Adapt tests for other moudules to use
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#33399
X-original-commit: 88cad50cac8130e1ff66a21ab63d53b41488a74a
Part-of: odoo/odoo#106007
Adapt community to make it possible to add employee cost when calculate
bom cost.
closesodoo/odoo#105645
X-original-commit: a239802249b2af2cc3fc2b3bb9fdfd0a408d887a
Related: odoo/enterprise#33898
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuchen Huang (yhu) <yhu@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce:
- set time effeciency of a workcenter to less than 100
- on a product page with a BoM using that workcenter
- for the cost click on compute price from BoM
Bug:
workcenter effeciency is not taken into consideration
Fix:
included time_effeciency in computing the expected duration
addepted tests to take it into consideration aswell
opw-3033672
closesodoo/odoo#104566
X-original-commit: 1dcd9dbef0a5e6d9bd2c5e52a42cff9aec98f1d0
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Walid Hanniche (waha) <waha@odoo.com>
With the change to 'always edit' on form views by default, several
'oe_read_only' fields had to be modified to play nice with the fact
that in most cases, there is no read_only mode
closesodoo/odoo#101188
X-original-commit: 868992abeeda983768323e1126b5643eff8fdb33
Related: odoo/enterprise#31810
Signed-off-by: Bouvy Damien (dbo) <dbo@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Create a storable product “B1”:
- Costing Method: average
- With BOM:
- BOM Type: Kit
- Components:
- 3 units of “C1” (cost c1 = $2)
- Go to the “B1” product form:
- Click on “Compute Price from BOM”
- Cost = 3 * $2 = $6
- Create a storable product A1:
- Costing Method: average
- BOM
- BOM Type: Kit
- Components:
- 2 units of B1
- Go to the “A1” product form:
- Click on “Compute Price from BOM”
So: 1 unit of A1 → 2 units of B1 → 3 units of C1
- Cost = (2 * 3 * $2) = $12
- Create a SO:
- Add 1 unit of “A1”
- save
- cost(`purchase_price`) = $12
- Confirm the SO
- The cost is recomputed and becomes = $6
Problem:
When the SO is created and the product “A1” is added, the cost is
retrieved from the product: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/14.0/addons/sale_margin/models/sale_order.py#L27
But when the SO is confirmed, a picking is created, therefore the
cost is recomputed: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/14.0/addons/sale_stock_margin/models/sale_order_line.py#L18
So The `_compute_average_price` function is called, in which a loop is
made for each move related to the `sale.order.line`, but the
`bom_line.product_qty` is used for each component (in this case the qty
necessary of the product `C1 ` to make a single unit of `B1`, but this
is not multiplied by the number of units needed to be used in the
parent's bom_line
opw-2971248
closesodoo/odoo#101012
X-original-commit: 9ec7aa9b89bc929af15473d0cc29084fd831cf94
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux (arm) <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Djamel Touati (otd) <otd@odoo.com>
The goal of this commit is to get rid of the analytic tags as they were confusing, serving tag purposes as well as distribution on analytic accounts.
Everywhere analytic tags were used as a distribution have been replaced with a new widget that will dispatch distribution on analytic accounts. If there was an analytic account field next to the tags, it has been included in the distribution.
Analytic tags that were used simply as information tags have been removed.
To fill the new widget, there are now 2 kind of rules that will help fill and prefill it.
The first are applicability: previous groups have been removed, and have by replaced by plans. Each account is required to have a plan. These plans define when they are available in the widget: a default applicability per plan and applicability lines that can specify rules following the context of the widget.
The second one are distribution models, that will replace previous default rules but follow the same principles. The accounts (and so the plans) that will be given by the distribution model can override the applicability rules from before.
closesodoo/odoo#98914
Related: odoo/upgrade#3885
Related: odoo/enterprise#30743
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Habib (ayh) <ayh@odoo.com>
*: base, mrp_account, product, mail, website_blog, website_event,
website_forum
This commit improves the button that allows to go to the backend view of
an object when you are on its corresponding page on the website. The
button is more visible and the user can see which object he is going to
edit. Note that this commit also:
- Changes the access key to translate a website page to ALT + T.
- Adds a new access key to edit an object in backend with ALT + E.
- Removes the possibility to duplicate a blog post (but this feature
will be reintroduced later for all models, generically) **.
**: Note that the duplication of blog posts actually had a mistake:
The controller to create a new blog post has been added with [1] where
it has been decided to not be a follower of the blog posts at their
creation. A new controller has been added by [2] to be able to duplicate
a blog post, to be consistent with [1], here also the user does not
become a follower of the new blog post (the copy). So far, so good.
Finally, [3] has changed the blog post creation controller so that the
user who creates the blog post is a follower of the new blog post.
Unfortunately the same change was not made for the duplicate controller,
which is a mistake. There is no reason to be a follower of the newly
created blog posts when you go through the add blog post controller but
not when you go through the duplication controller. The behaviors should
be consistent and there is no reason for there to be a difference.
[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/4c3b516a7b988d758a67ff19242e8ed0837d756c
[2]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/fe40538aff2b65f7719840c8e2d6e51e858f560f
[3]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/4bf9dc4078a5ca413539a6fd16400fd5aad46907
task-2889929
closesodoo/odoo#97353
Related: odoo/enterprise#30075
Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: qsm-odoo <qsm@odoo.com>
The goal of this revision is to get rid of the `groups_id` field of the model `ir.ui.view`.
- This feature wasn't really known or used by most developers,
and not straight-forward to understand.
Removing it allows one less complicated thing to learn for developers.
Besides, thanks to odoo/odoo#95729,
changing the behavior of the `groups=` attribute,
we can easily get rid of this `groups_id` feature
by simply adding `groups=` in the elements of the views
using the `groups_id` field, it will have the same effect:
adding the elements in the view only for the users part of the specified group.
- By getting rid of the groups_id many2many field on ir.ui.view,
it makes possible to cache the view architecture without
requiring to use the groups in the cache key.
Currently, if we want to cache the view architecture,
it would be required to use the intersection of the user
groups with the groups_id groups of the view,
making it costly to compute the cache key,
therefore altering the performance point to cache the view
architectures.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#98551
TLDR:
* invoices are implemented using computed methods instead of onchange
* the synchronization only happens when switching tabs in the Form view
to improve perfs.
_______________________________________________________________________
The whole engine of the synchronization of Invoices to the Journal
Entries has been refactored
* by using computed fields instead of onchange functions
* by synchronizing only from invoice to journal entry in `create` and
`write`
* by saving when switching tabs on the Invoice form, to synchronize
before showing the values
This comes with numerous advantages:
* no need to call the onchange methods manually
* no need to use the Form emulator to build invoices (i.e. EDI, OCR,
intercompany, ...)
* the performance for invoices with many lines improves drastically, going
from 2 minutes to 4 seconds to create an invoice with 500 lines
* the model is more declarative, we can now see how the values are computed
instead of having the values being copied from various places.
* remove the hack in `onchange` that disabled the recursivity of it,
which was unexpected and needed to be managed manually in all the
onchange methods
This means that:
* Some fields need to be exclusively computed on journal entries values
or invoice values, more specifically the Tax Summary widget.
It is now
- computed from entry lines, when opening the view
- computed from invoice lines when changing those, because the tax lines
will need to be recomputed anyways, erasing previously set values
- set with an inverse function when saving; after the sync has been done
* Some possible operations previously possible have been dropped.
(i.e. look at the removed test test_in_invoice_line_onchange_accounting_fields_1)
This is because such a behavior was undefined (how is changing the balance going
to affect the unit price? How is the amount currency going to affect it?)
_______________________________________________________________________
Implementation Details
----------------------
The "dynamic lines", meaning the payment terms and the tax lines are now
only created in the `create` and `write` functions.
In order to reduce code duplication, it has been implemented using
context managers used in both `account.move` and `account.move.line`
These context managers help comparing the values before/after, acting
like a local `onchange`, but getting benefit from the dirty flags from
the `compute` dependences.
This is relying on computed fields on the move (`needed_terms`) and on
the lines (`compute_all_tax`) which contain the values needed for the
related move.
Depending on the needed values and the existing values (`term_key` and
`tax_key`, respectively) the context manager will determine what needs
to be created/updated/deleted.
Some related changes are to produce a `dict` instead of a `str` for the
`tax_totals` (previously `tax_totals_json`) fields, by simplicity to
reduce the complexity of IO, and simplicity of debugging, because the
logic of the field needed to change (cannot be computed at the same time
anymore since it needed the lines to be synced)
By simplicity, and also because it makes more sense, some boolean fields
have been merged into `display_type`:
* `is_rounding_line`
* `exclude_from_invoice_tab`
* `is_anglo_saxon_line`
The `price_unit`, `quantity` and other "invoice fields" are now not set
anymore on lines that are not product lines since it didn't make any
sense to have it.
Performances
------------
You have to keep in mind that a simple `create` didn't compute a lot of
fields, for instance not taxes were set, no payment terms,...
Now it does.
```python
import random
from timeit import timeit
from odoo import Command
domain = [('company_id', 'in', (False, self.env.company.id))]
products = self.env['product.product'].search(domain).ids
partners = self.env['res.partner'].search(domain).ids
taxes = self.env['account.tax'].search(domain).ids
def create(nmove, nline):
self.env['account.move'].create([
{
'move_type': 'out_invoice',
'partner_id': random.choice(partners),
'invoice_line_ids': [
Command.create({
'name': f'line{i}',
'product_id': random.choice(products),
'tax_ids': [Command.set([random.choice(taxes)])],
})
for i in range(nline)
]
}
for j in range(nmove)
])
# After | Before
print(timeit("create(1, 1)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 0.11 | 0.09
print(timeit("create(100, 1)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 2.76 | 2.50
print(timeit("create(500, 1)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 14.56 | 12.34
print(timeit("create(1, 100)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 1.03 | 5.52
print(timeit("create(1, 500)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 3.99 | 125.02
print(timeit("create(50, 50)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 19.44 | 79.55
```
Another metric that can be used is running the test suite with
`--test-tags=/account` (only `account` installed)
* before: 404s, 267127 queries (366 tests)
* after: 318s, 232125 queries (362 tests)
Why this commit title?
----------------------
Someone told me that this was the perfect way of naming your commits.
c04065abd8
task-2711317
closesodoo/odoo#96134
Related: odoo/upgrade#3715
Related: odoo/enterprise#29758
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <las@odoo.com>
This commit aims at removing unuseful help message to:
1/ reduce translators work, to focus on more useful translations
2/ not sending unuseful information in load_views
3/ reduce help message to useful messages, so that we can mark
fields having a tooltip in the future UI.
4/ some cleanup of existing messages too
The main use cases:
- REMOVED: help redundant with the field name, providing no extra info
- MOVED TO COMMENT: technical help messages, that should not be in UX
closesodoo/odoo#97279
Signed-off-by: Fabien Pinckaers <fp@odoo.com>
Task: 2856281
- Remove user_type_id, account.account.type model, internal_type
- Add account_type that is a simple selection field
- Move internal_group and include_initial_balance to account.account
- Because of these changes, type_control_ids on account.journal is also removed
closesodoo/odoo#93212
Related: odoo/documentation#2223
Related: odoo/upgrade#3595
Related: odoo/enterprise#28205
Signed-off-by: Cedric Snauwaert <csn@odoo.com>
In the web client, in a real use case, it's not possible
to write on fields which are invisible,
as it's not possible to write on fields which are readonly.
This is a first step in the goal to change the behavior
of the `groups=` attribute in the back-end views,
to remove them for the view instead of making them invisible.
This is mainly to reduce the diff of the revision that will introduce
the mentioned above behavior change.
As nodes with `groups=` will be removed from the view
when the user doesn't have the group, it's no longer possible
to set a value on a field having a `groups=` the user doesn't have
in the `Form` test class, as the field will no longer be at all in the
view.
However, these unit tests shouldn't have been able to set values
on invisible fields in the first place.
This revision therefore aims to correct the unit tests setting value
on fields which were invisible because the user executing the
test was not part of the required group(s) for these fields
to be visible in the view.
closesodoo/odoo#94337
Related: odoo/enterprise#28936
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux (dle) <dle@odoo.com>
This task will:
- Clean the code (e.g. the production's moves are now created directly)
- Have the same behavior when creating object in the UI or directly in
backend
It's mainly on the `mrp.production` object and most of the computed
stored field are used as default value or act like an onchange on draft
production. Once the production order is validated, it's only modify
by direct write
Task-2709753
closesodoo/odoo#83576
Related: odoo/enterprise#24405
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
When invoicing a tracked product, the lots/SN delivered (or the related
quantities) are not always the correct ones displayed on the printed
invoice
To reproduce the issues:
1. In Settings, enable "Display Lots & Serial Numbers on Invoices"
2. Create a product P:
- Storable
- Tracked by lot
3. Update its quantity > 5 with lot L
Use case 01:
4. Create and confirm a SO with 5 x P
5. Process the delivery
6. Create an invoice
7. Edit the invoice line:
- Quantity: 1
8. Post and print the invoice
Error: The quantity related to lot L is 5, it should be 1
Use case 02:
4. Edit P:
- Invoicing Policy: Ordered quantities
5. Create and confirm a SO with 1 x P
6. Create and post the invoice
7. Process the delivery
8. Print the invoice
Error: There isn't any information about delivered lot L
Use case 03:
4. Create and confirm a SO with 3 x P
5. Deliver 1 x P (with backorder)
6. Invoice 1 x P + Post the invoice (-> INV01)
7. Deliver 2 x P
8. Reset, post INV01 again and print it
Error: The quantity related to L is 3, it should be 1. Moreover, if the
user then invoices the 2 others P, posts and prints this second invoice,
it won't contain any information about L
OPW-2730270
closes#81444closesodoo/odoo#89088
X-original-commit: 3598c0c8cda813efa1aebc17f041e4c0a1a29f06
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Florent de Labarre <florent.mirieu@gmail.com>
Currently, when changing qty_producing on a MO, consumed number of each
component will always be updated. In this commit, we add a new boolean
field manual_consumption to bom.line. If checked, that line won't be
updated when changing qty_producing.
The same but invisible field manual_consumption is also added to each
line on MO. It will use the value on BOM as defualt value. When user
manually set the consued qty, it will be checked automatically. Also,
when user manually update the SML, the field on SM will also be set to
true.
Task-2687494
closesodoo/odoo#80118
Related: odoo/enterprise#25607
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Install mrp_account and accounting
1:/
- remove MRP access to Marc Demo
- connect with Marc
- Go to any product with variant > variants > then open any variant
Problem:
Access error is triggered, we try to calculate the bom_count of this product, but the user does not have manager access to MRP
2:/
- now Give accountant access to Marc
- Go to any analytic account with bom or production
Problem:
Marc can see the number of boms or productions, while he does not have access to MRP
opw-2794179
closesodoo/odoo#87457
X-original-commit: 7701d85e2364bc4b59455338cc771733dbb12e73
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Djamel Touati (otd) <otd@odoo.com>
When returning a kit, the margin of the related SO decreases
To reproduce the issue:
(Need sale_management)
1. In Settings, enable "Margins"
2. Create a Product Category PC:
- Costing Method: FIFO
3. Create two products P_kit, P_compo:
- Both:
- Type: Storable
- Category: PC
- P_compo:
- Cost: 10
4. Update P_compo quantity: 1
5. Create a BoM:
- Product: P_kit
- Type: Kit
- Components: 1 x P_compo
6. Update P_kit's cost
7. Create and confirm a SO with 1 x P_kit, unit price = $100
- Note that the margin is correct: $90
8. Process the related picking
9. Create a return R
10. Go back to the SO
Error: the margin is now $80
When computing the cost of the kit, the move linked to R are considered.
Therefore, the cost becomes $20 and thus the margin becomes $80
OPW-2679473
closesodoo/odoo#83008
X-original-commit: 2f34669f9dc3c9abfcbb13198f90f37405ffc258
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
When reversing an invoice linked to a sale order, the value of the new
anglo saxon AML should be based on the value of the returned product
To reproduce the issue:
(Need account_accountant,purchase)
1. Create a product category PC:
- Costing Method: FIFO
- Inventory Valuation: Automated
2. Create a product P:
- Type: Storable
- Product Category: PC
3. For C in [10, 20, 30]:
- Create a purchase order with 1 x P at cost C
- Receive P
4. Create a SO with 3 x P
5. Deliver the products one by one
6. Create and Post the invoice INV linked to SO
7. Return the second delivery
8. Add a credit note to INV01:
- Credit Method: Partial Refund
9. Set the quantity to 1
10. Post the new invoice INV02
Error: The anglo saxon lines are listed in the journal items, which is
correct, but their value is $30 while it should be $20 (i.e., the value
of the returned product)
When delivering the last product, its standard price is updated with the
new value ($30):
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/6b96ed418cb626678f4fa5baec25a903d7a74eda/addons/stock_account/models/product.py#L305-L307
Later on, when posting the credit note, the module gets the anglo saxon
unit price (`_stock_account_get_anglo_saxon_price_unit`). However, it
does not consider that the current account move line is reversing
another one. In the reversing process, the computation of the invoiced
quantity should be based on the invoices lines that are reversing too.
Moreover, when computing the average unit price of the returned product,
the module should use the stock moves that are returning the product.
In the use case, because of the two issued noted above,
`_compute_average_price` does not find any stock valuation layer to
compute the average unit price and uses the fallback, i.e. the standard
price of the product:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/6b96ed418cb626678f4fa5baec25a903d7a74eda/addons/stock_account/models/product.py#L652-L656
That's the reason why, in the above case, the value is $30 instead of
$20.
Note: a similar use case can be reproduced with a kit
OPW-2646926
OPW-2628215
closesodoo/odoo#82978
X-original-commit: 524d0d5e8817e1c7bcc99204c4cbb90fcfb6074c
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
Analytic Accounts can be defined in the MO and can be changed in any MO stage. So the analytic account line will also have to be updated to be linked to the new AA
opw-2674347
closesodoo/odoo#79955
X-original-commit: 65a18382c1712968148898998e3778b77f199dea
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Suppose an automated AVCO product category. When confirming an invoice,
if the associated product was a kit and if its BoM has changed during
the process, a traceback can occur.
To reproduce the issue:
(Need sale_management)
1. Create a product category PC:
- Costing Method: AVCO
- Inventory Valuation: Automated
2. Create 3 products P1, P2, P3:
- Product Type: Storable
- Category: PC
3. Update P3's quantity > 0
4. Create two bills of materials:
- BOM01:
- Product: P1
- BoM Type: Kit
- Components: 1 x P2
- BOM02:
- Product: P2
- BoM Type: Kit
- Components: 1 x P3
5. Create a sale order SO with 1 x P1
6. Confirm SO and process the delivery
7. Edit BOM02:
- BoM Type: Manufacture
8. On SO, create the invoice INV
9. Confirm INV
Error: an Odoo Server Error is displayed with a traceback: "[...] in
_compute_average_price, bom_line_data = bom_lines[bom_line] [...]
KeyError: mrp.bom.line(19,)"
On step 7, when changing the BoM type, a new BoM line is created.
Therefore, in `_compute_average_price`, the BoM associated to the move
(i.e., `bom_line`) is not one of the lines in `bom_lines` (i.e., the new
BoM lines). There is already a check in case the line has been deleted,
but not if it has been changed.
OPW-2610685
closesodoo/odoo#78917closesodoo/odoo#79293
X-original-commit: 3ae0b781bcb5c2840f848bc63b9f3f9e1b2812cb
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
In a lot of test class, we use `setUp` instead of
`setUpClass`. `setUp` is execute for each test method and `setUpClass`
will be execute only once by Class (and use savepoint + rollback).
Then change setUp into setUpClass reduce the time to make all tests
and avoid to repeat this error for the future.
closesodoo/odoo#78082
Related: odoo/enterprise#21563
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin <Whenrow@users.noreply.github.com>
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Create a Product A with Costing Method = FIFO
- Create a Product B with Costing Method = FIFO and cost of 10
- Create a BOM of product A > type = Kit
- Add product B in bom line, with qty = 1 and UoM = dozen
- Add product A in `sale.order`
- Confirm order
Problem:
The cost is 10 rather than 120 (10 * 12 = 120)
Solution:
The kit cost must be the total cost of the components multiplied by their unit of measure
opw-2631487
closesodoo/odoo#78086
X-original-commit: 6c48262c8656821aa51669bd77cdf0f35634512f
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin <Whenrow@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Djamel Touati <DjamelTouati@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: fmdl <florent.mirieu@gmail.com>
If a MO created from a MTO doesn't have a BOM with a analytic account
already assigned to it, then propagate the SO analytic account (if it
has one) to the MO.
closesodoo/odoo#77897
Task: 2648460
X-original-commit: 061037fb79f007389408136fd3ed13e5de970908
Related: odoo/enterprise#21477
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
- update MO list status colors: draft = blue, in progress = yellow +
make the WO status colors match (waiting = blue, in progress = yellow)
and make draft MO lines all blue (to follow current design standard)
- cleanup Activity in tree view (no label in tree + "Next Activity" in
column selection dropdown)
- make units of analytic accounting for WO = hours
- make quantity for move_raw_ids products (i.e. components for MOs)
always have positive analytic_account_line.unit_amount (i.e. when
changing a done move's quantity + changing a quantity twice made this
value negative)
- make "Copy Operations" on BOM open the list view in "current" instead
of "new" due to lack of hook to prevent form view (i.e. open BoM in
current view) changing when clicking on lines in the new window's
operations (also ends up being a better UX anyways since being able to
view the operations form view is desired).
Task: 2648460
X-original-commit: 65a2d478197f5b856212225319500ca61b161809
Part-of: odoo/odoo#77897
Issue: With margin enabled and avco for stock valuation, after
confirming a SO with a product variant which is a bom kit,
when we try to change the variant, there is a traceback
Steps to reproduce :
1) Install Stock, Accounting, MRP, Sale,
2) Enable Margins in settings
3) Configure a Product Category with costing method AVCO
4) Configure a Product with 2 variants and that product category
5) [Important: KIT] Create 2 BoM, one for each variant and set those
BoM to KIT
6) Create a SO for that product and one variant
7) Confirm the SO, cancel it, and set to quotation
8) Edit the SO and change the variant, save
-> Traceback
Side-Note:
This issue is due to the fact that we iterate over the stock_moves to
find the quantity of the BoM, but that stock_move correspond to
confirming at step 7, when we change the variant at step 8, the stock
move has not changed, so still contains the previous bom_line_id with
the quantity, but this doesn't reflect with the new state of the SO
which is for a different variant.
For me since the stock move is canceled, it should be taken into
consideration when computing the average price but I might be wrong,
it's up to the reviewer to decide if it makes sense
opw-2639093
closesodoo/odoo#77606
X-original-commit: c0d4ed5ac641d339a6cd4e23db9667048d35360d
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin <Whenrow@users.noreply.github.com>
When the name of a production order changes, we should update the name
and the reference of the analytic accounting lines of its work orders.
Task-2638896
closesodoo/odoo#76090
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
Both mo_analytic_account_line_id and wc_analytic_account_line_id are
copied when duplicate the workorder. This is not correct.
Task-2638896
Part-of: odoo/odoo#76090
- The "BoM Structure & Cost" takes now in account
the subcontracting cost.
The subcontracting cost depends of the best supplier info in product
and subcontractor register in the BoM.
- Also add this subcontracting cost (to the cost field) when we click on
"Compute Price from BoM" in the product view.
task-2486811
Part-of: odoo/odoo#75041
Add analytic accounting for MO.
Post expense entries for:
1. raw material cost (change with consumed)
2. work center cost (change with real duration on work order)
Task-2469742
PR #68708
Clean up of some demo data that was referring to old demo data
names/prices. Also add extra demo data so we can have some
stock.valuation.layer values and some data points for enterprise
level reports.
Part 3.3 of task: 2440068
ENT PR: odoo/enterprise#20169closesodoo/odoo#74951
Related: odoo/upgrade#2727
Signed-off-by: Rémy Voet <ryv-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
For improved cost analysis, byproducts can now have a "cost share" (out
of 100%) indicated. This cost share will by multiplied by the total BoM
cost (i.e. components + operations costs) and reflected in the stock
valuation. The final product will also have the byproducts cost
subtracted from its final stock valuation. This is of course only
applies when costing methods are appropriate (i.e. non-standard price).
Additionally, we can now "Compute Price from BoM" for byproducts (via
its product form) and the BoMs that it is a byproduct of are now counted
towards its # BoMs smart button (we will now also see these BoMs when
clicking on the smart button). Of course when there is no cost share for
byproducts then clicking on "Compute Price for BoM" will not change the
a byproduct's cost and if there are multiple BoMs the prodcut is a
byproduct of, the calculation will only be based on the first BoM it
finds (i.e. same as current logic for manufactured products).
BoM Cost report has been updated to include byproducts with cost shares
(byproducts with cost share = 0 will not show up in report).
Additionally we update the report to display operations only costs now
that BoMs are allowed to have no components in them.
Part 1 of Task: 2440068
Upgrade PR: odoo/upgrade#2727
Related ENT PR: odoo/enterprise#20169
Part-of: odoo/odoo#74951
Hide useless measures:
- "Backorder Sequence"
- "Extra Cost"
- "Quantity to Produce" (same as "Total Quantity", but not standardized
to product's UoM)
Renames confusingly named measures:
- "Quantity Producing" => "Quantity Produced" (i.e. amount actually
produced)
- "Total Quantity" => "Product Quantity" (i.e. amount scheduled to be
produced in product's UoM)
Part 3.1 of task: 2440068
Related ENT PR: odoo/enterprise#20169
Part-of: odoo/odoo#74951
On BoM, a component line can be filter out depending
of the product variant to manufacture
(with "Apply on Variant" field).
Extend this feature to operation and byproduct line.
task-2614126
closesodoo/odoo#74973
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin <Whenrow@users.noreply.github.com>
No need to keep it, it's useless and can confuse translators
closesodoo/odoo#74782closesodoo/odoo#74832
X-original-commit: 40c74e686f23c10e35000be583716d0c093ce3b3
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
The license is missing in most enterprise manifest so
the decision was taken to make it explicit in all cases.
When not defined, a warning will be triggered starting from
14.0 when falling back on the default LGPL-3.
closesodoo/odoo#74245
Related: odoo/design-themes#48
Related: odoo/enterprise#19862
Signed-off-by: Xavier Dollé (xdo) <xdo@odoo.com>
- Enable Margin analysis
- Have a product [TEST] in a category with
- FIFO and Automated Valuation.
- Kit BOM with 3 items (A,B,C)
- Create a SO with [TEST] and confirm.
- Modify the BOM and remove C from the kit.
- Back to the SO, cancel it.
Traceback will show, because there no more a bom_line associated with
the move
opw-2541674
closesodoo/odoo#72696
X-original-commit: 27821b728f409d7e1a69e84d0beb5ac708e6420e
Signed-off-by: agr-odoo <agr-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
The company is not mandatory on the analytic account, and the currency on it
is a related field to the currency of that company, if set. In case it is not
set, we should add a default fallback on the currency of the company of the
manufacturing order.
closesodoo/odoo#72482
X-original-commit: 4fc2ec31861d4602357f130066ec3507b96d8dc8
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Tuyls <alt-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
- Activate anglo saxon accounting
- Have a [DEMO] KIT product in a category using automated
Inventory Valuation with costing method AVCO
- The KIT is composed by C1 and C2 in the same product category
- Define a cost on both C1 and C2
- Open a POS session, order [DEMO], Invoice and complete the order
- Close Session, Validate and display Journal Items
COGS entries will be missing.
This does not occur when making the order without invoicing
opw-2481518
opw-2545758
closesodoo/odoo#72460
X-original-commit: 659b455aca7a2c7f0cb41bfd6312bca25917d8a9
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: agr-odoo <agr-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Previous fix f056254d1c5153467b10d9581214ff6d1348be76 didn't take the
situation when production location has its own valuation accounts into
consideration. Fix it in this commit.
opw-2476417
closesodoo/odoo#71064
X-original-commit: 60e83f03b871605b7aa281503269f66ac3ea940b
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuchen Huang <yhu-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
yhu-odoo