add missing string labels
rephrase the error message
add missing _description
removed forward-ported hr_equipment.pot
was unclear, courtesy of the translators
Purpose
=======
This isn't useful now that project issues and tasks have been merged.
Specification
=============
Keep the label field, remove the checkbox
Now that we're closer to switching to P3 for good, these helpers have
outlived their usefulness, and mostly add noise.
All remaining dict.iter*() or dict.view*() must be converted to the
normal keys(), values() or items() calls.
Whenever the result is likely to be used for more than the scope of a
loop, or when the dict needs to be modified during iteration, the calls
must be wrapped in a ``list()``, to protect the new P3 semantics.
Those cases are very exceptional.
Also removed some dead code or improved the API to remove unnecessary
conversions.
This field was needed because a rating could be sent to a customer for a task or an issue.
This was buggy, because if a template was set on a shared stage between tasks and issues, the rendering could crash, generate an email with wrong piece of information, and so on.
By removing this field, we can also remove some ugly code that was needed to make that distinction.
Rating improvements :
- use parent res_model/res_id in action domain for
performance issue
- satisfaction on project kanban card redirect to
rating kanban with default filter
- UX improvements
- Clean method generatign action to rating kanban,
according to the project settings (use tasks and/or
issues).
Rating is used on different objects that
don't have the same business needs.
We want rating module to provide the common
needs (filter, views, basic actions, ...) and
other module will extends these basic tools
to complete their specific business needs.
This commit provide a parenting system for rated
record, such as mail alias.
For instance, 'project.project' is the parent of
task and issue objects.
This will allow to have a global view of customer
statisfaction on 'parent' objects (project and
livechat channel for now).
To do so, the rating
mixin provides 2 methods that need to be
overriden: `rating_get_parent_model_name` and
`rating_get_parent_id`.
In Python 3:
* various builtins and dict methods were changed to return
view/iterable objects rather than lists
* and the separate Python 2 view/iterable builtins and methods were
removed altogether
This is problematic when using these items as list (which the happens
repeatedly in Odoo), but more viciously when iterating *multiple times*
over them (which also happens, which I've messed up multiple times while
writing this, and which is a pain to debug even when you've just created
the issue).
Convert all code using these to semantics-matching cross-version
helper functions to get the LCD behaviour between P2 and P3, and
forbid the builtins via lint.
issue #8530
In rating module
- provide list and form view for rating
- better kanban view (remove js code, ellispsis
for long name, better feedback display, ...)
- provide more field on the mixin to cover
more case
- update res_name of rating when the ressource name
is changed (for consistency)
- make the rating web page, a correct html page (by
using web.layout template)
- some guidelines compliance
In rating_project and rating_project_issue:
- add filter for rated document
- some guidelines compliance
Several translation issues are faced with the rating module:
- the feedback page is always displayed in the admin language
- the feedback emails are always sent in the user's language
One would expect these to be in the partner language.
opw-694718
Rating is implemented for project.issue, but it is
impossible to set a template on the stage since the
domain force the mail.template to be declared on
project.task.
We use the same mecanism as `mail_template_id`
declared on project.stage.task in project
module. The list of available template on the stage
form view will be the ones for issue and task like
mail_template_id.
[IMP] rating: website rating page: reviewed design, rate on click, update on submit
[IMP] rating_project: rating_status: 'no' instead of False
[IMP] rating_project/issue: smileys insteaf of thumbs for consistency in kanban
[IMP] rating: allow to update an existing rating (feedback + rate)
[IMP] rating: consistency on rating names (statisfied, not satisfied, higly dissatisfed)
[IMP] rating: avoid deadend after rating, button to go to Odoo
[IMP] rating: res_config better sentence
Purpose:
For our internal project management, we would like to track the customer
satisfaction on the open projects. We send them an email every one or 2
weeks allowing them to give a feedback by clicking on one of 3
smileys: Happy, Average, Angry. They can also put a additional explanation.
We already have something similar which is working on livechat with a
unusable reporting, and on issues but unusable. Our project are managed by tasks.
Specification:
- On the project : Selection fields : (Periodical Rating or Rating on Stage)
+ Fields to choose the period if periodical
- On the stage : email_template_id field.
- IF :
---> Periodical : Send an email to all the customers for the tasks on this stage periodically
---> On Stage : Send an email to the customer's tasks when the task reaches the stage
- That way, it's impossible to send a satisfaction request both periodically and sequentially.
FP request
- Who is the customer : The customer on the task OR the customer on the related sales order
OR the customer on the projet OR nobody
- The last feedback is displayed on the task kanban card (Thumb up, down, or neutral)
- On the project kanban card, the customer satisfaction is displayed. This is the simple
mean of all the previous ratings.
In odoo at many places the filter items are having repeated strings eventhough the
fiter works differently , so find all the places where this happens and give
proper string to each filter..
Martin Trigaux