This commit adapts tests following recent changes on the helpers.
The main change is that addMockEnvironment (and all functions using
it) are now async, as they need to wait for services to be started.
Before this commit, the test `list: edit view menu item` would sometimes crash
as now the debug manager loads its templates with an `xmlDependencies` where it
was not the case before (included in base.xml), see 73327db065.
The information of the active model and record was not given in the context
Records created from the Manage Messages and Manage Attachements in the debug
menu were not linked to the current records
Add context in test too
closesodoo/odoo#27766
This branch introduces a large-scale reorganization of the
component tree generated by the web client. The short version is
that now, the control panel is a child of the view controller and
no longer a sibling. Graphically (and simplified), we go from
this:
webClient
/ | \
... ... actionManager
/ \
controlPanel viewController
/ \
to this:
webClient
/ | \
... ... actionManager
|
viewController
/ | \
ControlPanelController
/ \
CPRenderer CPModel
The motivation is that this work moves the code where it should be.
Before this commit, it was kind of weird to have code in the
controllers to render buttons outside of their root node (in
renderButtons). Also, the action manager had to take care of
coordinating search view states between view transitions.
So, this work simplifies the code. It also makes it easier to
extend. We see day after day that Odoo needs to take care of more
complex UI needs, and in many cases, these needs were quite
difficult to implement (we prefer spaghettis in our plates, not in
our code). The changes in this branch should open the way to
implement these features.
For example,
- it will now be easy to add the possibility of views (for example,
the search view or a new ControlPanel view) to add custom buttons
(of type action or object) in the control panel.
- Another need will be to serialize/ restore the state of the
search view across action boundaries (needed by the dashboard).
- Another example is the possibility for views to customize easily
the presence/absence of sub menus (filters/groupbys/favorites/
time range/...)
- Another need is an easier way for views/client action to customize
their control panel.
This commit also contains a large rewrite of the search view (so it
is more inline with our architecture and easier to maintain).
Part of task 1893568
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Geubelle <mge@odoo.com>
This rev. introduces robust helpers to use in the JS tests suite to
interact with DOM and components, and starts using them (almost)
everywhere.
All the helpers are exposed though testUtils.js.
There are 2 kinds of helpers:
1. Assertions
-------------
* assert.containsNone, containsN, containsOnce check that the DOM
(or a specific part of the DOM) contains a `selector`. It
generates a correct error message automatically.
ex: assert.strictEqual(form.$('.o_form_editable'), 1, "msg");
-> assert.containsOnce(form, '.o_form_editable');
* assert.isVisible, isNotVisible check that the DOM has an element
visible or not. They also check that the element is actually in
the DOM (before most tests didn't verify this).
* assert.hasClass, doesNotHaveClass, hasAttrVAlue, check specific
properties of a DOM element, and also validate that it is
applied on a single existing DOM element (before most tests
didn't verify this).
ex: assert.notOk(form.$('button').hasClass('btn-primary'));
-> assert.doesNotHaveClass(form.$('button'), 'btn-primary');
2. Utilities
------------
The goal of the utilities is to centralize the definition of many
standard components and interactions, ensuring that when we
refactor the JS framework, we do not need to change all the tests.
Existing mock utilities (addMockEnvironment, intercept, path,
patchDate, unpatch and fieldsViewGet) are moved to
'testUtils.mock.*'.
Existing DOM utilities are moved to 'testUtils.dom.*'.
New dom utilities are created for opendDatePicker, click,
clickFirst and clickLast. Helper `click` verifies that there is
exactly 1 element visible in the DOM you click on, `clickFirst`
and `clickLast` verify that there are more than one element on the
DOM.
ex: form.$('button').click();
-> testUtils.dom.click(form.$('button'));
New Form utilities: (testUtils.form.*)
clickEdit, clickSave, clickCreate, clickDiscard, all clicks on
the control panel buttons of the form.
`reload` reloads the form data.
New modal, graph, kanban and pivot utils (testUtils.pivot.*,
testUtils.kanban.*, etc.).
New fields utils: (testUtils.fields.*)
* editInput, editSelect: allow to change the value of a field,
using a selector to identify it. They validate that the input
exists and trigger the change event automatically.
* editAndTrigger: allow to modify a field and trigger specific
events after the value change
* many2one (testUtils.fields.many2one.*)
clickOpenDropdown, clickHighlightedItem, clickItem,
searchAndClickItem: use a field name instead of a selector and
do all the complex mechanism to open, filter and highlight
many2one fields.
Joint work with aab, dam, ged, mge, svs and vsc.
- added two new actions to the form view debug action list,
both opens list (+ form) views of messages and attachments respectively
for which the domain is restricted to the current record.
task: 1860031
Revision on https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/017e71322b6b7f0c232f0d66ba659a5972fc3534
Commit above correctly fixes an issue with 'Edit View: X' menu item
in the debug manager, in which the name of the view was missing.
To do so, it lets the controller be aware of the name of the view,
so that it can be used in the template of the debug menu.
However, we think there is a much better solution to fixing this
issue: since the debug manager has knowledge of the view action,
we can extend this object with the name of the view.
This is exactly what this commit does: extend the action view object
so that it knows the name of the view. That way, the template is much
more readable, as `view.displayName` is more meaningful than
`controller.viewName`.
Task-ID 1878254
Revision on https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/f7fbe8adffb1ee585c8171f6c86d38145c11848d
The commit above wrongly assumes that the object 'view' is an instance
of the view class. As a result, the property `display_name` was undefined.
This commit fixes the issue by letting the controller remember the name
of the view in a similar was as the type of the view. That way, the name
of the view can simply be retrieved from the instance of the controller
class.
Task-ID 1878254
Aaron Bohy