This branch is the combination of several optimizations in the ORM:
* store field values once in the cache: the cache reflects more
faithfully the database, only fields that explicitly depend on the
context have an extra indirection in the cache;
* delay recomputations by default: use method `recompute` to explicitly
flush out pending recomputations;
* delay updates in method `write`: updates are stored in a data
structure that can be flushed efficiently to the database with method
`flush` (which also flush out recomputations);
* make method `modified` take advantage of inverse fields to inverse
dependencies;
* filter records by evaluating a domain on records in Python;
* a computed field with `readonly=False` behaves like a normal field
with an onchange method;
* computed fields are computed in superuser mode by default.
Work done by Toufik Ben Jaa, Raphael Collet, Denis Ledoux and Fabien
Pinckaers.
closesodoo/odoo#35659
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux <beledouxdenis@users.noreply.github.com>
The selection values of a selection field are now stored in database in the
model ir.model.fields.selection
This will allow to have a modular approche on selections and each selection
is now linked to the module that declared it.
Previously to this change, the selections were linked to the field, meaning
uninstalling a module had no impact on the selections stored on database.
With this change, the selections will now be translated in the correct module
(having an external id) and the records having a used selection will now be
reset to null.
closesodoo/odoo#30228
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Raphaël Collet <rco@odoo.com>
If a db is in single lang (en_US or not) but still has translations, the
translation should be updated in addition to updating the referenced record
Add tests to formalise the expected behaviour:
If one language only (en_US or not), when writing on a translatable field:
- record field should updated
- value of potential existing en_US translation should be updated
- src of potential existing translations should be updated
- no new translation should be created
If en_US and fr_FR, when writing on a translatable field in en_US:
- record field should updated
- value of potential existing en_US translation should be updated
- src of potential existing translations should be updated
- new en_US translation should be created if was not present
If en_US and fr_FR, when writing on a translatable field in fr_FR:
- record field should not be updated
- value of potential existing fr_FR translation should be updated
- src of potential existing translations should not be updated
- new fr_FR translation should be created if was not present
Adapt test_new_api test
get_installed is ormcached, just putting active = True is not enough
Instead, make sure the field src is always up to date
Add tests
Changes in _write:
- Replace _set_ids (to be deprecated) call by _upsert_translations as it works
in batch
- Call _upsert_translations for any language, including en_US
In case an English translation already existed for a record, only the master
value (on the reference record) was updated but the user kept seeing the
translation value (was revealed 73a7534bfc).
- Read src_trans without language
Similar as above, if an English translation already existed, the translation
was used for the result of the read and not the new value that has just been
inserted into the database
- Add _set_source method
When updating a master record of a translated field, the src field must be
updated, including in different languages.
Before it was ok that the src field was out of date as the source was computed
Changes in copy_translation:
- set src as the new value without lang
update the comment to reflect reality since 489494e733
src will contain the English version if no changes were made and it will
contain the modified value if copy was overriden
Changes in upsert_translations:
- Do not force a module, comment, state
Only src, res_id, name, value and lang must be given. Optional values will no
longer be set to null if not given
Using api.constrains should be used instead
Simply leave a warning in case a model uses a non-empty attribute
`_constraints`.
closesodoo/odoo#34679
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Multi is the default api for methods, it is not necessary to explicitly
decorate methods with it, adds clutter and most people use it because
they see that the rest of the code uses it.
Done with `find . -type f -name '*.py' | xargs sed -i '/@api.multi/d'`
Purpose
=======
Currently when clicking on 'Archive' or 'Unarchive' on the list view,
we write directly on the record {'active': False}, instead of calling
toggle_active. Missing that way implementation of numerous business cases.
Example
- Archive a record --> archive its next activities
- (Un)Archive a user --> (Un)Archive its partner
- (Un)Archive a product variant --> (Un)Archive its template if
there is only one variant
- Archive an employee --> Open a wizard to choose an exit plan + describe
the departure reason
- Archive a route --> Archive its procurement rules
- ...
Specification
=============
- Call toggle_active instead of write when calling toggleActive in the web
client.
- On the other hand, use actionArchive and actionUnarchive to apply the
toggle action on the related records only.
Store the SQL constraint message directly in the field `message` of the
corresponding `ir.model.constraint` record, and manage translations from
there. Those records are given an XML id in order to be tracked in PO
files. The translation type 'sql_constraint` is removed.
This commit merges the following models
* account.invoice and account.move
* account.invoice.line and account.move.line
* account.voucher and account.move
* account.voucher.line and account.move.line
It was the opportunity for a big cleanup of the code, so it also restructures the whole account module, its different models/fields, the tests etc. for a better world and a better code readability.
==== Rationale ====
The rationale of this huge change is that we want journal entries / invoices to be easily edited, and changes reflected in the other model. It's a HUGE feature and very strategic for the fiduciary companies. For example, changing the account of a journal entry needs to be automatically reflected on the related invoice.
The same reasoning applies to sale/purchase vouchers.
==== Changes made in features =====
When creating an invoice, you are now creating a journal entry directly.
--> The object account.invoice no longer exists.
In the same fashion when creating an invoice line, you're now adding journal items directly in the journal entry representing the invoice. If this invoice line has some tax, it may create additional journal items as well.
--> The models account.invoice.line & account.invoice.tax no longer exist
Identically, when creating a sale/purchase receipt with its lines, you are now creating a journal entry directly and there's no more usability difference between encoding a receipt or an invoice.
--> The object account.voucher no longer exists.
--> The object account.voucher.line no longer exists.
--> The whole account_voucher module no longer exists.
Positive side-effects coming from these changes are
* draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipts now create a draft accounting entry. Validate these objects now simply post its journal entry. That means that draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipt can straightforwardly be included in reporting or budgets.
* opening a journal entry in form view will now always open the correct view: if it's a sale/purchase journal entry we will have a customer invoice/vendor bill view or a sale/purchase receipt view, whatever the menu we're coming from.
* code & business logic simplification. It is also condensed in a single place instead of being partially duplicated on invoices, vouchers and journal entries.
There should be no feature loss, except the one allowing to group multiple journal items together based on the same product during the invoice validation.
==== Changes made in models =====
* account.invoice: model removed. Instead, now use account.move with following mapping
field (account.invoice) field (account.move)
----------------------- --------------------
name invoice_payment_ref
number name
reference ref
comment narration
user_id invoice_user_id
amount_ total_company_signed amount_total_signed
residual amount_residual
state state + invoice_payment_state /!\ selection changed
date_invoice invoice_date
date_due invoice_date_due
sent invoice_sent
origin invoice_origin
payment_term_id invoice_payment_term_id
partner_bank_id invoice_partner_bank_id
incoterm_id invoice_incoterm_id
vendor_bill_id invoice_vendor_bill_id
source_email invoice_source_email
vendor_display_name invoice_vendor_display_name
invoice_icon invoice_vendor_icon
cash_rounding_id invoice_cash_rounding_id
sequence_number_next invoice_sequence_number_next
sequence_number_next_prefix invoice_sequence_number_next_prefix
'invoices' subset of account.move can be accessed by using the selection field 'type' or one of the many helpers like is_invoice()
* account.move: now has a valid state 'cancel' that has to be excluded from all business logic
* account.move: field 'amount' renamed into 'amount_total'
* account.move: field 'reverse_entry_id' renamed into 'reversed_entry_id'
* account.move.line: now has a field 'display_type' that has to be excluded from all business logic, in order to support invoice layouting
* account.invoice.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping
field (account.invoice.line) field (account.move.line)
---------------------------- -------------------------
invoice_id move_id
uom_id product_uom_id
invoice_line_tax_ids tax_ids
account_analytic_id analytic_account_id
'invoice lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the boolean field 'exclude_from_invoice_tab'
* account.invoice.tax: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping
field (account.invoice.tax) field (account.move.line)
--------------------------- -------------------------
invoice_id move_id
account_analytic_id analytic_account_id
amount price_unit
base tax_base_amount
'tax lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the relational field 'tax_line_id'
* account.invoice.confirm: model removed. Instead, now use the 'post()' function of account.move
* account.invoice.refund: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.reversal to reverse the entries with the same options as we had for invoices
* account.voucher: model removed. Instead, now use account.move of type in ['out_receipt', 'in_receipt]
* account.voucher.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line
==== Changes made in functions ====
* on account.move, method _run_post_draft_to_post() renamed into _autopost_draft_entries()
* on account.move, method action_account_invoice_payment() renamed into action_invoice_register_payment()
* on account.move, method action_invoice_reconcile_to_check() renamed into action_open_matching_suspense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_domain_edition_mode_available() renamed into _get_domain_matching_supsense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_intrastat_country_id() renamed into _get_invoice_intrastat_country_id()
* on account.move.line, method _get_domain_for_edition_mode() renamed into _get_suspense_moves_domain()
* in account.bank.statement, contextual key 'edition_mode' renamed into 'suspense_moves_mode'
Was task 1917430
When the model has several x2many fields which are non-disjoint, the web
client sometimes invokes `onchange` with inconsistent data: a line
appearing in two x2many fields with different values for a subfield.
The method must deal with that inconsistency and return correct data to
the client.
Comparing the length of the recordset is not enough for determining if
there is changes on m2m.
This also fix the merge of f14ae73a98 and
d0bb596f1d
Oversight of previous forward-port.
Display extra information on error messages:
- Access error based on ACLs: user, fields (if applies)
- Access error based on record rules: user, ids
- Missing error: model, operation, user, ids
closesodoo/odoo#33943
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: jev-odoo <jev@odoo.com>
This commit goal is to encapsulate every tour-test into a separate assets
bundle that would be called only during tests (command line) or by URL
(debug=tests). That way, a lot of .js files would not be loaded anymore
uselessly outside test mode and will speed up the page loads (especially in the
frontend as the backend do not reload the page anyway).
In order to do that, we needed to propagate the `debug` state from page to
page.
Otherwise, every page change during a test would simply lose the debug mode and
the test would stop as the test assets would not be loaded.
As we could not add the `&debug=tests` on every link (either hardcoded or
preprocess during the rendering), it has been decided to store it in session.
Technical summary:
1. `debug` state (currently only stored in URL) will be stored in session.
Either when adding the `debug` param in URL (handled with _dispatch) or by
starting Odoo with `test-enable` or `test-file` (handled by session init).
2. Once activated (and so set in session), debug mode will remain activated
even if not visible in URL (after a page navigation eg).
To deactivate it, set its value to nothing, `debug=`. That will exit debug mode
(whatever mode it is: debug, assets, tests).
3. As tour-test files are now in a separate bundle, every layout (when needed)
should `t-call="web.conditional_assets_tests"`.
As it would be redundant and verbose, no `t-if` is needed on the t-call to
load it only in test debug mode. That will be handled by
`compiled_assets_tests` that will actually do the conditionnal t-call-assets
to web.assets_tests, if tests debug mode is activated.
4. In addition to separating the tour-tests files in a separate bundle, we also
moved those files to a specific folder under /static/tests/tours next to
QUnit tests.
5. Also, tour files will be moved in a specific folder /static/src/js/tours for
cleanness purpose (those files will still be kept in their 'normal' assets
as needed outside test mode since it is tours).
This will be done in the next commit.
6. It is possible to enable multiple debug mode, such as 'tests' and 'assets'
together. Simply separate debug modes with a comma, eg '?debug=assets,tests'
task-1934445
Comes with https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/4281Closes#33213
As snapshots are costly to compute, we now create exactly two snapshots:
one initial snapshot and one final snapshot. All intermediate checks
are done with respect to the initial snapshot.
Note also that checks are costly for x2many fields. Therefore, once a
field has changed, it will never be checked again. This optimization is
correct since, by contract, the onchanges of a field are processed at
most once. This guarantees the absence of cycles in onchange.
For instance, assume that field A modifies fields B and C, and that
field C modifies fields D, E and F:
- before: 7 snapshots (snapshot, process A, snapshot, process B,
snapshot, process C, snapshot, process D, snapshot, process E,
snapshot, process F, snapshot)
- after: 2 snapshots (snapshot, process A, process B, process C,
process D, process E, process F, snapshot)
closesodoo/odoo#31872
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
Create a model and extend this model using an inherits. Define a
constraint in the inherited model that uses a field of the parent model.
Create a valid element using the inherited model then write an invalid
value. This pass the constraint although it should raise an exception.
The problem resides in the `write` function of `models.py`. It first
write values on the inherited model then write values on the parent
model. The order is wrong, it should write on the parent model first
then on the child model.
The solution is to change the order fields are written: first we update
child references to their parents, then we update the parents, then we
update the child.
opw-1962705
closes#32919closesodoo/odoo#33003
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
When 80f1ac3599 removed deferral of
parent store computations (the MPTT at the time), it also errornously
removed the computation during auto_init.
As a result, when adding a `_parent_store = True` and `parent_path`
field to an existing model (e.g. in an override, or when updating the
database) the column will be created but the column will be
False-filled, and hierarchical queries break as odoo will attempt to
perform string operations on `False` (either `False + '%'` or
`False.split('/')`).
Fix the issue by reintroducing the parent_store computation.
Note: uses the same gating as the old commit, the computation is only
performed if this is the install/update where the parent_path column
gets created.
We could alternatively gate on just _parent_store, but even the RCTE
can be expensive when executed on millions of records (at least when
it has to set all the parent_path) and while it could allow inserting
a bunch of records when calling -u to generate their parent_paths, it
feels like the caller could and would do so manually as they might
have shuffled the tree and need to update more than just the records
for which parent_path is null.
closesodoo/odoo#33034
Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
This commit merges the following models
* account.invoice and account.move
* account.invoice.line and account.move.line
* account.voucher and account.move
* account.voucher.line and account.move.line
It was the opportunity for a big cleanup of the code, so it also restructures the whole account module, its different models/fields, the tests etc. for a better world and a better code readability.
==== Rationale ====
The rationale of this huge change is that we want journal entries / invoices to be easily edited, and changes reflected in the other model. It's a HUGE feature and very strategic for the fiduciary companies. For example, changing the account of a journal entry needs to be automatically reflected on the related invoice.
The same reasoning applies to sale/purchase vouchers.
==== Changes made in features =====
When creating an invoice, you are now creating a journal entry directly.
--> The object account.invoice no longer exists.
In the same fashion when creating an invoice line, you're now adding journal items directly in the journal entry representing the invoice. If this invoice line has some tax, it may create additional journal items as well.
--> The models account.invoice.line & account.invoice.tax no longer exist
Identically, when creating a sale/purchase receipt with its lines, you are now creating a journal entry directly and there's no more usability difference between encoding a receipt or an invoice.
--> The object account.voucher no longer exists.
--> The object account.voucher.line no longer exists.
--> The whole account_voucher module no longer exists.
Positive side-effects coming from these changes are
* draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipts now create a draft accounting entry. Validate these objects now simply post its journal entry. That means that draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipt can straightforwardly be included in reporting or budgets.
* opening a journal entry in form view will now always open the correct view: if it's a sale/purchase journal entry we will have a customer invoice/vendor bill view or a sale/purchase receipt view, whatever the menu we're coming from.
* code & business logic simplification. It is also condensed in a single place instead of being partially duplicated on invoices, vouchers and journal entries.
There should be no feature loss, except the one allowing to group multiple journal items together based on the same product during the invoice validation.
==== Changes made in models =====
* account.invoice: model removed. Instead, now use account.move with following mapping
field (account.invoice) field (account.move)
----------------------- --------------------
name invoice_payment_ref
number name
reference ref
comment narration
user_id invoice_user_id
amount_ total_company_signed amount_total_signed
residual amount_residual
state state + invoice_payment_state /!\ selection changed
date_invoice invoice_date
date_due invoice_date_due
sent invoice_sent
origin invoice_origin
payment_term_id invoice_payment_term_id
partner_bank_id invoice_partner_bank_id
incoterm_id invoice_incoterm_id
vendor_bill_id invoice_vendor_bill_id
source_email invoice_source_email
vendor_display_name invoice_vendor_display_name
invoice_icon invoice_vendor_icon
cash_rounding_id invoice_cash_rounding_id
sequence_number_next invoice_sequence_number_next
sequence_number_next_prefix invoice_sequence_number_next_prefix
'invoices' subset of account.move can be accessed by using the selection field 'type' or one of the many helpers like is_invoice()
* account.move: now has a valid state 'cancel' that has to be excluded from all business logic
* account.move: field 'amount' renamed into 'amount_total'
* account.move: field 'reverse_entry_id' renamed into 'reversed_entry_id'
* account.move.line: now has a field 'display_type' that has to be excluded from all business logic, in order to support invoice layouting
* account.invoice.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping
field (account.invoice.line) field (account.move.line)
---------------------------- -------------------------
invoice_id move_id
uom_id product_uom_id
invoice_line_tax_ids tax_ids
account_analytic_id analytic_account_id
'invoice lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the boolean field 'exclude_from_invoice_tab'
* account.invoice.tax: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping
field (account.invoice.tax) field (account.move.line)
--------------------------- -------------------------
invoice_id move_id
account_analytic_id analytic_account_id
amount price_unit
base tax_base_amount
'tax lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the relational field 'tax_line_id'
* account.invoice.confirm: model removed. Instead, now use the 'post()' function of account.move
* account.invoice.refund: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.reversal to reverse the entries with the same options as we had for invoices
* account.voucher: model removed. Instead, now use account.move of type in ['out_receipt', 'in_receipt]
* account.voucher.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line
==== Changes made in functions ====
* on account.move, method _run_post_draft_to_post() renamed into _autopost_draft_entries()
* on account.move, method action_account_invoice_payment() renamed into action_invoice_register_payment()
* on account.move, method action_invoice_reconcile_to_check() renamed into action_open_matching_suspense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_domain_edition_mode_available() renamed into _get_domain_matching_supsense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_intrastat_country_id() renamed into _get_invoice_intrastat_country_id()
* on account.move.line, method _get_domain_for_edition_mode() renamed into _get_suspense_moves_domain()
* in account.bank.statement, contextual key 'edition_mode' renamed into 'suspense_moves_mode'
Was task 1917430
Raphael Collet