* portal
The user can now choose the font-size of its header menu items through
the customize dialog.
PR https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/29624
task-1904244
Options and option sets can declare a data-depends attribute to specify
which options need to be enabled for them to be displayed. With this
commit, we allow specifying which options need to be *disabled* for the
same purpose (we can now do that by prefixing the options IDs with '!').
PR https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/29624
task-1904244
* web_editor
This commit's goal is to optimize the delay to make a scss customization
thanks to the website customize dialog. Before this commit, the JS code
took advantage of existing web_editor routes but this was far from
efficient as this was done:
1) PY: Load all scss files used in the page
2) JS: Find the one we want to customize and adapt the scss content
3) PY: Create the scss customization with the new content
(So two RPC (including one very slow) and content building in
javascript)
After this commit, this is done:
1) PY: Load the scss file being customized, adapt its content according
to the new values and save the customization
(So the whole logic is in python, requiring only one small RPC)
This commit also take the opportunity to review the web_editor ace
editor loading code (the logic is shared with website customizations).
PR https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/29624
task-1904244
Next commit will change that file to make it extend a web_editor model
instead of a web_editor controller. This commit only moves the file.
PR https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/29624
task-1904244
* portal, web
This commit introduces the first of many-to-come non-color website user
values: the logo height. Now, the user can choose it in the customize
dialog.
PR https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/29624
task-1904244
Before this commit, in the theme customize modal, only lists were able
to be visible under the condition of a subset of options being enabled.
Now options can too.
PR https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/29624
task-1904244
Before this commit, the loading was shown during colorpicker choice or
body image choice too, which makes no sense. This commit also make a new
loading visual which is less intrusive and flicker less.
PR https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/29624
task-1904244
Before this commit, color options in the theme customize were treated
as big exception in the system. The whole color panel XML was defined
client-side and used custom design. Now, all colors are defined as
options in the "server-side" template, allowing for more customizations
and better maintenance.
This commit also makes the color saving system generic to allow for more
new options in the future (like customizing the logo height or the font
size, which is the next task).
PR https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/29624
task-1904244
Move the 'Show Logo', 'Show Sign In' and 'Fixed Top Menu' options from
the customize menu to the customize theme dialog using new features
introduced with https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/29624
The customize menu divider is also only added if there are toggable
options in there (which is not the case anymore for all pages since
this commit).
PR https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/29624
task-1904244
- Make the controller part more readable and more efficient (O(1) ORM
operations instead of O(n)) and remove deprecated code.
- Add the possibility to have a toggle standalone option. This is
used as soon as an `<opt/>` is alone in its container (note that now,
the container can be any tag and will be ignored during rendering).
- If an option has no specified 'string' to attach to it, the name of
the first view it toggles will be used.
PR https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/29624
task-1904244
When the edit mode is entered, some elements receive
data-editor-message attributes. These were not removed on save which
could in some cases make the attributes be saved in the database. For
this to happen it would require an `.oe_structure.oe_empty` element to
be put *inside* an editable element (instead of being the one which is
editable). In that case the `.oe_structure` content would be saved in an
inheriting view but the parent view would also be COW'd for no reason
because of that attribute.
Difficult to say if such a case exist in the current views but as it
technically possible and that some of our tests use that configuration,
it is worth fixing.
Note: this fix was in fact done in the new editor in master and allowed
to detect that one of our test was not testing a feature correctly
because of that. This will be adapted in a different commit of this PR.
closesodoo/odoo#30834
Commit https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/29075a8e2c734624cec4f6009185616634f70dea
was written while there was an incorrect behavior related to
multi-website, oe_structure_ID and edit mode in a rare specific case
(see the second commit from this PR for detailed explanation
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/30834).
That rare case was detected in 12.0 since the tour did not work on
master with the new editor (that fixed the incorrect behavior).
Basically, it was COWing the edited view even if only an oe_structure_ID
was touched.
Indeed, when saving a specific view in the HTML editor, we should also
search for its possible new ID as it could change if we also edited its
generic parent. In that case, the view will be copied and then unlinked
to preserve inherit order on the new specific tree.
Before this commit, if the first website in the select was not in your current
company, it raises a traceback.
Now with filter on your own company, and support empty website selected
removing required on related field and using attrs dynamic to make it required
closesodoo/odoo#30769
Every new page was being considered an empty homepage with "Welcome to
your Homepage! Let's start designing." shown. Now only an empty homepage
shows that message.
closesodoo/odoo#30839
* web_editor
Currently, when an user wants to edit the css of its website, he has
access to lots of files and, in debug mode, to even more files. While
the feature is nice for people who know what they are doing, a lambda
person can easily break its website by changing the wrong files. Also,
nothing warns the user that the files that are edited will never receive
updates anymore (unless if they are reset). The goal is to prevent
those behavior while still allowing the add custom css. Another goal
is to be able to *add* custom javascript.
Custom files created for the user:
SCSS: user_custom_rules.scss, user_custom_bootstrap_overridden.scss
JS: user_custom_javascript.js
See https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/29999
task-1919350
* website_forum, website_gengo, website_mail_channel, website_sale
Retrieving the global context is now the root's job, this will prevent
problems when trying to extend the values the context has.
See upcoming improvements with https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/29442closesodoo/odoo#30816
Following the new editor's merge at https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/29775,
'web_editor.BodyManager' stopped being used by the editor and the
related file was moved to website without being renamed or considered.
Hopefully, the editor replaced it by something else so the `BodyManager`
makes no sense on its own anymore. This commit merges its features
with the only other component which still used it: `WebsiteRoot`
See upcoming improvements at https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/29442
(related to task-1932066)
closesodoo/odoo#30740
Before this commit, clicking "Edit in backend" from the website could randomly
lead to the backend under another menu or without module, depending on the
other modules that are installed or version com/ent used.
After this commit, it will always open the backend under the specifiec menu
or website menu if not defined.
+ uses existing website dedicated action for product.template in 'Edit backend'
task-1919436
closes#30555
Co-authored by seb@odoo.comclosesodoo/odoo#30657
Before this commit, if you installed website in community you was not able to
install web_enterprise, because the web.login_layout was replaced (by hinerit)
by website and break the xpath from enterprise login.
Now we apply the Enterprise login xpath before that website replace it.
Before this commit:
1. If we were editing a template with no xml_id, typically the case when
editing a specific view (COW'd), the 'Template ID' label would be left empty
as the view does not have an xml_id but only a key.
2. If we were editing a generic view, the template would be COW'd and replaced
by the specific one created during the save.
After the save, the page would be reload and will try to reopen the edited
template (stored in url `res=123`). But as this template would be replaced
by the COW'd view, the JS would crash trying to access an inexisting view.
The HTML editor would then open in a very thin modal, barely editable.
Now:
1. Display the template's key instead of its xml_id. The key is basically a
duplicate of the xml_id, mainly used in website.
2. If we are saving a generic view, we search for its newly created specific
view to upload the URL hash before reloading.
task-1934279
Fix#30447
With the following view hierarchy:
A
|
B' (oe_structure_ID view)
Before this fix, when saving multiple templates at once from the same hierarchy
the COW views (website) would not be saved correctly as the first call to
`write` would COW the parent view, then the second concurent call to `write`
would create the child specific view under the generic parent view.
Instead, the generic parent should have been cloned to a specific parent view
and then the child view should be COW under the specific parent.
A A'
| |
B' B*' (This one is the old B', without B' changes in the html editor)
Instead of
A A'
|
B'
Calling the `write` one after another will do the trick. Indeed, when the
second call is fired, the first call has already triggered the COW behavior.
Thus, the second call correctly retrieves the COW view.
Another issue might still appear, if the parent view write is sent first.
Indeed, the parent view will be COW, thus the specific child view (second write
waiting to be fired) will be deleted to be added on the new specific hierarchy.
Thus, that write will then raise an error since the view does not exist anymore.
task-1934279
Fix#30447
On mobile the frontend menu navbar is an hamburger menu that open on
click.
If the option "Customize > Main layout | Affix Top Menu" is
enabled, there is two menu:
- one at the full top of the page
- one affixed to the top of the viewport (only shown if we are at least
scrolling 300px away from the top of the page)
But there is a side effect: when scrolling if the menu at the top of the
page is opened, it will be automatically closed => this makes sense to
avoid having two menu shown on the same page but is an odd behavior.
With this commit, the behavior is changed and when the menu is opened in
the top, the affixed menu is not shown (it only works if the top page
menu has no opened dropdown).
opw-1920310
closes#30564
Before this commit, if you duplicate a published record on the website,
the copy was already published, while in most of case you need to update
it to adapt to the new content. There doesn't make senses to duplicate the
same content on a website and let the duplicate content.
Task-1930058
Since multi-website, we COW (copy on write) views when editing a view on a
website.
This is causing 2 issues related to module install/update:
1. During a module install, when creating an inherited view, it will create
that view as expected on the generic tree.
But that generic tree may not be used on website(s). Indeed, if the view
was edited, we are now using a copy of the view instead of the original
XML view (with an xml_id).
That copied view won't get the new inherited view in its view tree.
Now, we correctly copy the new view under every specific view tree (if
exists).
2. During a module update, when updating a view, it will only update the view
having the xml_id, so the generic one.
But most of the time, the generic view is not used as it was usually COW'd
and the specific view now replace the generic one.
Now, we also apply the update on the COW'd view. Note that only unmodified
field will be updated, this behavior basically mimic the noupdate behavior
on view's ir.model.data.
Step to reproduce for bug 1:
- Install website_sale module
- Go to a product page and then enter edit mode
- Make a modification to trigger COW, eg edit the information area under the
price "30-day money-back guarantee".
- Now install website_sale_comparison module
- The product page won't have the comparison button as the comparison view
inheriting the product view was created on the generic tree and not copied
on the specific tree (COW'd before the comparison module install).
Step to reproduce for bug 2:
- Repeat first 3 steps of bug 1
- Now make a modification in a view from the XML file in
website_sale_comparison module and update the module
- Only the view with the xml_id is updated, not it's COW'd views. This mean
that only the generic view is updated and not the specific one(s) really
used on the website.
task-1920487
closesodoo/odoo#29956
Before this commit, a generic view tree could be valid but impossible to copy
on a COW specific tree.
This was because when looping through inherit_children_ids to copy them, they
would be sorted by the ir.ui.view sort order (name, priority, id).
Indeed, when applying view inheritance and reading a view arch, children are
sorted by (priority, id).
Thus, if sorting the children by (name, priority, id) was different than
sorting by (priority, id) and the children view would conflict in that new
order, the COW would raise an error "can't find DOM element"
Step to reproduce:
- Create a parent view with just a DIV in arch
- Add a child view that add something inside that DIV
- Add another child view with a name alphabetically lower than the other
child and that replace the DIV by something else, like a SECTION
- Everything works as expected, when reading the parent view arch, the first
child is inserting something into the DIV and then the second is replacing
the DIV
- Now try to trigger the COW on the parent view by writing something on it in
a website context
- It will crash as the child views will be copied in another order, sorted
firstly by name.
- Indeed, when reading parent view, the second child will be copied first as
it's name is lower than the first, it will then replace the DIV by a SPAN.
When trying to copy the other child view that is supposed to insert
something into the DIV, the DIV will not be found and it will crash.
Commit 68e9d5504c makes the redirection type mandatory, which is
logical. Since we can't add such a constraint in stable, we make the
field required in the view and assign a default value (in case the
module is not upgraded, which is very likely to be the case).
opw-1924983
closesodoo/odoo#30252
- Fix the position of 'Add to menu' toggle button in new page dialog
- Properly align tip icon in the welcome message
task-1895287
closesodoo/odoo#29403
Since panel collapse became card collapse while migrating from BS3 to BS4 with
commit 59237ea819, it is impossible to open the card content.
Indeed, there was already data-parent attribut pointing to inexisting DOM
element. This was not an issue in BS3 but BS4 is not working with it.
closesodoo/odoo#30142
In the 'banner' snippet, there is a column using a white jumbotron
component. Those comes with a default background color so when using the
website builder to remove the white background, it did not go away;
it was replaced with the default background color (some gray).
This commit sets the default background color of jumbotron components to
'transparent'.
task-1889341
closesodoo/odoo#30099
`ref` could raise even if raise_if_not_found was False on `viewref`, now we
prevent that, and rely only on the exception on `viewref`.
Also, when not set to raise, the method could return None instead of a recorset.
PR: #29753
Fine-tuning of commit b48d2b6b5e.
The call to unlink inside the unlink can recurse infinitely
in case there is a copy of a menu.
We replace that direct call by an accumulator so no recursion occurs.
opw 1922448closesodoo/odoo#30032
Christophe Simonis