The field pos_employee_ids (pos_hr) links hr employees records to
settings records
but this model isn't readable for Pos Administrators by default.
This commit gives read rights on hr.employee model to settings users,
reusing a confusing existing ACL whose name targeted system users,
whereas the group effectively targeted was the internal users.
Since this rule didn't give any rights, we might as well correctly
replace
it so that the name can match its purpose.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#91909
Settings user is not able to access Bill of Material (mrp.bom) records
unless they have additional groups (account, inventory, manufacturing, ...)
This commit makes sure the operation is done in sudo so that any setting user
is able to save the settings.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#91909
Now that settings views are only loaded for the ones able to see their content,
the field group_cash_rounding might not be present if a pos manager without
account manager rights opens the settings.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#91909
Since #87636, delivery carrier model is referenced in the settings when
website_sale_picking is installed.
Because of that, users with only settings access are not able to
open the settings anymore.
This commit adds read rights on delivery carriers so that base settings
users are able to update settings.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#91909
It seems most accounting tests relied on the fact that the "accountman"
test user has both the user AND manager groups (but previously, the
manager group was given by the implied group relation "Settings" ->
"account manager")
Part-of: odoo/odoo#91909
For bugfix purposes, app administration groups have been given to
(implied by) the "Settings" group because without those rights,
opening/saving the settings crashed.
1) Do not load hidden view content
This commit uses the conditional inheritance of views
(depending on user groups) to avoid loading unnecessary view
& record content client-side.
This improves performance for admins without the specific application
admin rights, but also fixes the main bugfix problem,
caused by the webclient querying name_get for the records in relational
fields content.
Example:
sale_management adds a res.config.settings field to specify
the default sale.order.template for the current company.
If a 'Settings' user without 'sale.group_sale_manager' opens the
settings, he won't see this setting, but if a default template is
specified for the current company, the webclient will still request
the name_get of this template to the server, because the field
was present in the view, only hidden with a groups attribute.
With this commit change in sale, the field won't be in the view unless
you have the Sale manager group, avoiding the error/traceback/bug.
2) Remove implied application administration groups
Do not force the specific application groups on all 'Settings' user,
they globally do not need those rights, and if they need it, they
can add it to their account themselves.
3) Add a test to make sure settings user are able to manage settings.
4) Enforce 'settings' -> 'access rights' -> 'internal user' groups
As the previous test highlighted some 'false positives' because
it considered a settings user unable to read `crm.team`
and `stock.warehouse` records, we also took the opportunity to enforce
the fact that 'Settings' & 'Access rights' users must be internal users.
It makes no sense for a portal/public user to have access to the
settings, and didn't work anyway.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#91909
the div with id auth_signup_documents is specified in the view
`sale.res_config_settings_view_form`, which is not a parent of
`website.res_config_settings_view_form`.
This led to an error during view rendering because of the changes in
the following commit, where the sale settings view is modified to be
only loaded for sale managers.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#91909
Minor usability changes:
* Reorganize menu to be more consistent with other HR apps;
* Tweak several views;
* Don't expire contract when date is set to Today - they will be
automatically expired the next day;
* Show contract name on form view.
closesodoo/odoo#92604
Related: odoo/enterprise#27919
Taskid: 2856135
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
add the compare_list_price to /shop, if there is a compare_list_price and a
price_list price for a product, the fixed_price will be displayed
task-2813257
closesodoo/odoo#90195
Signed-off-by: William Braeckman (wbr) <wbr@odoo.com>
Rework and code cleanup of automatic invoice and auto-confirm order
flows.
task-2541188
closesodoo/odoo#72368
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Method: _find_mail_template()
Before this change, the method returned only the id of the template.
Now, it will return the template, as the method name suggests. Also, it
will simplify the method by avoiding complicated research into XML.
Code imported from #68965 that contained a new feature that was at last
abandoned.
Task-id: 2541188
Part-of: odoo/odoo#72368
Co-authored-by: Demesmaeker <edm@odoo.com>
Updating the scheduled date of a delivery doesn't update the quantity to
order of an orderpoint
To reproduce the issue:
(Need purchase)
1. Create a storable product P with a seller
2. Create and confirm a planned delivery D with 1 x P
3. Open the replenishment page
- There should be a line for P (Forecast: -1, To Order: 1)
4. Edit D and postpone the scheduled date
5. Go back to replenishment page
Error: The line is still present, its forecast qty is correct (0) but
the quantity to order is still 1 (instead of 0)
`qty_to_order` is a stored field, so when loading the replenishment
page, its compute method is not called. Moreover, even though
`qty_to_order` depends on `qty_forecast` and the compute method of
`qty_forecast` is called, it still won't trigger the compute:
when setting the value of `qty_forecast` from its compute method, it
will lead to:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/b54f78de307543efcea934206806f361eaac811a/odoo/fields.py#L1106-L1109
So, as shown and explained, we bypass the `write` of `BaseModel` and
skip the business logic and the recomputations
The compute of `qty_to_order` should actually be triggered earlier: when
we edit the scheduled date (step 4). That's the reason why this commit
adds a dependency to the compute of `qty_forecast`: it makes more sense
and becomes an implicit dependency of `qty_to_order` -> update the
scheduled date will trigger the compute of `qty_to_order`
OPW-2868167
closesodoo/odoo#94400
X-original-commit: 791b68fc02cbc4dc5b376e5fc5d37e725f88d0dc
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
Follow-up of https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/0c30945d364a8b986f0b48db28e42c7b355471e3
Commit above changed the message formatter in python,
so that `attachment_ids` now always return a list of field commands.
This work fine in backend code of discuss, but in public livechat,
it still uses legacy code. The legacy code do not support field
commands, so instead it thinks the command is data of an attachment,
thus showing an "unamed" attachment.
Actually attachments are not supported in livechat. Code had some
handling of attachments just because this was shared with the
backend in the past.
This commit fixes the issues by simply enforcing showing no
attachment in any message in public livechat.
closesodoo/odoo#94394
Signed-off-by: Louis Wicket (wil) <wil@odoo.com>
This commit has as purpose to split the method `_is_add_to_cart_possible`
and put only the first part in another method so it can be overridden.
Issue:
The first part of the method _is_add_to_cart_possible check that the
product is active and can be sold.
The second part check if a combination is possible.
In sale_renting module, only the first part must be overridden since
second part is a common check to all product regardless if it
can or can't be sold or rent
opw-2879711
closesodoo/odoo#94373
X-original-commit: 99dc5a963002e887d5c4a9ad403e171b627d2e8a
Related: odoo/enterprise#28777
Signed-off-by: Nasreddin Boulif (bon) <bon@odoo.com>
1. Activate anglo saxon accounting
2. Create product with automated inventory valuation and standard pricing
3. Set decimal accuracy to 6
4. Set product cost price to 0,01719
5. Create PO for 30.000 items -> price = 0,01782 -> total = 534,6
6. Receive goods -> stock journal entry = 515,7 (based on the cost, ok)
7. Create vendor bill
Price difference is incorrect if you have a tax rate in the vendor bill
`price_unit_val_dif` will be rounded to 0.02
Multiplied by a great quantity the result will be wrong (84.30)
Without using the tax rate the price difference amount is the expected one
This commit partially revert 643d91ef5ebfb29fde142294ced82c470d42c136
to improve the original fix.
opw-2849074
closesodoo/odoo#94346
X-original-commit: 315a18f12f9d67284bbd8b027ca652db17aae9d2
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <las@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Grazioso Andrea (agr) <agr@odoo.com>
This commit duplicates the components Emoji and EmojiList into
other components called "LegacyEmoji" "LegacyEmojiList".
We do this so that we can implement the new EmojiPicker in Discuss
code, without affecting the code of `knowledge` during development.
When the Emoji Picker is in a good state with just the scope of
feature of Discuss, then we can integrate this new Emoji Picker
in other modules, like `knowledge`.
Task-2890268
closesodoo/odoo#94254
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
In picking type, we introduce a new setting ask-always-never setting for
creating backorder. When a backorder is needed, the behaviour will be
different according to this setting:
- ask: popup a wizard to ask if a backorder is needed
- always: generate backorder automatically
- never: no backorder
The main reasoning behind this change is that there are some scenarios
in which operators always create backorders (e.g. by validating the
transfer after scanning a pallet and setting quantities). Hence, always
asking if the user (operator) wants to create a backorder can be confusing.
task-2648993
Part-of: odoo/odoo#83462
When unbuilding a product, the selected source location is not applied
on the SM.
To reproduce the issue:
1. In Settings, enable "Storage Locations"
2. Create two storable products P_compo, P_finished
3. Update the qty of P_compo: 1 in WH/Stock
4. Create a BoM:
- Product: P_finished
- Components: 1 x P_compo
5. Process a manufacturing order MO with 1 x P_finished
6. Transfer the P_finished from WH/Stock to WH/Stock/Shelf 1
7. Create an unbuild order UO:
- Manufacturing Order: MO
- Source Location: WH/Stock/Shelf 1
- Destination Location: WH/Stock/Shelf 2
8. Confirm UO
9. Open the associated product moves
Error: The SML of P_finished is incorrect, its source location is
WH/Stock instead of WH/Stock/Shelf 1 (as a result, the quants are
incorrect too).
The issue only happens with P_finished. The destination of the
components is correctly defined:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/90a87d6ecd420c61ea8db8a6c571db477ee7220e/addons/mrp/models/mrp_unbuild.py#L229
(i.e., we use the destination location of the unbuild order)
OPW-2869454
closesodoo/odoo#94367
X-original-commit: 45ec5871a1ee6e3a31e790323f08df20715f4171
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
When selling a kit with a dropshipped component, the delivered quantity
will be incorrect
To reproduce the issue:
1. Create 3 consumable products P01, P02, P_kit:
- P02:
- Add a seller S
- Enable the dropship route
2. Create a bill of materials:
- Product: P_kit
- Type: Kit
- Components:
- 1 x P01
- 1 x P02
3. Create and confirm a sale order SO with 1 x P_kit
4. Confirm the generated purchase order (with vendor S)
5. Process the two pickings of SO
6. Go back to SO
Error: The delivered quantity of P_kit is 0 instead of 1
When computing the delivered quantity, because the `dropship` flag is
not set, we don't reach the revelant code:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/3db136f19480b31ca3f60a77c0c7354161bedde0/addons/sale_mrp/models/sale_mrp.py#L37-L44
OPW-2870893
closesodoo/odoo#94364
X-original-commit: fff6edad8cfb45b9a622bceefa4b83f620d7fe86
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux (arm) <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
When a MO is generated in order to supply another one, the smart buttons
"Source MO"/"Child MO" are still invisible.
To reproduce the issue:
1. In Settings, enable "Multi-Step Routes"
2. Enable MTO route
3. Edit the warehouse: 3-steps manufacturing
4. Create 3 stored products Super, Sub and Compo:
- Sub has two routes: MTO and Manufacture
5. Create two BoMs:
- For 1 x Super:
- 1 x Sub
- For 1 x Sub:
- 1 x Compo
6. Create and confirm a MO with 1 x Super
Error: On confirmation, a second MO is created to produce one Sub, which
is correct. However, neither the first MO nor the generated one has a
link with the other one (through the smart button "Source MO"/"Child
MO")
When confirming the MO, a SM is created to bring one Sub to the
pre-production location. Thanks to MTO route, this will generate another
SM that brings one Sub from post-production to stock location (this will
lead to the creation of the second MO). However, the other SM (1 x Sub
from Post to Stock) doesn't have the same procurement group. This is the
reason why it is not found by the `_compute` methods.
OPW-2730830
closesodoo/odoo#94334
X-original-commit: 81e5ce05f2f79eb19489f00fb867143189fb38df
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux (arm) <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
- Change some section and column headers to make content clearer based on MO status
- Add in columns/field for in progress MOs for easier tracking of MO status
- Update words to match field names more closely (i.e. Actual Duration, To Consume, etc.)
Task ID - 2688146
closesodoo/odoo#93066
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
Sorting the `stock.quant` by lot_id didn't work correctly
Steps to reproduce:
1. Install Inventory
2. Edit a product tracking to 'By Unique Serial Number' (e.g. Acoustic
Bloc Screens)
3. Go to Inventory > Overview > Receipts, create a receipt for 3
Acoustic Bloc Screens with serial number '05', '01' and '03' and
validate
4. Go to Inventory > Reporting > Inventory Report, remove the
'Group By' filters and sort the entries by Lot/Serial Number
5. The serial numbers are not properly ordered ('01' is between '03'
and '05')
Solution:
Order the `stock.production.lot` by name
Problem:
Sorting the `stock.quant` by lot_id used the id of
`stock.production.lot`
opw-2879464
closesodoo/odoo#94358
X-original-commit: 4c855bd3eeb7ffcebd76eb4eaa1e41edf2935021
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Merlin (megu) <megu@odoo.com>
We only want the edi.format options to appear on the sale journals
(out_invoice, out_refund).
In addition, the warnings are no longer displayed on top of the invoice.
closesodoo/odoo#94376
X-original-commit: dca5a2844ef2e90c257b78add3e147b291a9fa18
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <las@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Julien Van Roy <juvr@odoo.com>
Currently, the register payment button in the invoice form view is
accessible to any Accounting/Billing user. But in the payment register
wizard, the payment difference related fields are only visible for an
Accounting/Auditor user. This does not make sense as the auditor access
level is a read-only role, and there is no dependency between auditor
and billing rights. We should remove the group (as it is already
restricted in the access rights of the model) in the wizard to allow
billing users to use the functionality without the need for accountant
access rights.
closesodoo/odoo#94380
X-original-commit: 488bda480a38f9c09496f770be8a6f540c541044
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Thuyls (alt) <alt@odoo.com>
Adds a variant `_check_credentials_for_uid()` for auth_totp.device's
`_check_credentials()`. The new method will directly verify the device
key matches the given uid.
This spares the redundant uid comparison on the caller side, and
allows extension modules to customise the user/device matching logic.
closesodoo/odoo#94365
X-original-commit: 0e266eb3c73409950d1eb160c41eb6668d439856
Signed-off-by: Olivier Dony <odo@odoo.com>
The test was introduced in [1] with a typo on the first step (which is
only there to ensure the test does contain steps).
Note: with the 15.1 forward-port, the "number of steps" check had to be
adapted because snippets were removed at [2]. This reveals however two
issues:
- Snippets which use the generic "Dynamic Snippet" as base are not
tested by the test.
- [2] removed the s_speaker_bio snippet by mistake
Both those problems will be fixed in other PR alongside improving the
way the "number of steps" check works.
[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/460d5ecb926c13a79ba363f8f86442433d91bf6f
[2]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/b5c87d86cad1aa2b44f805da0b2d6635aeb85b96closesodoo/odoo#94359
X-original-commit: 8e6a6ab532637ef9ef8d87ca4062e26b2852825a
Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
*: website_livechat
This commit is a step towards refactoring the JS of public livechat,
so that it reuses the same architecture as the code of Discuss.
This implies code that uses JS models and OWL components.
Task-2892367
closesodoo/odoo#94347
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
This commit adds a search restriction on _compute_qty_received_method which will prevent the received method field from recomputing on orders that have already been finished.
This method is only called on the installation of this module and is used to update order lines of consumable products to use the standard computation of stock moves. In cases where purchase orders were completed ahead of this module's installation, this method effectively undoes all received quantities and resets them to zero. In orders that were already confirmed and billed, this displays the order lines with zero received quantities and no way to functionally change it.
opw-2854810
closesodoo/odoo#94325
X-original-commit: 849a561ebb26e7dca9018c6f81b8492ef21d7a7a
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
*: im_livechat, test_mail, test_mail_full.
The createMessagingMenu helper was used during tests to mount
the messaging menu and test it. However, this approach is not
very realistic and blocks some waiting PRs. In order to get closer
from the reality, let's instanciate a webClient and a systrayService
for the messagingMenu to be present at all time.
closesodoo/odoo#94301
Related: odoo/enterprise#28747
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
Since [1] the attachments are not found by `get_image_info` anymore
because the search based on the id only does not specify the model.
Because of this the mimetype of uploaded images is not put in the DOM
image's dataset. This lack of mimetype prevents the Shape, Filter, Width
and Quality image options from being used.
This commit defaults the model to `ir.attachment`.
Steps to reproduce:
- Drop a "Text - Image" snippet.
- Replace the image by uploading one.
=> The Shape, Filter, Width & Quality options did not appear anymore.
[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/da8def8e410de68256ba4ab09ebf7a8b699355ac
task-2883695
closesodoo/odoo#94288
X-original-commit: 99fda1024ff7d809f13523acd13770c02a49d1e1
Signed-off-by: Romain Derie (rde) <rde@odoo.com>
action act_window can have a "flags" field which contains tweaking parameter for the views.
A little inventory:
- ation_buttons: if true displays on List and Kanban the buttons that trigger action
in the control-panel bottom left area. It is true by default in JS.
- withControlPanel: whether to display the ControlPanel as a whole. True by default.
- search_view: not used or dealt with.
- mode ("readonly"|"edit") whether to initiate a form view in that mode.
(used and practical -- but will be outdated when the edit mode by default is implemented)
This commit removes the occurences of those flags keys that are useless
closesodoo/odoo#94078
Related: odoo/enterprise#28620
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Currently, when the visitor closes the chatbot conversation, the script keeps
running as there is nothing in the code to tell it to stop.
Which can cause issues, because the visitor is still able to "post" messages
through the rating, which will trigger the next step of the script.
Even though the user cannot see those messages and bot reactions, we should
still correctly end the script when the conversation is closed.
Especially since the visitor can ask to receive the conversation by email, and
we don't want him too see that the script wrongly continued.
Task-2882341
closesodoo/odoo#94234
Signed-off-by: Warnon Aurélien (awa) <awa@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
When testing the script and being logged in, a very edge case can happen when
we try to find a human operator and find "yourself" as a suitable operator.
In that case, act as if we did not find anyone.
Otherwise, the display gets strange as the bot adds "yourself" as an operator
but still acts as if he did not find anyone since there is only one person in
the conversation.
Task-2882341
Part-of: odoo/odoo#94234
Suppose we are printing a PDF on multiple records but having some of them excluded during the _prepare_html.
So, suppose these records are [20, 21].
If [21] is excluded during the rendering because nothing to render, the resulting html will contains only [20].
That is leading to a traceback when checking the outlines because of
assert len(outlines_pages) == len(res_ids)
This commit avoids to check the outlines if we don't care about generating attachments.
Then, we don't need to split the PDF in that case.
closesodoo/odoo#94204
X-original-commit: 210e63ab8b036bd20c68b1e03462c75af12aa326
Signed-off-by: Olivier Colson (oco) <oco@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <las@odoo.com>
Some more iterations for improving the Journal Items list UX.
- Added a searchpanel on accounts
- Added the column Residual in Currency
- Dropdown list on account edit
- Added the Residual column
closesodoo/odoo#94076
Related: odoo/enterprise#28644
Related: odoo/upgrade#3612
Signed-off-by: Cedric Snauwaert <csn@odoo.com>
This PR main purpose is to revamp the grouped Kanban implementation on mobile to provide a more responsive, smoother and closer to the desktop functionalities experience for the user.
In a nutshell:
- columns are displayed individually ; an horizontal scroll allows to
switch to the other ones, "snapping" to the column (aka. carroussel-like).
- each column takes 90% of the viewport's width to give a hint of its
siblings.
- each column scrolls (vertically) individually to avoid being lost when
switching from one column to another.
- folded columns are "virtually unfolded": they takes the same space as
the other ones, but content is loaded on-demand.
- some configuration modals are fullscreen for ease of use.
Also, in this PR, the WebClient's layout has been standardized between Community and Enterprise to ease the maintenance and avoid redundancy.
Part of the SCSS revamp task-2704984
task-2883057
closesodoo/odoo#94134
Related: odoo/enterprise#28652
Signed-off-by: Adrien Dieudonné (adr) <adr@odoo.com>
This commit revamps the grouped-kanban implementation for smaller
screens (aka. mobile) by making it more "responsive" and avoiding
mobile-specific variation. It makes the implementation simpler and
closer to what the user expects from the desktop version.
In a nutshell:
- columns are displayed individually ; an horizontal scroll allows to
switch to the other ones, "snapping" to the column (aka. carroussel-like).
- each column takes 90% of the viewport's width to give a hint of its
siblings.
- each column scrolls (vertically) individually to avoid being lost when
switching from one column to another.
- folded columns are "virtually unfolded": they takes the same space as
the other ones, but content is loaded on-demand.
- some configuration modals are fullscreen for ease of use.
Part of the SCSS revamp task-2704984
task-2883057
Part-of: odoo/odoo#94134
This commit refactors the WebClient's layout definition to avoid
differences and redundancy between Community & Enterprise editions.
This would ease the maintenance by streamlining both implementation,
keeping them closer. It also allows to have more similar scrolling
handling by default:
- on desktop: `o_content` is the action scroll container (no change)
- on mobile: `o_action` is the action scroll container (down from `html`
node, to keep the navbar)
Part of the SCSS revamp task-2704984
task-2883057
Part-of: odoo/odoo#94134
This commit achieves two things:
1) Avoid calling super() on an empty recordset, in case all products
are kits. Even on an empty recordset, some queries would be fired.
This commit avoids them.
2) Use prefetch to read kit components quantity fields, to make use
of the recorset optimizations that ends up saving sql queries.
Otherwise, component quantities were computed on-demand one by one.
closesodoo/odoo#94225
X-original-commit: ef4ae7f62d6b690b4745b4145ce25ff02b6b29f6
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Victor Feyens