When using profiling on a fresh test database, it can be tedious to
access settings to enable the feature. This commit adds a wizard to help
enabling profiling without accessing the settings when trying to
activate profiling on a administrator session.
closesodoo/odoo#75967
Signed-off-by: Xavier Dollé (xdo) <xdo@odoo.com>
This commit adds tooling to profile performance and save execution by
saving stack traces and queries to a file/database in specific format.
----------
Collectors
----------
For now, three different profiling modes (aka Collectors) are available
even if a last once should be introduced by @Gorash to profile qweb
execution.
- SQLCollector (or 'sql'): Saves the current stack trace and the query
every time Cursor.execute() is called. Any query executed on the thread
will be collected, no matter the cursor.
- PeriodicCollector (or 'traces_async'): Saves the stack trace every
'interval' seconds using a parallel thread to profile the caller thread.
The python implementation was optimized to minimize impact on
performance while remaining portable and easy to enable/disable
inside a odoo execution. Higher the frequency (lower the interval),
more impactful the profiling will become on the execution and increase
memory usage. From last experiments, 1ms looks to be a good minimum for
short executions.
- SyncCollector (or 'traces_sync'): Saves the stack trace every function
call/return. This collector is obviously quite impactful on performance
and can quickly overload the memory for long executions, but this is
quite useful to understand the precise path followed by some short
executions. Any time related information will be almost irrelevant with this
collector.
A base Collector defining minimal collectors features can easily be
extended to create custom collectors if needed.
----------------
Profiler & Usage
----------------
Collectors are not supposed to be used by themselves, but should be
given to a Profiler. The Profiler will synchronize collectors starts and
stop, and manage saving them to a file of in a ir_profile in the
database.
Exemple of usage:
```
with Profiler():
do_stuff()
```
This simple example will use the default collectors (sql and
traces_async) and save them to the database. The database is defined
automatically from current_thread 'dbname' if available.
Example of usage:
```
with Profiler(collectors=['sql'], db=False, path=/home/user/logs/do_stuff_profile/{time}):
do_stuff()
```
This more complex example disable the default behavior consisting
to save to the database, gives a path where the profile will be saved
and specify to only use the 'sql' collector. Note that
collectors=[SQLCollector()] would have the same behavior since
Collectors can be either a Collector instance or a string describing the
desired collector. This allows to define custom params for the
collectors and use custom collectors if needed.
Note that it is always possible to get results after execution without
saving it since they are available on the profiler.
```
with Profiler(collectors=['sql'], db=False) as p:
do_stuff()
print(len([None for entry in p.collectors[0].entries if ...]))
```
Profiler will also save the stack below the profiler start point, and
collectors will only collect the part of the stack over this stack.
This is a good way to reduce collectors CPU and memory usage.
Collected entries will be saved as follows:
```
[{
'start': 2.0,
'context': {},
'stack': [
['path_to_file', lno, 'func_name', 'line_content'],
...
],
},
...
]
```
SQLCollector will add three additional keys on each entry:
- query (query without parameters)
- full_query (mogrified query with parameters)
- time (the 'exact' execution time of the query)
----------------
ExecutionContext
----------------
A last tool, ExecutionContext, allows to define some context on some block of code:
Example of usage:
```
def process_modules(modules)
for module in modules:
with ExecutionContext(module=module): # note the 'not linter frienldy but still convenient' 2 spaces indentation
do_stuff(module):
```
This context will automatically be added in the stack as a virtual frame between
process_modules and do_stuff in order to split do_stuff from one single frame to
one frame per module.
----------
Speedscope
----------
The saved data are in a simple json format easy to analyze, but can't be visualized in
speedscope as they are. A utility class `Speedscope` can be used to generate a format
readable by speedscope. The used format is actually the format defined by speedscope,
meaning that all features should be available using it.
The output format is evented, meaning that we need to transform a list of samples
(a list of stack) to a list of event (going in/out a frame).
This is the main task of the Speedscope, as well as combining samples from different
sources, to display SQLCollector and PeriodicCollector results mixed together.
When stored on an ir_profile, the default speedscope generation can easily be generated
with the speedscope computed field.
This class can be used as it is but will mainly be useful for the next commit.
Special thanks to @rco-odoo for the in depth review and @Gorash for support.
This commit changes the way assets are declared in Odoo modules.
Before: assets were declared in template files. Template bundles were
generated from primary templates, so technically any qweb template could
have been called as an asset bundle, with the 't-call-assets' directive.
Being standard qweb templates, they had access to standard HTML tags
(script, link, with or without raw scripts or style definition), qweb
directives (t-call, t-raw, etc.) and could be inherited by other
templates.
Now: assets are defined in the module's manifest and generated by the
't-call-assets' directive.
More information on the new system can be found on the updated user
documentation (see the "JavaScript Reference" section).
Task: 2352566
Co-authored-by: Bruno Boi <boi@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Julien Mougenot <jum@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Perais <lpe@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine <dam@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Simon Genin <ges@odoo.com>
Introduce a way to schedule the execution of cron jobs *soon*. Triggered
jobs are included in the next execution batch.
Heavy refactor of the `ir.cron` model so the various parallel queries
use the (not so new) `SKIP LOCKED` postgresql select option which skip
rows that are locked instead of throwing an exception like `NOWAIT`
would do. Various methods has been renamed and the overall selection,
execution and update of job records have been re-architectured.
The cron workers can now to wake up early via a notification on the
`cron_trigger` channel of the meta `postgres` database.
closesodoo/odoo#62124
Task: 2368911
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
A manually created decimal precision won't have any impact on the system
unless used in custom code, and in this case, the record should be
specified directly in the custom code datas.
Furthermore, it can still be created/deleted in superuser mode if really
necessary.
closesodoo/odoo#60744
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
The access rights of a model was checked but not the records themself.
In case a user has access to a model but not to a specific record, he
should not be able to execute a server action on it.
Correct the ir.rule on private partners to be also verified for other
operations than read.
While it was not possible to actually write on it (due to side effects
of ORM where write implies a read operation),
check_access_rule('write') was working on a private address
closesodoo/odoo#61253
X-original-commit: b0028c05d6ba9c67f16992ddb446eea6a854d099
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
The document layout preview is a complete defferent simplified template
with its own css that replicates at best the different styles.
It does not have the external layout features and lack of fidelity.
The new preview actually use the real documents templates and put the
result in an iframe. It now has a high fidelity, though not perfect.
The goal is for a better onboarding, where clients see easely how
documents will look if they had an app to generate them. Of course, the
data on the document is a false invoice.
Refactor all this from base to web.
Task ID 2304177
closesodoo/odoo#56995
X-original-commit: c121a246f16899735306266a3a12b526e08e7620
Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
The modification of countries data should be restricted to knowledgeable users.
Indeed, by modifying, deleting and/or creating res.country records, the resulting
behavior generally won't be what you expect, breaking existing flows (delivery, taxes, VAT validation, ...)
in an open OR hidden way...
By restricting those modifications, we reduce the risks of users breaking their database through
'minor' changes unexpectingly triggering 'heavy' problems.
Currently, the access to private addresses group show in the other
category in user form view and due to that it is visible in non-debug
mode too.
So in this commit, Move the private addresses group to tehcnical
category so it should visible in debug mode only.
closesodoo/odoo#56811
Task-id: 2318509
X-original-commit: 5f0ef2e36c33343a6beada36ef121de4b8767089
Related: odoo/enterprise#12803
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
* ability for a user to request / create keys associated to their user
* overrides can block RPC solely through API keys, by overriding
`_rpc_api_keys_only()` (to require API auth even in
situations where the user has not requested it themselves)
* hash keys just in case as we can do so and might as well, add a
cleartext index (first 4 bytes of 20) to avoid blowing up the DB if
a user decides to create millions of keys for some daft reason
* users can delete their own keys, admins can delete (invalidate)
anyone's keys
* `scope` on API keys can be used to restrict usage to certain
kind of applications, so API keys can be used for other things
than global authentication. New keys manually created by users
have no scope by default so they are valid everywhere (global
keys). RPC auth (stateless XML-RPC/JSON-RPC) requires global keys
Co-authored-by: Florimond Husquinet <fhu@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Olivier Dony <odo@odoo.com>
Similar to github's sudo mode, my understanding of the intent is to
avoid third parties being able to perform sensitive / serious
operations when leaving a logged-in machine unattended.
This v1 only handles protecting "action methods" (methods called
through buttons and intended to return action descriptors), although
they can be used to "lock out" any methods they won't be able to
prompt and the caller will likely be surprised.
Before this commit only admin setting user can merge contact which is a bit to restrictive
Contract Creation group seems more adequate
closesodoo/odoo#54831
X-original-commit: b5d5bc30dd3769deab09cbc0915741a93df229ef
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
ACLs on the wizard lines should match that of the wizard, otherwise
ERP managers can see the action but get an error as soon as they open
the wizard.
Since ERP managers have write access on arbitrary users, that's
probably the right group to use.
Task 2275134
closesodoo/odoo#53007
X-original-commit: 657d44f08c402bc0547b7cbb01c2d447e641d062
Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
Only administrators can access properties and configure them.
ir.property may contain sensitive information and should only be
accessed via code call to specific methods
Only system users should be able to access directly ir.ui.view records
Other users should use helper methods like fields_view_get or render
to interact with view records (or use sudo)
Give read access to views to publisher
He needs to call read_template on some views like
'web_editor.colorpicker' in edition mode
Restrict ACL on website.page
Apply the same ACL than on ir.ui.view as the model inherits from it.
Give access to designer to modify views
Add a new group allowing administrators to remove the ability for
users to bulk-export data from the database. It's pretty minor as
technically the user can still access the underlying object through
the basic methods but it's still a bit of a roadblock.
Users can export by default.
Task 2170900
closesodoo/odoo#45400
Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
This commit adds the possibility to compare a view arch to another one.
The result will be shown in a diff viewer (github like).
This is following what was done at #32009
task-2190072
closesodoo/odoo#44646
Signed-off-by: Jérémy Kersten (jke) <jke@openerp.com>
Following changes needing ir.model.access on transient models too.
Remove groups declaration on the action to move it to ir.model.access
when possible.
Rules are strict by default with no unlink access by default and high
priviledge asked. Adaptations may be needed later.
Write access is given as a wizard may need to be modified in case the
action triggers an error and the user has to correct a value
account*: use account.group_account_user for all transient by default
remove account.print.journal relic
stock*: use stock.group_stock_user by default
survey: survey user can send invitations
mail: allow any employee to execute wizards
additional verifications are made to ensure they are executed
only on the documents the user has access to you
give portal access to mail.compose.message as portal still does
some actions like posting messages on the forum
add ir.rule to avoid reading somebody else messages
increase the query count because of undeterminist count
crm: saleman for lead2opp, manager for massmailing
partner manager for actions linked to partners
avoid a write in test_lead_lost
sms: any employee can send sms
mrp: mrp user can execute wizards
give unlink access as making write during do_produce operation
base_import: employees can import files
delivery: stock user can deliver
event_sale: sale user can configure the wizards
event user inherit from sale rights
gamification: employee can give badge
google_service: resolve FIXME
hr: add specific rights
manager can set a plan according to group on button
anyone who can write on an employee can register a departure
hr_expense: set rights based on buttons
hr_holidays: an approver can make a summary report
hr_recruitment: recruiter can refuse a candidate
hr_timesheet: can use the wizard if can create a timesheet
l10n_eu_service: managers can create fiscal positions
mass_mailing: same group as on mass.mailing.list
membership: accountant can create invoice from membership
payment: accountant can create a link
as the source is an account.move
keep the payment.acquirer.onboarding.wizard to system user
only as it is called during company configuration
point_of_sale: PoS manager only can use wizards
never create closing_balance_confirm_wizard records
product_expiry: stock user has rights on stock.picking
product_margin: access from accounting menus
repair: same rules as for above models
sale: set ir.rule for self wizard only
add rule from model introduced in payment to add salesman group
sale_crm: saleman can create a quotation from a lead
sale_coupon: any saleman can generate coupon
add self ir.rule
sale_product_configurator: salesman can select product variants
snailmail: employee can send letters
website: designers can write on website
website_crm_partner_assign: same rule as group on action
website_sale: sale ACL as for payment.acquirer.onboarding.wizard
website_slides: anyone can send invitation
base: base.language.*: allow employee (cf lang_install)
change.password.user: can not read change password wizard of
other users
test.*: no access is needed
Courtesy of Damien Bouvy, William Andre and Antoine Prieëls for review
of acl
Example:
User 1 has access to company A
User 2 has access to company B
Customer 1 is shared, has user 2 as their Salesperson
Try to create a SO for Customer 1 as User 1
=> access rights issue, the quote is trying to set User 2
as the salesman of the quote but cannot because of
base.res_users_rule
This commit makes this flow possible by sharing users
if they're not portal.
closesodoo/odoo#43190
X-original-commit: ebc8d85d383643c1d4d2aa6723bc7a589c7d1c68
Signed-off-by: Damien Bouvy (dbo) <dbo@odoo.com>
Commit d86c2c5883 removed the multi-company partner rule because it
interfered with the users rule. Indeed, interference between the user's
default company and its corresponding partner's company made it possible
to have users that were basically unselectable in relational fields if
you were not viewing more than one company at the same time.
However, this generates a lot of frustrations and tickets for Odoo
users, since having everything shared by default is annoying and a clear
departure from the expected behaviour.
This commit tries to mitigates this fix's side-effects by re-introducing
the multi-company rules but by not applying it to partners who are linked
to a non-share user (basically, any partner who has a user that is not
a portal user). That way, customers and vendors remain filtered by the
multi-company rules and only partners of internal users bypass the rule.
This is still a side-effect, and might raise a few eyebrows (why is this
partner visible even though it is in another company?), but the
trade-off seems to be worth it since it fixes the original issue with a
far smaller behaviour change.
Fixes#41720.
closesodoo/odoo#42592
X-original-commit: 2390ba60b8bd624daaea2e6d4e3fd85ef1b1faeb
Signed-off-by: Damien Bouvy (dbo) <dbo@odoo.com>
Usecase to reproduce:
- User1 in company A and company B (default company A)
- User2 in company A and company B (default company A)
As user1 select company B in company switcher.
-> You never see user2 as he's hidden by a record rule.
This issue was present in older version when disabling the “Common Contact Book” feature,
because it was then enabling the faulty record rule. Since [1], this faulty record rule is
always enabled.
(Note that res.partner record rules are applied to res.user through _inherits)
We chose to remove the faulty record rules so that the present usecase is now working,
but the drawback is that you now see partners from other companies.
Also remove [2] that try to fix the issue and become useless if the
rule is removed.
[1] commit 25714692b2
[2] commit d6c65aa4d4closesodoo/odoo#37712
Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>
You should always be able to read your own user whatever the company you
are logged into
closesodoo/odoo#36190
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
This branch is the combination of several optimizations in the ORM:
* store field values once in the cache: the cache reflects more
faithfully the database, only fields that explicitly depend on the
context have an extra indirection in the cache;
* delay recomputations by default: use method `recompute` to explicitly
flush out pending recomputations;
* delay updates in method `write`: updates are stored in a data
structure that can be flushed efficiently to the database with method
`flush` (which also flush out recomputations);
* make method `modified` take advantage of inverse fields to inverse
dependencies;
* filter records by evaluating a domain on records in Python;
* a computed field with `readonly=False` behaves like a normal field
with an onchange method;
* computed fields are computed in superuser mode by default.
Work done by Toufik Ben Jaa, Raphael Collet, Denis Ledoux and Fabien
Pinckaers.
closesodoo/odoo#35659
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux <beledouxdenis@users.noreply.github.com>
The selection values of a selection field are now stored in database in the
model ir.model.fields.selection
This will allow to have a modular approche on selections and each selection
is now linked to the module that declared it.
Previously to this change, the selections were linked to the field, meaning
uninstalling a module had no impact on the selections stored on database.
With this change, the selections will now be translated in the correct module
(having an external id) and the records having a used selection will now be
reset to null.
closesodoo/odoo#30228
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Raphaël Collet <rco@odoo.com>
The Common partner contact setting is removed from general settings because its
behavior wasn't really clean from a technical point of view
(disabling the rule on partner access) and wouldn't work as well with new
multi-company logic.
The default logic of sharing partner will be kept, but when someone wants to
limit partner sharing, he will do so partner by partner, by
setting the company_id.
Also, the default company_id on a partner will be blank so default partner
will be a sharable by multi-company.
when the partner is created at the time of user creation then the partner's
company will be the same as user's company.and when the partner is created at
the time of company creation(partner related to company) then the company of
partner will be newly created company.
task-2024446
Closes: #35266
The onboarding modal for setting up the few base fields of a company
has now been moved to a wizard
It is accessible from the general settings, but also in the onboarding
section of sale and account modules.
The following company settings are editable with that wizard:
- Set report **layout**:
The user can chose the overall look of the report. The current choices
are : *Standard* (default), *Background*, *Boxed* and *Clean*.
- Set company **logo**:
Changes the company logo.
- Set report **colors**:
The user can set the primary and secondary colors of the report through
a newly added widget allowing to pick a custom color.
When changing the **logo**, colors are automatically set to its most dominant
colors.
> A "Reset colors" button also triggers the color calculation.
- Set report **font**:
Changes the overall font of the report. Only Google Fonts are used
for enhanced compatibility.
- Company **tagline**, also called "header"
- **Footer**
- **Paper format**
- Report **preview**:
A mockup of a final report
Automatically updates when changing **layout**, **logo**, **colors** or **font**
Co-authored by: Julien Mougenot <jum@odoo.com>
closesodoo/odoo#33863
Signed-off-by: VincentSchippefilt <VincentSchippefilt@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Perais <lpe@odoo.com>
The decimal precision feature makes sense to be an ORM feature, no need to be
in a specific module
Previous syntax was
from odoo.addons import decimal_precision as dp
fields.Float(digits=dp.get_precision('Foo'))
and now is:
fields.Float(digits='Foo')
Remove the possibility to have a callable method on the digits attribute (it
was only used for precision anyway) and directly retrieve the digits on the
decimal.precision model
Rename the method digits to get_digits to avoid confusion between the field
attribute when declaring a field and the method to retrieve the precision
Task id: 48198
Purpose
=======
Allow the user to select the allowed companies for which he wants to see records
on top of selecting his current company.
It is confusing for users to see the records from the company he is connected to
and the records of the children companies.
Instead of using the hierarchy of companies to access records across companies,
the user can now select (from his set of allowed companies) the companies for
which he wants to access records.
/!\ This means that the user will interact with records from company A when in
company B.
Example: a SO has been created and confirmed in A. When in B, I create the
invoice from it.
Specifications
==============
1/ Deprecate the parent/children hierarchy on the res.company model. The fields are
kept on the res.company model to ensure the retro-compatibility, but won't be used
accross the standard code anymore. The only functional usage for this mechanism
was to allow to see records from several companies by creating a virtual parent
company, which will be possible with the new mechanism.
2/ By default, a user will only see the records of the company he is connected
to (or records without a company). (It is still editable by the user if needed).
For that, put this information in the user context, to allow having different
configurations on different browser tabs. Instead of having domains like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'child_of', user.company_id.id)]
you'll have something like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'in', company_ids)]
Note that the 'company_ids' is a value that is passed in the evaluation
context on the record rule, as we already have user, or time.
company_ids is a list of the ids of all the enabled companies in the
user's context.
3/ Out of the generic improvements brought by this task, this will illustrate
issues that could exist since several versions. For example, it should not be
possible to create a scrap order for the company A with a package of the company
B, or it should not be possible to create an invoice on the company A with
payment terms from the company B. Before the version 12.0, it was easy to
encounter this kind of issues as the admin was the SUPERUSER_ID. A positive side
effect of the fact that the SUPERUSER_ID has become an inactive user was to
make it more difficult to introduce mismatch on the records, but haven't solved
the issue, as it was still possible to do it with parent companies
configuration. Some of these issues have been fixed in this commit, but all the
business flows should be re-tested to check if an ir.rule should be introduced
(eg: a multi company rule for stock.quand.package), if the company of a record
is correctly transfered to another record created from the first record (eg:
From a SO, create an invoice and a payment, the company of the sales order
should be transfered on the invoice and the payment, even if the company of the
sales order is A and I'm logged into the company B with the company A enabled.
4/ Currently, if I click on a button on a notification email (example 'View
Task'), I face a traceback if I'm not logged into the company of the record.
Now, if you click on a button and if you have access to the record, the correct
company will be automatically set.
5/ If I display a kanban view with several records from several companies (and
an image), all the images should be displayed.
6/ Currently if you copy paste an url, this will crash if you're not in the
correct company. This won't be fixed because it's quite impossible to do it in
a clean way. This task brings a workaround. Copy/Paste -> Traceback -> Log into
the correct company, re-copy/paste -> Ok.
7/ 2 property methods have been added on the environment to retrieve the company
on which the user is logged in and the companies the user enabled, on a specific
tab.
That way, when creating a record, instead of doing
default=lambda self: self.env.user.company_id
do
default=lambda self: self.env.company_id
On the other hand, to retrieve the enabled companies, do
companies = self.env.company_ids
8/ Modify the Company Switcher widget to allow to log into another company
WITHOUT writing on the res.users (and thus bringing cache invalidation issues
and so on). Also allow to enable several companies and see records from several
companies, and independantly of the other browser's tabs.
9/ When focusing on a tab, save the current company configuration on the local
storage. That way, when doing 'CTRL+T' or a middle click, the context is
propagated to the new tab.
10/ Improve the error message in case of multi company access errors. Now, when
the user is in debug mode, display the related names of the records and the name
of the user who brings the issue.
11/ Remove the context erasing when writing on a res.users
This is probably coming from the migration to new API of the base module.
The context was not propagated at this moment, which was a common mistake at
that time. When migrating the module, probably by using the 'black box' method,
as the context was not propagated, it was erased on the new version. This is
now an issue because the context (i.e. the enabled companies) was erased when
writing on a res.users, leading to tracebacks.
See: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/7eab8e26d3d46c53f4be924d6a34e80a66e74960#diff-4c2e738ee8f64f11806c889ea097b5e7R624
12/ Fix the crash manager on redirect warnings. The issue is the following
- Create an invoice on a company without a configured CoA.
- Set a partner
- On the onchange_partner_id, a redirect warning is raised to propose you
to configure a CoA
- Click on 'Go to the configuration panel'
- A generic warning says something like 'Do you want to discard your changes?'
- Click on yes, the page refreshes, but not on the redirect action.
Now, set correctly the action on the hash, and reload instead. The breadcrumb is
lost for example, but you reach the correct action at least.
13/ Introduce a res.group to enable/disable the multi company per tab
feature.
14/ To help the users to know which tab is in which company, add the
possibility to have a favicon per company. When creating a company,
the classical 'O' icon is colored by default in a random color.
15/ Remove the company switcher on the frontend. This was mainly there
to allow a user to swicth to the company linked to the website.
This behavior is now transparent to the user. If the website A is
activated, then the company set on the context is the company of the
website.
16/ Deprecated the _company_default_get method on the res.company
model. Remove the method _get_company on the res.users model.
17/ Add 'allowed_company_ids' and 'current_company_id' on the pyeval
context. You can now use those variables on domains in the views to
access directly to the activated company.ies on the current tab.
TaskID: 1960971
closesodoo/odoo#32341
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Purpose
=======
Access group terminology is missleading. Yous have to be manager to administrate
an application. This task consists to rename groups to be understandable for everyone.
Groups should be reorganised on the users form to be more explicit.
Specification
=============
1/ Rename 'Manager' to 'Administrator' in users groups.
2/ Define a hierarchy on access groups by using the category_id in the manifests
A category 'Operations/Project' will create a category Project with a parent
category 'Operations', and something smart is already developed (in modules/db.py)
to avoid duplicating categories.
3/ Add a group in expenses to be able to approve expenses reports for my team.
4/ Add a group in timesheets to be able to approve timesheets for my team.
5/ Remove partially the useless crap in ir_module_category_data.xml
6/ Sort access rights groups on users form according to its parent category
closesodoo/odoo#29362
Signed-off-by: "Yannick Tivisse (yti)" <yti@odoo.com>
General Purpose
===============
We want an 'Employee profile' gathering every data about an employee.
The main form view is modified to become this employee profile.
A user can also see his own profile through the Preferences menu.
The new profile replaces the current Preferences view if the hr module is installed
and the current user is linked to an employee.
A user should be able to see and edit his own profile.
*Problem*:
Many fields on hr.employee are protected by groups="hr.group_hr_user".
Therefore, a regular user cannot see or edit those fields.
This protection must be bypassed to allow read/write access
to the regular user's own data.
A similar mechanism already exists for res.users (for Preferences)
The better (least worst) solution found is to reuse this mechanism by adding related fields on res.users.
Pros:
- Don't change security access on hr.employee
- Don't implement yet another custom security layer, risking to add new security breaches
- A lot of fields are added by other modules on hr.employee.
It would have required to integrate them with the custom security layer.
- Fields added by other modules on the user's preferences view (normal view, not the profile)
are automatically included in the employee's profile view.
- Allow the hr.employee form view to be different than the user profile accessible
through the Preferences menu.
E.g. add custom buttons only relevant to the logged in user such as "Request a leave".
Cons:
- Each field from hr.employee that you want to appear on its profile
must be added as a related field on res.users
- Those related fields must be added to user's preferences view (duplicate views)
- They also must be added to SELF_[READABLE | WRITABLE]_FIELDS
Note:
When the front-end loads the views it gets the list of available fields
for the user (according to its access rights). Later, when the front-end wants to
populate the view with data, it only asks to read those available fields.
However, in this case, we want the user to be able to read/write its own data,
even if they are protected by groups (groups are kept on the related fields on res.users).
The front-end need to be made aware of those fields by sending all field definitions.
hr_attendance
=============
This commit integrate attendance in the new employee profile.
It also adds a stat button to this employee profile showing
the number of hours worked last month.
Remove the boolean computed field 'manual_attendance'.
This field is just a shortcut to add/remove the employee's user
in the "Manual Attendance" group.
The checkbox is confusing on the employee's form and this should
be done through the normal group management screens.
hr_presence
===========
Display the presence status on the employee kanban template.
The status is a colored chip which can be green (present),
orange (to define) or red (absent).
Currently, the presence status is only computed when accessing
the report view. As this commits displays it on the employee kanban,
it should be updated more frequently.
The state should not be updated every time the kanban view is loaded
since the computation is a bit heavy. Instead: add a cron to update
status every 15 minutes.
-> The status is accurate on the report view (status is still updated
when loading the view)
-> The status in accurate at 15 minutes on the kanban view
[ADD] hr_attendance_presence
============================
Bridge module between hr_attendance and hr_presence.
This commit integrates hr_presence module in the employee
profile and adds the presence status on the employee kanban view.
But hr_attendance adds at the same place a similar status icon for
checkin/checkout.
This bridge module makes the status from hr_presence invisible as
hr_attendance should be the main presence control mechanism.
Also, this commit adds the ability (through a new setting option)
for hr_presence to take into account checkin/checkout to determine
the presence status.
l10n_be_hr_payroll
==================
integration with employee profile
If a user creates a paperformat, he should be able to modify it too.
Employees have no reason to modify the paperformat though (nor create).
Having a malicious employee modifying an existing report may be dangerous.
[CLA] signature for stijnh92
Fixes#26292closesodoo/odoo#27444
Xavier-Do