Users may want to be able to have transactions coming from multiple
payment acquirers to be registered in the same journal.
This will allows that.
Task id #2414749closesodoo/odoo#67331
Related: odoo/upgrade#2500
Related: odoo/enterprise#17258
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
Before this commit, status codes were partially handled and users may not had a proper feedback on the status of their payment.
Task #2517498closesodoo/odoo#69948
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
account_payment:
- Processing fees computation was done based on the wrong country.
payment:
- The acquirer's cancel message was missing from the
/payment/confirmation page.
- `redirect_form_view_id` field was declared with attribute 'name'
instead of 'string'.
- Uninstalling a payment acquirer would fail with a traceback.
- The first acquirer was not automatically selected if it was the only
selectable payment option of a 'manage' payment form.
- Specifying a preferred acquirer to the /payment/pay page would show
not acquirer at all if the preferred option was incompatible with
the constraints, rather than falling back on showing all acquirers.
payment_adyen:
- When the value of the API URL fields is malformed (e.g., missing the
"https://"), clicking on the confirm button raised a traceback.
payment_ogone:
- There was a typo in the return route.
payment_paypal:
- PayPal acquirers were not filtered out if the currency was not not
supported.
- Returning to the webshop without paying would raise a traceback.
task-2494916
closesodoo/odoo#69996
X-original-commit: 4f7e463fb8b13506caa8aff0beeef5eb0720bf00
Related: odoo/enterprise#17997
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <AntoineVDV@users.noreply.github.com>
With this commit, Selection fields with `required=True` which are
extended via `selection_add` are given proper ondelete policies to
ensure the cleanup of records containing these extended options during
uninstall of the extending module.
This commit also cleans up leftover uninstall hooks that were being used
to handle the same set of problems prior to the ondelete mechanism being
implemented for Selection fields.
closesodoo/odoo#46325
Related: odoo/enterprise#9117
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
Fine-tunning of 937b5c076e7175bec664ed0cf4b77505e342f1e2
Have a multiwebsite setup
have a payment installed for one of the two websites
Make an order on that website and try to pay
Before this commit, the transaction doesn't come back to odoo's
payment success controller
This was because the return url was set to the web base url ICP
After this commit, the payment success page is opened as we took
the request's url as the return url
opw-2080352
closesodoo/odoo#39643
X-original-commit: a9fb15b33fd041ee420581a5ba450017db06e0c7
Signed-off-by: Jorge Pinna Puissant (jpp) <jpp@odoo.com>
Replace website_published and environment by a generic state on
payment.acquirer
Payment acquirers aren't enabled by default. When setting their state to 'enabled' or 'test', it is verified the required fields for the provider are set.
Multi is the default api for methods, it is not necessary to explicitly
decorate methods with it, adds clutter and most people use it because
they see that the rest of the code uses it.
Done with `find . -type f -name '*.py' | xargs sed -i '/@api.multi/d'`
It was very confusing for the user to distinct account.payment and payment.transaction. From now on, the transactions are
technical objects and, in the backend, we only refer to it in log messages (Front end will be adapted in the same fashion
later on). They are hidden in debug mode in accounting\configuration\payments as their purpose is now purely technical/log
This commit also aims to reduce the gap between the accounting app and the transactions: account.payment objects are
created/validated upon completion of transaction.
To ease the capture/voiding of pending transactions, the related buttons are now displayed directly on the SO/invoice
instead of the transactions.
Was task: https://www.odoo.com/web#id=35857&view_type=form&model=project.task&action=333&active_id=967&menu_id=4720
Was PR #24043
[FIX] add domain based on journal to payment tokens
Was opw: https://www.odoo.com/web?debug#id=1828206&view_type=form&model=project.task&menu_id=5200
Now that we're closer to switching to P3 for good, these helpers have
outlived their usefulness, and mostly add noise.
All remaining dict.iter*() or dict.view*() must be converted to the
normal keys(), values() or items() calls.
Whenever the result is likely to be used for more than the scope of a
loop, or when the dict needs to be modified during iteration, the calls
must be wrapped in a ``list()``, to protect the new P3 semantics.
Those cases are very exceptional.
Also removed some dead code or improved the API to remove unnecessary
conversions.
In Python 3, all of these were "consolidated" under urllib(.request,
.parse, .errors) which is inconvenient.
Since we already have hard dependencies on requests and
werkzeug(.urls, which is a backport of Python 3's unicode-aware
urllib.parse) migrate *everything* to that.
A sticking point is urllib2.URLError, those were (mostly) replaced by
the slightly more general IOError which URLError extends.
In Python 3:
* various builtins and dict methods were changed to return
view/iterable objects rather than lists
* and the separate Python 2 view/iterable builtins and methods were
removed altogether
This is problematic when using these items as list (which the happens
repeatedly in Odoo), but more viciously when iterating *multiple times*
over them (which also happens, which I've messed up multiple times while
writing this, and which is a pain to debug even when you've just created
the issue).
Convert all code using these to semantics-matching cross-version
helper functions to get the LCD behaviour between P2 and P3, and
forbid the builtins via lint.
issue #8530
While sometimes convenient, the ability to unpack tuple parameters (to
lambdas and functions) was removed from Python 3. Either use the tuple
directly or unpack it in the function body.
(lib2to3.fixes.fix_tuple_params)
-*- coding: utf-'8' "-*-"
is not a valid encoding. Introduced by
666387a274 I think. It was probably a
typo/replace gone bad and it got copy-pasted everywhere. Emacs complains
every time you try to save changes to files with this invalid encoding.
This changes all of them to
coding: utf-8
adhering to eae045949d.
Done with:
find . -name '*.py' -print0 |\
xargs -0 sed -ie 's/-\*- coding: utf-'"'"'8'"'"' "-\*-"/coding: utf-8/'
This revision is related to 6efc371291
The return URL parameter key has changed: The capital letters
are not the same than before.
Besides, send a dict in the `ADD_RETURNDATA` doesn't seem
to be supported by Buckaroo. We therefore no
longer uses a dict but a string to avoid problems.
opw-665697
Fixing several issues in the computation of the sha1 signature:
- Removing BRQ_SIGNATURE parameter was only tested in uppercase.
The parameters returned by Buckaroo are case insensitive and we can not ensure
it will be uppercase. Check all keys instead.
- Sorting should be done case insensitive (e.g. 'AA' before 'bb') but the case
must be preserved in the final string to sign.
- The values returned should be URL decoded before being signed.
The value "J.+de+Tester" should be decoded to "J. de Tester"
- The final string may contain unicode and fail to be used by sha1() method.
Based on Buckaroo Payment Engine 3.0
http://pronamic.nl/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/BPE-3.0-Gateway-HTML.1.02.pdf
Happy New Year Odoo! 🎉🎆📯
Quoting Buckaroo Payment Engine 3.0 Implementation Manual:
Note: parameter names are not case sensitive (both in the request and in the
response). Parameter values are case sensitive.
Using data.get(BRQ_PAYMENT') is unreliable and may break in the future.
Update test to use different case.
opw 665439
merge *ALL* the dicts
The form rendering used to receive a dict for partner information and a dict for tx information and to transmit another dict to the qweb template; now everything is done in a single dict
Unify and refactor exception handling in framework and addons.
The generic `except_osv` is now deprecated, and replaced by more specialized exception subtypes:
- `UserError` (renamed from Warning, as it conflicts with the built-in `Warning`) raised when a non-technical error occurs during a business operation. It could be a missing information in the data provided by the user, or a misconfiguration.
- `AccessError`: raised when any operation is denied because the user conducting it does not have the required access rights.
- `AccessDenied`: raised when an operation that requires authenticated access is attempted via an unauthenticated request.
- `MissingError`: raised when an operation is attempted on a record that does not exist.
- `ValidationError`: raised when an operation violates a SQL or Python constraint.
- All other exceptions are internal errors due to a system problem or bug, and raised untouched to the client-side, which should display a traceback.
All exceptions take a single message argument.
The `test_exceptions` module has been updated to showcase both new and old (deprecated) exceptions.
A great many old `except_osv` had a useless title with "Error!" or "Warning", those have been removed, as this is handled by the client-side widget that displays the messages.
This commit introduces a more consistent policy for logging errors and warnings:
- All messages that do not require administrator attention should be logged at INFO level or lower. This includes all errors that are notified to the user in a friendly manner, even for access right problems or validation errors during business operations.
- All messages that indicate a likely misconfiguration or malicious use by the users should be logged at WARNING level, as they typically require administrator attention.
- All other unhandled internal errors cannot typically be handled by the user and should be logged at ERROR or higher level, as they require immediate administrator attention.
_buckaroo_generate_digital_sign uses the values dict to generate the shasign
At some point, it alters the dict, it removes BRQ_SIGNATURE, but, as the values dict was not copied, it altered the original dict.
So, the key BRQ_SIGNATURE was not anymore present for methods called after _buckaroo_generate_digital_sign.
For instance, the overriden method form_feedback of website_sale payment
Nicolas (vin)