Have a one2many display records in a kanban subview,
which opens a form view when edited.
Edit a field displayed only on the form view.
A call to _applyX2ManyChange is done without giving it the viewtype argument,
therefore the fieldinfo is taken from the wrong view, traceback ensues.
opw 1914163
closesodoo/odoo#29607
Recent works in the orm (see [1] for example) changed the behaviour of
the server in the case of onchanges: it tries to optimize Odoo by
sending a minimal diff to the web client in onchanges.
Concretely, this means that the web client receives commands 4 (link to)
instead of command 1 (update + record data). It also sends a minimal
diff in that case. This is a big issue for the web client, because it relied
on the knowledge of the data from the command 1 to be able to evaluate some
modifiers.
The good news is that we can mitigate the issue in one case: we do not
actually need to evaluate the modifiers in the case of a command 4
(comming from the server), because we can assume that the record is
valid. So, we simply bypass the check in that case.
Note that this should fix most of the problem, but a deeper problem
still remains: a crash can still happen when an onchange modifies a
record in a one2many (but in a different page), and we also have a
modifier which needs to be evaluated.
opw: #1904514
[1] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/29086closesodoo/odoo#29172closesodoo/odoo#29086
Recent works in the orm (see [1] for example) changed the behaviour of
the server in the case of onchanges: it tries to optimize Odoo by
sending a minimal diff to the web client in onchanges.
Concretely, this means that the web client receives commands 4 (link to)
instead of command 1 (update + record data). It also sends a minimal
diff in that case. This is a big issue for the web client, because it relied
on the knowledge of the data from the command 1 to be able to evaluate some
modifiers.
The good news is that we can mitigate the issue in one case: we do not
actually need to evaluate the modifiers in the case of a command 4
(comming from the server), because we can assume that the record is
valid. So, we simply bypass the check in that case.
Note that this should fix most of the problem, but a deeper problem
still remains: a crash can still happen when an onchange modifies a
record in a one2many (but in a different page), and we also have a
modifier which needs to be evaluated.
opw: #1904514
[1] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/29086closesodoo/odoo#29172
The current implementation of the state_selection widget always makes it
editable even if the field is readonly.
We improved this behavior by removing the handle of click on the widget
when the field is readonly, but keeping it even if the view is not in
edit mode, because it used for example in project to change state even
when view is not editable.
closesodoo/odoo#29218
Have:
- Model A with a x2m to model B
- Object A with multiple objects B in x2m (that will be sorted)
- On the list view of model A, click on a column to sort by a field
- this field shall not exist in B
- open a record A (towards form view)
Before this commit, the sorting of the x2m crashed, because the key orderedBy was propagated
Due to commit e713ed2a69
After this commit, it doesn't crash
OPW 1913133
closesodoo/odoo#29094
In a form view (account.invoice), have a date field as:
<field name="date" options="{\'datepicker\': {\'warn_future\': true}}"/>
Open a record with the field set to a value
Click Edit, click save
Click create
Before this commit, the value of the field of the new record
took the one of the previous record
On account invoices, it resulted on having the popup "The record has been modified etc...."
And it was not possible to create an invoice from another one
this was because we passed the same reference object for the datepicker
After this commit, there is no popup as the field do not take a value from the framework
OPW 1906085
closesodoo/odoo#28759
Steps:
- open a modal form view from tree view first line and make a change
- open a modal from the second line and make a change
- open the second line back: the change were lost
In a given number of conditions (a many2one inside the form view, there
is a one2many in the form view not inside the tree view, ....) this
happened because:
- when we save the first line, we get onchange data for the second one
- this onchange data can't be applied before second line is loaded, but
it is saved so it can be applied if second line is ever opened
- when the second line is opened the saved change is applied => OK
- when the second line is opened a second time the saved change is
applied again, possibly overwriting posterious change => BAD
With this changeset, when the record with unapplied onchange is loaded
for the first time, the unapplied onchange is applied only once.
Added test without the change failed with:
- only 1 turtle for second partner (result: 0 not 1)
- second partner turtle is Michelangelo (result: "" not "Michelangelo")
opw-1846820
closes#28644
This rev. introduces robust helpers to use in the JS tests suite to
interact with DOM and components, and starts using them (almost)
everywhere.
All the helpers are exposed though testUtils.js.
There are 2 kinds of helpers:
1. Assertions
-------------
* assert.containsNone, containsN, containsOnce check that the DOM
(or a specific part of the DOM) contains a `selector`. It
generates a correct error message automatically.
ex: assert.strictEqual(form.$('.o_form_editable'), 1, "msg");
-> assert.containsOnce(form, '.o_form_editable');
* assert.isVisible, isNotVisible check that the DOM has an element
visible or not. They also check that the element is actually in
the DOM (before most tests didn't verify this).
* assert.hasClass, doesNotHaveClass, hasAttrVAlue, check specific
properties of a DOM element, and also validate that it is
applied on a single existing DOM element (before most tests
didn't verify this).
ex: assert.notOk(form.$('button').hasClass('btn-primary'));
-> assert.doesNotHaveClass(form.$('button'), 'btn-primary');
2. Utilities
------------
The goal of the utilities is to centralize the definition of many
standard components and interactions, ensuring that when we
refactor the JS framework, we do not need to change all the tests.
Existing mock utilities (addMockEnvironment, intercept, path,
patchDate, unpatch and fieldsViewGet) are moved to
'testUtils.mock.*'.
Existing DOM utilities are moved to 'testUtils.dom.*'.
New dom utilities are created for opendDatePicker, click,
clickFirst and clickLast. Helper `click` verifies that there is
exactly 1 element visible in the DOM you click on, `clickFirst`
and `clickLast` verify that there are more than one element on the
DOM.
ex: form.$('button').click();
-> testUtils.dom.click(form.$('button'));
New Form utilities: (testUtils.form.*)
clickEdit, clickSave, clickCreate, clickDiscard, all clicks on
the control panel buttons of the form.
`reload` reloads the form data.
New modal, graph, kanban and pivot utils (testUtils.pivot.*,
testUtils.kanban.*, etc.).
New fields utils: (testUtils.fields.*)
* editInput, editSelect: allow to change the value of a field,
using a selector to identify it. They validate that the input
exists and trigger the change event automatically.
* editAndTrigger: allow to modify a field and trigger specific
events after the value change
* many2one (testUtils.fields.many2one.*)
clickOpenDropdown, clickHighlightedItem, clickItem,
searchAndClickItem: use a field name instead of a selector and
do all the complex mechanism to open, filter and highlight
many2one fields.
Joint work with aab, dam, ged, mge, svs and vsc.
Some tests were skipped these last months. This is a slippery slope.
The best time to reactivate them is the moment they were skipped, the
next best time to reactivate them is now. So, this is what this commit
does.
Three kinds of tests were skipped:
- 3 password tests
- 2 kanban progress bar tests
- one keyboard navigation test
Password tests
--------------
When the auth_password_policy addon was introduced, two tests in web/
were skipped, because they would fail when the auth_password_policy
addon is installed.
Since then, a commit was done to change the way the password field works
(commit 5bbbd25edf). With this commit,
the password field is no longer an 'include', but a new field widget.
This means that the skipped tests no longer fails.
Kanban progress bar tests:
--------------------------
In saas 11.2, the 'archive all' feature was removed, but it was readded
in saas 11.4. The tests had to be slightly adapted to make sure they
use the proper css selectors.
Keyboard navigation test:
-------------------------
It is now a functional decision not to allow moving from one cell to the
next by using left/right arrow, so this test is no longer valid.
closesodoo/odoo#28685
The option `showSearchInput`, which is used on the model field selector to display a search
input that filters the displayed fields, is not set by default.
This includes the model field selector instantiated in the `domain` field widget.
closesodoo/odoo#29986
The file relation_fields_tests.js was a huge 12K lines files for which some editors have a
hard time managing.
We have split it in 4 files to be more managable and removed remove unused data
and import.
closesodoo/odoo#28561
Suppose you are editing a SO to add a new line. Depending on the configuration,
a sale order line wizard may open (e.g. if packages are activated).
This wizard is a form view, opened from the tree view of the sale order lines.
We have commit 8e5156938a
that adds extra fields from the originating view.
(However it doesn't work if the other view is inlined, so we modify this part to
add the extra field even in this case.)
Then we need the field info from the origin view in the target view;
we do so by extending the former with the content of the latter.
opw 1904337
closesodoo/odoo#28441
Have a form record with a progress bar
Modify the max_value of the progress, as well as the current_value bar through an onchange
Before this commit, the new max_value was not taken into account
After this commit, it is.
closesodoo/odoo#29056
Define a x2m tree view with a default_sort including more than 1 field to order the list against
Before this commit, the second field was never used
After this commit, it is used
OPW 1909785
closesodoo/odoo#28840
With the BS4 update, a traceback occured when clicking on a m2m tag using colors
in a list view.
When using colors on m2m tags, the badge was wrapped inside a `dropdown-toggle`.
However, there is no `dropdown-menu` by default (it is only rendered in FormFieldMany2ManyTags
when clicking on the `.dropdown-toggle`, hence the traceback.
The `dropdown-toggle` class is now only set if necessary.
Task 1925313
closesodoo/odoo#31445
Let's assume a form view with field A and B (a one2many list), with
a column with attrs column_invisible depending on A.
If the user sets A manually, everything works fine (the column is
hidden/shown directly). However, if A is updated by an onchange
(e.g. depending on the number of rows in B), it doesn't. This
rev. fixes that issue.
Related to Issue: 1851451
Co-authored-by: Priyanka Kaakdiya <pka@odoo.com>
When a view is loaded, it checks which fields it has to load.
In the case of a many2one, it could be the case that a context key is present in
one view and not in the other; if it happens, we should reload the data, as a
name_get result could vary.
opw 1891295
closesodoo/odoo#28298
Before this commit, when loading the data and calling the prostprocess,
the viewType was not correctly passed which could lead to broken
behaviour. For example, if one was to load a record from a list view
embedded in a form view, the viewtype passed was the list which
prevented to load the data from the form view.
OPW 1891295
closesodoo/odoo#28279
On the user's preference, change the timezone to one that is different
from the browser.
Save the form.
Go back to the user's preferences.
Before this commit, every timezone was displayed inside the span that contain
the warning icon, and leaked everywhere on the form view.
This was because of the joint action effects of commits:
86897ca1674dfabb8f7a
Which provoked the field to be re-rendered in edit mode,
but with an $el on which a span was added. `<option/>` elements
were then added to both `<select>` and `<span>`
This did not happen before v12.0
After this commit, there is no display glitch
OPW 1895088
closesodoo/odoo#28108
Let's assume a one2many editable list containing a many2one field
(e.g. in a sales order, the product_id m2o in order_line o2m), and
the scenario where the user clicks on 'Create and Edit' in the o2m,
and then presses ESCAPE in the opened dialog.
Before this rev., it crashed because the 'navigation_move' (cancel)
event wasn't stop propagated by the form renderer (the one of the
dialog), and thus bubbled up to the list editable renderer, which
asked its basic model to discard a record it didn't know.
Note: same fix as in 8445baa (done in saas-11.3), but with a
simpler test.
Task 1878254
In Firefox, the input behavior and visual representation (navigation, caret
placement, value selection, etc.) was broken when using a datepicker (easily
reproductible on date and datetime widgets).
This was due to the `focus` event being stopped on the input, which doesn't
seem to be correctly supported by Firefox.
The deleted code was supposed to toggle the picker when the field was clicked
(see odoo/odoo@89093a1) (toggle on click and disable focus) but the lib
correctly supports on focus without extra code.
This also fixes the fact that the datepicker was not open on focus (only on
clicked). In some tests where the field was the first in the form view, it is
now correctly autofocused.
Forward-port: not useful from 12.0 because the code has changed with BS4 and
this has already been applied in odoo/odoo@6692919 and odoo/odoo@c63630d.
Closes#23438closesodoo/odoo#27657
Christophe Simonis