- make `bom_id` required. No sense to have a operation without BoM
- `company_id` of operation is now related
- Clean the multiple `allowed_operation_ids` into related
fields instead.
task-2373638
What are the steps to reproduce your issue ?
1. Install 'Manufacture' and enable 'Work Order' in settings
2. Create product 'ProductA', enable 'Manufacture' in 'Inventory' tab
3. Create a BOM for 'ProductA'
4. For that BOM, create a new operation called 'OperationA' with PDF worksheet but don't attach any PDF
4. Go to 'Manufacture' and create a MO with 'ProductA', the 'OperationA' is automatically set in 'Work Orders'
5. Start the work order
What is currently happening ?
When you try to pause, an error is raised.
'TypeError: Cannot read property 'pdfViewer' of undefined'
What are you expecting to happen ?
Start and pause the work order even without attached PDF.
Why is this happening ?
'this.pdfViewer = existing.data('PDFViewerApplication').pdfViewer'
When there is no pdf attached. The data 'PDFViewerApplication' does not exist.
How to fix the bug ?
Change worksheet default value to text, and make the field mandatory in case of a PDF type
opw-2387428
closesodoo/odoo#62350
X-original-commit: 8597aada3d9bacc3cff4707bb78a7bc48d723cfb
Related: odoo/enterprise#14992
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Achraf <abz-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
Add to `check_company` on `bom_id` of operation, to avoid company issue
after in MO when we create `mrp.workcenter.productivity.loss`.
Also remove the readonly on `company_id` to get the possibility of
modify it if the company_id of BoM change.
Mainly transifex issues but also some errors found through 'grep' checks.
Fix typos and obscure english strings in xml contents, fields strings/helps, some docstrings, ...
ensuring correct translations base (and fallback when translations isn't available).
closesodoo/odoo#57276
X-original-commit: 4214f05d454bca2b60fda3a288d529c098e84f77
Related: odoo/enterprise#13053
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
This doesn't make sense anymore: when we record production on a WO, in
any cases everything is processed as we make backorders.
Part of: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/54283
task-2278147
Bunch of last minute fixes including:
- serial handling in tablet view
- expected durations and backorders
- button unplan unlinks the leave but the computed aren't recomputed
then we need to manually set the date_planned_start/finished
then we need to not propagate them on the related document
(move/production) because they are required
- operation company_id wrongly set
task-2241471
Set the operations directly on the Bill of Material.
Duplicate the demo data where a routing was shared.
Adapt the tests.
Remove the following feature:
- set the same routing on parent and kit child bom
- when planning, if the component of the kit have the same operation
than a component of the parent bom, merge these operations
task-2241471
The field note of mrp.routing.workcenter was not very usefull, and not
appear in the workorder related to this operation. Sometime, we need to
have a small description of the work to do for a opeartion in the WO,
instead of a complet pdf or google slide.
-> Convert the note field as a description of the job to do and add a
"text" worksheet_type to select it, in the mrp.routing.workcenter and
add the related field in the WO. Update the view of accordingly.
-> (migration): The 'note' content remain the same, then migration is
not needed. If the user change the worksheet_type into text, the
"note" will be the previous "description".
task-2196687
For the `mrp.routing.workcenter`, removes the help from the `worksheet`
field to set it into the view.
This way, the tooltip doesn't appear each time the user cursor is placed
in front of the pdf in the workorder tablet view (`mpr_workorder`).
task-2225362
closesodoo/odoo#48903
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
- Create a workcenter with a capacity of 500 units
- Create a BOM with a routing generating one work order in the WC
created
- Create 3 MO with the following real durations:
MO 1: 1000 units produced in 420.95 seconds
MO 2: 1000 units produced in 120.28 seconds
MO 3: 1000 units produced in 60 seconds
- Create a MO for 1 unit
The Duration expected is computed as
The Time Cycle is computed as:
(420.95 + 120.28 + 60) / (1000 + 1000 + 1000) = 0.20041
The Total Expected is computed as:
0 + 0 + (1.0 * 0.20041) * (100.0 / 100.0) = 0.20041
0.20041 seconds is not realistic based on the previous MO real
durations.
This is because the Time Cycle doesn't take into account the workcenter
capacity. If we can produce 60 units in parallel in 60 seconds, that
doesn't mean we can produce 1 unit in 1 second. Therefore, the Time
Cycle should be multiplied by the WC capacity, which gives a Time Cycle:
500 * (420.95 + 120.28 + 60) / (3000) = 100.205
Which is much closer to the real duration.
opw-2070759
closesodoo/odoo#37548
X-original-commit: 9d3a73f64feb3b9e71c50a04adb6206b6393c757
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Ensure proper domains are applied and enforced on relation fields thanks
to the `check_company` attributes.
Make sure unbuild have proper sequence for each companies.
The produce wizard and workorders company is the one of the production.
The BoM line company_id is the one of its bom_id.
Added some tests.
task-1985992
Modify tree view for MRP Production
Modify form view and tree view for Unbuild orders
Add group by for Bill of Materials
By default show line shart when opening MRP Production report
Modify view for Work Orders
Modify view for Work Centers
Modify view for Routings
Modify view for Maintenance Request
Modify view for Bill of Materials
task-2042304
closes - https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/35482
This attribute is misleading as it is insufficient to correctly upgrade
the database. It only renames the column in the database, but other
operations are needed, like updating the corresponding `ir.model.fields`
record (and its xmlid). The default values and the translations are also
lost during the upgrade.
Moreover, this feature was misused. It was:
- left on fields during multiple versions.
- used on reports (SQL views). This would be ok if the feature was
complete, but, as is, it was useless.
- kept unchanged after a second renaming of the field (which can happen
versions later the first rename).
- used, even when the meaning of the field changed. i.e. the field
`archived` has been renamed to the classic `active`, but the value
in the database should be switched.
This commit adds new `embed_viewer` widget which will be used display URLs
via embedded iframes. You can add any valid URL to display page via iframe,
although widget automatically converts raw google slide URL into embedded URL.
Task ID: 1909010
closesodoo/odoo#29404
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: pga-odoo <pga@odoo.com>
Multi is the default api for methods, it is not necessary to explicitly
decorate methods with it, adds clutter and most people use it because
they see that the rest of the code uses it.
Done with `find . -type f -name '*.py' | xargs sed -i '/@api.multi/d'`
The goal is to be coherent with the user property.
Actually, company_id and company_ids on the environment are no fields.
Calling env.company_id returns a browse record, not an id.
Purpose
=======
Allow the user to select the allowed companies for which he wants to see records
on top of selecting his current company.
It is confusing for users to see the records from the company he is connected to
and the records of the children companies.
Instead of using the hierarchy of companies to access records across companies,
the user can now select (from his set of allowed companies) the companies for
which he wants to access records.
/!\ This means that the user will interact with records from company A when in
company B.
Example: a SO has been created and confirmed in A. When in B, I create the
invoice from it.
Specifications
==============
1/ Deprecate the parent/children hierarchy on the res.company model. The fields are
kept on the res.company model to ensure the retro-compatibility, but won't be used
accross the standard code anymore. The only functional usage for this mechanism
was to allow to see records from several companies by creating a virtual parent
company, which will be possible with the new mechanism.
2/ By default, a user will only see the records of the company he is connected
to (or records without a company). (It is still editable by the user if needed).
For that, put this information in the user context, to allow having different
configurations on different browser tabs. Instead of having domains like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'child_of', user.company_id.id)]
you'll have something like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'in', company_ids)]
Note that the 'company_ids' is a value that is passed in the evaluation
context on the record rule, as we already have user, or time.
company_ids is a list of the ids of all the enabled companies in the
user's context.
3/ Out of the generic improvements brought by this task, this will illustrate
issues that could exist since several versions. For example, it should not be
possible to create a scrap order for the company A with a package of the company
B, or it should not be possible to create an invoice on the company A with
payment terms from the company B. Before the version 12.0, it was easy to
encounter this kind of issues as the admin was the SUPERUSER_ID. A positive side
effect of the fact that the SUPERUSER_ID has become an inactive user was to
make it more difficult to introduce mismatch on the records, but haven't solved
the issue, as it was still possible to do it with parent companies
configuration. Some of these issues have been fixed in this commit, but all the
business flows should be re-tested to check if an ir.rule should be introduced
(eg: a multi company rule for stock.quand.package), if the company of a record
is correctly transfered to another record created from the first record (eg:
From a SO, create an invoice and a payment, the company of the sales order
should be transfered on the invoice and the payment, even if the company of the
sales order is A and I'm logged into the company B with the company A enabled.
4/ Currently, if I click on a button on a notification email (example 'View
Task'), I face a traceback if I'm not logged into the company of the record.
Now, if you click on a button and if you have access to the record, the correct
company will be automatically set.
5/ If I display a kanban view with several records from several companies (and
an image), all the images should be displayed.
6/ Currently if you copy paste an url, this will crash if you're not in the
correct company. This won't be fixed because it's quite impossible to do it in
a clean way. This task brings a workaround. Copy/Paste -> Traceback -> Log into
the correct company, re-copy/paste -> Ok.
7/ 2 property methods have been added on the environment to retrieve the company
on which the user is logged in and the companies the user enabled, on a specific
tab.
That way, when creating a record, instead of doing
default=lambda self: self.env.user.company_id
do
default=lambda self: self.env.company_id
On the other hand, to retrieve the enabled companies, do
companies = self.env.company_ids
8/ Modify the Company Switcher widget to allow to log into another company
WITHOUT writing on the res.users (and thus bringing cache invalidation issues
and so on). Also allow to enable several companies and see records from several
companies, and independantly of the other browser's tabs.
9/ When focusing on a tab, save the current company configuration on the local
storage. That way, when doing 'CTRL+T' or a middle click, the context is
propagated to the new tab.
10/ Improve the error message in case of multi company access errors. Now, when
the user is in debug mode, display the related names of the records and the name
of the user who brings the issue.
11/ Remove the context erasing when writing on a res.users
This is probably coming from the migration to new API of the base module.
The context was not propagated at this moment, which was a common mistake at
that time. When migrating the module, probably by using the 'black box' method,
as the context was not propagated, it was erased on the new version. This is
now an issue because the context (i.e. the enabled companies) was erased when
writing on a res.users, leading to tracebacks.
See: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/7eab8e26d3d46c53f4be924d6a34e80a66e74960#diff-4c2e738ee8f64f11806c889ea097b5e7R624
12/ Fix the crash manager on redirect warnings. The issue is the following
- Create an invoice on a company without a configured CoA.
- Set a partner
- On the onchange_partner_id, a redirect warning is raised to propose you
to configure a CoA
- Click on 'Go to the configuration panel'
- A generic warning says something like 'Do you want to discard your changes?'
- Click on yes, the page refreshes, but not on the redirect action.
Now, set correctly the action on the hash, and reload instead. The breadcrumb is
lost for example, but you reach the correct action at least.
13/ Introduce a res.group to enable/disable the multi company per tab
feature.
14/ To help the users to know which tab is in which company, add the
possibility to have a favicon per company. When creating a company,
the classical 'O' icon is colored by default in a random color.
15/ Remove the company switcher on the frontend. This was mainly there
to allow a user to swicth to the company linked to the website.
This behavior is now transparent to the user. If the website A is
activated, then the company set on the context is the company of the
website.
16/ Deprecated the _company_default_get method on the res.company
model. Remove the method _get_company on the res.users model.
17/ Add 'allowed_company_ids' and 'current_company_id' on the pyeval
context. You can now use those variables on domains in the views to
access directly to the activated company.ies on the current tab.
TaskID: 1960971
closesodoo/odoo#32341
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
product_location was confusing, not correctly working and is now
replaced by a new feature to manage subcontracting correctly.
TaskID: 1915022
closesodoo/odoo#32390
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
When the user create an operation, the system set the
operation time based on previous workorders. However they
don't exists since we just created the operation and the
default time is 60 minutes. It would be easier to ask for
a default value based on fixed time and let the user modify
it later manually after some workorders.
The commit is related to task id: 1910342
closesodoo/odoo#29208
This commit contains the core of the new MRP. It contains a whole refactoring
of the MRP application, with improved and new features, written in new API.
Among other here are the main manufacturing workflow improvements :
- Picking type not only for pickings but also for manufacturing orders
- Properties replaced by picking type
- BoM can only be produced with its routing (no other)
- Either produce without routing with only production orders, or produce with
routing
- By default, there is an order in the work orders (serially), but you can
override it to be able to work in parallel
- Time clocking on work orders and block time on work centers with reporting
on OEE, performance, losses, ...
- Real-time adaptation of timings on operations
- Lots/serial numbers can be inputted like in the pickings on manufacturing
orders. It is also possible to input them in the work orders.
- Material availability independent of production order state (possibility to
start production when only part of it is there)
- Work sheets on work orders
- Put messages on work orders to make your workers pay attention to something
- Full traceability link to see for each produced piece of stock, the
consumed pieces, ...
- Separate scrap object (a scrap is not done based on an original move
anymore)
- Separate unbuild system (if you want to unbuild into its original
components)
Thanks to all people that helped during this development, notably but not
limited to Chirag A Dodiya (cod@odoo.com), Gaurav Panchal (gan@odoo.com),
Jignesh Rathod (jir@odoo.com), Mansi Trivedi (mtr@odoo.com), Pariket Trivedi
(ptr@odoo.com).
MRP module is migrated to the new API. It excludes mrp models that will change
quit a lot during the new MRP conversion. Actually most of the code is not
migrated, but at least side models and their methods are already migrated.
This should lessen the diff when writing the new MRP.
Split files and move them according to the new API guidelines. Containing
- mrp splitted into its main models and files
- stock code moved into its own models and files
- various renaming