Before this commit, recruitment models and views were mostly
set inside 'hr_recruitment.py' and 'hr_recruitment_views.xml'
respectively. In order to navigate easily, models are separated
into distinctive files.
closesodoo/odoo#105935
Related: odoo/upgrade#4048
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
in the model/view the name of the field is Applicant's Name and in the user error message the warning is shown as Contact Name, improving the message for easy and better understanding for the end user
closesodoo/odoo#107498
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Some cases require usage of Markup in order to correctly display HTML content
and avoid escaped or invalid statements.
Fix: in hr_recruitment, support default_job_id from context, easing display
of job's alias in empty list helper.
Task-3074357
closesodoo/odoo#106061
Related: odoo/enterprise#34139
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Purpose is to cleanup code: stop using help parameter name (use help_message as
help is a keyword), try to call super(), ...
Task-2710804 (Mail: Clean MailThread Posting API)
Prepares Task-36879 (Mail: Support MultiCompany Aliases)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#105992
If an applicant goes through the salary configurator
to create his contract, the employee created will not get
the associated sign requests nor the skills as it is working
now when creating an employee from the "create employee"
button on the applicant page.
Also fixes:
- a traceback obtained on the salary configurator
when having hr_contract_salary installed and
not hr_work_entry_contract
- a traceback obtained while trying to access an applicant
form while in debug mode
task-3002185
closesodoo/odoo#104320
X-original-commit: 20d5de3490baaab62715fe0f4f2a9a48dc248d55
Related: odoo/enterprise#33332
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
Purpose: The number of 'Late activities' are displayed on the kanban card.
The number excludes the activities for the hired applicants. Yet, once we
click on it, we are redirected to the activity view, which included the
later activities. On the one hand, this is not consistent, but on the
other hand, one might still be interested in those activities later on.
Thus the best way out is to put the filter for the "Running Applicants".
This filter will filter out the applicants in hired stage, but if we are
interested in them, one could just remove the filter.
task - 3001375
closesodoo/odoo#102691
X-original-commit: 16e025de14be3ace07191ab153259ed17b174748
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Gvaladze Sopiko (sgv) <sgv@odoo.com>
Currently clicking the 'Other applications' smartbutton on an
application redirects to a kanban view that does not have very useful
information.
With this commit, this smartbutton now redirects to the application list
view and adds small UX changes to this list view.
task-2946398
closesodoo/odoo#99828
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
When hr_recruitment is installed and a user doesn't have any recruitment access, an access error is raised.
This commit fixes the access error, allowing the user to access the hr departments view when hr_recruitment is installed and the user has no hr_recruitment access.
task-2971553
closesodoo/odoo#99591
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
From the applicant page, there is no way to access the related partner's page.
If you made an error on the email address before creating the partner and you wish to update it,
it will not be updated on the partner's mail address, which is used to send the signature request.
taskID 2880904
closesodoo/odoo#93840
Related: odoo/enterprise#28502
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
hr_*:
hr
hr_contract
hr_recruitment
website_hr_recruitment
Increase UX and possibilities to postulate to a job on recruitement.
Also moves the model hr.contract.type from hr_contract to hr so that it
can also be used from hr_recruitment without having two models in parallel.
taskID 2898063
closesodoo/odoo#96551
Related: odoo/enterprise#29777
Related: odoo/upgrade#3861
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
Purpose
=======
Currently, only email sending can be scheduled with the `scheduled_date` field
defined on on <mail.mail>. It's not possible to delay the sending of
notifications.
We want to be able to delay the sending of the emails, but also the inbox
and bus bus notifications.
Technical
=========
For that purpose, we created a new model which stores the message we need to
notify with the scheduled date. When a scheduled_datetime is given we skip the
notification process. Instead an entry in that new model is created. A cron
regularly polls the scheduled message and launch the notification process on
messages that are ready to be sent.
Task-2207626 (Rating: Delay rating notification to ease feedback)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#95623
Co-authored-by: Thibault Delavallée <tde@odoo.com>
This commit aims at removing unuseful help message to:
1/ reduce translators work, to focus on more useful translations
2/ not sending unuseful information in load_views
3/ reduce help message to useful messages, so that we can mark
fields having a tooltip in the future UI.
4/ some cleanup of existing messages too
The main use cases:
- REMOVED: help redundant with the field name, providing no extra info
- MOVED TO COMMENT: technical help messages, that should not be in UX
closesodoo/odoo#97279
Signed-off-by: Fabien Pinckaers <fp@odoo.com>
The interviewer field was added by #78622, and adds access control for
`hr.applicant` based on whoever was assigned as the interviewer.
Due to the access control implications, it's useful to track the value of
this field in the applicant history.
closesodoo/odoo#95432
X-original-commit: 4b9447972009aa56ddacdba8eba4f7686537a753
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Move the definition of class Query to odoo.tools, in order to avoid
circular imports when importing Query in core Odoo modules.
Also reorganize imports in the impacted modules.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#66938
1f7c83cc3e renamed _notify_compute_recipients to
_notify_get_recipients. This function was not renamed with it so
members of the hr_recruitment.group_hr_recruitment_interviewer group
were receiving chatter they shouldn't be receiving.
The test didn't catch this because:
- the interviewer was not subscribed and thus never received email,
- MockEmail._filter_mail got passed status=False instead of None,
which always made it return an empty mail.mail recordset.
opw-2898730
closesodoo/odoo#95004
X-original-commit: 4dd9d3ee6fb261fd856036ced35bfb15b302b0b7
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
This commit aims to improve the recruitment reports clarity,
particularly the confusion between source and medium
TaskID : 2837445
closesodoo/odoo#90975
Related: odoo/enterprise#27148
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
Purpose
=======
This commit add an option on the configuration to install the enterprise
module to scan and import CV information on the application form.
closesodoo/odoo#92019
Related: odoo/enterprise#26687
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Purpose
=======
In this commit, we will fix the loops that occur when you send an email
to an alias (to create a ticket e.g.). In that case Odoo can reply
"Your ticket has been created" and then the auto-replier of the user
can reply to this email and the loop occurs.
Specifications
==============
To solve this issues, we add 2 system parameters
- <mail.gateway.loop.minutes>, 120 minutes by default
- <mail.gateway.loop.threshold>, 20 by default
When an email is sent to an alias, we look on the last records created
<mail.gateway.loop.minutes> minutes ago. If we overcome the limit
<mail.gateway.loop.threshold> the email is ignored.
Alias creation detection
========================
To detect the number of records created by a specific email address we
use the `_primary_email` attribute set on the model.
Task-2294034
closesodoo/odoo#78597
Related: odoo/enterprise#21772
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
From 450 to 1.5 ms
closesodoo/odoo#90609
X-original-commit: 045d80187c10c74747a3fd35b931cfe0c9862c08
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Purpose:
At the moment, you can only find multi applications for the same applicant
based on the similar email.
Not every application comes through the same email.
We want to find same applicants based on the same email, phone or
mobile phone.
task - 2701472
closesodoo/odoo#86428
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
Refactor the `load_views` API so it no longer sends multiple times the same
fields description.
e.g.
When `load_views` is called to get the kanban, tree and form views,
the list of fields of the model was sent 4 times:
- Once for each view, with only the fields used in the view,
in `['fields_views']['kanban']['fields']` for instance
- Once globally, with all the fields of the model, in `['fields']`
The goal of this revision is to change that so it sends the list of all fields
only once.
In addition, if a view contains x2many fields,
the fields description of the comodel is also sent.
It was sent in the `views` key of the view fields dict.
e.g.
When calling `load_views` of `res.partner` to get the kanban,
tree and form views,
the `res.partner` fields description was actually sent 6 times:
- Once for each view
- Once globally
- Once for each view of the many2many field `child_ids` of the form view, in
- `['fields_views']['form']['fields']['child_ids']['views']['kanban']['fields']`
- `['fields_views']['form']['fields']['child_ids']['views']['form']['fields']`
The change suggested in this revision is to:
- Remove the fields description for each view in `['fields_views']`.
As it no longer contains the fields,
the key becomes `['views']` instead of `['fields_views']`.
- Replace the dict key `['fields']` by `['models']`,
which is a dict with as key the model name and as values
the model fields description. It contains the fields description
for all models implied in the view:
the model of the main view and the model of all one2many and many2many fields.
With this change, the fields description will only be sent once by model
implied in the view.
In addition, the web client was getting the information about the fields
sometimes in the global fields description list (e.g. `['fields']`),
sometimes in the fields description list of the view type
(e.g. `['fields_views']['form']['fields']`),
making it a pain to try to make changes / performance gain
in these field description dictionaries, because you never knew in which dict
the web client was getting its info.
Now, as there is only one place to get the fields description from,
it's clearer and cleaner.
- one2many and many2many fields views are passed directly in the main view
architecture rather than being put in the `views` key
of the field description.
This is actually easier to treat by the web client,
and this will allow in a future work to cache an entire view in one block
of text rather than having to combine multiple cached blocks of text
to return one view.
- one2many and many2many fields which do not have directly embedded views
have their views directly injected in the architecture,
so the web client doesn't have to do RPC calls to `load_views`
for each one2many and many2many fields not having embedded views.
For instance, this allow to reduce the number of RPC calls to `load_views`
from 8 to 1 when loading the form of `product.product`.
Currently, this behavior is limited to 1 level deep but we consider making it
go all the way down in future works. We did not do it for the moment because
in certain cases it rises the processing time and the size (bytes) too much.
e.g. the sale.order view can be 5 levels deep,
meaning you can reach 4 dialogs on top the main view.
```
sale.order form > order_line > sale.order.line form > invoice_lines >
account.move.line form > asset_ids > account.asset form >
depreciation_move_ids > account.move form.
```
This will also benefit in future works to cache an entire view in one block
of text rather to having to combine multiple cached block of text
to get one view.
- `fields_view_get` becomes `get_view`.
As it no longer returns the fields description,
keeping the `fields` in the name `fields_view_get` no longer makes sense.
Hence removing `fields` from the method name, it becomes `view_get`.
As it gets renamed anyway, we take the opportunity to rename it `get_view`,
which is more in line with the general getter/setter guidelines
in the model object world.
- `_fields_view_get` becomes `_get_view`. For the same reasons than above.
- `load_views` becomes `get_views`.
This is not mandatory, there is no technical reason to rename `load_views` as
it practically sends the same info as before,
the view architectures and their fields description. Just in another way.
We just take the opportunity of this pull request to suggest a cleaner API:
`_get_view`, `get_view` and `get_views`.
- Arguments `toolbar=False, submenu=False` fo the methods
`_fields_view_get` and `fields_view_get` are converted to a kwargs `**options`
in `_get_view` and `get_view`.
The rationale is that submenu was already no longer used (deprecated)
and the mobile options is introduced.
The mobile options is necessary to tell the server to send the mobile views
for x2many fields (kanban instead of tree).
Instead of adding a new argument each time we add a new option to
`fields_view_get`, it seems wiser to have a kwargs `**options` to avoid
to re-write all overrides each time a new option is introduced.
- `_fields_view_get` returned a dict containing the arch in text and some of the
view information. Now, `get_view` returns a tuple with the view architecture
as an `etree` node, and the view as a browse record. The rationale is that all
overrides of `_fields_view_get` were about modifying the arch only
(e.g. changing the address format/re-organizing the address related field
nodes of the partner according to the company country).
To do so, all these overrides were doing `etree.fromstring` to parse the arch
which was sent in text to convert it to an `etree`,
then operations were done on the `etree`,
and then `etree.tostring` was called to convert back the arch to string.
With this change of signature to send the arch as an `etree`,
all these back and forth `etree.fromstring` -> `etree.tostring` are avoided,
allowing some performance gain and less code in the end.
- A cleanup of the keys returned in the dict of `fields_view_get`
has been performed in `get_view`:
- `fields` is removed, as explained above,
- `view_id` is renamed `id`,
- `name` is removed, it was unused by the web client,
- `type` is removed, it was unused by the web client,
- `field_parent` is removed, it was unused by the web client,
- `base_model` is removed, it was unused by the web client.
- `filters` is moved from the global dict returned by `load_views`
(now `get_views`) to the dict returned by `fields_view_get` (now `get_view`)
as it applies only to the `search` view type.
- Retro-compatible methods for the 3 methods
`fields_view_get`, `_fields_view_get` and `load_views` are provided,
with deprecation warnings in them.
- The web client could cache the model fields description
(as it already caches the views),
so it doesn't need to fetch them again if it asks for another view of a model
for which he already has the fields description.
If we do so, `get_views` could return only the list of models used by
the views, without the fields description as of now,
and the web client would then call `fields_get` independently only for
the models for which it doesn't have yet the fields description.
This would avoid the server to return the fields description
and to call `fields_get`, which is costly, for each `get_views`,
therefore gaining performances.
- Inject the views of the one2many and many2many fields all the way down,
unlimited depth level, as explained above.
- Cache with `ormcache` the architecture of back-end views.
This is already done for qweb views, it's not done for back-end views.
Therefore the postprocessing of the views is performed for each `get_views`,
which is costly, while the view architecture doesn't change for users
belonging to the same groups, according to the groups implied by the view.
This pull request is co-authored by
Aaron Bohy (aab) for the web client part and
Denis Ledoux (dle) for the server part.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#87522
Purpose
=======
This is the optimal way to add a user on a group, to avoid calling the
contraint method _check_one_user_type on all the users from the group
closesodoo/odoo#87998
Related: odoo/enterprise#25908
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
The fix made in odoo/odoo#87723 was not taking into account the active
field.
closesodoo/odoo#87930
X-original-commit: ce6245470139e7615e5b857cb241c8fa51483e46
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
On large databases, the method `_compute_new_application_count` could
take up to 80% of the total loading time of the Job positions as each
job was generating 2 queries.
closesodoo/odoo#87862
Taskid: 2812400
X-original-commit: 147f6a933f106fea540bd62522b941a855fffda2
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
* Redesign views
* New layout for the job kanban card + redesigned menu
* Create new reports
* Candidate Sources: get a better view on where applicants are
coming from;
* Time in Stage: shows how long an applicant is in the current
stage.
* Archiving a job archives applicants as well
odoo/enterprise#24816odoo/upgrade#3395closesodoo/odoo#85479
Taskid: 2738082
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
This commit modifies most of the usages of read_group and uses
_read_group instead. _read_group doesn't join automatically on the
many2one fields when no order_by is specified, making it more performant
when the "name" of the many2one is not relevant, which is the case for
most back-end cases
closesodoo/odoo#84908
Task-id: 2479334
Related: odoo/enterprise#24877
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
Purpose
=======
Ensure that the names of the UTMs models (campaign, medium and source)
are unique.
If not, generate automatically an unique name.
The name field is no more translatable; it makes no sense to translate
a technical which will be added in the URL, and can even cause issues
(the UTM record is not recognized because of the translation).
For the campaign, we keep a "translatable" name which is called
"title".
For the UTM source, use a mixin to generate automatically the name of
the source based on the content (_rec_name) of the record. So we remove
the override of create / write / copy in the different models and
ensure consistency between those models.
Task-2245823
closesodoo/odoo#60501
Related: odoo/enterprise#21882
Related: odoo/upgrade#1863
Signed-off-by: Warnon Aurélien (awa) <awa@odoo.com>
PURPOSE
Global purpose is to rename some methods and add some docstrings to clean
API of notification methods used in mail thread. Notably use _notify_thread
prefix for main methods, and _notify_by_'mean' for tool sub-methods.
SPECIFICATIONS
Remove unused arguments coming from old implementation and usage. They were
introduced notably for performance reason when cache was more often invalidated
which is not the case anymore. Anyway when parameters are unused it is always
better to remove them.
Remove ``notify_by_email`` parameter in ``_notify_thread``. It is only used
in channels to avoid notifying people of some automated notifications. The
same behavior has been cleanly implemented at odoo/odoo@018820d .
Rename methods, starting with ``_notify(_records)`` to ease their grouping
and understanding. Add some additional prefixes like ``_notify_by_'mean'``
and ``_notify_get_recipients`` for recipients related computation. Add some
docstrings, notably when parameters usage is not clear.
Some linting is also performed in updated actions, just to lessen styling
issues notably on runbot.
This commit should not change anything functionally as it contains only
some renaming and docstrings updates as well as some outdated parameters
removal.
Task-2710804 (Mail: Clean Mail.Thread API)
Part-of: odoo/odoo#82167
The possible index names have been renamed "btree", "btree_not_null"
(instead of "not null") and "trigram" (instead of "gin").
Task 2742526
Part-of: odoo/odoo#83274
Create a new Interviewer access rights.
This right is automatically given to users that are added as
Interviewers on a Job Position or on an Application.
An interviewer can only access applications they are interviewer of the
job or the application itself, the chatter is disabled for them as it might
contain some sensitive information (salary details, contract link, etc.)
closesodoo/odoo#78622
Taskid: 2669730
Related: odoo/enterprise#21778
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Three supported types:
- btree (default for index=True)
- btree not null (when >90% of the data are null)
- gin trigram search (for char fields)
Review of indexes on all objects.
closesodoo/odoo#83015
Signed-off-by: Fabien Pinckaers <fp@odoo.com>
Creating employee from applicant was not providing the default
home_address_id
closesodoo/odoo#81121
X-original-commit: 68cdf057a9e769071fab6726eaf3b37d16959bf1
Related: odoo/enterprise#23443
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
It is more intuitive that application_count smartbutton has
the label 'x Other applications'.
task - 2695252
closesodoo/odoo#80551
X-original-commit: f1a2f51fec0a31b80a20c78a5b3d11561dce7164
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
PURPOSE
This commit consolidates UTM usage across all applications.
Global purpose is to avoid having undesired side-effects, such as unlinking an
utm.source/utm.medium/utm.campaign and at the same time cascading the deletion
to various records without noticing.
SPECS
ALLOW MORE PEOPLE TO CLEAN UTM RECORDS
Currently, not even the system administrator can delete utm.mediums and
utm.sources (he can only delete campaigns).
These were considered as "technical records", but allowing some cleanup is
a good idea since these records are often automatically generated and can
create a lot of unnecessary noise in the database.
That's why we now allow the following groups to delete all UTM records
(sources, mediums and campaigns):
- group_system
- group_mass_mailing_user
- group_social_manager (enterprise)
PREVENT DELETION
For some use cases, removing an utm.source/utm.medium/utm.campaign would
cascade delete the related record, which was unintended / hidden side effect.
These combinations were secured by preventing to unlink:
- mailing.mailing source_id field
Trying to delete the utm.source will throw an error message
- mailing.mailing medium_id field
Trying to delete the utm.medium will throw an error message
- hr.recruitment.source source_id field
Trying to delete the utm.source will throw an error message
ADDING CLEAN ERROR MESSAGES
When trying to delete an UTM record that is linked with ondelete="restrict", we
improved the error message to give a clear explication to the user, e.g:
"You can't delete these UTM sources as they are linked to the following
mailings in the Mass Mailing APP, and deleting the source would break the
statistics: Newsletter"
SPECIFY 'ondelete' strategy
For a lot of uses of sources/mediums/campaigns, the 'ondelete' strategy was not
specified, leading to the confusion of "is this really how we want to handle
this?".
A lot of ondelete="set null" have been added in various field definitions to
ensure that this is the desired and logical strategy we want for that
specific model.
PREVENT REMOVING HARDCODED UTM RECORDS
In some functional flows, UTM records are hardcoded using their direct
record reference.
This is notably the case for the recruitment process and its creation of
aliases, and for the Email / SMS Marketing flows.
As deleting them would break these flows, we prevent their deletion in a
"api.ondelete" method.
ENFORCE NEW RULES WITH TESTS
A lot of python tests have been added to make sure we enforce the decisions
taken here above.
LINKS
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#19048
Task-2459480
closesodoo/odoo#72239
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Purpose
=======
Give the user a more organized view of the digest KPIs in the backend and
improve global wording of digest sections and KPIs.
Specifications
==============
Reorganize order of KPIs in digest view. Fix some typos, move buttons in
list and form views.
Task-2582128
closesodoo/odoo#77507
Related: odoo/enterprise#21340
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Improves the application count compute by ignoring case when matching
applications by email.
TaskId-2669835
closesodoo/odoo#78541
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
Previously when creating an applicant through the calendar application,
no activity would be created making the newly created record not show up
in the calendar because it depends on the activities linked to the
record.
A calendar event will now be created upon creation through the calendar
view in order for the applicant to be displayed directly.
Also fixes an issue where if no contact is set on the application it
would prevent you from refusing it.
TaskId-2641495
closesodoo/odoo#76831
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
Issue: When receiving a mail on a alias for a job position, the
application is created correctly in the right stage but the e-mail
template for that stage is not sent to the applicant
Steps to reproduce :
1) Set an alias and a external mail server
2) Configure incoming mail server
3) Create a job position with a mail alias and a email template
4) Receive a mail for that job position
5) The application is created but no mail is sent to the applicant
Why is that a bug:
When we create an application manually the mail is sent to the
applicant but when creating it via e-mail reception, it's not sent
even though it should. This is due to stage_id missing from the flow
when receiving an e-mail
opw-2533310
closesodoo/odoo#75721
X-original-commit: 108b1c30e6254f24564246c401ad50a983498066
Signed-off-by: Nathan Marotte <nmarotte@users.noreply.github.com>
Since a partner of the type private is created when
the partner is created at message post (see _message_post_after_hook),
most of the hr.applicant are linked to a partner_id of type private
And recruitment officer may not have the access to private address,
those user can get an access error while opening a form view of an
hr.applicant due to get_suggested_recipients called.
They are already able to see the email address and the name of the
applicant directly on the applicant form we can consider they should
be able to call get_suggested_recipients
closesodoo/odoo#75454
Solution: read the partner with sudo
X-original-commit: b916e8fd8347e77f2f2e15bf0473a0b3642436f9
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Remove read access on `ir.model`, `ir.model.fields`, `ir.model.fields.selection` and `ir.model.data` for employees.
To access such records, the code must use the helpers (`_get`, `ref`,...) instead of CRUD operations directly.
Simplify the helpers to ir.model.data that were public and redundant.
self.env.ref is encouraged instead but with the slight drawback that `ref` makes a call to `exists()` (`_xmlid_lookup` can be used if this wants to be avoided).
Part of task-id 8203
closesodoo/odoo#69120
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Assign the job recruiter to applications created through the email
alias.
Previously the email alias did not contain the recruiter's ID and the
application would not be assigned to anyone. This commit changes that
behaviour and also updated the alias creation values when the right
fields change, such as department_id.
The Alias should be kept synchronized with the job configuration.
Closesodoo/odoo#74236
Task ID: 2608541
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Multi-Application Management and UX improvements.
Improve in Recruitment app Job Positions Kanban view;
It is more intuitive if list is applications default view; improve the applications form;
Task - 2404610
closesodoo/odoo#63946
Related: odoo/enterprise#15750
Signed-off-by: Kevin Baptiste <kba@odoo.com>
Change the text of the meeting smart button to be similar to the one
found in appraisals, it now also shows the date.
Closesodoo/odoo#72649
Task ID: 2578165
Related: odoo/upgrade#2642
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
When using the Add button on the calendar view introduced with
odoo/odoo#64948 the event would not be linked with the applicant.
After further investigation the method used to get the applicant id in
default_get was not flexible enough, the one from crm calendar has been
'copied'
Task ID: 2578165
closesodoo/odoo#73635
X-original-commit: f23e07dcb0606dbc4bf835b8266323d5a515662d
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: William Braeckman (wbr) <Williambraecky@users.noreply.github.com>
Dossogne Bertrand