Due to subcontracting. Some documents are hidden from the users since
they are there to ease technicaly. However they are linked to useful
documents and we want to avoid to log an activity on them.
Usecase to reproduce:
- Validate a purchase_order with a user without group inventory user or manufacturing user.
AccessError on operation read for BoM. A purchase user should be able
to validate an order independently of the documents that will be
generate.
Allow to do a dropshipping with a subcontractor.
If the product uses the routes drophipping and have
a subcontracting BoM. Then a PO for the subcontractors
will genrate a need in the subcontracting location for
the required components.
A module is needed because the picking_type_id for dropshipping
do not have a warehouse_id. The warehouse_id is needed in order to
know from which warehouse the subcontracting components should be
deliver.
Test the flow when a product is set as resupply on subcontract
and not MTO, it should be trigger by a reordering rule and not
by a subcontracting receipt.
When a move is created from a location A to a location B and not
via a rule but it wants to apply the rule logic in order to know
if a move is MTS or MTO then _adjust_procure_method is called.
It will check if a rule between A and B for the selected product/
category/warehouse and if it exists it will apply the rule procure
method to the move. If not it will check if the route MTO is ticked,
and will set the move as MTO even if no rule exist. It could be
miss understanding by the user that have moves MTO without matching
rule. It would be easier to have a single proccess with rule.
Add a test for the following usecase:
- Subcontracted product and components tracked by lot.
- Create a receipt
- Use the register components button in order to prefill quantity
- Correct the final lot on details operation form
If the components have the route resupply subcontractor on order then the
delivery order triggered by the receipt do not have the origin nor the
subcontractor partner. This commit update the procurement group in
order to add those information and propagate it.
due to commit 108ee65af2a88d61526dc047043138bddc3f9b63#diff-99ad190cf09687f6efdebc1f7636062c
picking type for subcontracting order use field use_create_components_lots
instead of classic picking type.
Replace the type subcontractor on the partner.
Instead replace it by a property for a subcontracting location.
The purpose is to have a simplier configuration. The user would
just need to add the partner on the BoM in order to start a
subcontracting process.
Create two moves with a product MTO and the same SO.
Confirm them. It will generate a new picking without origin.
However the purpose of removing origin on picking is to avoid
an endless enumaration of all documents but if they only have
one origin it should be display.
In this case, the origin was ignored because moves.mapped('origins')
result in a list of ['doc_origin','doc_origin'] and have a length
of 2 because .mapped do not return a distinct set on fields different
than Many2one, one2Many and M2M.
Currently, the subcontract picking present multiple difficulties:
- The user has to introduce multiple time the lot produced.
In register components button and then create a new move line with
the show details operation button.
- Same problem with the correction system. The user has to modify the
lot in details operation and then go on the subcontract production and
unlock and edit it.
In order to facilitate those behavior. A move line will be automaticaly
created during the register components process. Also the subcontract
moves for components will be available in the detail operations tab.
Usecase to reproduce:
- Create a receipt of 1 units of a subcontracted product
- Receive 2
- Validate the receipt
-> An extra move for subcontractor of 1 has been validated but a
new move of 2 still in waiting availability and can not be
validated.
It happens due to action_done that will validate existing subcontract
order (with the initial quantity). Then the move is validated and an
extra move is created and merged in the first one. This new merged
move of 2 is then confirmed and validated. That will recreate a
subcontract order of 2 that will not be validated since it was validated
in the picking action_done at the start.
This commit will modify:
- action_done on move in order to validate the subcontract order after
the move validation and the new subcontract order creation too.
- action_confirm in order to create the subcontract order with the
additional quantity and then merge it to the existing moves.
Usecase to reproduce:
- BoM -> 1 component for 1 final product
- Create a MO with a quanity of 5
- Update the quantity to 6
-> The move finished has an initial demand of 4
Stat button "Attendees" of an event now redirects to Kanban view
of attendees (previously redirected to List view).
Task-ID 1935268
closesodoo/odoo#31621
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
Removing these margins makes swipe on 'o_mail_preview'
nicer in enterprise without having blank spaces.
Note that these rules should be in enterprise.
Task ID : 1895453
This allow us to reuse this logic in enterprise when you swipe.
Note that we could have directly called the handler but the name
wasn't appropriate. So we preferred to extract some code in a
well named function.
Task ID : 1895453
As the available Austrian Localization was very basic and migrated for
years without any contribution or consolidation, a complete refactoring
was contributed by WT-IO-IT GmbH to move forward.
closesodoo/odoo#35642
Signed-off-by: Josse Colpaert <jco@openerp.com>
As it is is trying to write the journal type field everytime we try to
create a account.bank.statement record, even when the value we try to
write is the same already, it is assigned again in the journal.
With this new change we are not trying to overwrite the journal's type
field anymore. Only using it.
Closes#35578closesodoo/odoo#35714
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli (qdp) <qdp@openerp.com>
Each model of the relation can define `ondelete` for its `column2` foreign key.
This way the behavior is similar to m2o where the target of the `ondelete` is
the `comodel` foreign key.
Some models were already defining `ondelete` 'restrict' on m2m fields and after
review it appears the behavior introduced in this commit is the expected
behavior for them.
The 'restrict' from product.product has to be removed however because the rest
of the code needs adaptation now that it is properly restricted. These changes
will be done on a separate PR.
closesodoo/odoo#35654
Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
- no default reason (otherwise the invoice ref is repeated twice)
- rewording of refund types and helper texts
- avoid 'Reversal of: INV/2019/001, False' as reference -_-
When you try to find a carrier in the wizard that let you add one on
your sale order, you don't see all of them because of a domain that only
show the ones that havethe same company id of the sale order, but it
should also show you the ones that don't have company_id set.
So we removed the domain in the view, and the invisible company_id as it
is not used anymore. Because the domain we need is already applied in
'available_carrier_ids'.
This behavior has been introduced in rev: c058562d73closesodoo/odoo#35856
Signed-off-by: pimodoo <pimodoo@users.noreply.github.com>
task-1973902
+ use of img locally
+ last PO review:
+ show latest in the list
+ remove underline
+ force same height if blog or not
+ ...
closesodoo/odoo#34609
Signed-off-by: Jérémy Kersten (jke) <jke@openerp.com>
Task 1861198
Add code in tax lines for enterprise commit
Check that some control formula are verified. Display it before exporting the xml and on the tax return journal entry.
closesodoo/odoo#34186
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli (qdp) <qdp@openerp.com>
Add the dependency between website and auth_signup
auth_signup is in auto-install but there was no strict dependency
Before this commit, installing website transformed the field
auth_signup_uninvited from a static list to a computed list (due to related).
This fixes the following bug:
1. install auth_signup
-> create selections
2. install webstite
-> remove selections and turn it into a computed field with dynamic
selections
3. update auth_signup
-> recreate the selections when updating the module
4. reload the registry (automatic at the end of update)
-> try to remove the selections -> error as not in install/uninstall
mode
Instead, keep the list static and turn it into a computed field with
inverse
closesodoo/odoo#35861
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Currently when shipping method is added on the sales order with error message
then on update of shipping method it will display the error message in dialog
but it will be hidden behind the update shipping method wizard
so on update shipping method display notification instead of dialog.
Closes: #35808
Signed-off-by: Damien Bouvy (dbo) <dbo@odoo.com>
On shipping method company is not required field so having blank
company on shipping method will be a shared method.
so while adding shipping method on so also display the company on
which the company is not set.
Closes: #35808
Before this commit, the external email settings were saved but the
alias domain model was empty. This was caused by this field being
editable in mail module, but readonly in hr_expense and crm_module.
This commit fixes the issue by force saving the readonly fields, so
that they are stored in database and non-empty after save.
Task-ID 2047446
closesodoo/odoo#35589
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
Arnold Moyaux