Manage pricelists through a common configuration between sale and point_of_sale
Remove lots of technical fields
Improved Pricelist Flow
-----------------------
if pricelists enabled (product.group_product_pricelist), two modes are proposed:
* basic(default): pricelists enabled, but only with basic rules
* advanced: pricelists enabled, but with advanced rules (product.group_sale_pricelist)
When pricelists are enabled, we can always access them through the menu OR access their product-targeted rules from the products/templates views.
Follow up of 58a2ffa26f
Variant specific field `image_raw_original` was meant to be renamed to
`image_variant_1920` instead of `image_variant_max` to follow the same naming
convention as the other fields (having the pixel number in the name).
closesodoo/odoo#35493
Signed-off-by: Jérémy Kersten (jke) <jke@openerp.com>
Usability improvements:
- Prevent the user from doing actions that will lead to exceptions.
- Improve error messages when exceptions do happen.
Also add more constraints to keep the database in a consistent state.
task-2035609
closesodoo/odoo#34833
Signed-off-by: Jérémy Kersten (jke) <jke@openerp.com>
part of product_configurator logic moved to product to be accessible in purchase even if p_configurator isn't installed.
And adapt configurator to be extended by matrix
This attribute is misleading as it is insufficient to correctly upgrade
the database. It only renames the column in the database, but other
operations are needed, like updating the corresponding `ir.model.fields`
record (and its xmlid). The default values and the translations are also
lost during the upgrade.
Moreover, this feature was misused. It was:
- left on fields during multiple versions.
- used on reports (SQL views). This would be ok if the feature was
complete, but, as is, it was useless.
- kept unchanged after a second renaming of the field (which can happen
versions later the first rename).
- used, even when the meaning of the field changed. i.e. the field
`archived` has been renamed to the classic `active`, but the value
in the database should be switched.
image_original => image_1920 (now resized to 1920)
image_big => image_1024
image_large => image_256
image_medium => image_128
image_small => image_64
image replaced by image_1920 (when writing) or by image_1024 (when displaying
what was previously the big size)
+ add new intermediate format:
image_512
PR: #34925
Create a product template Pt with attibutes A1, A2,
respectively with values Va1_1, Va1_2, and Va2.
This should make 2 variants, V1 and V2.
Sell some of these variants.
Then they can't be deleted since they are linked to orders/invoices/...
Now delete attribute A2. We know that:
Warning: adding or deleting attributes will delete and recreate existing
variants and lead to the loss of their possible customizations.
In fact, old variants are only archived instead of deleted:
for variant in variants_to_unlink: ... variant.write({'active': False})
as a fallback.
Now add again the attribute A2 to Pt.
It creates a new variant with the correct attributes.
Since the product is not active and has valid attributes and attribute values,
it is reactivated.
As a result we get the same variant twice.
Here we can simply add a check: if there is already an existing variant with
the same values, we can skip this activation.
We add a tiny little test to make sure that we have correct number of variants.
It's basically unreadable but somewhat commented.
fix coauthored with @rco-odoo
opw 2029985
closesodoo/odoo#35013
Signed-off-by: Nans Lefebvre (len) <len@odoo.com>
When reading the non stored computed field property_product_pricelist,
the force_company set in the context is taken into account. But when
writing on property_product_pricelist, the force_company was not taken
into account. So it was inconsistent as you could read a record with a
force_company in the context and wrote on an other record as the inverse
function didn't take the force_company into account.
closes#31561
opw:2032024
closesodoo/odoo#34757
Signed-off-by: Simon Goffin (sig) <sig@openerp.com>
- Install stock module
- Activate multi-company and variants
- Create a second company
- Create a product with 2 variants
- Create a picking with the product for both companies
- Add an attribute on the product with 2 values
- Save
An AccessError is raised on `stock.move`.
It arises because the field `product_qty` on `stock.move` must be
recomputed but is on a record in a different company.
The `try` / `except` clause doesn't protect against the recomputation.
Indeed, what happens is:
- try to unlink in batch => AccessError due to recomputation
- try to unlink individually => AccessError due to recomputation
- try to write individually => the field couldn't be recomputed before
(flagged as dirty), so try again to recompute => AccessError
We perform the operation as sudo, and take care of checking the access
rights beforehand.
opw-2009450
closesodoo/odoo#34369
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Since 0477bdb75a
The last use of `create_from_tmpl` was removed therefore it is better to not
change the context for no reason.
closesodoo/odoo#34107
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
This table tracked standard price changes.
It was used to compute the valuation at date in AVCO and standard
through `get_history_price`.
The next commits will introduce the stock valuation layers, separating
the valuation from the stock move. As a valuation layer will be created
when a standard price is updated on the product or when a stock move
impacts the valuation, the information from this table will be
duplicated.
We don't plan to adapt `get_history_price` to work with the valuation
layer since the valuation report at date and today will be the same: a
grouped list on the valuation layers with eventually a domain on the
date.
task-1875873
The goal is to be coherent with the user property.
Actually, company_id and company_ids on the environment are no fields.
Calling env.company_id returns a browse record, not an id.
The group 'group_discount_per_so_line' is used on reports in
point_of_sale but is created in 'sale' module and point_of_sale doesn't
depends on sale. So we've move this group on product to be able to
properly use it in point_of_sale.
TASK-ID: 2008468
closesodoo/odoo#35041
Signed-off-by: pimodoo <pimodoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Purpose
=======
Fields `customer` and `supplier` on `res.partner`
are mostly used in domains of many2x fields.
Those domains can confuse end users because they don't
see the partner they are looking for; and it's not obvious why.
Some identified problems:
1. It can lead to duplicated partners: the user does not find
the partner, so he creates a new one.
2. The user imports supplier contacts in the Contacts app, so they
don't get the `supplier` flag. Then the user wants to make a purchase order,
and cannot find the new suppliers in the list
3. A user removes the customer flag on a prospect, because they don't think
it's a customer yet - except now they can't make a quote for that customer...
Specification
=============
Remove the two mentioned fields.
Since fields `customer` and `supplier` have been removed, all partners
are now shown in many2one dropdowns.
But in some cases, not all partners are relevant or some are more likely
to be relevant than others. e.g. when creating a PO, top suppliers have a
higher priority than other partners.
So, adapt the places where those fields were used with the new mechanism to
display the searched the partners, according to the number purchase/sales
orders they made.
TaskID: 2031147
Co-authored-by: Yannick Tivisse <yti@odoo.com>
Purpose of this task:
Choose a vendor with the minimum price, respecting the quantity
Before commit:
The system was choosing the vendor by sequence,
But if there are any vendor having a different price for the same product,
based on ordered quantity, then the system can't choose the lowest price.
After this commit:
If there are vendors having different price based on the ordered quantity,
then the system will choose the vendor based on the quantity and lowest price.
task-1947351
closes: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/34049
Purpose of the commit is to make the multi company consistence with product,
sale order and order template.
So the Common Product Catalog setting is removed from generel settings
because its behavior wasn't really clean from a technical point of view
(disabling the rule on products access) and wouldn't work as well with
new multi-company logic.
The default logic of sharing products will be kept, but when someone
wants to limit products sharing, he will do so product by product, by
setting the company_id.
Also the default company_id on product will be blank so default product
will be a sharable by multi company.
and added company_id on sale templates so user can select his/her own
company or the templates which are common.
task-2025168
Closes: #34342
Multi is the default api for methods, it is not necessary to explicitly
decorate methods with it, adds clutter and most people use it because
they see that the rest of the code uses it.
Done with `find . -type f -name '*.py' | xargs sed -i '/@api.multi/d'`
Perf for the creation
=====================
The biggest impact of this change is when each template has only very few
variants to generate and there are a lot of such templates.
And when few templates generate a lot of variants this is potentially just a bit
better than before, and not definitely not worse.
The opposite change was done in commit f8dad1bb4b
due to an issue with unlink but since the unlink is changed to use dichotomy now
we have the best of both solutions.
For example when creating 10000 products, few with a lot of variants (max 1000)
and many with few variants (or only one), the time it takes goes down from at
least 10min (the attempt was canceled before the end) to only 25s.
Perf for the unlink
===================
For the following test case:
- create a template
- give it 3 attributes, 10 values each
- -> that generates 1000 variants
- add the first variant to an order to test it
- not happy with the config, remove one of the attributes from the template
- -> that removes the 1000 variants
This is slow because of the `savepoint` used to archive if `unlink` fails.
With dichotomy it takes 14s.
With a loop (one by one) it takes 5min.
Part of task-1918881
closesodoo/odoo#34650
Signed-off-by: Jérémy Kersten (jke) <jke@openerp.com>
Since previous commit moved decimal_precision module's feature into base,
use the new syntax for fields declaration
Remove the imports to the removed module
Remove the module from dependency in manifest
sed -i "s|digits=dp.get_precision('\([A-Z a-z]*\)')|digits='\1'|" **.py
sed -i "/from odoo.tools import decimal_precision as dp/d" **py
For 3000 lines (3 for 1000 products):
- 35s before this commit
- 22s after this commit
Gain around 30%
closesodoo/odoo#34295
Signed-off-by: Jérémy Kersten (jke) <jke@openerp.com>
Victor Feyens