This reverts commit dcf50bf242.
The commit should not have been forward-ported after 9.0 since
Model update method has been @api.multi'ed.
This also introduced an issue since changing the first line would
change the date_planned of the order (which would alter subesquent
updates).
opw-697680
The feature "set all date to all order line" on a purchase order allow
user to update the schedulded date of all order lines.
It was backported in 9.0 with 401a3cfa but in 9.0 date_planned was not
stored, the button would wrongly set the scheduled dates of the lines to
the minimum date.
With this commit the functionality should work as expected, unless
someone use an out-of-date template in which case the functionnality is
disabled.
opw-697680
note: PO date_planned is stored after 9.0 so this commit must not be
forward-ported.
Currently when someone is added as follow to a document default subtypes
are computed if no specific subtypes are given to the subscription. However
if internal subtypes are set as default those are added to all new
followers. It should take into account customers and shared users and avoid
adding them internal subtypes.
Customers and shared users are not notified of messages using an internal
subtype. So currently there is no information leak. However with this fix
we ensure internal subtypes are not followed by external people even if
no notification is created.
Steps to reproduce:
-Install website_quote
-Add a language French
-Create a quotation template
-Add a line with a new prodcut
-Translate the field description
Bug: Traceback becasue the field quote_description was not translatable.
opw:697508
For example: https://abc.def:8080
It is already allowed for the printer in main point_of_sale module.
Apply the same schemes in pos_restaurant.
Closes#13769
When renaming a warehouse, the sequence are renamed.
Previous sequences uses slashes while the new one backslashes.
Keep consistency between sequence from origin and new one.
Closes#13774
* ccd6fc6 already fixed the bug of the account move for expenses with more than 1 taxes but the taxes were not used.
Adding in `_prepare_move_line` to be included in the created move line.
* added Contributor License Agreement
Closes#12849
The account move line created for a tax must have the right account_analytic_id
according CONDITION.
CONDITION(inspired from function compute defined on model "account.invoice.tax")
if the tax is for an "in_invoice" or an "out_invoice" => tax_code = 'tax_code_id'
=> the account_analytic_id of the tax must be set to 'account_analytic_collected_id'
if the tax is for an "out_refund" or an "in_refund" => tax_code = 'ref_tax_code_id'
=> the account_analytic_id of the tax must be set to 'account_analytic_paid_id'
note:forward-port upto saas-6
opw:694821
Before this revision,
using a selection field with as possible keys `0`,
such as `require_payment` in `website_quote`,
resulted to the records field values to be stored
as `NULL` instead of `0` in the database.
This leads to the inability:
- To distinguish records with this selection field not set
or set to `0` (as both are stored as `NULL`)
- To search for records with the field set to `0`
(as they are considered not set)
For instance, while having `website_quote` installed,
search for sales orders with `Payment` set to
`Not mandatory on website quote validation`: It won't
return any result, even if you have some.
opw-697454
filter 'products' doesn't exist on product.template, it is named 'consumable'
rename 'search_default_products' to 'search_default_consumable' in actions
Closes#14690
The account move line created for a tax(with analytic = True) must have
the same account_analytic_id than the account move line created for the
taxed amount.
opw:694821
Before this commit, in anglo-saxon accounting the account of a
vendor's bill line was defined as the stock input account, or the
default account.
With this commit the chain becomes:
- if one: stock input account,
- else if one: expense account,
- else: default account
opw-695167
Declaring the keyword argument `context` in an API v7 `orm.browse_record` can
lead to mixed API v7/v8 inheritance bugs (`context` will be treated as a
function parameter instead of being injected in `self.env.context`). As the
context is already propagated in line 953, we can safely remove it from line
971.
Closes#13115
When the user name entered hasn't an email specified the error message wasn't
displayed in the reset view.
The error message was in e.name, not e.message
There are literals inside a t tag that should be translated but they are never
exported to the pot file because they are inside a t-value attribute as python
code.
Closes#14344
* Added accounts provided following the structure provided by the SAT
this accounts are only the minimal necessary ones, with the objective
to set the first easiest engagement to new users and tags will represent the actual information
from the document linked.
* The name of the tag is the concatenation of tag.code + tag.name, because the account.tag
model have not the code field.
Note: we will need more accounts but some of them for special operations
which are not basic at all, then it is better just propose the operational accounts
once we understand a proper closing process.
* Set the proper user-types on accounts in order to be able to use it with the official reports this CoA
for operational purpose.
* Added nature field and data in tags to allow set this value in electronic account report, and
set this value with data pre loaded, we did not use user.type for this due to the fact that the same user type can have different nature (if it grows for credit or debit), I do not know if this field brakes the stable rule we can discuse about that.
* Assign the account tags with in the Mexican CoA template installation, and with an onchange(account.code) when manually modifying/creating accounts.
Rationale: If the code of the accounts follows the pattern 111.00.00 or 111-00-00 then it will
set the tag 111.00 if the tag exists, if not then this will be ignored.
* Generate an account tag by each second level account in SAT catalog, and assign to the corresponding account.
When testing the access rights, attachments associated with
archived/inactive records are inadvertently being hidden due to
the default ORM behavior of search.
Patch simplified while merging.
Closes#14366
When `paypal_validate_data` is called without any reference, `tx` is None.
Before the migration, it was catched by a `tx and tx.acquired_id` but it is no
longer the case.
Introduced at f1ac1b12Fixes#13834
- Create a SO, link it to a Quotation Template (e.g. "Odoo Monthly" from
the demo data). Note that the Quotation Template must require a
payment.
- Click on "Preview", then "Accept & Pay" in the website quote
- Pay with Authorize.net
- In the Subscription linked to the SO, change the invoice date to a
date in the past (so it will generate an invoice)
- Execute manually the Scheduled Action "Generate Recurring Invoices and
Payments for Subscription Contracts"
The payment is correctly registered on Authorize (you should receive a
confirmation email), but:
- No invoice is generated
- The next invoice date has not been changed
The issue comes from the fact that:
- `payment_authorize` executes the callback method
`reconcile_pending_transaction` before changing the status of the
transaction.
- The method `reconcile_pending_transaction` cancels and unlinks the
invoice if the transaction is not 'done' or 'authorized'.
In order to solve the issue, two fixes are necessary:
- Switch the status update with the callback (this commit), as it is
already the case for Ogone and Stripe.
- Do not manually call `reconcile_pending_transaction`, since it is
already executed as callback. This avoids two increments of the period
(commit in Enterprise).
opw-694730
1. Setup authorize.net acquirer
Published on website
Order Confirmation: capture manually
Store card: always
2. Buy something on the store => SO gets confirmed
3. Buy again but select the saved card
4. You get a confirmation screen on the website, but the SO is not
actually confirmed in the backend (but it should)
The issue is that the confirmation of the SO is located in the
`form_feedback` method. When paying with a saved credit card, there is
no form filled in since we use a S2S transaction. Therefore, the method
is never called, and the SO never confirmed.
Fixes#14007
opw-693517
Nicolas Lempereur