When you try to find a carrier in the wizard that let you add one on
your sale order, you don't see all of them because of a domain that only
show the ones that havethe same company id of the sale order, but it
should also show you the ones that don't have company_id set.
So we removed the domain in the view, and the invisible company_id as it
is not used anymore. Because the domain we need is already applied in
'available_carrier_ids'.
This behavior has been introduced in rev: c058562d73closesodoo/odoo#35856
Signed-off-by: pimodoo <pimodoo@users.noreply.github.com>
task-1973902
+ use of img locally
+ last PO review:
+ show latest in the list
+ remove underline
+ force same height if blog or not
+ ...
closesodoo/odoo#34609
Signed-off-by: Jérémy Kersten (jke) <jke@openerp.com>
Task 1861198
Add code in tax lines for enterprise commit
Check that some control formula are verified. Display it before exporting the xml and on the tax return journal entry.
closesodoo/odoo#34186
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli (qdp) <qdp@openerp.com>
Add the dependency between website and auth_signup
auth_signup is in auto-install but there was no strict dependency
Before this commit, installing website transformed the field
auth_signup_uninvited from a static list to a computed list (due to related).
This fixes the following bug:
1. install auth_signup
-> create selections
2. install webstite
-> remove selections and turn it into a computed field with dynamic
selections
3. update auth_signup
-> recreate the selections when updating the module
4. reload the registry (automatic at the end of update)
-> try to remove the selections -> error as not in install/uninstall
mode
Instead, keep the list static and turn it into a computed field with
inverse
closesodoo/odoo#35861
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Currently when shipping method is added on the sales order with error message
then on update of shipping method it will display the error message in dialog
but it will be hidden behind the update shipping method wizard
so on update shipping method display notification instead of dialog.
Closes: #35808
Signed-off-by: Damien Bouvy (dbo) <dbo@odoo.com>
On shipping method company is not required field so having blank
company on shipping method will be a shared method.
so while adding shipping method on so also display the company on
which the company is not set.
Closes: #35808
Before this commit, the external email settings were saved but the
alias domain model was empty. This was caused by this field being
editable in mail module, but readonly in hr_expense and crm_module.
This commit fixes the issue by force saving the readonly fields, so
that they are stored in database and non-empty after save.
Task-ID 2047446
closesodoo/odoo#35589
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
-Purpose of this task is speed up the put in pack process.
-after this commit, on the Picking when clicking 'Put In Pack' button
if there are no quantity set as done all the reserved quantity put in
the pack.
Task- 1966999
closesodoo/odoo#35280
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
This module provide you a data from Mexican Bank data extracted
from `SAT Bank catalog
<http://www.sat.gob.mx/fichas_tematicas/buzon_tributario/Documents/catalogo_bancos.pdf>`_.
Additionally was added the following fields:
- ASM code in Banks: to identify banking institutions by ASM standard
- CLABE code in Bank Accounts: required to the sending and receiving
of domestic inter-bank electronic funds transfer.
closesodoo/odoo#35742
Signed-off-by: Josse Colpaert <jco@openerp.com>
On `website` itself there is no `website_id` so the domain has to be read from
`self` directly.
Also oversight of forward-port 039e6bae99:
On `slide.channel` the override that was done in an earlier version is doing the
same as the generic override that was introduced later, so it can be removed.
closesodoo/odoo#35839
Signed-off-by: Jérémy Kersten (jke) <jke@openerp.com>
Looks like the race condition dates back to the introduction of
"default" export fields but #32339 made it into a hard error (rather
than silently not load the fields): setting / selecting the default
fields waited in the exports lists to be loaded, but the exports lists
are just predefined lists of fields, that's got no relation to the
loaded or default fields, which are loaded (somewhat implicitly) by
_onChangeCompatibleInput.
As a result, if the lookup of the ir.exports was faster than fetching
the model's fields, we'd execute "select the fields from the list
view" before the exports widget knew anyting about the model's own
fields.
Because the old code iterated on the loaded fields and checked if they
were to enable it would just do nothing (as it would iterate an empty
object). Because the new code iterates on the defaults fields and
looks them up in the records map, it gets an undefined and triggers an
error.
Fix by waiting on the proper RPC call.
Reported-by: Andreas Stauder (@BT-astauder)
closesodoo/odoo#35837
Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
This branch is the combination of several optimizations in the ORM:
* store field values once in the cache: the cache reflects more
faithfully the database, only fields that explicitly depend on the
context have an extra indirection in the cache;
* delay recomputations by default: use method `recompute` to explicitly
flush out pending recomputations;
* delay updates in method `write`: updates are stored in a data
structure that can be flushed efficiently to the database with method
`flush` (which also flush out recomputations);
* make method `modified` take advantage of inverse fields to inverse
dependencies;
* filter records by evaluating a domain on records in Python;
* a computed field with `readonly=False` behaves like a normal field
with an onchange method;
* computed fields are computed in superuser mode by default.
Work done by Toufik Ben Jaa, Raphael Collet, Denis Ledoux and Fabien
Pinckaers.
closesodoo/odoo#35659
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux <beledouxdenis@users.noreply.github.com>
When redirecting to record, the wrong 'form' view will sometimes be
loaded. A 'hack' has been done in crm_lead.py to redirect the user to
the relevant 'form' view based on the value of the 'type' field.
However, this solution is not clean as it does not solve all cases
(multiple crm.lead records loaded from the activity systray, reloading
the page after redirection, etc.)
Goal of this task is to solve those issues by merging crm.lead.form.lead and
crm.lead.form.opportunity form views. That way multi records actions will
always display the relevant information according to record type.
Note: Here some fields used as a twice in the form view just to stay
close to the current design. Still few things which are not possible
here for 'lead' and 'opportunity', that is
* A dynamic 'placeholder' on 'name' field.
* A 'domain' on 'partner_id' field.
* A 'widget' on 'probability' field.
Task 47118
closesodoo/odoo#32248
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
In this commit useless code is removed
* method 'close_dialog' and 'edit_dialog' from crm.lead;
* actions: crm_opportunity_report_action_graph,
create_opportunity_simplified, crm_lead_action_activities,
merge_opportunity_act;
* views: view_create_opportunity_simplified
Indeed this is dead code and can be removed to clean a bit module.
Task 47118
analytic account data preparation is now a hook method
This allows to modify the creation method without unecessary updates
closesodoo/odoo#35784
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Task 2031686
* Change some labels on the dashboard
* Move the action "Take money In/Out" to a button because it was also dsplayed in bank journals and we only want it for cash journals
* Add reconciliation param on the first account config list, as well as a button to go to the form (it is an editable list)
* Add an action to duplicate accounts in batch
* Smartly detect when a cash statement can be extended instead of creating a new one, making it more obvious to the user that he may need to validate his previous statement(s)
closesodoo/odoo#35137
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli (qdp) <qdp@openerp.com>
As the 'allow_company_ids' are now depending on the context and impact
the access to some data, we need to provide them to some controller
(route). Json route auto-pop the context when given (0322f77279)
into the environment. In the 'read_follower' route, the `check_access_rules`
raises when you want to access a document of another company (even if
this one is in your allowed companies), simply because their is no
'allowed_company_ids' key in the context. This context key is automatically
added when calling the `rpc` method in JS (as explain in session.js
of a5b6f31cf2).
To fix the wrong access error on followers reading, we simly have to give
an empty context when calling `_rpc` in the follower widget.
Task-1999686
closesodoo/odoo#35705
Signed-off-by: Jérome Maes (jem) <jem@openerp.com>
In Project app, we now ensure the company of a task. Indeed, since that
model can be billed, and is important in some business, we need to ensure
its link to a company. A task can live outside a project, so the company
of a task can not be related. Task company can be set by user, but must
be the same as the project (is set), as the task can be billed depending
on project properties.
Task-1999686
When confirming a SO creates a task, the task is in a project. The
company from the task should be the one from the project, as we will
(in the next commit) restrict the company of a task: it will only
allow a project to have task in the same company as its.
Task-1999686
PURPOSE
=========
When working in restaurants, there are often more than one waiter working on the same floor.
But Odoo doesn't support that.
There can only be one person working on one session for the same tables.
The purpose of this task to allow several people to work on the same session (while synchronizing sessions).
SPECIFICATIONS
===============
- MultiUser is active by default.
- Allow multiple waiters to login on one PoS Config.
- All waiters login to the same session, the waiter that does the paiment is the responsible for the order (same as now).
- Synchonize the information across the multiple instances running on same floors.
Syncronisation will take place at switch of table.
(close tables automaticly if no activity, to force sync)
- Syncro cannot be done if no internet : how do we manage it ? We should inform the user the internet connection has been lost and that synchro cannot be done. What impacts? To check
Useful links
https://github.com/it-projects-llc/pos-addonshttps://apps.odoo.com/apps/modules/11.0/pos_bus_restaurant/
Related PR:
odoo#32789
TASK-ID: 1891130
closesodoo/odoo#33973
Signed-off-by: pimodoo <pimodoo@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR modify the subcontracting process:
- Support extra quantity
- No more interaction with the subcontract order. Everything is directly accessible on the operation
- Dropshipping with subcontracting
- Bypass reservation process
- The partner type subcontractor is removed and every partner could be set on the BoM
- Update the initial demand will trigger the rules.
- Demo data
- Subcontractor is required on the BoM (no more BoM for all partners of type subcontractor)
Visually:
- Remove the stat button for linked operation.
- Register Components is only available when a subcontract component is tracked
- Button on operations in order to correct tracked components
- Show Operation button will ask to record components until the total quantity is provided(correction on finish lines are allowed after)
More details available in each commit
Task 1962187
closesodoo/odoo#35738
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
Before a modification on a quant, stock.move and stock.move.line
check if they satisfy the condition to impact the quant.
However in a new module this condition is hardly editable.
The purpose of this commit is to easily add condition to bypass
reservation.
Before this commit a returns would select the classic
partner location. However in the case of a subcontractor return
it should be returned to the subcontract location
Force to set subcontractors on subcontracting BoM since
it's always used in order to determine if a subcontracting
should be apply on a receipt or not. Also there is not magical
behavior has 'if there is no subcontractor on the BoM then it
means all partners...'
- nothing tracked
The "register components" button shouldn't appear, the receipt looks normal.
- finished products tracked
The "register components" button shouldn't appear, the receipt looks normal.
- finished products not tracked and components tracked
The "register components" button appear and the burger redirects to "Produce" wizard. The user should record all the productions before being able to access SML through the burger wizard. He cannot force any SML for subcontracted products with tracked components before having recorded all the productions.
- finished products and components tracked
The "register components" button appear and the burger redirects to "Produce" wizard. The user should record all the productions before being able to access SML through the burger wizard. He cannot force any SML for subcontracted products with tracked components before having recorded all the productions.
Due to subcontracting. Some documents are hidden from the users since
they are there to ease technicaly. However they are linked to useful
documents and we want to avoid to log an activity on them.
Usecase to reproduce:
- Validate a purchase_order with a user without group inventory user or manufacturing user.
AccessError on operation read for BoM. A purchase user should be able
to validate an order independently of the documents that will be
generate.
Allow to do a dropshipping with a subcontractor.
If the product uses the routes drophipping and have
a subcontracting BoM. Then a PO for the subcontractors
will genrate a need in the subcontracting location for
the required components.
A module is needed because the picking_type_id for dropshipping
do not have a warehouse_id. The warehouse_id is needed in order to
know from which warehouse the subcontracting components should be
deliver.
Test the flow when a product is set as resupply on subcontract
and not MTO, it should be trigger by a reordering rule and not
by a subcontracting receipt.
When a move is created from a location A to a location B and not
via a rule but it wants to apply the rule logic in order to know
if a move is MTS or MTO then _adjust_procure_method is called.
It will check if a rule between A and B for the selected product/
category/warehouse and if it exists it will apply the rule procure
method to the move. If not it will check if the route MTO is ticked,
and will set the move as MTO even if no rule exist. It could be
miss understanding by the user that have moves MTO without matching
rule. It would be easier to have a single proccess with rule.
Add a test for the following usecase:
- Subcontracted product and components tracked by lot.
- Create a receipt
- Use the register components button in order to prefill quantity
- Correct the final lot on details operation form
If the components have the route resupply subcontractor on order then the
delivery order triggered by the receipt do not have the origin nor the
subcontractor partner. This commit update the procurement group in
order to add those information and propagate it.
due to commit 108ee65af2a88d61526dc047043138bddc3f9b63#diff-99ad190cf09687f6efdebc1f7636062c
picking type for subcontracting order use field use_create_components_lots
instead of classic picking type.
Pierre Masereel