especially to alter the behavior of a standard function to make it
behave like a function that is already available (defined in our
extension of jQuery).
The pricelist `list0` is name 'Public Pricelist' and is already present in the
product.pot file.
USD is the renamed name after installing website_sale
Closes#23686
Have a model with a m2m (field A)
this m2m has also a m2m (and displayed as m2m tags in the view) (field AA)
Have a domain on field A, to trigger the search view selection
Click on add an item
Select everything in the modal, making sure that there is more than 40 records
Click on Select
Before this commit:
There was a traceback indicating the local data did not contain records >= 40
This was because the internal data repository was constrained by a limit
After this commit:
We adapt the limit of the local data repository and there is not traceback
OPW 1823400
When a field has a domain like `"[('foo', '=', bar)]"` and is in a view, check
that `bar` is in the view as well. Note that the check should only occurs in
editable views (form or editable list) and when the field itself is editable.
OPW 1820269
- Create a Product A with attribute color and attribute values white and
black.
- Create 3 products (Components 1, 2 and 3)
- Create a BOM for A like:
Component 1, Variant column is empty
Component 2, Variant white
Component 3, Variant black
- Go to Inventory > Master Data > Product Variants, and open one of the
2 variants of Product A
The BOM count is zero, while it should be 1.
The current implementation of `bom_count` doesn't take into account
attributes that can be set on the BOM line.
opw-1814973
The 'Cost' price should be displayed in the main form view of
`product.product`, not only the simplified view.
The reason is that the field `product_variant_count` has the same value
for the product and the template, therefore it cannot be used to make
the distinction between the two models.
To do so, we need to reintroduce the `is_product_variant` field to make
the distinction between `product.product` and `product.template`.
opw-1814973
Before this commit, a user that ccick 'Customize' on th eproduct page
see the 'List View of Variants' aven if option 'Variants' in settings
was disabled.
Now we hide this view if the group for variants is not enabled in the settings.
This commit closes#23398
That means that a user that enable the view while the variants was enable,
need to disable the view before disable the variants.
Purpose
=======
Currently both 'Married' and 'Legal Cohabitant' are considered as the same thing.
We should separate these 2 marital status to have a more accurate information.
- Switch to mobile view
- Go to Inventory > Delivery Orders > Create
- Add an item, save & close
- Save the picking
Error: impossible to save because a mandatory field is not set.
The kanban view used in mobile should not contain the `date` field,
which is not included in the view `view_move_picking_form`. Otherwise, a
`date: false` value is sent to the server.
opw-1816837
When the view 'List view of variants' is enabled from the customize menu,
wishlist was broken and return traceback because product_id was null
This commit closes#23395
Before this commit, when you was comparing several products (/shop/compare?products=x,y,z)
when you had clicked on 'delete product y' from the top, that was comparing x and z; but
your compare queue continue to be x,y,z.
Now we delete from the compare queue the product y.
This commit closes#23532
When setting a chart of account on a company, we have default taxes from
the default chart of account different from chosen one.
But if a chart of account is chosen, it should override them in the
onchange_chart_template_id function. This works as expected for a
truthy complete_tax_set chart of account template, but not for a falsy
complete_tax_set chart of account template.
The complete_tax_set indicates that we don't want to set default taxes
and the user should do it or modify the given tax rates himself.
opw-1824751
closes#23655
- Create a customer, set an address
- Create an opportunity from the kanban view
The address fields are not filled in in the opportunity.
We add all fields filled in by `_onchange_partner_id_values`
Complement of commit e2bbee6df5
opw-1816438
When we discard an element, we want to make sure that the new state is
not corrupted by previous user operations. In our case, we possibly had
a limit and an offset values modified by the user.
This could lead to unpleasant situations, with incorrect data displayed
on the form view.
Note that this actually fixes a new bug introduced by commit
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/e7fab234201e357da52c3576ad2e8fc9ceee9359
(this is the commit that introduces the tempLimitIncrement attribute)
The issue here is quite simple. If we are editing a multipage one2many
field, then we click on the pager, we need to properly unselect the
current row.
If we do not do that, then we can enter invalid data. For example,
assume that there is a readonly field. We click on add, it creates a
(virtual) record with no value for that field. When we click on the
pager, we select the next page, and bypass all validation.
When we are in the process of adding a record, we do not want to update
the pager count. The reason is that if the user is at the limit (so,
1-40/40, no pager visible), then click on add, there will be a pager
shown with 1-40/41. Now, imagine that the record currently being added
as a required field, and the user clicks on the pager. In that case, we
need to discard the newly added record (bringing the total back to 40),
then move to next page, which does not exist anymore.
So, to fix this issue, we simply consider that a record being added
does not count, from the point of view of the pager.
When making a payment with authorize.net by clicking on "Pay Now" in the shop, it was
possible to send several transactions for the same SO because the button "Pay Now"
was enabled before being redirected.
opw:1819588
- Create a product with 3 variants
- Put a picture on the template, then on all variants but the first one
(the one with computed for field `product_variant_id`)
- Check "Multi image" setting in website config
In the product page of the eCommerce, the carousel is not displayed.
This is because the template only checks if the first variant has an
image in order to display the carousel. It should check all variants.
opw-1823242
On the product_normal_form_view
to be consistent with the product_variant_easy_edit_view view.
product.attribute.value values should not be modified from the product view but
using the variant configuration from the product
Consistent with what was wanted at a4d88c9efdCloses#23298
Before this commit, linking was enable for pivot view of model sale.report.
User that click on a cell will be redirected on a default view list/form
with all fields.
Now linking is disabled.
If you want to open the sale order on click, you need to start with the
pivot view from model sale.order.
This commit closes#23445
Purpose of this commit is to explain with more details how to write commit
messages. Content of the Git section is also updated with last decisions
and conventions.
60c920d4a should solve duplication of chatter when editing the website.
But portal module doesn't depends on website, so eg. on a instance with
just helpdesk (and no website) we would not see the chatter on the
frontend.
This fix reverts 60c920d4a and adds another solution not depending on
website.
opw-1813792
closes#23614
Steps to reproduce the bug:
-Just purchase a simple product using Authorize.net
-Click on "Pay Now" to be redirected to Authorize.net gateway
Bug: The company field added during checkout page was not filled.
opw:1817597
On an editable line with a many2one
Click to create a record
Click on create a record in the many2one
It opens the form view of the object in a modal, which has a many2many list, which choices are domainized
Click 'add an item' on this list
It should open a modal with the filtered choices
Click on any of the existing record
Before this commit:
There was a traceback in JS
That was because the event bubbled up to a parent, when it shouldn't
After this commit:
The whole flow unfolds without errors
OPW 1823205
Before this rev., this attribute was ignored for groups containing
sub groups.
Task 1786309
Closes#23514
Co-authored-by: Mohammed Shekha <msh@openerp.com>
This rev. increases the wait interval of the redirect handler
called when a document is clicked in a mail thread (e.g. in the
'Inbox' in Discuss). This increases the protection against
double-clicks (preventing the document from being opened twice,
thus making twice the required RPCs, and from appearing twice in
the breadcrumbs).
A more robust solution (at the ActionManager level) will be
developed for saas-11.2 (where the ActionManager has been
refactored and is testable).
When the bottom left and right areas were taking to much space, the
right one overflowed the kanban card, because those two areas
weren't allowed to shrink. This might occur for example on the
sale.order view.
This rev. improves the layout of the inner kanban view for
operators in livechat channels, mainly by setting a max-width on
their avatar (with classname 'o_kanban_image').
The motivation of this commit comes from a feedback following an
internal migration.
On the website when selling a ticket, a percentage discount may be
applied on the ticket price.
This percentage is calculated as:
{event product price} - {event product price reduced} / {event product price}
So with a ticket price 20, a linked product priced 60 reduced to 30, we
would get a ticket price 10 on the website.
This commit hide the discounted price if the pricelist that is applied
was configured as "Discount included in the price".
opw-1807889
closes#23611
Before this commit, changing the value of a many2one field on the
frontend was not possible anymore since 11.0 because the RPC 'order'
parameter was not properly formatted with the new conventions.
See task-1767802
Closes https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/23545
Before this commit:
* Activate debug mode.
* Go to general settings > Document Template.
* Change the Template selection to the empty value.
* Click on "Edit Header".
Result: Traceback.
This happens because we try to concatenate the value of the template
field to a string, and since it's empty (False) boolean and str can't be
implicitly concatenated, this of course raises an uncaught error.
After this commit:
* We check if a template has been selected before performing the
concatenation.
Closes#22736Fixes#22622
Before this commit:
* Install any module that creates a SQL view and another that extends
this view.
e.g.: sale and pos_sale for `report.all.channels.sales`.
* Uninstall the module that extended the SQL view.
e.g.: uninstall pos_sale.
* Try to access the view from the web client -> Traceback, table not
found.
This happens because when reloading the registry, postgres drops the sql
view and it must be re-initialized.
After this commit:
We solve this issue by calculating all missing tables/views during the
uninstallation process, and re-initializing all of them right before
reloading the registry.
Also remove sql-view hacks in the modules `sale` and `sale_margin`.
Fixes#23528, #23529, #23530
Aaron Bohy