Improve performance (*3) on _compute_product_availability
`mapped` makes use of orm prefetch, which is inefficient in this use
case when facing high volume.
closesodoo/odoo#30545
On some devices and chromium with printing option "Background graphics",
a printed receipt on the point of sale could have a black bottom below
the receipt content.
This is caused by the point of sale black background and happen rarely
because most frequently browser printing remove backgrounds.
opw-1940434
Co-authored-by: Romeo Fragomeli <rfr@odoo.com>
closes#31472
Before this commit, doing expression.OR() with only FALSE_LEAF would
yield [] which is equivalent to TRUE_LEAF and is therefore not correct.
The same happened (to a lesser extent) with expression.AND() within an
expression.OR(), since the former would return a [] which would be
ignored by expression.OR().
See tests for a clearer view of the use cases.
Fixes#30113, #26540closesodoo/odoo#31202
The admin can decide to publish/unpublish messages in the comments
of a product from the website. The button is also shown for notes
even if they are never published.
opw-1935337
closesodoo/odoo#31420
When importing an invoice without specifying the type, the invoice type
is set to `out_invoice`, but the account set is the supplier account.
At this point, the invoice type is simply undefined (`False`). It will
be set by default at creation to `out_invoice`. Therefore, we reach the
`else` condition which uses the supplier info.
We simply inverse the condition, so it creates a consistent object.
However, it raises a bigger question about how the action context should
be kept at invoice. We won't address it :-)
opw-1925547
closesodoo/odoo#30154closesodoo/odoo#31373
- Switch to French language
- Go to Inventory > Inventory Adjustment
- Launch an adjustment
The field 'Real Quantity' doesn't follow the float formatting.
This is because the widget is set as `field_float_scannable`, which is
not recognized by the formatting function.
Since the widget descriptor has priority over the type descriptor, we
must explicitly take this widget into account, on top of adding the
`format_value` method.
opw-1940884
closesodoo/odoo#31366
- When changing the user of a `hr.employee` record, access rights errors
could be triggered.
Those errors are triggered when a record (for example a leave) is
linked to this employee and the current user has limited write
accesses by record rules on this record.
closesodoo/odoo#31032
- Go to Inventory > Reports > Inventory Valuation
- Select the pivot view
The top row (containing the Total) has an empty 'Inventory Value'.
This is because there is no domain on the line, so it is skipped.
We fall back on the global domain instead.
opw-1933191
closesodoo/odoo#31280
On IE11, in 10.0 up to master in some instance when creating a record
under some conditions the dropdown may be automatically opened and need
to be closed.
This has been pinpointed to 90c1af1151 so it seem that a combination of
fields/code/autocomplete and changing the placeholder at one time causes
the issue.
Since IE11 lie and say it is mozilla 11.0 we just apply the 90c1af1151
when the browser is chrome (we did no did this at first to have the same
behavior accross browsers).
note: there is an opened bug in chromium https://crbug.com/928305 if
solved the hack could be removed completely.
opw-1940592
closes#31271
Before this patch, any exception raised by a constraint method that
were not of type `ValidationError` were hard to debug, because the
origin line was never logged.
Explicitly logging the error (with traceback) when we catch it
ensures proper contextual info, even in the absence of exception
chaining.
closesodoo/odoo#28612
In Odoo, create a user John@example.com (the cap is on purpose)
In Google Calendar, create an event and invite john@example.com
Sync your Google calendar.
Before this revision,
the event created in Odoo did not add John@example.com,
but created a new attendee, john@example.com, because
of the sensitive casing.
Besides, give the priority to partners having
users, so if there are two partners with the same email,
one of them having a user,
e.g. John@example.com (with user) & john@example.com (without user),
set the partner having the user as attendee,
as its the one with the user who use the Odoo calendar,
and potentially the Google sync as well.
opw-1925592
closesodoo/odoo#31111
Before this, groups on non-stored inverse fields were not checked upon write.
The impact on existing fields is pretty small, since the inverse methods of
those fields are subject to access rights on the records they use.
closesodoo/odoo#30356
This is the first step to a more comprehensive handling of company-dependent
fields which are ir_properties.
With model-specific access rights, users should be able to read/update a
company-dependent field no matter their access rights on ir_property.
Before this commit, a user having access to res.partner, but not to ir.property
couldn't write on property_account_receivable/payable just because he couldn't
write the corresponding ir.property. After this commit, he can.
OPW 1923345
When an inline editor is eg. in a form view, the focus is always stolen
by it.
This is because we trigger a mouseup on the editor to update its
toolbars values and informations.
note: backport of 11.0's 7a453b0b7a
In 10.0 this trigger could cause a "blur" which in some instance is not
wanted (eg. inside a newline of a list view).
opw-1906581
closes#31078
The html widget automatically replace an empty field value by
`<p><br></p>` to be able to add content.
But this may cause unintended "onchange", since the value has "changed"
and the onchange themself could cause error when triggered at the wrong
time (eg. inside a list view with required fields).
With this changeset, the onchange is averted when the value was false
and is now `<p><br></p>`.
opw-1906581
closes#31078
Revert commit 296c5a2106
which was half-right: the accounting logic is correct but it overlooked
that it broke the reconciliation of cash returns
i.e. the client gives more money, and you return the change
Given that this latter use case may occur more frequently we focus on that
while we break freight returns
i.e. the client returns a product, and you give the money back
It is not possible to support both use cases because
ultimately we don't know from which order an account.move.line comes
the related PR #23356 should support both use cases
but adds a field on account.move.line
OPW 1925607
closesodoo/odoo#31037
This commits adds a message to the module import wizard to make it more
clear what kind of modules can be imported through the front end.
project : RD feedback
task : [base_import_module] what it is not for.
opw-1939967
closesodoo/odoo#31057
Calling `search` on `product.product` without specifying an order
will sort the products by name.
As the product name is a translatable field,
it requires to make a join on the translation table to sort
the product by their translated name.
This join is costly, and in this case it was completely
irelevant to do it, as the goal was simply to compute
a domain with only a list of product ids, for which
the order simply did not matter.
By forcing the order on the id,
we avoid the sort on the product name,
and therefore the join on the translation.
The performance is therefore improved.
opw-1930010
closesodoo/odoo#31066
Force the location and destination location's company to match with the
picking and picking type company. This is to prevent users to move
products between companies without using a transit location, since stock
valuation is not supported.
The record rule `stock_location_comp_rule` gives access to children
companies. The domain added in the view is more restrictive, and allows,
for a company A, transfers from locations:
Company A -> Company A
Company A -> No Company
No Company -> Company A
opw-1893276
closesodoo/odoo#30952
When dropping a snippet into a page, it is dropped in the drop-zone
which is the nearest of the user cursor. When moving a snippet, that
condition did not apply and the user was required to put the cursor at
the exact location of the drop-zone.
Also, for both drag and drop features, the drop zones which appeared
were not displayed correctly for full width columns, which made dropping
sometimes impossible when multiple col-*-12 were below each other.
task-1937758
closesodoo/odoo#30899
If fleet.vehicle_state_active is not found in the system then the method
will raise an error, hence it won't allow creating any fleet.vehicle
closesodoo/odoo#30925
- Create a product and set a contact as the vendor (for instance, Arthur
Gomez from Asustek in the runbot)
- Set a specific name and code for the supplier
- Create a RFQ for this vendor (Arthur Gomez - the contact person)
- Add the product, confirm the RFQ
On the product, the company (Asustek) is automatically added as vendor,
but there is no vendor name and code.
opw-1929745
closesodoo/odoo#30891
- Activate:
'Track lots or serial numbers'
'Manage several Warehouses, each one composed by several stock locations'
'Advanced routing of products using rules'
- In the main warehouse, activate Pick + Ship
- In Stock Locations, create 'WH/Stock/Shelf 3' and 'WH/Stock/Shelf 4'
(1 and 2 already exist, use the same config)
- Create a new product 'Foo', activate Tracking By Lots
- On Foo, use 4 times the "Update Qty on Hand" (order is important):
Add 1 on Shelf 2, create a lot
Add 1 on Shelf 1, use the same lot
Add 3 on Shelf 4, use the same lot
Add 1 on Shelf 3, use the same lot
- Create a SO, set a partner
- Ensure that YourCompany is used as warehouse
- Add several SO lines (order is important)
a line with 1 product Foo
a second line with 1 product Foo
a third line with 4 products Foo
- Confirm the SO, you now have 2 deliveries, 1 Pick, 1 Out
- Open the Pick, all moves should be available, you should have:
4 operations:
Shelf 2, quantity 1
Shelf 4, quantity 3
Shelf 1, quantity 1
Shelf 3, quantity 1
3 moves:
A, quantity 1
B, quantity 1
C, quantity 4
- On each operation, select the lot created before and set the quantity
to be fully done
- Validate the Pick
The moves end up like this:
- Move A with qty 1: is done and linked with a quant of 1
- Move B with qty 1: is done and linked with no quant
- Move C with qty 4: is done and linked with a quant of 1, a quant of 3,
a quant of 1 (sum is 5)
In the Out picking, the move linked with the source move (B) with no
quant stays in "Waiting another move" even if the source move is done.
This outgoing move will never be available.
In the method `recompute_remaining_qty`, we loop on operations, and
match them wih the moves. However, the operation with the largest
quantity (Shelf 4, quantity 3) is processed before the move with the
highest quantity (C, quantity 4). Therefore, when we later loop on move
C, `qty_assign_cmp` is larger than zero, which sets `need_rereserve` and
ultimately triggers `rereserve_quants` in `do_transfer`.
A first part of the fix is to check for the location of the quants when
matching moves and operations. This fixes the original issue, but
inconsistencies can still arise since a quant which is taken partially.
therefore, we make sure to never take more than the quantity on the
link.
opw-1932624
closesodoo/odoo#30857
- Set a cost of 12.34 for product P
- Create manually a new analytic entry
- Choose product P
- Set desired quantity
The analytic amount is set to 12.00.
This is because `move_id` is empty, therefore `currency_id` is empty as
well and `decimal_places` is zero
opw-1924184
closesodoo/odoo#30869
Before this commit, the customer is allowed to change picking type after the
stock.picking record is moved from draft.
But it doesn't make the changes in the stock moves and operations as the
procurements are already created for initial demand.
To avoid confusing the user, it can now only be modified in draft state.
Authored by SodexisTeam
opw 1848252
opw-1934814
closesodoo/odoo#30865
- Create a product P with:
Costing Method Average Price
Inventory Valuation Perpetual (automated)
- Create a component C with, costing 10.
- Create a BOM for P:
1 Unit of C
- Create a MO for P, validate
=> a journal entry of 10 is created
- Modify the BOM for P:
2 Units of C
- Create a MO for P, validate
=> a journal entry of 15 is created
The journal entry should be 20.
opw-1928342
closesodoo/odoo#30766
Before that, having a payment with amount_residual=0, but amount_residual_currency!=0 did not display it.
Also, 'outstanding credits/debits' label was displayed in case amount_residual was != 0 with an amount_currency=0 (and of course, a currency_id value was set on the aml). This could for example happen in case of partial reconciliation, were the amount_residual field is used to keep track of what will have to be written in the exchange rate difference entry when the reconciliation becomes full.
closesodoo/odoo#30362
This commit simplifies the code and improves the performance
of _compute_sale_order_count.
execution time from O(n^2) to pretty close to O(n)
Project : Performance Issues
Task : Geostaff : Success Pack 5 (100h) (opw-1912303)
With https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/ac8b0fcfc5299b5ea62543b8382cb419fed4868e,
the 'country_events' class was renamed to 'oe_country_events'. This was
done correctly for JS animations and snippets but not for the 'Country
Events' option in the customize menu. This made the option useless.
This commit solves the problem by supporting the two classes (as it
is a stable fix).
closesodoo/odoo#30662
In a pos session:
OFFLINE
make an order with invoicing , try to validate
The order stays there because it needs to be validated by the server
make another non invoiced order, validate
ONLINE
make another order
At validation, all orders will be pushed to the server
Before this commit, when trying to validate the invoiced order
the report download couldn't find the order id, and crashed
This was because the order in question was already pushed
but treated as a non invoiced order
After this commit, an "warning" message is displayed to the customer
saying he/she has to print the invoice from the backend.
In most cases it is enough and acceptable, since a customer would actually leave the premises
and come back later for the invoice
It is also safer in terms of data consistency to keep pushing all orders once the connection is back
OPW 1918044
closesodoo/odoo#30485
Before this commit, the web client had a naive strategy to handle lost
connections: it tried to poll the server every 2 seconds until a rpc
succeeds.
This works quite well from the perspective of the user, but may be a problem
from the perspective of the server. If a server is down for a longish period,
then each users active tabs will then perform a request every 2 seconds. This
means that the server will be progressively hammered by many requests, which
will clutter the logs, and make it more difficult to gracefully recover.
With this commit, we simply exponentially increase the delay each time, and add
a little jitter to give a better distribution.
Cherry-pick of 4a3f04bcc5closesodoo/odoo#30136closesodoo/odoo#30596
Have a tax that has a different account for refunds
make an invoice and its refund
Before this commit, the refund's tax is still in the old account
After this commit, the refund's tax is in the account for refund defined on the tax
OPW 1907950
closesodoo/odoo#30325
In case the discount product is misconfigured and therefore not loaded
by the POS, a traceback appears when applying a discount.
Add a comprehensive error message instead.
Closes#30574
opw-817527
closesodoo/odoo#30582
Task #1930691
Purpose
=======
If the download security is set to 'Authenticated users', the route should prevent public users
from downloading the slides.
closes#30281closesodoo/odoo#30399
Before this commit, the menu to go into the backend from the website was
not possible to open on iOS without opening the right menu first. This
was because position: fixed is not able to counter overflow: hidden in
iOS. This is the fix for stable versions, the proper solution will be
done in master.
Closes https://github.com/odoo/odoo/issues/29390
task-1923151
closesodoo/odoo#30507
Previous to this commit, if one were to create an ir.model.field with a
poorly constructed domain (read: SyntaxError), the server would properly
send an error message stating that an Error occurred, however this would
be too late as the registry with the bad code would have already been
reloaded, this meant that the registry would be left in an unstable
state (read: crashed).
With this commit, a constraint on the domain is added so that we confirm
that the code in the domain field is properly constructed, thus no need
to reload the registry and therefore no crash.
closesodoo/odoo#30157
For editing many2one fields (and partially many2many) most widget show
an autocompleting list of targeted records.
They thus have `autocomplete="off"` to prevent browser completion.
But chromium has an history of breaking `autocomplete="off"`, see:
- https://caniuse.com/#search=autocomplete
- https://crbug.com/468153
- https://crbug.com/587466
- https://crbug.com/914451
- https://crbug.com/923895
It seems that since chromium 71, the heuristic to ignore
`autocomplete="off"` has become more aggressive and for example if there
is at least 3 fields like an address in a page, chromium will ignore
`autocomplete="off"` for the fields like an address.
So for example the eidting the many2One field with placeholder "Country"
in a contact page now has a browser autocomplete menu that is:
- hidding the many2one autocomplete
- going to save empty country it appeared visually filled if the
autocomplete result was selected.
With this changeset, the placeholder in the many2one instance is
interspersed with U+FEFF charcters (ZERO WIDTH NO-BREAK SPACE) so the
browser does enable the autocomplete feature by force.
This should thus remove the issue (until it is fixed by chromium) in the
case of field named "Country" or matching other regexes in this file:
https://github.com/chromium/chromium/blob/cdb1b2073f12/components/autofill/core/common/autofill_regex_constants.cc
U+FEFF has been chosen instead of more recommended characters because
other have been shown erroneous for printing in some windows
configuration (see cb2a3afa7).
10.0 version of #30439
opw-1930588
closes#30439closes#30449
Some views have the primary mode while having an inherit_id view
In such views, if the user wants to change the inherit_id,
the mode must remain primary.
The use case behind this is a user who want to change
the inherit_id view of the view
product.product.form (product.product_normal_form_view)
to another view.
This view is in primary mode while having an inherit_id
(product.product_template_form_view).
In such a case, the primary mode must remain,
otherwise the view will no longer be opened by default
when opening a product.
Indeed, when searching the default form view of a model,
it only searches for primary mode views for this model.
The `all` is there because this is an `api.multi` method.
We could consider adding a `self.ensure_one`,
but it breaks the API if someones calls this method with multiple records.
This is likely to happen, as this method is used
in `write` which is likely to be called with multiple records.
In my opinion, in master, this should be replaced by an
onchange so the user can see the change of mode
when he adds or remove an inherit_id for a view.
opw-1916324
closesodoo/odoo#30241
Laurent Mignon (ACSONE)