In commit [1], a check was added to see if a media is editable in order
to prevent its edition if it is not the case. However, this also had as
effect to block the edition of some grid images. Indeed, as the columns
in grid mode containing only an image have their `contenteditable`
property set to `false`, the images don't pass the check because their
parent is therefore not editable.
This commit removes the `contenteditable` property from these columns
in order to make their images pass the check and therefore allow their
edition.
Tests are also added, ensuring that these grid images can be correctly
replaced.
[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/ddade4346347266b7f699d05865578dc96e2bf98
opw-3028116
Fixes#103234closesodoo/odoo#104899
X-original-commit: d8c374e3e6b31bf88aa42952aadf3379936f7600
Related: odoo/design-themes#617
Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
*: website_sale
Since [1], it was not possible to edit a company team snippet image
anymore as soon as the page was saved once. Indeed that commit added
o_not_editable/contenteditable="false" on the parent column to make sure
no text can be added in that column and contenteditable="true" on the
images so that they are still editable (even though HTML-specs-wise
adding contenteditable="true" on images probably does not mean much as
images are self-closing tags, our editor understand that as the ability
to edit the image anyway). That contenteditable="true" part is however
removed when leaving edit mode... and was not restored upon entering
edit mode again.
This fixes the problems with a specific JS patch, we'll review to see if
better can be done in master.
Funny enough, that bug was actually gone in 15.0... by mistake. A recent
bug fix actually reintroduced that isolated bug at [2] (by reintroducing
the fact that images in a non-editable environment are not possible to
edit). The 3 opened tickets this commit mentions were actually reported
for 15.0 immediately after that, while the 14.0 being broken about this
since the beginning apparently did not bother anyone.
Note: as a forward-ported fix, this also takes the opportunity to clean
a bit what was done at [3]. (calling `_super`, no duplicated code,
adding comments, ...).
[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/656cac1bf21c7c5a56aa569008aac58436c747fb
[2]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/e113bae04a64a8bd341a80736086ab7c25079dd3
[3]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/e2f7b8fad76dc816b2f6864340d3740446117cdb
opw-3031217
opw-3032482
opw-3035289
closesodoo/odoo#104521
X-original-commit: 1636ba5ed2f8a284bef0930313a85cc3dc7cf072
Signed-off-by: Romain Derie (rde) <rde@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
*: mass_mailing, website
Commit [1] introduced data-option-name allowing to name snippet options
without data-js so that their automatic snippet-option-XXX class was
not snippet-option-undefined. This was indeed useful to target specific
options in tours.
The attribute is however a complete duplicate of data-js (if you use
one or the other, it does exactly the same thing). Indeed, you can
define a data-js without a linked JS class (as it is already done). And
if you define both expecting the class using data-option-name but the JS
used from data-js that won't be the case, data-option-name is simply
ignored.
This removes data-option-name. This prepares refactorings that will be
done in the future:
- The way to define option in XML will be reviewed (probably client
side definitions, probably OWL templates).
- Adding data-js will probably require a JS class to exist, but all
option definitions of Odoo will declare one to ease extensions and
stable fixes.
Those are theoretical at this point though. This commit main focus is
simplifying the code.
[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/7b0a147cd43e8e890ebe5a882292a69a5c8c90acclosesodoo/odoo#103988
Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
This commit restores the possibility to control the height of the
image gallery snippet. This was indeed possible in <= 11.0 for all
snippets but it was removed in 12.0 as controlling the height via inner
paddings seemed enough and better (as responsive). For the image gallery
snippet however, this was a big regression as the height is forced to
70% of the current screen height on drop and the images inside are
displayed depending on that forced height. Trying to control via
paddings was not leading to the wanted effect.
This restores the possibility in 14.0 as 12.0 and 13.0 are now
deprecated. This is following a customer issue where not having the
ability to control the height is actually confusing as the user edits
its website across different screens and the height is forced to 70%
height of the screen used at the time of edition. With an height input
in the panel, the confusion is gone.
Note: this also introduces a `forceStyle` parameter for the
`selectStyle` option to be able to force the inline style a widget
controls. Indeed, without it, the system is "smart" and tries not to
force inline style when it is not needed (if you try to force red on
something that is naturally red (thanks to a CSS rule for example), it
won't be forced). Here, this was leading to an issue when trying to set
the height:
- Current height is 700px
- There is some code that forces a min-height on all carousel items so
that they are the same height. As the gallery image dimensions depend
on the block forced height (this is how the snippet work), the forced
min-height are related to that forced height (something like 680px).
- You focus the height input and type 800px
- The same code forces new min-height on all carousel item (something
like 780px).
- You un-focus the height input, the system tries to re-set 800px (which
is already set)... it ends up removing it as it thinks that setting
that height is not needed as the snippet is now "naturally" 800px tall
thanks to the carousel items' min-heights.
opw-2838774
closesodoo/odoo#104068
X-original-commit: d4d0da320d42093e720c7d440cf6611249c0295a
Signed-off-by: Romain Derie (rde) <rde@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
Both dynamic snippets and visible on mobile use the `d-none` class:
- dynamic snippets activate it by default and only remove it when the
content is ready to be displayed
- visible on mobile makes the section `d-none` when it must be hidden on
mobile and the class is contradicted by another class which is only
taken into account non-mobile
This commit introduces a dedicated class to temporarily hide the dynamic
snippets.
task-2930503
closesodoo/odoo#103637
X-original-commit: 7b3be2f183f53bfcb5f365a2c26127da0702dc15
Related: odoo/upgrade#3980
Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
*: website_blog, website_crm_partner_assign, website_customer,
website_event, website_event_exhibitor, website_event_meet,
website_event_track, website_forum, website_hr_recruitment,
website_membership, website_sale, website_sale_loyalty,
website_sale_slides, website_slides, website_slides_forum
With commit [1], the "customize_show" options were moved in edit mode.
They were wrongly displayed for non-designer users. Trying to use those
would throw a warning at the user.
[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/17a8a37e9bfc5b787d9666597d43e63f0064919fclosesodoo/odoo#103142
X-original-commit: f2ca62a4a9ccb6713a39c100fc87c112619eac41
Related: odoo/enterprise#32768
Signed-off-by: Romain Derie (rde) <rde@odoo.com>
This is basically reverting commit [1] which was done a few years ago
as improvement to [2], but it was a bit overkill IMHO.
Indeed, there is a sort of hack when creating a page with special
extension like "my-page.js" that will actually create a special page
with special arch. The goal is for such pages to be `t-call`ed later.
That's commit [2].
On top of that, when deleting such a special page, we introduced a
mechanism to show the views and pages that would possibly `t-call` the
that page which is requested to be deleted.
That's commit [1].
It basically is mimicking what was already done when you change the URL
of a normal page, we tell the user where that url is actually possibly
used.
But since the recent improvement in Odoo 16 done at [3], the page
manager is now a backend list view. It means that multi delete is now a
thing.
Thus, the page dependencies behaviors (key and url) need to be
refactored to handle multiple given URL/Key and not just one.
We choose to remove the key dependencies part (only used for those
special pages) instead of adapting it:
- That 'hack' is probably almost never used
- It's some code to maintain, eg now we need to refactor it
- We would need some extra code to make it only triggered for website
pages and not all records, unlike the url dependencies screen which
concerns all records
- That's an advanced feature (special pages), if you are using it, you
probably knows how to handle a website and you don't need us to remind
you where this special page's view is used.
[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/a91a3a563338e746d6d23cd57551af30e322e367
[2]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/727d461e1d2bcec4571665b90b6d1630f671a0a3
[3]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/31cc10b91dc7762e23b4bde9b945be0c4ce3fe3b
X-original-commit: 77f03abc56b147171eeba66bc55df5ee92c8af1a
Part-of: odoo/odoo#103136
Some snippets have a "hard coded" background color which doesn't change
when we want to put a preset color (theme). We have to delete the back-
ground first before being able to choose a preset color.
This commit fixes this behaviour by putting a preset color by default
on the concerned snippets (instead of a fixed color). These snippets
are searchbar and text highlight.
task-2824393
closesodoo/odoo#103123
X-original-commit: 4a1442679bb1058d08428e08bec3433e968fb64b
Related: odoo/design-themes#604
Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
The Masonry and Big Boxes snippets don't have a background option
because their blocks are supposed to take the whole space, so a
background is not really necessary. But since the addition of the grid
mode, these blocks can be placed more freely and a background may
therefore be necessary.
This commit adds the background option to these snippets.
task-3014939
closesodoo/odoo#103109
X-original-commit: 019f6824caafdf2cdc79babcbe45af3db0df1550
Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
*: website_event
The 'website_event.menu_edit_menu' menuitem was added on 'website_event'
module to the 'custom menus' registry so it can be displayed by the
'website_custom_menus' service if the event page has menus to edit.
The goal of this commit is to move this code to 'website' by using a
generic 'custom_menu_edit_menu' menuitem that will be cloned to edit
every content menu on the current page with the corresponding
'EditMenuDialog'. This is needed as a fix as it would be a regression
to not have this in 16.0 since it was possible to edit any menu on a
page in previous versions.
task-2973149
closesodoo/odoo#102997
X-original-commit: 6af5ad67c9657c7dcaf4afa1ecb4561e9c72270a
Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
Since [1], the Masonry snippet is in grid mode only and its templates
have been modified to allow this mode. However, some of them don't look
good and have to be improved.
This is what this commit does:
- some text blocks were too small so their height has been increased
- the Masonry second default image has been replaced by another one
that looks better.
[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/85b352af319edec84407f2046cf795b4e5503460
task-3013055
closesodoo/odoo#102984
X-original-commit: ad8926eafd34c2743e1a5247f6171fd183e6e506
Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
The goal of this commit is to add some fixes on page properties dialog
after the Owl REF [1].
- XML: use default form view style (remove </group>).
- Move the '/' back into the non editable part of the URL.
- Prevent python code from creating a different URL (and optionally
setting "website.rewrite" record for it) when the new URL is the same
as the initial one after slugify.
- 'useAutofocus()' on the first page properties field.
[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/61a9d7bd2abc6081b321a51d329f9e85209215e5
task-2687506
closesodoo/odoo#102869
X-original-commit: 1165dfcd4fd5677d14f3d3329ad7c62be847b31a
Signed-off-by: Romain Derie (rde) <rde@odoo.com>
Before this commit the neutralize system introduced in v16 was using ORM
methods in order to change appropriate records. Although flexible, this approach
could lead to call some methods with side effects while neutralizing
(eg: overloads of write).
This patch converts the neutralize system to a safer "inert" SQL based approach
by migrating the generic method _neutralize to SQL files exposed in the
data folder.
Task id: 2961687closesodoo/odoo#102792
X-original-commit: e5dbded9bb363351feff7ca8a56c7f8a6860f492
Related: odoo/enterprise#32580
Signed-off-by: Fabien Meghazi <fme@odoo.com>
This commit includes several changes in the Plausible dashboard:
- Remove the "Analytics" title.
- Add margins (container-fluid => container).
This also fixes the country map overflow and the flickering.
- Remove the duplicated scrollbars.
- Use the background colors from within the iframe.
- Hide the date range buttons by default, but show them if website_sale
is installed.
It also reorders the Reporting menu as follows:
- Analytics
- eCommerce
- Online Sales
- Visitors
- Page Views
task-2993773
X-original-commit: b8c1976e933628182496929d348dda11b5051a0c
Part-of: odoo/odoo#102782
In [1], the resizing and the drag and drop of a grid item both put
it in front of all the other items and in front of the background grid
(thanks to the `z-index` property).
This commit changes that behavior: now, the grid item stays at the same
z-index if we are resizing it or if we are dragging it over the grid
from which it is coming. In the case of a drag over an other grid, it
is placed in front of all its grid items. In all these cases, the grid
item is placed behind the background grid.
[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/93144
task-2973198
closesodoo/odoo#102525
X-original-commit: 67d1b078329600efce414974307d74e9fa9ba9fe
Related: odoo/design-themes#601
Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
This commit modifies the Masonry snippet, along with all its templates,
in order to always be in grid mode.
A change worth noting is that the images are now real images and not a
background and text can be added over them with the "Add Elements"
option. This change happened mainly for the look of the mobile view but
also because it is more logical since the snippet is supposed to
contain "images" and "text".
The themes extending Masonry have also been adapted in [1].
[1]: https://github.com/odoo/design-themes/pull/592
task-2973198
X-original-commit: 85b352af319edec84407f2046cf795b4e5503460
Part-of: odoo/odoo#102525
Currently, the toggle to grid mode is not the same process for all
snippets: some have both the option 'Layout Grid/Cols' and the ability
to toggle on drag but other don't have the option, making it
complicated/impossible to leave the grid mode. Also, the snippets for
which the grid mode has been blocked don't have their move handle
anymore, which prevents them to use the normal drag and drop (it was
hidden because dragging them would toggle the grid mode).
This commit uniformizes the grid mode for all snippets and adds the
move handle back to the ones that cannot use this mode. It also
improves the grid mode of the 'Items' and 'Carousel' snippets.
More precisely:
- All the snippets that are allowed to have the grid mode now have both
the option "Layout Grid/Cols" and the ability to toggle on drag.
- The snippets who cannot toggle the grid mode have the move handle
back but it doesn't toggle on drag and they don't have the option. They
use the "normal" drag and drop.
- The drag and drop has been improved to allow normal columns to go
inside the grids. Indeed, since the drag was previously blocked, this
case could not occur but now that it is possible, it had to be taken
into account.
- The grid mode of the Items snippet has been improved by removing the
"hardcoded" height that was breaking the grid.
- The vertical dropzones of Carousel appearing when dragging inner
content have been removed because they appeared in grid mode and were
breaking it. It is also more logical because now that this snippet has
a column option, vertical dropzones should only appear when dragging a
column.
task-2973198
X-original-commit: 84d684d8bdf43d3db11defd8174dee44775085c2
Part-of: odoo/odoo#102525
*: website
In grid mode, the images take the whole space in their column so they
always have the same size as them. However, if text was added in the
column (before or after toggle), it always looked like it was
overflowing and the overlay would not cover it even after resizing.
Also, since these images have the value of the `object-fit` property
set to `cover`, the images are cut if they are too big for the column.
This is problematic if the image has a shape because the shape is cut
too, ruining the visual effect.
This commit solves these issues by distinguishing the images that are
alone in their column from those that are not. An image is considered
alone if it is a direct child of the column and if there is no text in
it (the line breaks and empty lines are excluded). Now, only this kind
of images, if they have no shape, take the whole space in the column
and have `object-fit` set to `cover`; the other ones behave like the
columns in normal mode.
This distinction also allows to block the edition of the columns
containing only an image. Indeed, adding text or dropping inner content
in them had the same overflowing effect.
task-2973198
X-original-commit: e9c7e020daf88022d6e02de0a5620074e8417b5a
Part-of: odoo/odoo#102525
The grid mode allows some snippets to move and resize their columns in
a grid. However, some of them were blocked because they don't look good
in this mode. This is the case of the Big Boxes snippet: because it
contains two blocks full of padding and since toggling the grid mode
removes this padding, it ended looking weird.
This commit allows the previously blocked Big Boxes snippet to toggle
the grid mode. More generally, this commit allows snippets having only
columns containing a background color to look good in grid mode by
keeping a more logical padding for them.
task-2973198
X-original-commit: a051922f8359178f4abe578ce9555d34cbb02613
Part-of: odoo/odoo#102525
Having multiple groups one after the other will cause the labels to not
have the same width; converge all in a single group
closesodoo/odoo#102424
X-original-commit: c787b16421807355e58d3029a0941d3bdd65fad7
Signed-off-by: Bouvy Damien (dbo) <dbo@odoo.com>
In [1] the padding of the discrete cookies bar template was moved from
the column to the row.
This prevents editing the padding per column using the website editor.
This commit moves this padding back onto the columns and wraps the text
inside a paragraph so that it does not get closer to the bottom border
of the screen.
[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/2ca91a90d0aa61405547349d5cd366179bc3f419
task-2800976
X-original-commit: c50e2adf592a336d1f991e9a461eeeb21a2a64f0
Part-of: odoo/odoo#102380
Before this commit the Device visibility option was on its own row
inside the options panel.
This commit moves the buttons of the Device visibility option before
the dropdown inside the main row of the Visibility option.
task-2900730
closesodoo/odoo#102154
X-original-commit: 82000acfb6f8c7884994135413dcddac5441f8b4
Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
*: web_editor, website
Prior to this commit, the template structure for declaring the snippet
options used in a specific context (website, mass_mailing, ...) made it
hard to easily modify SnippetOptions defined in web_editor.
Indeed, the structure was as below
```xml
<template>
<t t-call="web_editor.snippet_options" />
... Additional Options ...
</template>
```
If someone wanted to alter the behaviour of an option from web_editor
for their module, they had 2 solutions
- To extract that option inside another template, extend that template
inside their own module, remove its call from web_editor and instead
call manually the option inside each module (preferred method)
- To impact the web_editor template directly with an extension instead
of a new primary template or override JS options using include or
replacing an option inside the registry.
The second solution was often used but created extra code to make sure
that other modules were not impacted... and it was often not properly
done. For example:
- [1] and [2] introduced javascript code inside the web_editor options
and isolating it by checking if they are in fact, inside mass_mailing.
- [3] adds code in mass_mailing mentioning JS classes of website, and
actually broke parallax for website (after [5]).
- [4] broke the image transform option for website (after [5]).
- [6] added some shapes for mass mailing images but ended up adding them
for the website builder too.
- [7] created different images options for mass_mailing... but ended up
impacting website options too. Half of those can actually either be
put in web_editor to improve everything or just in mass_mailing to not
break the website.
- ...
This commit tries to fix everything "the right way" in master (and will
be backported for the recent 16.0). Other stable fixes will need to be
made to restore the website options in a stable way.
To fix that, this commit changes the structure to
```xml
<template inherit_id="web_editor.snippet_options" primary="True">
<xpath ...>
... Change existing options ...
</xpath>
<xpath expr="." position="inside">
... Additional options ...
</xpath>
</template>
```
This allows each module to modify the existing web_editor templates
without impacting it and each other. They can even change the JS
behaviour by using an XPath to replace the data-js of an option, and
changing it to their own extended version of the JS option.
[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/f296992317e96562c66bd7ad59a5080d6c551ed5#diff-df5e4ff426027c53ebe6e25c25820fb92237c17a036f6202a93e5ca681ec8c16R134-R138
[2]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/cd403480f90cf7103651f3be818a14b06d3c73ca#diff-df5e4ff426027c53ebe6e25c25820fb92237c17a036f6202a93e5ca681ec8c16R175
[3]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/e9237ae8004502a3071e8ceb132d9dac11fe00b3#diff-df5e4ff426027c53ebe6e25c25820fb92237c17a036f6202a93e5ca681ec8c16R372
[4]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/ff422df49201be6ed7baa11ef3deb5b9a41042a7
[5]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/31cc10b91dc7762e23b4bde9b945be0c4ce3fe3b
[6]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/24a4c7f897d4db6bdf0f3cbfc91a3ce7351241a2
[7]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/d0c2d8e9a1436a8eaf263797c790329f81d7615bclosesodoo/odoo#99850
Related: odoo/design-themes#597
Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: qsm-odoo <qsm@odoo.com>
*: website_blog, website_event
Commit [1] introduced new templates. This commit's goal is to build on
that template system to provide more flexibility for designers.
It adds new data-attributes to set on the first node of a template.
- data-row-per-slide: Allows for the template to tell a dynamic snippet
carousel how many rows of cards it should display.
- data-arrow-position: Allows for the template to tell a dynamic snippet
carousel where the arrows should be positioned.
(for now just bottom, or side)
- data-extra-classes: give the template the possibility to add extra
classes to the dynamic snippet instead of just the card.
This commit also removes options to select the amount of elements
displayed on each row. This is now only changeable through templates, or
by directly editing the snippet's DOM through debug tools. This was done
to reduce the amount of options visible, so that the user just chooses
a template and it is ready to go.
[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/49bd79b0bdca76415780bdfa199195371c2692e5
task-2677203
Part-of: odoo/odoo#80128
*: website_blog, website_forum, website_hr_recruitment, website_sale,
website_slides
The goal of this commit is to set the missing 'view_ids' on some
actions linked to website 'pages' tree/kanban views.
Linking a form view to actions will make the 'Edit' & 'Configuration'
buttons work correctly (on kanban record dropdown for 'hr.job' &
'slide.channel').
The website url on "product pages" kanban should start on a new line
after this commit too.
Related to task-2889981
closesodoo/odoo#101814
X-original-commit: a61e730cd9f92b2c343646f33f3e59cef518c3bf
Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
The cookies bar default templates are designed in order to guide the
user towards selecting the option that will provide the best user
experience.
This raises security concerns (see discussion in PR for details).
This commit adapts the buttons of the default cookies bar templates so
that both options are shown with the same style, forcing the user to
take a decision.
task-2800976
closesodoo/odoo#101845
X-original-commit: 32d88f47a67679b7e90fa58e25089846484b48ca
Signed-off-by: Romain Derie (rde) <rde@odoo.com>
*: im_livechat, survey, utm, website_crm_iap_reveal, website_forum,
website_livechat, website_sale, website_sale_comparison
Before this commit all cookies were considered essential.
This commit makes some of them optional. It also makes it possible for
the website visitor to only accept the essential cookies.
task-2800976
X-original-commit: 9a8a9463289a7446e9be0ef62ff895feb37a4de4
Part-of: odoo/odoo#101845
Co-authored-by: Benoit Socias <bso@odoo.com>
Before this commit, the only possibility when adding a google font was
to use google servers to serve the font.
This was not ideal as some people really want to serve it themselves
without the need of their visitors to reach google servers.
That's especially true since recently where it seems like German clients
are receiving letters about that to tell them it's illegal and this
should be changed, as it wouldn't respect the GDPR.
Somehow, it seems related to the fact that google knows you visited a
website by just downloading the font, because they very well know with
just your IP who you are exactly.
It's yet unsure if that issue is well-founded or not, but since German
courts seem to be sanctioning people about this, there is no reason to
not at least provide a workaround.
What is sure is that it makes a lot of noise and more and more people
seem to be impacted by this as many opw are getting opened, as well as
github messages.
Whether it is well-founded or not is thus not really our problem
anymore, we should just provide a way for our users to protect
themselves against this "German law problem" (or at least think they are
protecting, if Odoo thinks that's a non issue or the German court is
wrong or ambiguous).
Note that a cookies banner to inform users would not be enough for that
"problem", as the user would already have accessed your website and thus
the related problematic fonts.
Another solution which is not something we want (at all) would be to
serve local system fonts while the user did not consent about google
fonts, or having a blocking screen page telling people visiting the
website will fetch google fonts. Obviously those 2 possibilities are a
no go as it leads to terrible UX.
Finally, note that:
- in Odoo 16, the default fonts will be the system fonts, meaning there
won't be any call to google by default, regardless of this pr
- there is a work in progress to improve the current cookies bar to
differentiate essential and non essential cookies and to allow user
to accept only one or both (task-2800976).
Useful links:
- https://github.com/odoo/odoo/issues/83638#issuecomment-1054470699
ODO detailed point of view about this
- https://rewis.io/urteile/urteil/lhm-20-01-2022-3-o-1749320/
The German law about this
Closes#83638
task-2756486
opw-2970167
opw-2960466
opw-2960555
opw-2952427
opw-2800976
opw-2748647
(possibly many more)
Courtesy of @bso-odoo for the regex part which was inspired by another
of his google font fix attempt
closesodoo/odoo#101826
X-original-commit: b06ce21eba6388ce34bbffffadcb489f0e8557dd
Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Romain Derie (rde) <rde@odoo.com>
Since [1] it is possible to request that some blocks are not displayed
on mobile devices.
This commit adds a similar option to prevent blocks from being displayed
on desktops (i.e. on non-mobile devices).
[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/9463f0f889f9dd8da6077895c125da4998a933c0
task-2900730
closesodoo/odoo#101483
X-original-commit: 3103e0553011b5c1f4078972d7a88fa3fd4068b2
Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Antoine (anso) <anso@odoo.com>
*: website_event, website_forum, website_hr_recruitment,
website_sale, website_slides
The website content list views should act as a page manager (click on
a record redirects to iframe, "CREATE" and "Publish / Unpublish"
buttons, ...).
The goal of this commit is to add a kanban version of these views for
key app models ('website.page', 'blog.post',...) since the same code
can now be used for list and kanban controllers / renderers since [1].
It is especially important in mobile where the kanban views are nicer
than list views by default.
[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/ed09db19c372da8d8be541f365117d1ce8e965ba
task-2889981
closesodoo/odoo#101174
Related: odoo/enterprise#31821
Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
*: website_blog, website_hr_recruitment
Add multi-edit on the remaining "pages" list views not using it:
- pages
- blog posts
The only remaining one would be "jobs" but editing the Department field
seems broken at the moment.
Related to task-2889981
closesodoo/odoo#101215
X-original-commit: be58687284884550cc4e6c2ac7255abee4eb1125
Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
The goal of this commit is to add a 'Publish' / 'Unpublish' button to
the additional actions of the 'website content' list views.
'Archive' / 'Unarchive' options are also removed for the 'website.page'
records.
task-2889981
X-original-commit: de02335b8db1396a24e10b78f8f78ed79fded421
Part-of: odoo/odoo#101215
The goal of this commit is to:
- Tweak the website filter (on website pages list added at [1]) to make
it work for all website content records (page, blog, ...).
- Update the 'New Page' dialog to be able to select the website_id for
the new page.
- Tweak the '_compute_is_homepage()' method to set 'is_homepage = True'
on website's '/' page when 'homepage_url' is not set in settings.
[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/940f4ee875332dafa1f379970a7683be6b3ee606
task-2889981
X-original-commit: d6014c60acc4231a5e56d492d2a39deaf789cbe8
Part-of: odoo/odoo#101215
Setting width *and* height attributes allows to reserve some space to
avoid layout shift during page loading. Of course, CSS rules set the
height the user chose, while the width is set to 'auto'. But while the
image is loading, it is best to already reserve some width to reduce
layout shift (like making the menu move or even re-render itself into a
"+" menu).
The chosen values for the space reservation are the ones of the default
logo and theme, but it does not really matter as long as they are
coherent. While the image is being loaded, the chosen user height is
still applied and the 'auto' width rule induces a width that respects
the aspect ratio set by the width and height attributes. That could be a
problem if the real logo has a larger height than width, in which case
the layout shift would be increased because of the arbitrary values set
as width and height, but in most cases, this should reduce it.
This also allows to gain some page speed scoring.
Examples:
=# Logo 200 x 100, height set to 50
Before this commit
- while loading: width = 0, height = 50
- once loaded: width = 200 / 100 * 50 = 100, height = 50
-> layout shift of 100 - 0 = 100
After this commit
- while loading: width = 95 / 40 * 50 = 118.75, height = 50
- once loaded: width = 200 / 100 * 50 = 100, height = 50
-> layout shift of 100 - 118.75 = -18.75
=> Shift of 18.75px to the left, way better than shift of 100px to the
right
=# Logo 100 x 100, height set to 50
Before this commit
- while loading: width = 0, height = 50
- once loaded: width = 100 / 100 * 50 = 50, height = 50
-> layout shift of 50 - 0 = 50
After this commit
- while loading: width = 95 / 40 * 50 = 118.75, height = 50
- once loaded: width = 100 / 100 * 50 = 50, height = 50
-> layout shift of 50 - 118.75 = -68.75
=> Shift of 68.75px to the left, kinda the same as a shift of 50px to
the right.
=# Logo 100 x 200, height set to 50
Before this commit
- while loading: width = 0, height = 50
- once loaded: width = 100 / 200 * 50 = 25, height = 50
-> layout shift of 25 - 0 = 25
After this commit
- while loading: width = 95 / 40 * 50 = 118.75, height = 50
- once loaded: width = 100 / 200 * 50 = 25, height = 50
-> layout shift of 25 - 118.75 = -93.75
=> Shift of 93.75px to the left, worse than shift of 25px to the right
but the case of having a 'portrait' logo is considered less common
than having a 'landscape' logo. Ideally, we should choose the
arbitrary values related to the most common aspect ratio.
closesodoo/odoo#101149
X-original-commit: 73786c5c45202914e02325c19a2afaa47d31c341
Signed-off-by: Romain Derie (rde) <rde@odoo.com>
This commit prevents the "|" between the additional title and the
website or company name from being turned into a translatable `span`.
closesodoo/odoo#101102
X-original-commit: 81c7c4cdf973b36e8ed787f8247da3a4bbf93117
Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
Commit [1] changed the way QWeb templates are loaded for public widgets,
removing the xmlDependencies attribute.
Most of the public widgets' templates were therefore defined in
assets_wysiwyg. This is wrong however, as those assets are only loaded
in specific situations.
This commit removes the templates definitions from the assets_wysiwyg
into specific records defined alongside the snippet templates.
Steps to reproduce:
- Drop the "Image Wall" snippet
- Save
- Visit as a public user (logged out)
- Click on an image from the image wall
- TB
[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/f05adbc8b59c67cbec4847687a1ee07e620c2a7a
task-2984724
closesodoo/odoo#100766
X-original-commit: 39dcd15833afc3860b9c4012a9a4c9da76844a07
Signed-off-by: Romain Derie (rde) <rde@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Arthur Detroux (ard) <ard@odoo.com>
*: auth_password_policy, bus, calendar, event, mass_mailing, stock,
survey, web_editor, web_tour, website, website_event, website_forum,
website_mass_mailing, website_sale
This commit is a first step towards a potential deletion of the
assets_common bundle, although that step would need more work, specs and
discussions as some layouts kinda only use the assets_common bundle
(some take the full assets_common but parts of the assets_backend one
for example).
The main goal of this commit is to have the assets_frontend bundle
directly include the "common" files we need. As a first step, this
commit only blindly duplicates them all into assets_frontend (without
removing the potentially useless ones). The goal is to have those
advantages:
- Reaching a frontend page only calls two main JS files (one normal and
one lazy-loaded) instead of 4 (two normals and two lazy-loaded). This
may help reach a better google page speed (which is becoming more and
more strict).
- The frontend CSS is built as one: the common SCSS which was using
bootstrap variables, or even Odoo-based SCSS added by mistake in
common instead of both backend and frontend is now computed with the
right bootstrap customizations. E.g. the tempusdominus datetimepickers
use bootstrap grays... after this PR, they use the right grays as
customized by the user on the website.
It was also chosen to not have a common "sub-asset" which is included in
assets_frontend. Making assets_frontend completely independent makes
sense (as it probably will for other "main" asset bundles): we can focus
on adding the files each layout needs without the need of worrying if it
impacts unrelated layouts. Sub-assets (when not strictly necessary) is
also a source of errors: extending the "main" bundle instead of the
right sub-asset it may use (like it was the case with the sub-assets of
assets_common: _assets_common_scripts and _assets_common_styles as
explained in the previous commit). So this is indeed a small drawback of
not factorizing the code for the inclusion of "common" files in bundles
but it seems more explicit and easier to maintain that way. Note that
adding "common" file is not the most common usecase anyway, apps
generally only need files in backend or frontend.
The __manifest__ declaration will also likely evolve in more and more
uses of wildcards to match entire directories. In the future, adding
"common" web-app files in both backend, frontend and other "main"
bundles could just be about one line duplicated into each bundle.
closesodoo/odoo#100314
Related: odoo/enterprise#31394
Signed-off-by: Romain Derie (rde) <rde@odoo.com>
Some (most?) people keep trying to double click on it to edit it.
The wording was not helping as "Replace this" doesn't really tell the
user how to do it. He actually has to click on the "Edit" button on the
right panel.
Personal experience, the first times I tried that code snippet, I didn't
find that button and it took me a few times before understanding how it
works.
The new wording and the shortcut button to edit it should be more clear.
Another idea was to allow dblclick to enter edit mode, but this seems
overkill and the 2 improvements here should be enough to make it easy to
figure.
Also added a comment about the `
` and one-liner, it is far from
obvious when reading the code..
task-2978786
closesodoo/odoo#99922
Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
The mini UI on the frontend as a connected backend user was a bit
confusing: the "Edit" button used the exact same design and wording as
the "Edit" button in the backend but it had not the same effect as it
did not enter edit mode but just redirected the user to the website
preview (client action iframe).
We still want the same behavior, we just needed another button design:
- Change the label from "Edit" to "Editor".
- Change the "pencil" fa icon with the website app icon (same as app
switcher in enterprise).
- Use a dark color instead of the primary color. This reuses a dark
color of the website edit mode.
closesodoo/odoo#100355
Signed-off-by: Romain Derie (rde) <rde@odoo.com>
Short summary:
- People can now use the snippets option to show/hide based on country
- We never use / test / maintain this feature, if it still works since
its introduction 4 years ago that's by luck
- It is probably barely used, we never got a single question or issue
about it
-----------
When we introduced the multi-website feature, it came with 2 main use
cases:
1. Multi website by domain -> Every website has its own domain and based
on that we serve the expected website
2. Multi website by geoip -> Multiple website can have the same domain
and based on GEOIP/country we serve the expected website
We never really supported, highlighted or promoted the geoip case.
We actually never use it ourselves when doing tests, and we don't
consider it when doing specs / improvements.
At most, only a very few people know about it in Odoo.
That GEOIP case is probably not useful at all, as displaying a whole new
website based on lang is not easy since nothing can be shared out of the
box -> Every website has its own COW records.
For instance, one could think of having its main website A and another
website B on which he just added 3 products specific to that website B
country.
But such a case won't even work properly, as any adaption on website A
won't be reflected on website B (design, theme etc).
closesodoo/odoo#99938
Related: odoo/upgrade#3892
Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
XML files are now declared in python module manifests. During the qweb
't-call-asset' directive, assetbundle will fetch the declared xml files,
apply the inheritance (t-inherit) and create a javascript service (for
eg: 'web.assets_backend.bundle.xml') which is added at the end of the
*.js mimifier file.
When the debug mode is activated, comments are added in the template
indicating which file the template comes from as well as the
inheritances applied to it.
****
JavaScript:
assets.js (module @web/core/assets) takes care of loading libraries,
javascripts and styles.
`loadJS(url)` (loads the javascript and returns a resolved promise when
the templates are also loaded via the '*.bundle.xml' service)
`loadCSS(url)` (loads the style a resolved promise when the file is
loaded)
`loadXML(xml, app=assets.defaultApp)` (load template into
application/owl, used by the `*.bundle.xml` services)
`getBundle(bundleName)` (get the bundle descriptor)
`loadBundle(desc)` (load the files and bundle from a descriptor)
templates (XML element content all owl templates)
A new `ready(serviceName)` method on boot.js lets you know when a
service is loaded are the require.
The xmlDependencies attribute no longer exists.
Python:
The xmls taken into account by assetbundle.py, applying `t-inherit`
inheritances and adding an `name_of_the_bundle.bundle.xml` service in
the generated JavaScript file.
****
Every manifest changes is into the next commit, except 'web_tour' in
this current commit as example.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#95500
Commit [1] introduced t-cache on the footer making it cached depending
on its website id. This is wrong as the footer can be visible or hidden
depending on the page it is currently rendered in.
This commit adapt the t-cache so that the footer is cached based on the
page.
Steps to reproduce:
- Go in edit mode and click on the footer
- Turn off "Page Visibility"
- Save
Footer is now hidden on every page depending on which page rendered it
first.
[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/b0a2a41d78292cb8b9e53788d40c6dc5915a466dclosesodoo/odoo#99832
Signed-off-by: Romain Derie (rde) <rde@odoo.com>
*: web_editor, website_blog
This commit improves the mobile preview of websites. A mobile phone
image has been added around the iframe during the mobile preview. This
image was already used for the themes mobile preview, this is why the
css code has been unified to be used in these 2 mobile previews.
Parallel to this commit, we have modified the websites displayed in the
iframe of the preview of the themes so that the scrollbar of these is
visible (before it was hidden behind the image of the phone) but with a
smaller width in mobile mode.
This commit also improves the button to switch to mobile preview by
coloring it green when mobile preview is active.
task-2890050
closesodoo/odoo#98061
Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
This commit improves the overall 'website_sale' sidebar design and solve
minor usability issues.
Design overrides has been removed in order to allow customization
thought SCSS variables and ensure consistency between components.
task-2907955
Part-of: odoo/odoo#98558
Soukéina Bojabza