[FIX] base: res_users in multi company

Usecase to reproduce:
- User1 in company A and company B (default company A)
- User2 in company A and company B (default company A)

As user1 select company B in company switcher.
-> You never see user2 as he's hidden by a record rule.

This issue was present in older version when disabling the “Common Contact Book” feature,
because it was then enabling the faulty record rule. Since [1], this faulty record rule is
always enabled.
(Note that res.partner record rules are applied to res.user through _inherits)

We chose to remove the faulty record rules so that the present usecase is now working,
but the drawback is that you now see partners from other companies.

Also remove [2] that try to fix the issue and become useless if the
rule is removed.

[1] commit 25714692b2
[2] commit d6c65aa4d4

closes odoo/odoo#37712

Signed-off-by: Arnold Moyaux <amoyaux@users.noreply.github.com>

odoo/addons/base/security/base_security.xml

@@ -12,12 +12,6 @@
             <field name="perm_read" eval="False"/>
         </record>
 
-        <record model="ir.rule" id="res_partner_rule">
-            <field name="name">res.partner company</field>
-            <field name="model_id" ref="base.model_res_partner"/>
-            <field name="domain_force">['|', '|', ('id', '=', user.partner_id.id), ('company_id', 'in', company_ids), ('company_id', '=', False)]</field>
-        </record>
-
         <record model="ir.rule" id="res_partner_portal_public_rule">
             <field name="name">res_partner: portal/public: read access on my commercial partner</field>
             <field name="model_id" ref="base.model_res_partner"/>
@@ -167,7 +161,7 @@
             <field name="name">user rule</field>
             <field name="model_id" ref="model_res_users"/>
             <field eval="True" name="global"/>
-            <field name="domain_force">['|', ('id', '=', user.id), ('company_ids', 'in', company_ids)]</field>
+            <field name="domain_force">[('company_ids', 'in', company_ids)]</field>
         </record>
     </data>
 </odoo>