Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Create a BoM with components
- Archive one of the components
Problem:
No warning is displayed for the user to inform that the product is
used as a component in a BoM
opw-3089104
closesodoo/odoo#107863
X-original-commit: 9b7c416387d93507b6f750aba58ad6233a59d512
Signed-off-by: Djamel Touati (otd) <otd@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Stpes to reproduce the bug:
- Create a storable product “P1”:
- tracking: Serial number
- BOM: 1 unit of C1
- Create the MO 1:
- produce 1 unit of P1:
- Create the SN1
- Create the MO 2:
- produce 1 unit of P1:
- Create the SN2
- Create an Unbuild order:
- Select the MO1
Problem:
You have the possibility to select any Serial number linked
to the product “P1”, whereas only SNs created in this MO can be selected
opw-2834529
closesodoo/odoo#95956
X-original-commit: 167b1668450c5af44bc1d36d1c7d59921bc2b811
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Djamel Touati (otd) <otd@odoo.com>
Purpose of this commit to fix the UI in Manufacture app.
So, in this commit done following changes As suggested in Task:
- Able to expand next activity column of MO list view
- Added tooltip of default capacity field on work center
- Added quantity tooltip of BOM
TaskID - 2689994
closesodoo/odoo#95315
X-original-commit: 463a81eb325f624e8947f1b3444947f8ba1dc24b
Related: odoo/enterprise#29113
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
# Issue:
With User1, create a MO with work orders, and start one Work Order.
With User2, go to the MO, and start the same Work Order
=> Nothing happen, we currently prevent the workorders to have more than 1 open Time Tracking.
OPW-2845080
closesodoo/odoo#91123
X-original-commit: 8cb5aad6126e3f63ee4ef91115c8b4a6be571828
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: DavidFesquet <dafr@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Create a MO with work orders
- Confirm the MO
- Under the tab Work Orders > click on the button start multiple times quickly
Problem:
Several `mrp.workcentre.productivity` are created for the work order,
whereas normally the workorder can have only one timer started (without date_end).
Solution:
- If the workorder already has a timer running, return true to stop the process
- Add a constraint to block the user when he tries for example to create with an rpc call several `mrp.workcenter.productivity`
without an end date for the same workoder
opw-2802436
closesodoo/odoo#90094
X-original-commit: dd22195a75ec437e42424ee95ca9a41feeb48b0b
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Djamel Touati (otd) <otd@odoo.com>
When changing the structure of a kit, it lead to undesirable behaviors
on Odoo
Issue 01:
1. Create 3 products P_kit, P_compo01, P_compo02
- Type: Storable
- Category: PC
2. Create a bill of materials:
- Product: P_kit
- Type: Kit
- Components:
- 1 x P_compo01
3. Create a purchase order PO with 2 x P_kit
4. Confirm PO and process the receipt
5. Edit the bill of materials of P_kit:
- Add 1 x P_compo02 in components
6. Return 1 x P_compo01
7. Go back to the PO
Error: The received quantity is 0 while it should be 1.0
When processing the return, the received quantity is recomputed, which
lead to:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/59fcb31f5a0b8136dae26b70ca0087f9b5cf3d24/addons/purchase_mrp/models/purchase_mrp.py#L29
However, since in the mean time the user added a new line in the BoM,
`_compute_kit_quantities` doesn't find any associated SM
(`bom_line_moves` is empty in [3]) and thus returns 0.
Issue 02:
(Need account_accountant. Use demo data)
1. Create a product category PC:
- Costing Method: AVCO
- Inventory Valuation: Automated
- Set up the Price Difference Account
2. Create 3 products P_kit, P_compo01, P_compo02
- Type: Storable
- Category: PC
3. Create a bill of materials:
- Product: P_kit
- Type: Kit
- Components:
- 1 x P_compo01
4. Create a purchase order PO with 1 x P_kit
5. Confirm PO and process the receipt
6. Edit the bill of materials of P_kit:
- Add 1 x P_compo02 in components
7. Create and Post the bill
Error: an Odoo Error is raised "ZeroDivisionError: float division by
zero"
While confirming the bill, some anglo saxo lines are generated. To do
so, the valuation of the kit is computed: [1]. In the above case, it
will lead to [2]. However, since in the mean time the user added a new
line in the BoM, `_compute_kit_quantities` doesn't find any associated
SM (`bom_line_moves` is empty in [3]) and thus returns 0. Back to [1],
the quantity is used to divide the total price -> it will raise an error
if this quantity is zero
Suggestion:
Such situations should not happen: once a product is used at least once,
it should not become a kit nor have a new structure (if it was already a
kit). Otherwise, `_compute_kit_quantities` will not correctly work since
it is not possible to take the BoM changes into consideration.
[1]
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/abfe37fcea5b20f77799d9331d4d011530880669/addons/purchase_stock/models/account_invoice.py#L72-L74
[2]
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/75191404788ab83645ee35b779991ea6fcdfa406/addons/purchase_mrp/models/stock_move.py#L19
[3]
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/7d1af314320547ab5e37c1d97cad22992c98565b/addons/mrp/models/stock_move.py#L275-L294
OPW-2780855
closesodoo/odoo#86821
X-original-commit: 33fa43f795798276fa9d29dd0810289cbb1a2a9c
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <awt@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce the bug:
Go to a work order that is ready or waiting, try manually changing the scheduled start or end date > save
Problem:
Traceback is triggered because when we modify the date, we check if the start date is before the end date. But we cannot compare a False with a date
opw-2768054
closesodoo/odoo#85991
X-original-commit: 1768a072fd40d14dc8c402c3ccad9a6733460c03
Signed-off-by: William Henrotin (whe) <whe@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Djamel Touati (otd) <otd@odoo.com>
If a work center is used in any routing, a warning will be displayed when it will be archived
opw-2658596
closesodoo/odoo#79185
X-original-commit: a05f4e05b9f4df88948ac3dfc1522828b63bfb64
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <arm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Djamel Touati (otd) <otd@odoo.com>
"Material Availability" vs "Component Availability" label means
the same thing but it shouldn't.
- Rename these and add a help string for both fields.
- Change decoration to be green if the MO Readiness is
'ready'.
- The logic of `_compute_*_availability` doesn't take in account the
'ready' `(reservation_)state` to distinct clearly both fields
(`(reservation)_state` vs `*_availability`)
task-2668922
closesodoo/odoo#79033
X-original-commit: acc385137a6a59f3632d91a7fcabd5ab42e8bc7f
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <tic@odoo.com>
Custom text decoration classes have been dropped with d9a0877096
in favor bootstrap default ones.
This commit will adapt the list-view generation code ans some mrp
translations that were mistakenly omitted.
task-2579123
If a MO is validated with all of its (component)
move_raw_ids.quality_done = 0, then when trying to validate the
nonsensical "The quantity to produce must be positive" validation error
will occur. This is due to all move_raw_ids being marked as Cancelled,
which auto-updates the MO state to cancelled, which prevents the
validation from properly completing.
To avoid this error, we prevent the user from having 0 consumption for
all components.
Task: 2422698
Related (v13 fix + bug description) Task: 2463893
ENT PR (test fixes): odoo/enterprise#18355closesodoo/odoo#71068
X-original-commit: 81ba7084aeb3899787d083a2a2568a490f9c53e5
Related: odoo/enterprise#18411
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Tiffany Chang <ticodoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Because kits might never be in stock, it's impossible to fullfil the
quantity of a reordering rule: asking a mini/maxi quantity on a kit
makes no sense.
Odoo will continuously propose to order more to reach the quantity
necessary for the kit, but will never reach the asked qty, as it's a
kit, not a manufactured product.
OPW-2448878
closesodoo/odoo#68362
X-original-commit: c47a9319c081105e46e56f881b25fd6442266089
Signed-off-by: Adrien Widart <adwid@users.noreply.github.com>
For odoo-master Transifex project, no demo data
closesodoo/odoo#66500
X-original-commit: 813931ac850e5ba4181259a5957ec72226fb670c
Related: odoo/enterprise#16510
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Including demo data this time
closesodoo/odoo#58862
X-original-commit: 575abde110acb3d12b25f177a863374becef0894
Related: odoo/enterprise#13705
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Mainly transifex issues but also some errors found through 'grep' checks.
Fix typos and obscure english strings in xml contents, fields strings/helps, some docstrings, ...
ensuring correct translations base (and fallback when translations isn't available).
closesodoo/odoo#57276
X-original-commit: 4214f05d454bca2b60fda3a288d529c098e84f77
Related: odoo/enterprise#13053
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
Currently on branch saas-13.5
Without demo data
closesodoo/odoo#57168
X-original-commit: 32f752b486053b19a8c6167efb5ca0813f2bf3f8
Related: odoo/enterprise#12997
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
VAT, NIF in Spanish, is translated NIT in Spanish from Bolivia
Clean and translate the files with the correct translation.
opw-2197155
closesodoo/odoo#45533
X-original-commit: 641c14f08435b1df1d89184cc00855416bf40bc5
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Without demo data, for the odoo-master transifex project
closesodoo/odoo#41935
X-original-commit: dab7670b73506fb3a835695ee3bd735e0c5e5c2b
Related: odoo/enterprise#7287
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Followup of a425695e
The terms were back in 12.0
Courtesy of Juan José Scarafía
closesodoo/odoo#41624
X-original-commit: 85d0c7001a997748d7691205bbb8d066597591a5
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
If a Bill of Material is created without code (eg. when created as a new
group from a kanban view grouped by BoM) we would get a traceback
instead of an error.
With this changeset, we get a "You cannot create a new Bill of Material
from here." error if it is being tried.
opw-2124162
fix#38904closes#40289closesodoo/odoo#40457
X-original-commit: 32c13cd7d1387c0ea81a9bb5968d18c2b8f32051
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
Touati Djamel (otd)