Purpose
=======
The current kanban view is messy. It is difficult to identify which
apps are installed or not. The user can completely miss a module
that might have interested him. A search panel would make things way
more readable.
closesodoo/odoo#44401
Taskid: 2181557
Related: odoo/enterprise#8144
Related: odoo/upgrade#879
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Let's say we have a chain of move
wh1 - intercomp transit -> intercomp transit - wh2
The second move will be reserved according to what the first move
brought since they are chained. This behavior resulted in rev[0] which
tries to work around the ir.rule limiting the access of stock.move and
stock.move.line records in multi-company environment.
This patch wasn't perfect since, if the first move brought a lot, the
second move will reserve this lot and it will result in another access
error since the lot will still have the company of the first move.
We fix this by implementing the following logic: receiving from another
company should behave the same as receiving from the supplier, no
reservation is applied. We fix this by marking the inter company transit
as `_should_bypass_reservation` and we break the move chain if the
pull/push rule create an intercompany chain.
[0] 6ff34073153767d449804669f31e26c04de0a670
closesodoo/odoo#45601
Task: 2160847
X-original-commit: 67b45da9d877a5a1bb9adb3ce14051e01f67045f
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
rev[0] aimed to fix an intercompany reservation issue by allowing the
intercompany moves to be seen, however the new domain was too soft and
also allows the visibility of any moves going to a location without
company, for example now outgoing moves to customer from all companies
are visible.
We strengthen the domain to only allow intercompany moves, ie we add the
transit constraint in the domain.
We also fix the same issue for the move line model (see [1])
Now that this one is fixed, the next move is automatically reserved
during _action_done. This didn't work either, so we carefully sudo and
force_company on the destination move.
[0] 3c4bb080c3
[1] f9461c7096a65565a05136a4c6c42ddfa6881926
task-2157248
closesodoo/odoo#42270
X-original-commit: 9a237d1af79519665d0895a30c9ce55a1d835918
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
The commit 3c4bb08 fixed an issue about reservation from transit location
for versions from 11.0 to 12.0 by soften the record rule on stock.move
From 12.3, we need to additionnaly soften the stock.move.line rule
to have the same result as this model has a record rule too since that version
closesodoo/odoo#39859
X-original-commit: b8b63d387b5af5928001ca7a53ef66916bc070b9
Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
On a delivery type picking, adds a button to able the partner to sign
the delivery on receipt.
task-1878607
closesodoo/odoo#39183
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: sle-odoo <sle@odoo.com>
Ensure proper domains are applied and enforced on relation fields thanks
to the `check_company` attributes.
product.template
- make responsible a property field in order to ensure proper next activities when a product
is used between multiple companies
stock.putaway.rule
- added a company_id field
stock.move.line
- company_id is not related anymore since a move line can exist without a move until its validation
stock.package_level
- added a company_id field
stock.picking.type
- company_id is now required
stock.production.lot
- added a company_id field, adapted the constraint accordingly
stock.quant
- check the consistency only in inventory mode
stock.quant.package
- company_id is now empty if the package is empty
stock.picking
- company_id is now related to the one of its picking type
Added some tests.
Moved stock_traceability in the `report` directory.
Removed useless /tests/tours/route.js.
task-1985992
Usecase to reproduce
- Create company A and company B with one warehouse each
- Warehouse from A resupply warehouse in company B
- Create a product and check the route MTO and resupply from warehouse A
- Connect as Demo User that only have access to company B
- Do a delivery order in company B for this product -> it creates a
receipt from warehouse A
- Deliver in warehouse A to company transit
- Try to reserve the receipt in company B
-> It does nothing.
It happens because the receipt move is in company A and the delivery
order is in company B. The move is tagged as make_to_order so the
reservation is based on move_orig_ids. However the move_orig_ids is
empty due to record rule that hide since it's in the other company.
In order to fix it, allow to see move from other companies that goes
to transit location.
opw-2033066
closesodoo/odoo#35223
Signed-off-by: Nans Lefebvre (len) <len@odoo.com>
Create a new report in order to see quantity in the past
and in the future. Also display the planned in and out moves
at their schedule date. The view available for this report is
a graph view even if it could be display with other views.
Technically it's an SQL views based on stock.quant and stock.move
Currently the interval for the report is -3 months, +3 months because
the forecast quantity is based on quants - moves during this interval
in order to keep a linear performance that's not growing with the data.
task: 2000948
closesodoo/odoo#34898
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
This commit adds fields 'company_id' on stock.scrap model.
The company will filter locations and stock moves linked to the scrap
document.
We add also a specific sequence by company.
Task-1930055
closesodoo/odoo#30498
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
Purpose
=======
Allow the user to select the allowed companies for which he wants to see records
on top of selecting his current company.
It is confusing for users to see the records from the company he is connected to
and the records of the children companies.
Instead of using the hierarchy of companies to access records across companies,
the user can now select (from his set of allowed companies) the companies for
which he wants to access records.
/!\ This means that the user will interact with records from company A when in
company B.
Example: a SO has been created and confirmed in A. When in B, I create the
invoice from it.
Specifications
==============
1/ Deprecate the parent/children hierarchy on the res.company model. The fields are
kept on the res.company model to ensure the retro-compatibility, but won't be used
accross the standard code anymore. The only functional usage for this mechanism
was to allow to see records from several companies by creating a virtual parent
company, which will be possible with the new mechanism.
2/ By default, a user will only see the records of the company he is connected
to (or records without a company). (It is still editable by the user if needed).
For that, put this information in the user context, to allow having different
configurations on different browser tabs. Instead of having domains like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'child_of', user.company_id.id)]
you'll have something like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'in', company_ids)]
Note that the 'company_ids' is a value that is passed in the evaluation
context on the record rule, as we already have user, or time.
company_ids is a list of the ids of all the enabled companies in the
user's context.
3/ Out of the generic improvements brought by this task, this will illustrate
issues that could exist since several versions. For example, it should not be
possible to create a scrap order for the company A with a package of the company
B, or it should not be possible to create an invoice on the company A with
payment terms from the company B. Before the version 12.0, it was easy to
encounter this kind of issues as the admin was the SUPERUSER_ID. A positive side
effect of the fact that the SUPERUSER_ID has become an inactive user was to
make it more difficult to introduce mismatch on the records, but haven't solved
the issue, as it was still possible to do it with parent companies
configuration. Some of these issues have been fixed in this commit, but all the
business flows should be re-tested to check if an ir.rule should be introduced
(eg: a multi company rule for stock.quand.package), if the company of a record
is correctly transfered to another record created from the first record (eg:
From a SO, create an invoice and a payment, the company of the sales order
should be transfered on the invoice and the payment, even if the company of the
sales order is A and I'm logged into the company B with the company A enabled.
4/ Currently, if I click on a button on a notification email (example 'View
Task'), I face a traceback if I'm not logged into the company of the record.
Now, if you click on a button and if you have access to the record, the correct
company will be automatically set.
5/ If I display a kanban view with several records from several companies (and
an image), all the images should be displayed.
6/ Currently if you copy paste an url, this will crash if you're not in the
correct company. This won't be fixed because it's quite impossible to do it in
a clean way. This task brings a workaround. Copy/Paste -> Traceback -> Log into
the correct company, re-copy/paste -> Ok.
7/ 2 property methods have been added on the environment to retrieve the company
on which the user is logged in and the companies the user enabled, on a specific
tab.
That way, when creating a record, instead of doing
default=lambda self: self.env.user.company_id
do
default=lambda self: self.env.company_id
On the other hand, to retrieve the enabled companies, do
companies = self.env.company_ids
8/ Modify the Company Switcher widget to allow to log into another company
WITHOUT writing on the res.users (and thus bringing cache invalidation issues
and so on). Also allow to enable several companies and see records from several
companies, and independantly of the other browser's tabs.
9/ When focusing on a tab, save the current company configuration on the local
storage. That way, when doing 'CTRL+T' or a middle click, the context is
propagated to the new tab.
10/ Improve the error message in case of multi company access errors. Now, when
the user is in debug mode, display the related names of the records and the name
of the user who brings the issue.
11/ Remove the context erasing when writing on a res.users
This is probably coming from the migration to new API of the base module.
The context was not propagated at this moment, which was a common mistake at
that time. When migrating the module, probably by using the 'black box' method,
as the context was not propagated, it was erased on the new version. This is
now an issue because the context (i.e. the enabled companies) was erased when
writing on a res.users, leading to tracebacks.
See: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/7eab8e26d3d46c53f4be924d6a34e80a66e74960#diff-4c2e738ee8f64f11806c889ea097b5e7R624
12/ Fix the crash manager on redirect warnings. The issue is the following
- Create an invoice on a company without a configured CoA.
- Set a partner
- On the onchange_partner_id, a redirect warning is raised to propose you
to configure a CoA
- Click on 'Go to the configuration panel'
- A generic warning says something like 'Do you want to discard your changes?'
- Click on yes, the page refreshes, but not on the redirect action.
Now, set correctly the action on the hash, and reload instead. The breadcrumb is
lost for example, but you reach the correct action at least.
13/ Introduce a res.group to enable/disable the multi company per tab
feature.
14/ To help the users to know which tab is in which company, add the
possibility to have a favicon per company. When creating a company,
the classical 'O' icon is colored by default in a random color.
15/ Remove the company switcher on the frontend. This was mainly there
to allow a user to swicth to the company linked to the website.
This behavior is now transparent to the user. If the website A is
activated, then the company set on the context is the company of the
website.
16/ Deprecated the _company_default_get method on the res.company
model. Remove the method _get_company on the res.users model.
17/ Add 'allowed_company_ids' and 'current_company_id' on the pyeval
context. You can now use those variables on domains in the views to
access directly to the activated company.ies on the current tab.
TaskID: 1960971
closesodoo/odoo#32341
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Commit 240d191ba3 introduced the field
company_id on model stock.move.line and a python constraint that check
if the company is the same on the move line and on the related move.
In order to avoid performance issue, this commit replace the constraint
by a 'related' parameter on the company field.
As the company_id is not editable we suppose this change will not introduced
unwanted errors
Task : 1970012
closesodoo/odoo#32738
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
Purpose
=======
Access group terminology is missleading. Yous have to be manager to administrate
an application. This task consists to rename groups to be understandable for everyone.
Groups should be reorganised on the users form to be more explicit.
Specification
=============
1/ Rename 'Manager' to 'Administrator' in users groups.
2/ Define a hierarchy on access groups by using the category_id in the manifests
A category 'Operations/Project' will create a category Project with a parent
category 'Operations', and something smart is already developed (in modules/db.py)
to avoid duplicating categories.
3/ Add a group in expenses to be able to approve expenses reports for my team.
4/ Add a group in timesheets to be able to approve timesheets for my team.
5/ Remove partially the useless crap in ir_module_category_data.xml
6/ Sort access rights groups on users form according to its parent category
closesodoo/odoo#29362
Signed-off-by: "Yannick Tivisse (yti)" <yti@odoo.com>
There is no company_id field on stock.move.line and it is so impossible
to restrict easily the access rights on move lines (except by passing
through stock.move, but all stock move line don't always have a
stock.move)
To resolve this we've added a field company_id on stock.move.line, and a
constraint to force it having the same company_id than the one on stock
move.
Task ID : 1905232closesodoo/odoo#28575
The field sale_id on model stock.picking is not defined in stock module.
So the rule was wrong when sale_stock was uninstalled.
opw:1912564
closesodoo/odoo#29145
Usability improvement:
- Common view for push and pull rules
- Add an help text in order to describe the rule
- Rules menu
- Warehouse checked by default on route created by a warehouse
- Lower the MTO route sequence in order to take it first.
- Tooltip cleaning
Technical improvement:
The purpose of this task was also to merge stock.location.path(push rule) and
procrement.rule. Those two model were design to execute the same task
but in a different direction. Thus it contains duplicate code.
Task ID 1852969.
After commit 996a817071
The portal report on picking only check if
the user has a 'read' access on picking.
If he can read it, sudo is called and thus
record rule/access right on component objects
are not necessary.
This commit removes useless rights for portal users.
This removes the procurement.order model. To fufill their needs SO, PO, MO and
stock moves now call the _run method of the relevant procurement.group.
This mecanism is now only used for stockable product, tasks now uses their own
independent mecanism.
The _run method will check all the applicable rules and create directly the
needed model to fufill the need.
The modules stock, purchase, mrp, extends the _run method to implement their
specific strategy relevant for the rule type they define.
If an exception happens the message will be logged as a mail messsage on the
source model, for example, if a sales order cannot be fufilled the salesperson
will now see directly the reason.
OLD commit messages:
[WIP] procurement: removing procurement.order in stock, sale, purchase, sale_stock. WIP
fixup! [WIP] procurement: removing procurement.order in stock, sale, purchase, sale_stock. WIP
[IMP] Basic tests
[FIX] test not necessary anymore
[FIX] remove unnecessary print statement
[FIX] unnecessary test + why passing warehouse worked before?
[IMP] purchase: one move by purchase order line
[FIX] purchase: correct inventory tests and pass move_dest_ids among procurements
[FIX] because of bad cherry-pick merge
[IMP] make mrp pass by adding move_dest_ids there too
[IMP] tests of sale_mrp, no need for cancelpropagation then
[IMP] better to consistently use recordsets also for one2many
[FIX] purchase_requisition
[FIX] Exceptions should trigger errors, which should be caught in the tests
[FIX] sale_mrp: remove usage of procurement.order and use sale order name instead of sol
[FIX] stock_dropshipping: add sale_line_id on purchase_line_id
[FIX] Remove pdb
[IMP] add stock_dropshipping files
[IMP] stock: search carrier through sale line instead of procurement group
[IMP] add procrule test and preision needed when updating sol
[FIX] sale_order_dates + [IMP] procurement exceptions by scheduler
[FIX] No need to return task
[IMP] move file as name changes and add corrections
[FIX] Continue Run Schedulers wizard fix
[FIX] name issues of takss
[FIX] updating sale order line, but there is still a problem with the recompute
The goal is to prepare the removal of
'portal' module.
Since this module only provides access rules and
rights, those ones are moved directly into its
parent module (aka 'stock').
Since no module depends on it, we can remove it
without problem.
As picking types aren't always used in a picking context, and picking
aren't really meanigful for a lot of people, we rename this concept as
"operation type" in views and in the planner.
Add a link in the general settings to access easily the default_user form view in order to modify the default access rights
The default_user manager rights declarations in all the applications have been move in a noupdate="1" definition to avoid the manual configuration overwrittings
- Separate group_stock_multiple_locations into 2 groups:
o group_stock_multi_locations
o group_stock_multi_warehouses
- Add a selection fields to manage the 3 levels of warehouses management complexity:
o Manage 1 WH with 1 location
o Manage 1 WH with multi locations
o Manage multi WHs with multi locations
- Display the menuitems and fields accordingly
- On a company creation : Create a related Warehouse
- stock.location : Add a helper on the parent location
- stock.warehouse : Add a helper on the company_id field
In "stock.move" model the fields location_id and location_dest_id
are required. But when disabling "Manage Multiple Locations and Warehouses"
in Technical Settings, these fields became hidden in stock.move.form and
then it was impossible to add an new product to consume in mrp.production.form.
In 8.0, to be in group_stock_user implies to be in stock.group_locations.
Introduced by e58b16a
opw:660032
Victor Feyens