- Create manually an account.payment after having created manually some journals
(without installing a coa).
- Install a module containing a coa and calling try_loading_for_current_company or depending
of other module doing such things.
=> Crash because company.chart_template_id is not set.
-opw: 1921711
closesodoo/odoo#30117
Start on the modal obtained by a "search more". The offset is never reset.
So suppose you are on page 2, looking at record 81-160.
Do a research that gives less than 80 records.
The result of the search is nothing, since is has been done with a 80 offset.
It should be reset to 0 when we do a new search.
opw 1920826
closesodoo/odoo#30109
Create an automated action that creates a new record (of target crud_model_id).
Try using a link_field_id: nothing appears to be selectable, even if some fields
satisfy the intended conditions.
The issue is that the crud_model_name field was related to crud_model_id.name,
instead of the correct crud_model_id.model (note the apt naming).
Note that in the onchange the value of crud_model_name was correctly set to
crud_model_id.model, adding to the confusion.
opw 1910671
closesodoo/odoo#30145
Before this commit, a generic view tree could be valid but impossible to copy
on a COW specific tree.
This was because when looping through inherit_children_ids to copy them, they
would be sorted by the ir.ui.view sort order (name, priority, id).
Indeed, when applying view inheritance and reading a view arch, children are
sorted by (priority, id).
Thus, if sorting the children by (name, priority, id) was different than
sorting by (priority, id) and the children view would conflict in that new
order, the COW would raise an error "can't find DOM element"
Step to reproduce:
- Create a parent view with just a DIV in arch
- Add a child view that add something inside that DIV
- Add another child view with a name alphabetically lower than the other
child and that replace the DIV by something else, like a SECTION
- Everything works as expected, when reading the parent view arch, the first
child is inserting something into the DIV and then the second is replacing
the DIV
- Now try to trigger the COW on the parent view by writing something on it in
a website context
- It will crash as the child views will be copied in another order, sorted
firstly by name.
- Indeed, when reading parent view, the second child will be copied first as
it's name is lower than the first, it will then replace the DIV by a SPAN.
When trying to copy the other child view that is supposed to insert
something into the DIV, the DIV will not be found and it will crash.
When using the 'Auto-Complete' feature of a vendor bill, oldest vendor
bills are suggested first.
This is because the `_order` uses the `vendor_bill_id` and the
`purchase_order_id`. In the view, we have a mix of positive, negative
and null ids, therefore this can't work.
We sort on the date and the name instead, which gives a more reliable
result.
opw-1925910
closesodoo/odoo#30299
To reflect the latest accounts and taxes
Update nl.po files to help translators
A future commit will translate the missing entries
closesodoo/odoo#30297
In the background layout footer, it happens that the content is over a
zone that must stay blank. That's why w've added a left-padding to the
footer.
OPW-1928366
closesodoo/odoo#30296
The field `sale_order_template_id` is only defined on `sale_management`, so
calling that method without `sale_management` would crash (traceback).
The method was in `sale_management` in the first place but commit
34c47eecd3 happened and some mistakes were made
that day.
PR: #30000closesodoo/odoo#30294
Before this commit, changing the value of the HOST variable didn't work because
it wasn't correctly used everywhere.
Moreover, the `web.base.url` was not correctly set: it is set during
authenticate, but when calling it from the console instead of from a request,
which is the case for tests, it is not able to grab and set the URL as needed.
PR: #30000
opw-1920083
Before this commit, an error arrived when creating a customer profile
without email.
Now, if the email don't exists we send an empty string to Authorize.
closesodoo/odoo#30075
Before this fix, if 2 or more sale lines have the same product with different
lot-numbers the amount for each move will be set to the total amount of the
product.
This fix resolves this problem and will only count the amount sold of
each lot.
Resolves https://github.com/odoo/odoo/issues/30006closesodoo/odoo#30019
On small screens, when we click on the overview of a task
inside the "project" app, the displayed table doesn't fit the screen.
This commit only add missing parent "div.table-responsive" to add
responsive support.
A better fix has been merged in master, see:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/dc017d17e9170d3fc0a5104ab9dc84f748bc097a
opw-1907877
closesodoo/odoo#29971
- Create a SO with a stockable product, validate
- On the corresponding picking, change the partner
- Print the 'Picking Operations' or 'Delivery Slip'
The partner printed is the partner of the SO, not of the picking.
This was reported many times in the past, and is quite confusing. It
happens because the partner on the `stock.move` remains the partner set
on the SO.
We shouldn't change the reports, nor automatically propagate the change
since it might cause issues, e.g. in case on dropshipping or manual
creation of the picking.
Therefore, we add an action which allows to set the partner on the stock
move manually.
opw-1917851
closesodoo/odoo#29939
opw-1917605
Before this commit, when accounting is set to global rounding, the base
amount per tax is not correctly calculated.
Now, the Base amount per tax is calculated adding the rounded lines.
To test this issue, you need to set to global rounding and create a
customer invoice with the following lines :
line 1 = Qty:40; unit price:2.27; tax:15%; discount: 10%
line 2 = Qty:21; unit price:2.77; tax:15%; discount: 10%
line 3 = Qty:21; unit price:2.77; tax:15%; discount: 10%
When the invoce is printed, you would notice that the amount is 186.43
and it should be 186.42.
closesodoo/odoo#30021
The eCommerce sometimes animates product images when they are put in
the cart / wishlist / comparison panel. Those animations did not work
on Firefox and IE and made strange scrollbars appear instead.
When creating a banner using the web editor, the targeted image
appears centered in the editor but is aligned on the left in the
email.
The issue also happened with other alignment (left in a centered
widget, right, ...) for example on outlook 2007 and should be solved
with this changeset.
opw-1904827
Co-authored-by: Nicolas Lempereur <nle@odoo.com>
closes#29985closesodoo/odoo#29214
The template `website_gengo.web_editor.TranslatorInfoDialog` was not used
anymore.
It is supposed to replace the one in `web_editor` module.
Among other things, 2972976 refactored the `web_editor` template to
contain only the modal body content. The bug might be coming from it.
closesodoo/odoo#29955
Usecase to reproduce:
- Connect with demo user
- Create a MO w/h routing
- Confirm and produce it
- Record the production wizard
Access right error on product.product for field tracking
It happens because the wizard use a related to product.tracking howerver
it is not set as readonly on the view and send to the server as a value
on save. Since it write on a related field it will try to write on the
linked model(product.product).
This commit set the field as readonly so it is not set to the server.
The field is just used inside domain and it is invisible to the user
so it do not modify any behavior.
opw-1918684
closesodoo/odoo#29942
Have a RFQ in draft. Log a note or send a new message, but use the full composer to do it.
Before this commit, the RFQ was set to sent
After this commit, it stays rightfully in draft
It is mark as sent, only if the button SEND RFQ is used
OPW 1908094
closesodoo/odoo#29902
Before this commit, when the fiscal year was setting to 29/02.
The function that compute the fiscal year dates gives an error.
This occurs when the date passed as parameter wasn't a leap year.
Now, for the non leap years we use the 28/02.
opw-1917035
closesodoo/odoo#29932
As of saas-11.3 there is a "Attach document" widget that is meant to
more easily add attachment.
But on firefox the click event is coming from the button, where on other
browsers it was possibly from a child element.
So the code expecting the child element did not work on firefox.
opw-1920842
closes#29903
The method `read()` may be very slow when reading relational fields and
computed fields, because the computed fields can be computed on a recordset
that is larger than expected.
The issue occurs on model 'res.partner' when reading fields 'child_ids' and
'purchase_order_count', for instance. Suppose we read those two fields on a
partner with 1000 contacts. First, the one2many field is read from the
database and stored to the cache; the latter adds the value ids to the
prefetching of 'res.partner'. Then, the fields are fetched from the cache.
When 'purchase_order_count' is accessed on the partner, the field is computed
on all its children as well...
closesodoo/odoo#29867
opw-1920590
Before this commit, the function prepare_backend_url forced in the url
the view_type 'form'. This occurs because a misunderstand between the
fields ir.actions.act_window.view_type (That indicate if an hierarchy
in the view list exists, with as possible values : form and tree, which
can be mistaken as views types) and ir.actions.act_window.view_mode
(which is a list of allowed views).
Now, if not ask otherwise, the function give the url of the first
(the default) allowed view; or one of the allowed view if asked for it.
closesodoo/odoo#29882
Christophe Simonis