Enable the subtasks in the settings. Create two project "A" and "B",
create two tasks "A.a" and "B.b". Set the parent task of "B.b" to "A.a".
╭─ Project A ─╮ ╭─ Project B ─╮
│ │┏━parent━┿━━━▶ B.b │
│ A.a ━━━━┿┛ ╰─────────────╯
╰─────────────╯
In normal situation, each task and subtasks are in the same subproject,
in such case, the parent task has been duplicated and it is important to
relink duplicated subtasks to the new parent task. In the case the
parent task is not within the current project, the subtask cannot be
relinked to a duplicated parent as it does not exist.
We could either let the link as is or remove it, we decided to remove
the link.
opw-2037623
closesodoo/odoo#35023
Signed-off-by: Julien Castiaux <Julien00859@users.noreply.github.com>
Select invoices with partners with different languages.
Execute the 'Send' action, and choose send_mail.
The mails are all sent in the same language.
The composer extracts the template's body to put it as self.body
(note that everything also applies to the subject field).
This is done with one language.
Down the line, mail_compose_message renders the values with the object,
using self.body (which can be manually edited).
Therefore the lang parameter is ignored at this point.
This should ideally be fixed at the mail level, which is riskier in stable,
so it may be fixed either later or in master.
So this fix only intends to fix the consequences for this specific use-case,
in a much safer way, but it could be removed once the true fix is one.
opw 2035525
closesodoo/odoo#34975
Signed-off-by: Nans Lefebvre (len) <len@odoo.com>
This was working fine previously in v11.
Now in v12 it stopped working because Bootstrap 4 adds `!important` to `.text-muted`.
Adding `!important` makes these styles useful again.
closesodoo/odoo#35011
Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
Let's assume the following scenario:
- open a pos session, sell a product, leave the session and close
it
- on the session form view, validate it and open the
account.bank.statement
- in the dialog, click on the "Journal Entries" stat button
A traceback is raised, because context keys specific to the current
action (e.g. *_view_ref) are propagated to new action.
The python method should only put new keys in the context, and the
JS framework combines them with the current context, from which
action specific keys are filtered out.
Closes#34893
Issue 2034970
closesodoo/odoo#34970
Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
When there is a sale_order_line that has either no product_id nor
product_uom nor product_uom_qty (typically a section line),
the computing of the product_qty used in delivery return 0 for each
line below that sale_order_line.
OPW-2034915
Steps:
Create a SO
Add some lines
One should be a section (not the last line)
Save
Check product_qty on each line. The lines after the section will
have a product_qty = O
closesodoo/odoo#35010
Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
Before this commit, there was a different when opening the quants (the
'On Hand' button) from the product or from the product template. Only
from the product template, the functions _merge_quants and
_unlink_zero_quants were called. This means that when opening from the
product, the quants were not merged, and the empty quants were not
removed.
Now, from the product or from the product template when opening the
quants both functions are called.
Fine-tuning of cdd5b78c63
opw-2035001
closesodoo/odoo#34987
Signed-off-by: Jorge Pinna Puissant (jpp) <jpp@odoo.com>
Backport from 12 to saas-11.3 (original commit : 97b44806f5)
Having 4 products and 3 BoMs:
BoM 1:
product = Finished
quantity = 100 units
- Semi-Finished 10 units
BoM 2:
product = Semi-Finished
quantity = 10 units
- Assembly 10 units
BoM 3:
product = Assembly
quantity = 10 units
- Raw Material 10 units (product.product 5$/unit)
Before this commit, the price for 100 units of Finished product was
500$, which is wrong. The price was calculated using 100 units of
Semi-Finished product and not 10 units as it should be.
Now, the price is 50$
opw-1973347
closesodoo/odoo#33115
Signed-off-by: Jorge Pinna Puissant (jpp) <jpp@odoo.com>
closesodoo/odoo#34900
Signed-off-by: Simon Goffin (sig) <sig@openerp.com>
Register a payment on a vendor bill.
From the menu Account > Purchase > Payment, clik to see that payment
click on the smart button to see the invoices
Create a new Bill
Before this commit, the default type and journal of the new bill were actually the ones of a customer invoice
After this commit, those defaults are the ones of a vendor bill
OPW 2038786
closesodoo/odoo#34967
Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
Activate option to pay invoice on the portal
Activate an acquirer with the mode: handle payments in Odoo
Make an invoice for a partner
Access that invoice through the route with the access_token
You should not be logged in !
Try to pay, with stripe for example
Before this commit, there was a cryptic error syaing that the credit card ID was invalid
This was because the transaction token was created on the public user
While we tried to access it as the invoice's partner
After this commit, there is no error as the transaction token is on the invoice's partner
OPW 2034691
closesodoo/odoo#34919
Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
This commit extends the changes introduced by 88de93114 to adapt
Odoo payment flows to the switch in transaction signature done
by Authorize.net.
The initial fix was not sufficient for flows that mixed redirection
payment flows and server-to-server flows (e.g. paying a quote with a
card that gets saved then using the token to pay for a subscription).
The problem comes from the fact that the server-to-server API uses
the API Transaction Key and API Login ID as credentials to authenticate
requests; there is no need for a signature since this data is never
publicly exposed on the website and a MITM is mitigated by the fact
that it would need to be done between the Odoo server and the
Authorize.net servers (both of which use https in a normal deployment)
which is admitedly more complex than doing a MITM on a Starbucks wifi.
On the other hand, the 'redirection' flow will include all transaction
parameters as inputs in an html form, therefore the signature is
required to ensure that the values have not been modified by a website
user or a mitm.
Since both flows can coexist on the same configuration, we cannot use
the same field depending on the payment flow configuration - we need
both fields to be stored for the provider.
This commit therefore has to introduce new fields on payment.acquirer
record that can store the signature key for authorize in addition to the
usual authorize fields. Instead of adding a new module, this commit uses
non-stored computed fields that will generate System Parameters entries
for any acquirer of the 'authorize' kind when set through the interface.
closesodoo/odoo#34670
Signed-off-by: Damien Bouvy (dbo) <dbo@odoo.com>
If "Recurring Cost Amount" is set on a frequency and the date field
"Contract Expiration Date" is not set, the configuration makes no sense
since we would have an infinite cost, and infinite fleet.vehicle.cost
records and so on which is not possible.
With this changeset, the expiration will be required if there is a
recurring cost set.
opw-2036071
closes#34883
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
Enable "eCommerce Categories" in the website shop customize menu, select
a category, sort by catalog price, filter on an attribute, the category
is lost.
When you sort the records, the url changes from `shop/category/x` to
`shop?category=x`. As the attribute form is a plain get action, the
elements from the query string are lost.
We include the category in an hidden input so it is used by the get.
opw-2032477
closes#34603closesodoo/odoo#34877
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
There was an error in this tax's repartition. A tag was wrongly added to its base.
closesodoo/odoo#34245
Signed-off-by: Josse Colpaert <jco@openerp.com>
Under certain unknown conditions, the range cannot be applied and
triggered an error. In order to allow the user to keep editing, we need
to prevent the dialog from showing, hence the use of `console.error`.
If this error appears, the carret is moved to the beginning of the focused
node.
If this error appears, then bullet can generate an error (I managed to
have the bug once or simulate it by manually breaking the dom and range)
We suspect a wrong snippet custom javascript code.
see: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/34188closesodoo/odoo#34871
Signed-off-by: VincentSchippefilt <VincentSchippefilt@users.noreply.github.com>
Let's assume a form view with a readonly many2one field with a
default value. When creating a new record, the user can click on
the many2one value, which should open the related record in a form
view (stacked in the breadcrumbs).
Before this rev., this didn't work: we actually came back to the
previous view/action in the breadcrumbs, when trying to open the
related record.
closesodoo/odoo#33172
Signed-off-by: VincentSchippefilt <VincentSchippefilt@users.noreply.github.com>
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Create an invoice I
- Set the invoice date in the past and add payment terms
- Validate I
- Create refund from I
Bug:
The invoice date is set as today but the due date was set in the past.
opw:2033438
closesodoo/odoo#34748
Signed-off-by: Simon Goffin (sig) <sig@openerp.com>
During checkout, the user can create a new billing (only for public user as it
will create a 'normal' `res.partner`), a new shipping, edit its billing (that
will edit himself) or edit its shipping address.
All those cases will go through the exact same methods, public user and logged
in user included.
This previously led to multiple issues and multiple fixes to correctly set
`company_id` and `website_id` on the address (res.partner).
See 44372471ef that fixed the `website_id` part.
See 3a0f05f33 that fixed the multi-company behavior, but needed 2ba71140 to not
modify the company of an already created partner, but was still incomplete as
after that fix a logged in user would still have the admin (sudo) company
instead of the website one as supposed.
This commit will fix that bug and add some tests for all mentionned issues.
Fixes#28853
Backport from odoo/odoo#34596closesodoo/odoo#34689
Signed-off-by: Jérémy Kersten (jke) <jke@openerp.com>
When a pl promo code is applied, the code is shown in the promo code input.
Before this commit, if the user clicked on "Apply" (so with the same code) it
would remove the pl as it would go in the `if` condition that is supposed to
handle empty code modo to reset pl.
Coming from #34633closesodoo/odoo#34734
Signed-off-by: Jérémy Kersten (jke) <jke@openerp.com>
Forward port of a8dfc7fb73
Before this commit, when a transaction has as status 'authorized', the
transactions' confirm page gives an error : 'Oops! There was a problem
with your payment.'
Now, the page gives the same message as when the transaction has the
status 'done' : 'Your payment was successful! It may take some time to
be validated on our end.'
opw-1984325
Prevent singleton error when validating stock.picking with option cancel_backorder
in case there are multiple backorders involved by displaying all the backorder's names separated by commas.
opw: 20337021
closesodoo/odoo#34709
Signed-off-by: Simon Goffin (sig) <sig@openerp.com>
Have a Tax 24%, included
Have account.voucher with a line reading:
`Price: 64.93; Tax: 24% Incl`
Validate the voucher
Before this commit, the account.move.lines created were wrong and unbalanced
as the amounts that should have been affected by the tax included haven't been
After this commit, the move and its lines are correct and balanced
OPW 2031751
closesodoo/odoo#34784
Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
Backport of https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/34132
The test case of alipay payment is going to failed due to:
1) Now the redirect_url from the return_url is removed in commit :
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/0aefe72b773a21bdd38fdc86779d3030bd5127c6
but it's still it's there in test cases so removed from test case.
2) To make the transaction done it must be in draft, pending or authorised
state but in first test case payment process the transaction state is set to
cancel and in another payment process use the same transaction again to set
it success so before use the same transaction again just set the state to draft.
task- 2005926
closesodoo/odoo#34708
Signed-off-by: Christophe Monniez (moc) <moc@odoo.com>
When the 'before' (resp. 'after') hook is defined on a QUnit module,
it is executed once, before (resp. after) the whole module is
executed. When the test suite is executed several times, tests that
failed in the previous execution are always executed first,
separately from the other tests of their module. In that case, the
'before' hook is executed directly (before the execution of the
failed test), but the 'after' hook is only executed once the whole
module has been executed. This means that a lot of other tests,
coming from other modules, can be executed in the meantime.
In calendar tests, we used the 'before' and 'after' hooks to catch
scroll events. So, when a calendar test failed, and the suite was
re-run, some tests depending on the scroll failed.
To prevent this, we use 'beforeEach' and 'afterEach' hooks instead,
as they are executed before and after each test.
closesodoo/odoo#34932
Signed-off-by: Julien Mougenot (JUM) <Arcasias@users.noreply.github.com>
When posting a message (here is the livechat use case),
the _postMessage function can call the callback function.
but this parameter is not mandatory.
If the caller of this function doesn't need a callback function
to be called after execution, the _postMessage function was crashing
as callback is not defined.
This commit fix this _postMessage function by checking that
callback is defined before calliing it.
Pre-required for Task ID: 2028059
Fix Task : 2037048
PR #34917
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
1* Allow products access from product_id / product_template_id of sale.order.line
2* Allow use of optional products along rentals and events.
closesodoo/odoo#34170
Signed-off-by: Damien Bouvy (dbo) <dbo@odoo.com>
Put toogle_button or a favorite widget to handle a boolean field in an editable list
click straight up on the widget's button or link
Before this commit, the widget changed its appearence, but the changes were not
propagated to the model. This is because the controller will not force_save if its mode is edit
(to let changes piling up and save everything when clicking save), which is the case
of the editable list
After this commit, following what has been done at 2f5e44d40b
clicking on a widget in an editable list just activates the row for editing
but doesn't change the widget's value
OPW 2033700
closesodoo/odoo#34878
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
previously, when user tried to change the schedule_date, it
was being passed as a string instead of datetime. corrected
that.
Task-2034542
closesodoo/odoo#34873
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
The ready code warning timeout of 2 seconds can be confusing since
it is triggered just after the 2 seconds. We can log this message
at the end in order to give the real timeout.
In JS tests, when the ready code takes too much time, a warning is
logged. As a consequence, the runbot updates the github status as a
failure, causing real pain to people who simply wants to merge their
features.
With this commit the warning is changed into an info and the runbot will
be happy.
closesodoo/odoo#34865
Signed-off-by: Xavier Dollé (xdo) <xdo@odoo.com>
Odoo Translation Bot