The parent commit allows to select a specific interval for any
date or datetime field in the groupby menu. This makes some filter
akward, for instance "Order Month".
Accordingly, we have rewritten the string and help attributes in
search views archs and removed groupbys related to the same field
(that would have become redundant).
The action 'account.action_invoice_tree2' has been changed into a server action, so we want to open the tree view of invoices by modifying some values of the action we should now use the xml reference 'account.action_vendor_bill_template'.
Additionally, the help tooltip is now completed as would do the server action
This is mandatory to ensure consistency of the data generated by the test, as stock pickings created from a PO are by design always created for the current date (there is no way forcing this), meaning that they always use today's exchange rate for their valuation.
Despite the fact we rewrite the date of the valuation moves artificially, we cannot correct the debit and credit values, since the anglosaxon entries get automatically reconciled (and you cannot modify a reconciled entry).
So, we have to make sure that "today"'s rate will always be the last rate we created in order to ensure complete control of the test. This deletion will have no further impact, as the transaction will be rollbacked at the end of the test.
The date of the invoice is used for currency conversion in anglosaxon stock valuation. Before this fix, the tests crashed between june 6th and december 31th, as the demo data define a currency rate for USD on june 6th. Using the proper date on the credit note ensures the good rate (the one in application when making the credit) is always applied.
The `price_unit` on `stock.move` is not rounded since it is a technical
field. Therefore, the comparison might fail depending on the rate (which
happens after June 6th because of `base.rateUSDbis`).
Let's consider a Sales user U with no access to Purhcase
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Create a SO with one line with the drop shipping route
- Validate the SO
Bug:
A access error was raised because the user has no access right on
Purchase.
opw:1851301
formataddr (from the email python library) writes email_from as '"name" <email>'
in the email_from field of the mail.compose.message record.
When the mail is rendered, onchange_template_id is triggered.
This then overwrites the values of email_from among other fields.
What happens is that it uses the email_from field from the template to render
the email_from, bypassing what was put by formataddr before.
What happens in some cases is that it is rendered as 'name <email>'
(note the quotes have been stripped away).
If name contains arbitrary symbols, e.g. name = 'pépé [company] <pdg>, ohlala',
then getaddresses which is supposed to parse the (name, email) pairs gets thrown
off (in particular, <pdg> will be interpreted as an email address, and many
other problems with the various special symbols).
It then gives these wrong elements as email addresses, which will usually crash
when getting non-ascii symbols (i.e. these strings don't respect the relevant
RFC for email addresses).
Closes:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/issues/23502https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/2311823118
opw 815202
opw 1824243
purchase_requisition install stock, but when doing services you might
still want the option. This option was only display when stock
is installed. This commit changes this to make it visible when
purchase is installed.
The option is better visible and installing a new apps, then
hidden (or difficult to find).
product.product inheritS from product.template, and they both
define the 'standard_price' field, but implement it differently;
- product: the field is a company dependent one (so non stored)
- template: the field is a computed one based on tis variants
For the first case, since the field is not stored in database, when
doing SQL query, we have to get the value from the table ir_property.
That is what purchase report does, but instead of searching on resource
'product.product', it does it on 'product.template'. There are
obviously no entries in ir_property table for 'standard_price' field
on product template. As consequence, the "product value" (cost)
is always null in purchase reporting.
This commit fixes that by modifying SQL query to get the good
value from ir_property table.
Purpose
=======
The method _name_search and _search add support to search as another user.
All the overrides of name_search and search redefine the behavior of the search.
This bring inconsistencies as the result of a call to _name_search and name_search
could differ on certain modules, which is not acceptable.
Specification
=============
Example:
~~~~~~~~
If the name_search method is overridden to search also on the driver name,
then calling name_search with a label 'JF' will return all the cars with a name containing
'JF' or all the cars with a driver name containing 'JF'. Let's say that we have a ir.rule
preventing a user to read the cars of another company. Then the call to name search only returns
the cars satisfying the previous condition AND belonging to his company.
Now, we want to overpass this constraint. We call _name_search with the attribute name_get_uid=1.
Then the call to _name_search returns all the cars from all the companies with a name like 'JF',
but nothing is done about the driver_name.
Example of wrong search redefinition on a model
-----------------------------------------------
@api.model
def name_search(self, name, args=None, operator='ilike', limit=100):
domain = args or []
domain = expression.AND([domain, [('name', 'ilike', name)]])
partners = self.env['res.partner'].search([('name', operator, name)])
if partners and name:
domain = expression.OR([domain, ['|', ('driver_id', 'in', partners.ids), ('driver_id', '=', False)]])
rec = self.search(domain, limit=limit)
return rec.name_get()
Example of correct search redefinition on a model
-------------------------------------------------
@api.model
def _name_search(self, name, args=None, operator='ilike', limit=100, name_get_uid=None):
domain = args or []
domain = expression.AND([domain, [('name', operator, name)]])
partner_ids = self.env['res.partner']._search([('name', operator, name)], access_rights_uid=name_get_uid)
if partner_ids:
domain = expression.OR([domain, ['|', ('driver_id', 'in', partner_ids), ('driver_id', '=', False)]])
rec = self._search(domain, limit=limit, access_rights_uid=name_get_uid)
return self.browse(rec).name_get()
The same logic should be applied on the overrides of the search method.
When stock is not install and using purchase alone, user
should be able to edit received quantity manually for
consummable (and services) products.
This is a direct consequence to the split of purchase
and stock module.
We want to break the dependency between stock and purchase
for our furtur developpement. For more modularity, a new
bridge module 'purchase_stock' is created.
This commti move part of business code, views, data, ...
related to stock management from purchase into purchase_stock
without changing any feature.
Task #47927
The idea is to do like the sale report: being
able for other modules to extend the report and
add their own fields. As we are going to split
stock from purchase, we will need this.
Before that, the following scenario (tested in purchase/tests/test_anglosaxon_valuation_reconciliation.py) failed:
- create a PO
- change of currency rate
- create and validate vendor bill in foreign currency
- receive goods
- change of currency rate
- return the goods
- change of currency rate
- refund the bill
At the end of it, both invoices (bill and refund) were not in 'paid' state, but they should have been! The anglosaxon stock valuation code had some issues in the way it managed currency rates. The main one was that we converted the computed valuation_price_unit variable in company currency using the date of the invoice as a reference, which was wrong in case the invoice was a refund, as it should then use the date of the valuation for this. This problem caused the code to detect an exchange rate difference between refund and valuation as a price difference, hence generating a line in the price difference account, which caused the debtor account line of the associated account.move to be wrong, and hence impacted the residual field of the invoice ("amount due", in GUI). Finally, as this field contained an inconsistent value, the refund invoice was not marked as paid after reconciling it with the original one.
Solving this needed to refactor the code quite a bit, so that we don't convert everything in invoice currency in the end, but rather do it directly everytime we compute a part of valuation_price_unit. The test had also to be partly re-written as it was too naive in the way it used currency rates, we needed something closer to a real utilisation of the program.
We recently hid the Variants menu items in debug mode. We want to revert
this because the users need to see that menu for business operations.
eg : Check the inventory per variant
This partially reverts commit 62900064c0
Related to task #1839980Closes#24553
On purchase orders, the scheduled date is mantadory. This date is computed from
the purchase order lines and hidden. If there is no purchase order line, the date
stays empty and it's not possible to save the PO.
This commit uses the order date as scheduled date if there are no PO lines
This commit remove force_assign method in every tests of point_of_sale, purchase, sale_mrp,
sale_stock, stock and stock_account . This method is not longer used since V11.
This commit is related to task ID 59417
Before that, the following scenario failed due to FIFO handling of stock:
- make PO 1 for 10 x product A at 10€/piece, receive and invoice everything
- make PO 2 for 10 x product A at 20€/piece, receive and invoice everything
- refund and send back PO 2
=> With FIFO handling, it means the valuation corresponding to the return of product A consists of the first received products, hence 10x10=100€. The credit note, though, was made with the price of the invoice (200€) and did not (because of a too simple check) use the price difference account to post the missing amount (100€).
Test test_fifo_anglosaxon_return (purchase/tests/test_stockvaluation.py) failed because of that.
- Create a product FIFO / Real-Time valuation
- Create a PO with 1 unit, validate, receive the picking
- Create the corresponding vendor bill, but do not validate
- Unlock the picking and change the received quantity to 0.0
- Validate the invoice
A traceback because of a zero division occurs.
When searching for the stock moves linked to the PO, we should filter
out the ones with a zero quantity.
opw-1843543
Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine