Rather than hiding all payment providers and payment tokens from the
payment form, a warning is now shown to the user if their company is
not the same as that of the document (SO, invoice, ...) they're paying
for.
task-2983985
closesodoo/odoo#100375
Related: odoo/enterprise#31424
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
"Demo token" badge is only displayed for tokens created under Demo provider.
This is misleading and should be connected with provider state not it's name.
It should be shown on every token created under "test mode".
task-2908903
closesodoo/odoo#101937
Related: odoo/upgrade#4023
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Fees charged by payment providers are shown when choosing a payment
option (provider or token) on a payment form.
Before this commit, the fees badge was not shown next to tokens, which
could be understood as fee-free.
With this commit, the fees badge will also appear next to tokens.
task-2854120
closesodoo/odoo#103100
X-original-commit: 9dded8b5fadf99379018446d9390e6f9510e8e80
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Due to migration from Bootstrap 4 to 5, rounded badges look bad. No
unification of badge styles, some are rounded and some are squared. Tags
style should be unified and adjusted for Bootstrap 5 with this commit.
task-3001057
closesodoo/odoo#103099
X-original-commit: 611e2f20f975c590eb75d64379be84dd4cc472ef
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Changing the name of model payment.acquirer to payment.provider
and everything that it touches. It is technically incorrect to
use the term "acquirer" for systems that only provide a service
of payment.
After this commit the model payment.acquirer and all related to
it will be renamed to payment.provider.
Task - 2842088
closesodoo/odoo#90899
Related: odoo/upgrade#3542
Related: odoo/documentation#1981
Related: odoo/enterprise#27131
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
The name "Payment Acquirer Test" of the acquirer bundled with the module
`payment_test` is confusing. It is actually the only acquirer that
doesn't connect to a test API, and its purpose is not to make test
transactions but to showcase the integration of other apps (Accounting,
Sales, eCommerce, Subscriptions) with demo payments.
Hence, the module is renamed to `payment_demo` along with its data and
technical keys to better make the distinction between acquirers' test
environment and demo payments.
task-2853481
closesodoo/odoo#99397
Related: odoo/upgrade#3846
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
This commit enables eCommerce customers to pay with the express payment
methods Apple Pay and Google Pay from the cart page.
For the moment, only Stripe supports this additional feature but it
was designed to make it easy to implement with a new provider.
task-2754209
closesodoo/odoo#88374
Related: odoo/enterprise#29915
Related: odoo/documentation#2392
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Before this commit, tokens were prefixed with usually 12 X’s. To improve
readability, modernity and to shorten the length, this commit changes
token prefixes to a standard of •••• 1111.
task-2832669
closesodoo/odoo#94978
Related: odoo/upgrade#3738
Related: odoo/enterprise#29190
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
The alert block content and style for the transaction status after
payment were computed in two different places: In the dedicated
`payment.transaction_status` QWeb template, and in the
/payment/confirmation` route's controller which, for some reason, was
re-inventing the wheel instead of relying on the dedicated template.
This commit combines the slightly different behaviors in the template
and gets rid of the duplicated logic in the controller to:
- Handle the states 'draft' and 'error'.
- Always show the transaction's state message, and not only when the
transaction was in a state for which there exists no pre-defined
message (`draft` and `error`).
task-2924873
closesodoo/odoo#96348
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Before this commit, it was impossible to migrate from one payment
acquirer to another as the only way to do so was to change a payment
acquirer’s state to ‘disabled’, subsequently disabling all tokens of that
acquirer (detrimental for eg. running subscriptions).
After this commit, payment acquirers have an additional boolean
‘Published’. With this functionality, users can safely migrate by
keeping an acquirer ‘enabled’, but invisible for customers.
There are five combined states an acquirer can take:
‘enabled’ & ‘published’: Visible to all users
‘enabled’ & ‘unpublished’: Visible only to internal users
‘disabled’ & ‘unpublished’: Same as previously ‘disabled’
‘test’ & ‘published’: Same as previously ‘test’
‘test’ & ‘unpublished’: visible only to internal users
task-2871459
closesodoo/odoo#94242
Related: odoo/upgrade#3688
Related: odoo/documentation#2308
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
After the payment apocalypse, `payment_test` was cleaned and stripped of
all useless parts. It was a very basic testing acquirer that allowed to
enter fake arbitrary payment details, choose whether they should be
tokenized, and then pay. It was intended to test the payment flow of
various applications (Sales, Subscriptions, Invoicing, ...) for a single
scenario: successful payments with immediate capture.
In order to extensively test an app's payment flow (explore other
scenarios), we need `payment_test` to have additional features.
Now, `payment_test` will allow profound testing of these features:
- separate authorization and capture
- customer fees computation
- tokenization
- refunds
- on the /pay page, users will be able to select the status of the
payment
- on the payment transaction form view, users can change the status of
a payment 'pending' to either succeed or fail
- on the payment token form view, users can change the state of future
transactions made with that token
task-2512196
closesodoo/odoo#78083
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: xlu-odoo <xlu@odoo.com>
*: account_payment, sale, website_sale
Users should not be able to discard the tokenization of their payment if
they pay for a subscription.
This commit introduces a new helper method to better predict when the
tokenization checkbox should be shown or hidden. This also ensures that
the behavior will be the same across all modules.
task-2695201
closesodoo/odoo#91860
X-original-commit: 1d8dc53f8ed2a967b35213bc913cdfbc42ff15bc
Related: odoo/enterprise#27568
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
This commit uses the `is_html_empty` util method to detect empty HTML
fields in cleaner and more resilient fashion than what was done in
808cc53bb02b0f1851a2a229bd5235a5fb944408.
closesodoo/odoo#84999
X-original-commit: 89f3aa8a979c5236b587f9690595117b52f0dd63
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Before this commit, an empty line would be shown in the payment forms on
the card of each payment acquirer whose `pre_msg` field was not empty.
This is because displaying this HTML field in a form view and saving it
causes the value `<p><br></p>` to be written on the field, even if it
was left empty. The same issue occurred with the `pending_msg`,
`auth_msg`, `done_msg`, and `cancel_msg` fields that are shown on the
portal of some apps (Sales, Accounting...).
With this commit, the value of these fields is tested before displaying
them. If the value is `<p><br></p>`, the field is not displayed, hence
avoiding to display a blank line.
closesodoo/odoo#84755
X-original-commit: 808cc53bb02b0f1851a2a229bd5235a5fb944408
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Before this commit, the validation flow with verification (payment of a
small amount with immediate refund) was performed with the use of
validation routes: after payment, the customer was redirected to the
validation route stored on the transaction to trigger the refund. This
implementation had an issue: if the customer never reached the
validation route, they were not refunded their validation amount. This
could happen if the customer closed the tab after paying with an
acquirer offering payments with redirection, or if the validation
payment was asynchronously confirmed through a webhook notification.
This commit gets rid of validation routes and requires acquirers to
immediately refund the validation amount when the payment is confirmed.
This way, a payment confirmation coming from a webhook can trigger the
refund too.
As the only acquirer that implements the validation with verification
flow, Authorize.net now voids validation transactions as soon as they
are authorized.
While we're at it, the logging of processing values is adapted to only
log specific rendering values if a redirect form is rendered.
task-2612977
closesodoo/odoo#74707
Related: odoo/enterprise#20060
Related: odoo/upgrade#2710
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <AntoineVDV@users.noreply.github.com>
Small UI improvements for clarity/continuity:
1. In the "Sales' onboarding wizard > payment configuration >
documentatlion link", font roboto is now used.
2. In the sales order, the error message when 'there is nothing
to invoice' now also explains also what the user has to do to invoice
"Prepaid" services.
3. In the "Payment confirmation" section of the payment portal,
'Reference', 'From' & 'Amount' fields don't look like editable
fields anymore.
4. In the payment forms, tokens created with the Test acquirer
are now identified with a "Test Token" badge in place of the
verified token checkmark.
task-2505913
closesodoo/odoo#70076
Related: odoo/enterprise#18036
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <AntoineVDV@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit brings back the possibility to pass invoice ids in payment
links, a feature that was lost with commit 573ed74c. If such an id is
present in the payment link URL, the transaction that is created must
have a reference starting with the name of the invoice, and must be
linked to it.
task-2494916
closesodoo/odoo#72992
X-original-commit: 6c13a361400332955cdf5ac5a14bd1970b4f66ef
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
The *_msg fields are HTML fields so there's no reason to do anything.
A few of the values are a bit more debatable though:
* Thanks_msg seems pretty much never used?
* The `message` value comes from `state_message`, looking at how
that's set it doesn't seem like there's any reason for it to ever
contain markup?
account_payment:
- Processing fees computation was done based on the wrong country.
payment:
- The acquirer's cancel message was missing from the
/payment/confirmation page.
- `redirect_form_view_id` field was declared with attribute 'name'
instead of 'string'.
- Uninstalling a payment acquirer would fail with a traceback.
- The first acquirer was not automatically selected if it was the only
selectable payment option of a 'manage' payment form.
- Specifying a preferred acquirer to the /payment/pay page would show
not acquirer at all if the preferred option was incompatible with
the constraints, rather than falling back on showing all acquirers.
payment_adyen:
- When the value of the API URL fields is malformed (e.g., missing the
"https://"), clicking on the confirm button raised a traceback.
payment_ogone:
- There was a typo in the return route.
payment_paypal:
- PayPal acquirers were not filtered out if the currency was not not
supported.
- Returning to the webshop without paying would raise a traceback.
task-2494916
closesodoo/odoo#69996
X-original-commit: 4f7e463fb8b13506caa8aff0beeef5eb0720bf00
Related: odoo/enterprise#17997
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <AntoineVDV@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit replaces the old online payments API of the `payment`
module with the new one and adapts to it all the implementing modules.
See the merge commit for more details.
task-2085989
task-2119838
task-2165982
task-2289255
Co-authored-by: Victor Feyens <vfe@odoo.com>
Steps:
- Install account,payment
- Go to Invoicing
- Create an invoice
- Click Actions > Generate a Payment Link
- Follow the generated link
- Pay
Bug:
The transaction is not linked to the sale order in the link table
`account_invoice_transaction_rel`
Explanation:
This fix is broadly mimicking the behavior of the sales module regarding
the link of an order to a transaction, adding `invoice_id`s where they
are needed throughout the payment process in order to link the
transaction to the invoice.
opw:2451534
closesodoo/odoo#67296
X-original-commit: 7c6d06fa5858f79f3b22cdeaf74cdc26a642742f
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: backspac <backspac@users.noreply.github.com>
Issue
- Go to Accounting / Customers / Invoices
- Pick any invoice not paid
- Action: Generate a Payment Link
- Open the link
- Refresh the page having Javascript disabled
- Click the Pay Now button
Traceback
Cause
If JS is not loaded, the values in the form fields are
not bound as expected.
It can also happen with slow connections and fast click
on the button at the loading. Before the JS is entirely
loaded (as it is lazy-loaded).
Solution
Button disabled by default, wait the page to be loaded
and then activate the button
OPW-2255760
closesodoo/odoo#54128
X-original-commit: 0e7071f249e69c5cca519ec66120530eb0f97153
Signed-off-by: Jason Van Malder (jvm) <jvm@odoo.com>
The previous commit introduced some changes for SCA/PSD2 but some things
were missing; most notably, registering payment cards in a s2s flow used
the old Charge API that is not SCA-ready.
This commit uses the SetupIntent API instead, allowing to register the
card prior to payment. The global flow is described in the Stripe
documentation in more details: https://stripe.com/docs/payments/cards/saving-cards
Unfortunately, given the complete flow of payments, it is not possible
to use the PaymentIntents API since this would require having the
reference of the transaction before it gets created (the TX is created
after the form submission, but the token must already exist at that
point). Since this is meant to be backported, this changes are kept
minimal in this feature branch. The PaymentIntents API would have been
better since registering a card during a payment makes it more likely
that future off-session transactions will not require an authentication
step. We'll have to live with that for now; it's difficult to know
exactly how this will affect customers before PSD2 goes into effect on
september 14.
Another branch might completely change the flow soon-ish to a more
asynchroneous model, although it may miss the v13 freeze date -_-
- treat s2s transactions as such
- don't filter out tokens saved on acquirers that are not set for full
s2s mode, as tokens might get created through a form and still be usable
- detect the submit event as well as the click on the 'Pay Now' button
to avoid completely wrecking the payment flow by pressing the return key
- correct start override in JS should chain promises
* payment, im_livechat
Inline scripts using `odoo.define` cannot work anymore as the boot.js
file loading will be deferred.
Most of features which used an inline script should probably be entirely
refactored. This commit focuses on removing the inline scripts
with a minimal diff (or at least tried to).
Note: for the website livechat, the inline script was kept as it seems
to be a longer refactoring to get rid of it (even though it is clearly
possible). The inline script was however adapted to make sure it works
with lazy loaded JS in the frontend.
Part of https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/32181
task-1961045
Currently, when some add token for s2s payment, dummy transaction of
1 unit was performed and it was frautrating for customer.
So added option on acquirer's settings that check if you want's
to validate the transaction or not.
If 'verify Card validity' is ticked on payment acquirer then and then
it will verify with dummy transaction otherwise it will not going to verify
the card details.
Task-1903170
closesodoo/odoo#29595
Signed-off-by: Damien Bouvy (dbo) <dbo@odoo.com>
The link "Manage your payment methods" didn't work on the website because
the variable acquirers is a list of records.
This list has been created in function "payment_method" with the route
'/my/payment_method'
opw:1913299
closesodoo/odoo#29142
Purpose of the task is when extra fee is activated on the payment acquirer,
the customer is no warned about extra cost when choosing the payment acquirer.
so display the extra fees on payment acquirer when doing the payment.
Related Task ID : 1845815
Closes : #31730
This commit aims to improve the user experience when using payment acquirers. There currently are no error feedback with some acquirers, which leaves the user wondering what is going on and what is the real status of its payment.
In some cases, the user is currently being redirected to the home page even though the payment has failed. We want to make it more obvious to the user that something unexpected has happened by redirecting to an intermediate page that will provide good feedback on payments status.
Another goal of this commit is to order acquirers by sequence instead of by flow and to select the first acquirer by default. This feature was already implmented in commit fe294fd43e521bd2d339e962f43acf46c3d4cb97, some UI adaptations were needed though.
Related to task #36680Closes#26958
* payment, portal, website, website_sale, website_sale_delivery
The way we used BS3 was not always perfect/conventional and was thus
not BS4 compatible at all.
Also improve the general look of some screens.
In a previous commit, we removed the use of the 'btn-sm' classes as we
used it everywhere for default-size buttons instead of customizing the
size of those default-size buttons directly.
This commit proves it was even more necessary as the 'btn-xs' class does
not exist anymore in BS4 and we so can use the 'btn-sm' class instead.
Demesmaeker