves the situation by doing the fields_get only once.
Note that this is not the end of the story: this only has a small effect on
the performance of this method. It looks like there is a deeper issue in
some cases (kanban view for subscription, field 'activity_state')
Fine tuning of this commit:https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/7501691da9a9dae832b7d6e78c6a5f57fc983b5c
Fields signup_token, signup_type, signup_expiration are protected
When sending a quotation (mail template 'Sales Order - Send by Email'):
the token needs to be read (and sometimes written)
opw:1907157
Before this commit:
1. If a view A is being inherited by a view B and C and the view C is doing an
xpath on B (but inherit A), then copying the tree to make it specific would
crash.
Indeed, when copying C, the view inheritance check (while doing the xml
check) would break since C would be tested against the generic tree and not
the new specific tree.
2. If a generic view being written with a website_id in the context had already
a specific child, we would copy both its specific child and generic child
for the same key instead of simply copying the specific one.
This happens if we triggered previously a COW on a child view, then only
that view had been made specific (and is still in the generic tree).
Then, when cloning the parent, we need to copy and make specific all the
hierarchy but ignore the generic elements if they already have a specific
one.
Now:
1. Fixed with adding the inherit_id on the copy vals
2. Fixed with filtering children_ids with filter_duplicate() before cloning the
children tree
opw-1908308
Closes#27914closesodoo/odoo#28405
Create an invoice for a day, and register a payment right away
BUT choose a date in the future for that payment
Imagine a French Check. You write it, and tell your partner to cash it in
10 days later
You would enter that transaction as a temporary payment
in your own books
OPW 1893646
Before this commit, the line of the partner did not appear in the aged
report after if the report was for the date just after the invoice date
After this commit, it does
closesodoo/odoo#28728
Julien (juc) Castiaux