PURPOSE
In project, private tasks (with no project) are visible to other users even if
they have project admin rights.
SPECIFICATION
Private tasks will not be visible to other users even if they have project admin
rights.
Task-2656512
closesodoo/odoo#78601
Signed-off-by: Laurent Stukkens (ltu) <ltu@odoo.com>
Adds personal stages to tasks.
Users assigned to tasks will be able to have their own pipeline to
handle their tasks independently of the project's pipeline.
The assignee field on Tasks has also been changed to a Many2many to
support multiple assignees on one task.
The same table is used to store those information, essentially a triplet
(task, user, stage), to ensure that:
1) personal stages only apply to tasks to which you are assigned to.
2) synchronizing to make sure that you don't have a personal stage for a
task on which you are not assigned anymore.
Alongside those changes, some minor changes have also been made:
- Modified the task's tree view.
- Renamed the Tasks menu to 'My Tasks'.
- The default view is now the kanban view for the 'My Tasks' action.
- project_id is not required anymore, tasks with no project are
considered 'private', those tasks are only visible to those that are
assigned to it.
- Added tracking of both user_ids and depend_on_ids in the chatter.
Closesodoo/odoo#74087
Task ID: 2398734
Before this commit, the project sharing feature is enabled by default
when the Project app is installed but the user could never use the
feature and thus we add more access rights to portal user for nothing.
To avoid this, this commit removes by default all additional access
rights given by project sharing feature and adds this access rights only
when a collaborator is added.
If the user removes all collaborators for all projects then we need
to disable the feature. That is, we will remove the access rights and
ir.rule records added.
So, the feature will not really disable but we remove the additionnal
access rights and ir.rule records added with this feature.
task-2379518
closes#73341
This reverts commit fc7778f8c512202dc3361d6b87be8c28b299c3c8 because of
a change in the spec.
The access mode are removed and replaced by this access mode for portal
user:
- read: the user goes to the classic portal view
- edit: the user is added as collaborator of the shared project and can
access to project sharing views.
To do this, the portal share is inherited by the project share wizard.
This new wizard can be open to share in readonly and open to share in
edit mode via 2 buttons in the form view of the shared project.
A new stat button is added to form view of project to see the
collaborators of this project. That is, the ones can access to the
project sharing views. The project manager will can remove or also add
new collaborators via the views in this stat button.
task-2379518
closes#73341
Before this commit, the portal user could see archived tasks by filtering the
tasks with the search view.
This commit adds a condition in the domain of the `ir.rule` for this user
to allow him to see only the active tasks.
task-2379518
closes#73341
Before this commit, when the portal user can access to project sharing
views, he can just read. If we just add ir.rule to allow the edition,
the portal could create/edit. We have to allow the project manager to
define the access rights of portal users when he want to share them a
project with the project sharing feature.
This commit adds 3 access modes portal users in project sharing views.
1. **Readonly**: the portal can only see the tasks in the different views.
2. **Comment**: the portal can use the chatter in task form view.
3. **Edit**: the portal user can create and edit tasks.
task-2379518
closes#73341
Co-Authored-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Adds new optional stages for the project.project model.
Previously projects would stay dormant when they were finished, we can
now define stages for those projects to determine where a stage is in
it's lifecycle.
Also adds some small changes to the project itself, such as adding tags.
Closesodoo/odoo#73648
Task ID: 2581575
Related: odoo/upgrade#2646
Signed-off-by: LTU-Odoo <IT-Ideas@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit adds project updates in project to take in stock the current
status of the project : which task or milestone changed in the past 30
days.
The project manager is able to add a status on the project update, and
edit the description of the update. There is also a chatter in which
he/she can discuss some points with other project users.
The description is build with informations retrieved from mail tracking
values or from project.* models. Those informations are collected in a
dict and rendered in a template to ease the inheritence in further
modules needs.
Following commits will add behaviour to handle those updates and
milestones in the various views. See PR for further information.
PR : #68899
task-2393768
This reverts commit odoo/odoo@7059b17.
This commit translates tests introduced in this reverted commit to be
aligned with the current workflow.
This commit reverts functionality or business logic linked to the
reverted commit :
- odoo/odoo#47248 : You no longer have to be an allowed user to see the
timesheets but only a message partner.
- odoo/odoo#49021 : We no longer deal with allowed_user_ids or
allowed_portal_user_ids
- odoo/odoo@f2a1a00 : We no longer deal with the allowed users lists.
This commit removes the button project_privacy_visibility for functional
reasons.
Closes: #65367
task-2439329
Related: odoo/upgrade#2128
Related: odoo/enterprise#16067
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
This commit brings a new feature for the Project App and project
configuration. This feature is called "Task Dependencies" and it allows
to the user to determine the order in which to perform tasks in a
project.
task-2387984
closes#66740
Some interventions are done on a regular basis (e.g. maintenance of
fire alarms, safety inspections). Having tasks auto-generate would
facilitate the process and would ensure that the next intervention
isn't missed/forgotten.
closesodoo/odoo#55517
Taskid: 2172156
Related: odoo/enterprise#12246
Related: odoo/upgrade#1604
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Purpose
=======
The current kanban view is messy. It is difficult to identify which
apps are installed or not. The user can completely miss a module
that might have interested him. A search panel would make things way
more readable.
closesodoo/odoo#44401
Taskid: 2181557
Related: odoo/enterprise#8144
Related: odoo/upgrade#879
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
=======
Purpose
=======
Currently for a user to be allowed to see a private project they must follow the
project. This means that they will be added as a follower of all new tasks in the
project which causes them to receive 1000000 notifications, especially if there are a
lot of tasks in a project.
==============
Specifications
==============
1) Add an Employee m2m field on project next to 'Invited Employees'
- only visible if the 'Invited Employees' option is selected
- the project should only be visible to employees selected there (regardless if they
are followers or not)
2) Add an Employee m2m field on tasks below the 'Email cc' one in debug mode
- only visible if the 'Invited Employees' option is selected on the related project
- should be pre-filled with what is set on the project
- the task should be visible to employees selected there (regardless if they are
followers or not)
3) Add a Portal users m2m field on project next to 'Portal users and all employees'
- only visible if the 'Portal users and all employees' option is selected
- the project should only be visible to portal users selected there (regardless if
they are followers or not)
- rename the option into 'Invited portal users and all employees'
4) Add a Portal users m2m field on tasks below the 'Email cc' one in debug mode
- only visible if the 'Portal users and all employees' option is selected
- should be pre-filled with what is set on the project
- the task should be visible to portal users selected there (regardless if they are
followers or not)
5) Following a project/task should not grant the user/employee the ability to see the
project/task
Task 2031527
closesodoo/odoo#40505
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
As task can be billed, it became a important business model. To avoid mistakes in a multi company
environment, we need to make the company_id field required. Indeed shared task can be problematic
with access rights when a employee will log timesheet from another company in a task that is not in
the same company as its project.
To populate this field, we recommend to take the company of task's project, or to fallback on
the company of the user that created one.
Task-1999686
Purpose
=======
Allow the user to select the allowed companies for which he wants to see records
on top of selecting his current company.
It is confusing for users to see the records from the company he is connected to
and the records of the children companies.
Instead of using the hierarchy of companies to access records across companies,
the user can now select (from his set of allowed companies) the companies for
which he wants to access records.
/!\ This means that the user will interact with records from company A when in
company B.
Example: a SO has been created and confirmed in A. When in B, I create the
invoice from it.
Specifications
==============
1/ Deprecate the parent/children hierarchy on the res.company model. The fields are
kept on the res.company model to ensure the retro-compatibility, but won't be used
accross the standard code anymore. The only functional usage for this mechanism
was to allow to see records from several companies by creating a virtual parent
company, which will be possible with the new mechanism.
2/ By default, a user will only see the records of the company he is connected
to (or records without a company). (It is still editable by the user if needed).
For that, put this information in the user context, to allow having different
configurations on different browser tabs. Instead of having domains like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'child_of', user.company_id.id)]
you'll have something like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'in', company_ids)]
Note that the 'company_ids' is a value that is passed in the evaluation
context on the record rule, as we already have user, or time.
company_ids is a list of the ids of all the enabled companies in the
user's context.
3/ Out of the generic improvements brought by this task, this will illustrate
issues that could exist since several versions. For example, it should not be
possible to create a scrap order for the company A with a package of the company
B, or it should not be possible to create an invoice on the company A with
payment terms from the company B. Before the version 12.0, it was easy to
encounter this kind of issues as the admin was the SUPERUSER_ID. A positive side
effect of the fact that the SUPERUSER_ID has become an inactive user was to
make it more difficult to introduce mismatch on the records, but haven't solved
the issue, as it was still possible to do it with parent companies
configuration. Some of these issues have been fixed in this commit, but all the
business flows should be re-tested to check if an ir.rule should be introduced
(eg: a multi company rule for stock.quand.package), if the company of a record
is correctly transfered to another record created from the first record (eg:
From a SO, create an invoice and a payment, the company of the sales order
should be transfered on the invoice and the payment, even if the company of the
sales order is A and I'm logged into the company B with the company A enabled.
4/ Currently, if I click on a button on a notification email (example 'View
Task'), I face a traceback if I'm not logged into the company of the record.
Now, if you click on a button and if you have access to the record, the correct
company will be automatically set.
5/ If I display a kanban view with several records from several companies (and
an image), all the images should be displayed.
6/ Currently if you copy paste an url, this will crash if you're not in the
correct company. This won't be fixed because it's quite impossible to do it in
a clean way. This task brings a workaround. Copy/Paste -> Traceback -> Log into
the correct company, re-copy/paste -> Ok.
7/ 2 property methods have been added on the environment to retrieve the company
on which the user is logged in and the companies the user enabled, on a specific
tab.
That way, when creating a record, instead of doing
default=lambda self: self.env.user.company_id
do
default=lambda self: self.env.company_id
On the other hand, to retrieve the enabled companies, do
companies = self.env.company_ids
8/ Modify the Company Switcher widget to allow to log into another company
WITHOUT writing on the res.users (and thus bringing cache invalidation issues
and so on). Also allow to enable several companies and see records from several
companies, and independantly of the other browser's tabs.
9/ When focusing on a tab, save the current company configuration on the local
storage. That way, when doing 'CTRL+T' or a middle click, the context is
propagated to the new tab.
10/ Improve the error message in case of multi company access errors. Now, when
the user is in debug mode, display the related names of the records and the name
of the user who brings the issue.
11/ Remove the context erasing when writing on a res.users
This is probably coming from the migration to new API of the base module.
The context was not propagated at this moment, which was a common mistake at
that time. When migrating the module, probably by using the 'black box' method,
as the context was not propagated, it was erased on the new version. This is
now an issue because the context (i.e. the enabled companies) was erased when
writing on a res.users, leading to tracebacks.
See: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/7eab8e26d3d46c53f4be924d6a34e80a66e74960#diff-4c2e738ee8f64f11806c889ea097b5e7R624
12/ Fix the crash manager on redirect warnings. The issue is the following
- Create an invoice on a company without a configured CoA.
- Set a partner
- On the onchange_partner_id, a redirect warning is raised to propose you
to configure a CoA
- Click on 'Go to the configuration panel'
- A generic warning says something like 'Do you want to discard your changes?'
- Click on yes, the page refreshes, but not on the redirect action.
Now, set correctly the action on the hash, and reload instead. The breadcrumb is
lost for example, but you reach the correct action at least.
13/ Introduce a res.group to enable/disable the multi company per tab
feature.
14/ To help the users to know which tab is in which company, add the
possibility to have a favicon per company. When creating a company,
the classical 'O' icon is colored by default in a random color.
15/ Remove the company switcher on the frontend. This was mainly there
to allow a user to swicth to the company linked to the website.
This behavior is now transparent to the user. If the website A is
activated, then the company set on the context is the company of the
website.
16/ Deprecated the _company_default_get method on the res.company
model. Remove the method _get_company on the res.users model.
17/ Add 'allowed_company_ids' and 'current_company_id' on the pyeval
context. You can now use those variables on domains in the views to
access directly to the activated company.ies on the current tab.
TaskID: 1960971
closesodoo/odoo#32341
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce:
- Create a channels C with user A linked to an employee E
- Create project P with privacy_visibility='followers' meaning only visible for employees that follow P
- Add the channel C as a follower of P
- Log as user A go to Project app
Bug:
The project P is not readable for A
opw:1958386
closesodoo/odoo#32324
Signed-off-by: Simon Goffin (sig) <sig@openerp.com>
Purpose
=======
Access group terminology is missleading. Yous have to be manager to administrate
an application. This task consists to rename groups to be understandable for everyone.
Groups should be reorganised on the users form to be more explicit.
Specification
=============
1/ Rename 'Manager' to 'Administrator' in users groups.
2/ Define a hierarchy on access groups by using the category_id in the manifests
A category 'Operations/Project' will create a category Project with a parent
category 'Operations', and something smart is already developed (in modules/db.py)
to avoid duplicating categories.
3/ Add a group in expenses to be able to approve expenses reports for my team.
4/ Add a group in timesheets to be able to approve timesheets for my team.
5/ Remove partially the useless crap in ir_module_category_data.xml
6/ Sort access rights groups on users form according to its parent category
closesodoo/odoo#29362
Signed-off-by: "Yannick Tivisse (yti)" <yti@odoo.com>
'remaining_hours' is defined in project as a simple
float field, manually updateable, only displayed
when the group "Time Estimation on Task" is activated.
But for now, there is no setting to active this group.
Those are legacy useless stuff, so we can remove it.
The purpose is to make 'time estimation' feature only
available when timesheet is installed.
Thie commit also split the compute methods of
'remaining_hours' and 'progress' fields to make
'remaining_hours' updateable, though inverse method.
Without splitting the compute method, the calculation
of the progress was done correctly during onchange
but not when saving.
Impacted modules: project, rating_project,
sale_service_rating and website_rating_project.
Removed modules: rating_project and sale_service_rating.
Move code to empty 'rating_project' module, in order
to kill it.
Code is not modified, simply copy/paste at the right
place in 'project' module code.
However, 'enable rating on task' options is convert
into a res.groups that can be activated from the
project settings.
-> Move Subtasks mechanism from hr_timesheet to project.
-> Various functional improvements:
- Add new 'Sub-tasks' setting and 'Sub-task Project' field based on
this setting.
- Relabel 'Team Collaboration' section to 'Task Management'.
- Remove 'Customer Satisfaction' section and move setting
'Rating on Tasks' into 'Task Management' section.
- Add customer name on the project's kanban view.
- Set default value of 'Sub-task Project' field is the same project.
- Add 'Parent Task' stat button on task form view.
- Make 'Sub-Tasks' stat button visible when no parent task
Add a link in the general settings to access easily the default_user form view in order to modify the default access rights
The default_user manager rights declarations in all the applications have been move in a noupdate="1" definition to avoid the manual configuration overwrittings
Split project to move portal features to a new module named website_project.
Portal users may now access their projects and tasks throught the
website_portal My account page. The Backend portal menuitem is removed.
Simplify the privacy settings of project, to be visible to portal users the
project must be in 'portal' mode.
Original authors: Vipul Bhatt, Florian Wintjens
- Hide account_id field and add a required project_id field on timesheet entries
- Remove is_timesheet field: as project_id is only required for timesheet entries and not for other analytic lines, it can be used to determine wether a line is a timeheet entry or not.
- Remove project_timesheet module as all its functionalities are moved to hr_timesheet
- Replace timesheets on contract option on products by timesheets on project
- Small fixes and improvements in timesheets and projects views and groups
Coming from a bug in web_settings_dashboard. Invited user didn't have any rights
when created from the dashboard, which was leading to an error.
This bug leaded to a new discussion. Better to have basic employee having user
rights for all main applications. For bigger entreprises there is an admin that
will carefully remove extra rights, if necessary. The target is small businesses,
it makes sense that every way to create a user gives the same result.
In conclusion, each new user has a full access to the applications by default
How is it implemented ?
We added an inactive default user which original access right to the groups
'base.group_user' and 'base.group_partner_manager' in base. Each
application will extend the default user's access right by adding the maximal
access right for this application.
On user creation, we will use by default the 'group_id' field from the default
user. We will in the same time remove the ugly 'default_groups_ref' key which
was passed sometimes in the context for some fields in some views, and sometimes
nothing.
So, the user can modify the access rights for the default user, but he should be
aware that removing project user access rights for a default user will prevent
a *created on the fly in a task* user will not be able to access the task.
This change avoid to display the tasks
that a user is not permitted to see
in the reporting view 'Task analysis'
Closes#4399
Courtesy of jkei
https://github.com/jkei
Followers can now be partners or channels. Partners following a document
will receive needaction, as previously. However people can follow documents
through channels. Members of a channel are able to listen to a stream
of messages using the channel. Those messages do not create needaction
messages. It is therefore possible to follow documents without receiving
too much notifications. For interesting documents subscribing with its
partner will create notification.
message_follower_ids fields is udpated. It is now a many2many to
mail.followers, not to res.partner anymore. A subscription can be either
a partner (partner_id) or a channel (channel_id).
Some access rules have been updated accordingly.
[REM] portal_project: move ALL the things
- move portal access rights from portal_project and website_project_issue to project and project_issue
- move portal menuitems back to their respective module
- remove public visibility of projects
- adapt demo data to have a 'Demo Portal' project
- add correct access rights for account.analytic.line for portal users
- small view tweak (do not display 'timesheet' tab if one can't see antyhing in it anyway)
For privacy_visibility 'followers' or 'portal', the user should be follower of the project (not the task).
Remove public access to portal task
Fixes#2372
If no project on the task (or other rule), an employee (not a portal) can access if is follower of the task.
Follower rule is not enough as a user creating a rule will subscribe to the rule but to subscribe to record, the user should have access to it in the first place.
To make sure the snake does not bit its tail, fallback to give access on task where the user is reponsible (user_id = user.id).
Fixes#139
Adapted the tests to the new behaviour (removed not relevant and added some on creation)
ir.rule records are in noupdate data blocks to let the admin
alter them without fear of them being reset at next update.
Other records such as groups are in normal mode, so they
can be updated whenever necessary
bzr revid: odo@openerp.com-20121218232001-t425t4hi7qbmsip2
Ipsita Borisagar