with this commit, we have updated the attachment widget view same as like chatter attachment view
moved the common scss code from mail to web for many2many_binary widget, which is used for attachment
and update test case according to the widget
Task ID: 1930087
This rev. changes the layout of *editable* list views to a fixed
layout. This means that we are now responsible of the width of
each column. To do that, we associate with each field type a
factor, and the higher the factor is, the larger the column will
be (w.r.t. the others). This default value can be overriden in the
arch.
The fixed layout allows to remove the absolute positionning of
widgets inside editable lists (done in the next commit).
Part of task 1915702
Co-authored-by: Martin Geubelle <mge@odoo.com>
On a form view:
- we open a modal form view
- in this modal we open a modal form view
- we close that second modal
=> the modal is closed and the first one is still opened, but on mobile
we can't scroll to above or below the modal.
This is because bootstrap remove .modal-open class on body when we close
the second modal, but this class is necessary to scroll (this is not
much an issue on desktop since scroll is often not necessary).
We already had a fix that was weakened in 02a063fd73.
With this changeset, we keep .modal-open as long as a modal is opened.
Without the change, added test failed with:
10. Modal is said opened (expected: true, result: false)
opw-1948423
closes#32106
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
The widget handle was displayed on x2m fields in form views, even when
the field was readonly, which makes no sense.
It is now correctly hidden.
Fixes#30580
opw-1937833
closesodoo/odoo#31743
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
For many2one fields, 'default_get' only returns the id, whereas
'onchange' (like 'read') returns an array with id and display_name.
Before this rev., when creating a new record, we always called
'name_get' for all many2ones, whether or not their value was
obtained by 'default_get' or 'onchange', i.e. even if their
display_name was already known.
It may just look like unnecessary RPCs, but those RPCs could
actually cause a crash when the user has access to the main model
(and thus can access the display_name of the many2one thanks to
related sudo), but doesn't have access to the many2one comodel.
closesodoo/odoo#30892
Before this rev., a crash might occur when the user quickly
switched twice between pages (e.g. go to page 2, then page 3) on a
slow network.
In the given example, when data of page 2 returned, the list was
re-rendered. Unfortunately, the offset of that list' datapoint was
already changed due to the switch to page 3, meaning that the view
tried to render a page that wasn't loaded yet, leading to a crash
if there were modifiers to evaluate, or to empty records being
displayed.
This rev. ensures that the view is rendered with the data of the
page it expects.
closesodoo/odoo#30150
Start on the modal obtained by a "search more". The offset is never reset.
So suppose you are on page 2, looking at record 81-160.
Do a research that gives less than 80 records.
The result of the search is nothing, since is has been done with a 80 offset.
It should be reset to 0 when we do a new search.
opw 1920826
closesodoo/odoo#30109
Most operations on X2Many widget possibly propagates a field context
(name_create, name_search, ...) but the original read or read on an
onchange does not.
With this changeset, the field context is also used in these instances.
The assertions added in the added test failed with:
expected: ["world"], result: [undefined]
expected: ["world","world"], result: [undefined,undefined]
fixes#29203
opw-1914466
closes#29866
Fine-tuning of commit e7fab23420
In a one2many with more than one page with a limit of k records, add a line l.
It increments the list limit to k+1. Remove a line above (of index <= k).
It will try to load a line l' to replace it, that it will find on page 2.
However when deciding if it should read missing fields on that record, it will
scan at most u records, skipping virtual ids.
Here u is the min between the current number of lines and the list limit
without the temporary increase due to the added record.
Since there are at least two pages, u = k.
However since l is in the list at index k, then l' won't be read, and since it
was on page 2 its data hasn't been loaded.
Therefore the js would traceback when trying to evaluate it.
opw 1913361
closesodoo/odoo#29338
Use case: a x2m (ex: attribute values) displayed in a x2m (ex: attributes on
product) using different fields in different views (ex: tags in product form view
and list in product attribute form view). When opening the x2m record (in a
wizard) then going back on the form view, the tags are empty because the
`display_name` value has been lost when fetching x2m for the second time.
In this case, the list `fieldsInfo` needs to be updated with the existing
(default for tags) one so all the fields will be correctly loaded.
Task 1916891
closesodoo/odoo#29598
This branch introduces a large-scale reorganization of the
component tree generated by the web client. The short version is
that now, the control panel is a child of the view controller and
no longer a sibling. Graphically (and simplified), we go from
this:
webClient
/ | \
... ... actionManager
/ \
controlPanel viewController
/ \
to this:
webClient
/ | \
... ... actionManager
|
viewController
/ | \
ControlPanelController
/ \
CPRenderer CPModel
The motivation is that this work moves the code where it should be.
Before this commit, it was kind of weird to have code in the
controllers to render buttons outside of their root node (in
renderButtons). Also, the action manager had to take care of
coordinating search view states between view transitions.
So, this work simplifies the code. It also makes it easier to
extend. We see day after day that Odoo needs to take care of more
complex UI needs, and in many cases, these needs were quite
difficult to implement (we prefer spaghettis in our plates, not in
our code). The changes in this branch should open the way to
implement these features.
For example,
- it will now be easy to add the possibility of views (for example,
the search view or a new ControlPanel view) to add custom buttons
(of type action or object) in the control panel.
- Another need will be to serialize/ restore the state of the
search view across action boundaries (needed by the dashboard).
- Another example is the possibility for views to customize easily
the presence/absence of sub menus (filters/groupbys/favorites/
time range/...)
- Another need is an easier way for views/client action to customize
their control panel.
This commit also contains a large rewrite of the search view (so it
is more inline with our architecture and easier to maintain).
Part of task 1893568
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Geubelle <mge@odoo.com>
Have a one2many display records in a kanban subview,
which opens a form view when edited.
Edit a field displayed only on the form view.
A call to _applyX2ManyChange is done without giving it the viewtype argument,
therefore the fieldinfo is taken from the wrong view, traceback ensues.
opw 1914163
closesodoo/odoo#29607
Recent works in the orm (see [1] for example) changed the behaviour of
the server in the case of onchanges: it tries to optimize Odoo by
sending a minimal diff to the web client in onchanges.
Concretely, this means that the web client receives commands 4 (link to)
instead of command 1 (update + record data). It also sends a minimal
diff in that case. This is a big issue for the web client, because it relied
on the knowledge of the data from the command 1 to be able to evaluate some
modifiers.
The good news is that we can mitigate the issue in one case: we do not
actually need to evaluate the modifiers in the case of a command 4
(comming from the server), because we can assume that the record is
valid. So, we simply bypass the check in that case.
Note that this should fix most of the problem, but a deeper problem
still remains: a crash can still happen when an onchange modifies a
record in a one2many (but in a different page), and we also have a
modifier which needs to be evaluated.
opw: #1904514
[1] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/29086closesodoo/odoo#29172closesodoo/odoo#29086
Recent works in the orm (see [1] for example) changed the behaviour of
the server in the case of onchanges: it tries to optimize Odoo by
sending a minimal diff to the web client in onchanges.
Concretely, this means that the web client receives commands 4 (link to)
instead of command 1 (update + record data). It also sends a minimal
diff in that case. This is a big issue for the web client, because it relied
on the knowledge of the data from the command 1 to be able to evaluate some
modifiers.
The good news is that we can mitigate the issue in one case: we do not
actually need to evaluate the modifiers in the case of a command 4
(comming from the server), because we can assume that the record is
valid. So, we simply bypass the check in that case.
Note that this should fix most of the problem, but a deeper problem
still remains: a crash can still happen when an onchange modifies a
record in a one2many (but in a different page), and we also have a
modifier which needs to be evaluated.
opw: #1904514
[1] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/29086closesodoo/odoo#29172
Have:
- Model A with a x2m to model B
- Object A with multiple objects B in x2m (that will be sorted)
- On the list view of model A, click on a column to sort by a field
- this field shall not exist in B
- open a record A (towards form view)
Before this commit, the sorting of the x2m crashed, because the key orderedBy was propagated
Due to commit e713ed2a69
After this commit, it doesn't crash
OPW 1913133
closesodoo/odoo#29094
Steps:
- open a modal form view from tree view first line and make a change
- open a modal from the second line and make a change
- open the second line back: the change were lost
In a given number of conditions (a many2one inside the form view, there
is a one2many in the form view not inside the tree view, ....) this
happened because:
- when we save the first line, we get onchange data for the second one
- this onchange data can't be applied before second line is loaded, but
it is saved so it can be applied if second line is ever opened
- when the second line is opened the saved change is applied => OK
- when the second line is opened a second time the saved change is
applied again, possibly overwriting posterious change => BAD
With this changeset, when the record with unapplied onchange is loaded
for the first time, the unapplied onchange is applied only once.
Added test without the change failed with:
- only 1 turtle for second partner (result: 0 not 1)
- second partner turtle is Michelangelo (result: "" not "Michelangelo")
opw-1846820
closes#28644
This rev. introduces robust helpers to use in the JS tests suite to
interact with DOM and components, and starts using them (almost)
everywhere.
All the helpers are exposed though testUtils.js.
There are 2 kinds of helpers:
1. Assertions
-------------
* assert.containsNone, containsN, containsOnce check that the DOM
(or a specific part of the DOM) contains a `selector`. It
generates a correct error message automatically.
ex: assert.strictEqual(form.$('.o_form_editable'), 1, "msg");
-> assert.containsOnce(form, '.o_form_editable');
* assert.isVisible, isNotVisible check that the DOM has an element
visible or not. They also check that the element is actually in
the DOM (before most tests didn't verify this).
* assert.hasClass, doesNotHaveClass, hasAttrVAlue, check specific
properties of a DOM element, and also validate that it is
applied on a single existing DOM element (before most tests
didn't verify this).
ex: assert.notOk(form.$('button').hasClass('btn-primary'));
-> assert.doesNotHaveClass(form.$('button'), 'btn-primary');
2. Utilities
------------
The goal of the utilities is to centralize the definition of many
standard components and interactions, ensuring that when we
refactor the JS framework, we do not need to change all the tests.
Existing mock utilities (addMockEnvironment, intercept, path,
patchDate, unpatch and fieldsViewGet) are moved to
'testUtils.mock.*'.
Existing DOM utilities are moved to 'testUtils.dom.*'.
New dom utilities are created for opendDatePicker, click,
clickFirst and clickLast. Helper `click` verifies that there is
exactly 1 element visible in the DOM you click on, `clickFirst`
and `clickLast` verify that there are more than one element on the
DOM.
ex: form.$('button').click();
-> testUtils.dom.click(form.$('button'));
New Form utilities: (testUtils.form.*)
clickEdit, clickSave, clickCreate, clickDiscard, all clicks on
the control panel buttons of the form.
`reload` reloads the form data.
New modal, graph, kanban and pivot utils (testUtils.pivot.*,
testUtils.kanban.*, etc.).
New fields utils: (testUtils.fields.*)
* editInput, editSelect: allow to change the value of a field,
using a selector to identify it. They validate that the input
exists and trigger the change event automatically.
* editAndTrigger: allow to modify a field and trigger specific
events after the value change
* many2one (testUtils.fields.many2one.*)
clickOpenDropdown, clickHighlightedItem, clickItem,
searchAndClickItem: use a field name instead of a selector and
do all the complex mechanism to open, filter and highlight
many2one fields.
Joint work with aab, dam, ged, mge, svs and vsc.
The file relation_fields_tests.js was a huge 12K lines files for which some editors have a
hard time managing.
We have split it in 4 files to be more managable and removed remove unused data
and import.
closesodoo/odoo#28561
Suppose you are editing a SO to add a new line. Depending on the configuration,
a sale order line wizard may open (e.g. if packages are activated).
This wizard is a form view, opened from the tree view of the sale order lines.
We have commit 8e5156938a
that adds extra fields from the originating view.
(However it doesn't work if the other view is inlined, so we modify this part to
add the extra field even in this case.)
Then we need the field info from the origin view in the target view;
we do so by extending the former with the content of the latter.
opw 1904337
closesodoo/odoo#28441
jpr-odoo