Let's assume the following scenario in a Kanban view with a default
filter. The user removes the filter, and quickly adds a new one.
On a slow network, it may happen that the second reload request
returns before the first one. On odoo.com, this is easy to
reproduce on the tasks Kanban view.
Before this rev., when this occured, the result of the first
request was displayed, whereas it should have been ignored as
another request was done later on.
Recently, rev. c0809dd41 removed a protection in the reload of
Kanban views with progressbars. This protection ensured that the
manual reload of the progressbars was only done when one of the
records of the Kanban view was updated (and not when a column, or
the whole view was).
However, removing it highlighted a bug linked to the manual reload
of progressbars, which messed up the list of ids in the
environment. As a consequence, for instance, if the user archived
the records of a column, and then opendc a record in form view,
it couldn't use the pager anymore.
Besides fixing this bug, this rev. re-introduces the protection,
and refines it to prevent 2 useless RPCs when the whole Kanban
view was reloaded.
opw~1841276
opw~1841342
The way the calendar view selected its form view was broken for two
reasons:
- any value given in the form_view_id attribute was kept as string,
which means that the string value would be sent to the server, and
this is not good.
- if no value was set, the calendar view then simply did a do_action
with the form view id set to false, which means that the default form
view is used. This is mostly ok, except when we are in the context of
an action with a form view which is not the default one. In that
case, we clearly prefer the form view from the action.
For example, before this commit, the form view in the timesheet
application (community) is not the same as the default form view on
account.analytic.line.
Note that this commit also adds a small tweak to the mock server to
better simulate errors like the web client does (in session.js).
Before this, the progressbar values were not updated (both count and progress)
after archiving all the records of a column.
Multiple things have been done here to update it.
Firstly, a optimization had been done to avoid reloading the progressbar when
updating a column ; this optimization was not correct due to this precise use
case. This will update the progressbar.
Secondly, the `aggregateValues` are reset when putting empty groups back in the
datapoint. This attribute is used to compute the counter if a `sum_field` is set
on the progressbar widget. It needs to be reset because the loop that computes
it won't iterate on empty groups.
Eventually, the mockRPC of the progressbar route was not taking the `group_by`
argument into account (probably a typo).
When doing several grouping quickly (or if the system is slow) on the
pivot view, we may try to display data that now doesn't corresponds to
the current selected groupBys.
This commit ensures that when we load data of the pivot view, we drop
the previous data loading that are currently being carried out.
Without the fix, the added test failed with:
TypeError: Cannot read property 'length' of undefined
because the test does:
- select one level of group by
- select two levels of group by
- resolve the first level of group by
- resolve the second level of group by
Without the fix, we would try to display the data for one level of group
by when the pivot view had two levels selected.
With the fix, displaying the first level of group by was discarded once
a second one was being requested.
opw-1825892
closes#24396
When a user creates a new column in a kanban view, leave the action and
comes back, the order is not preserved. With this commit, we force a
call to resequence to ensure that the order does not change.
and keep all those filters at last. (PR#20463)
e.g. If field used in color attribute of calendar view does not have value then such sidebar filters will not have string besides filter checkbox
in such cases we should set Undefined string and put all those filters at last in filter list
Currently we can see issue in calendar of manufacturing orders in db with demo data
Related to Issue #1778360
Co-authored-by: Mohammed Shekha <msh@openerp.com>
Here is a scenario that could happen before this commit:
1. go to a list view with more than one record, say 3
2. click on the 3rd record to open the form view
3. the pager says 3/3
4. click on edit button
5. click on discard button
6. the pager says 1/3 (but the record displayed is still the same)
It is often necessary to restore the offset for the sub records, because
the number of pages in a one2many could have changed. However, it is
not a good idea to do that for the main record, since it interferes with
the usual flow of operations.
On a pivot view expand a field in column
another one in row
Then put a domain in the search view
Save the whole thing (ir.filter) as favorite
Before this commit, the ir.filter was not saved the right way when a domain was present
(Let alone its restoration)
This was because of
- the internal default groupbys of the pivot model was not updated, and what we got in the params was overwritten
by what existed before
- a slight typo in the code made the row updated with the col values
OPW 1835865
OPW 1829925
closes#24215
In the calendar view there is some mixing of moment with:
- a local date with given timezone
- a UTC date with added timezone manually applied
The setDate function of calendar model sometimes received either of the
two types, and always transforms them to UTC date with added timezone.
This cause eg. the following issues:
- in the minicalendar, if we click on a day (eg. 12) the day highlighed
will be the one of 12th at midnight with timezone applied. So with a
negative timezone the 11th would be highlighted in the mini calendar
(but the 12th would still be the day shown).
- if we change scale (week/day/month) or open calendar or use next or
previous button: we call `setDate` with a UTC+timezone moment. So each
time this is done, we get an additional timezone
eg. when opening the calendar view on the 12th at 5:00 with GMT-0200:
-> the target date is 12th at 1:00
-> if we set the day mode: target date is 11th at 23:00
-> if we set the week mode: target date is 11th at 21:00
With this change we keep target_date and highlight_date as local date so
setDate always receives a local date and jquery-ui DatePicker gets the
date in the expected format.
opw-1831368
closes#24188
In a kanban grouped by many2one with a progressbar, after emptying a column
by moving all records, the column wasn't correctly updated. This was causing,
in the best case, a record duplication or, in the worst case, a traceback.
This issue comes from the fact that, with a progressbar, a read_group is
performed each time a record is moved. When the group (column) becomes empty,
the read_group won't return this group even though the group still appears in
the kankan. When moving back the record in this empty column, there is a
desynchronization between the kanban controller data and the model.
To fix this issue, an option `keepEmptyGroups` is passed when performing the
mentioned read_group ; this mimics the kanban display that keeps empty groups
displayed and there is no desync anymore.
Fixes#23982
To reproduce the error, go to Accounting > Import Statement, then
Cancel. An error occurs because `belongs_to_company` is not in the data.
Indeed, it is directly set on the action
`open_account_journal_dashboard_kanban`.
Commit 9961bbf4eb re-evaluates if a record should be displayed in the
Kanban view after applying an action (in particular, archive a record).
However, the domain evaluated might contain values which are not in the
data. This is for example the case if there is a domain on an action.
Fixes#24142
opw-1835216
opw-1835123
When a user click on an action button, we need to check if the record
match with the domain to remove it from the view if this action change
the record value.
Special case: we filter by active field equal true, if the active field
is available in the data (field present in the kanban view).
opw-1832879
Co-authored-by: Nicolas Martinelli <nim@odoo.com>
- Create a vendor bill, save and validate
- Duplicate the bill, save
- Click on "Create"
A customer invoice is created, while the user expects a vendor bill.
After duplication, the new record is loaded but the context is lost.
Since the default value for the invoice type is based on the context key
`type`, a loss of context leads to an incorrect invoice type.
opw-1826453
Co-authored-by: Géry Debongnie <ged@odoo.com>
- Set the OS timezone to GMT-6
- Create a project task with a date deadline on D day
- The tasks appears at D-1 in the calendar
This was supposed to be fixed with 0c0fb63b0d, but actually no.
opw-1815446
opw-1828130
On an editable line with a many2one
Click to create a record
Click on create a record in the many2one
It opens the form view of the object in a modal, which has a many2many list, which choices are domainized
Click 'add an item' on this list
It should open a modal with the filtered choices
Click on any of the existing record
Before this commit:
There was a traceback in JS
That was because the event bubbled up to a parent, when it shouldn't
After this commit:
The whole flow unfolds without errors
OPW 1823205
Before this rev., this attribute was ignored for groups containing
sub groups.
Task 1786309
Closes#23514
Co-authored-by: Mohammed Shekha <msh@openerp.com>
In some cases, the footer in a form view dialog could be duplicated.
The reason was that the form view was rerendered completely, footer
included, by the renderer, out of the formcontroller control (it is the
formcontroller's job to move the footer buttons to the footer).
A possible fix is to work on the form renderer to make it aware that the footer
buttons are expected to be only rendered once, but it has the disadvantage to
be a fix specific to this issue, and any other form view behaviour with some
side effects may have the same issue.
This commit tries to prevent the form view from rerendering itself
completely in those cases. This also has the disadvantage of possibly
not being a complete fix, if some edge cases are missed. However, I
have the feeling that we still want to avoid rerendering the full view
if possible.
Before this rev., it crashed when trying to create records of the
res.users model. This is due to commit ad1cceb.
The 'default_get' of 'res.users' always returns a value for field
'groups_id', whereas the docstring of 'default_get' states that it
only returns default values for fields given in arguments.
Rev. ad1cceb changed a bit the way the result of 'default_get' was
processed, by iterating over the values instead of over the fields
in the view. So, before ad1cceb, 'groups_id' was simply ignored,
and after, the BasicModel tried to process it and it crashed when it
attempted to retrieve its fieldsInfo, as this field isn't in the
view.
This rev. restores the previous behavior.
Fixes#23303Fixes#23305
Before this rev., an issue occurred on grouped editable list views
that became ungrouped after a reload (i.e. when the grouped part in
the search view was removed). In this scenario, the click handler
outside the list used to leave the edition wasn't bound (because
the list was grouped at the beginning, and thus not editable). So,
it was impossible to leave the edition, even by clicking on 'Save'.
Fixes#23061
Create a new column in Project, add a record and then hit 'Archive Records' : a
traceback occurs.
When creating the new column, the `groupedBy` attribute on the datapoint is set
according to the parent list datapoint, which makes no sense as the records are
not grouped inside the column.
The mentioned attribute is now removed as the records cannot be grouped inside
the column.
Before this rev., the aggregates values displayed in the footer of
list views were formatted according to the field type, and the
field's widget was ignored, whereas it should be used by default.
For instance, if the 'float_time' widget is set on a float field,
the sum should be formatted as FloatTime as well.
Closes#22724.
Before this rev., the list of selected records wasn't correctly
reset when the list was reloaded (e.g. when coming back using the
breadcrumbs). In the UI, the records weren't selected anymore, but
in javascript, the list of selected records wasn't empty. As a
consequence, the aggregates were wrongly computed, and always
displayed 0.
Closes#22725.
Since the <widget> tag is not used anymore in any of our views, it was
not really properly supported. In particular, the form widget was not
notified when the state of the form view has changed, which makes it
very difficult to actually do any useful work.
With this commit, we make sure that the widget method 'updateState' (if
it exists) is called with the new state whenever it changed.
This should allow developers to do useful work without having to work
around the issue. Note that this is not really a perfect solution, since
the updateState methot may or may not have been implemented.
I think that we need some kind of ViewWidget abstraction, which could be
used to have a better and more complete API for widgets in a basic view.
And AbstractField could inherit from ViewWidget.
Rev. dbdd742 introduced the 'baseMode' parameter of field's nodes
in the BasicRenderer. Its purpose is to encode the generic mode
of the field, regardless of its readonly modifier (i.e. in form
views, the baseMode of all fields is the mode of the renderer and
in list views, the baseMode of all fields is 'readonly', except for
fields in the row being edited, whose baseMode is 'edit').
Unfortunately, when the value of the readonly modifier of a field
was 'readonly', its baseMode was changed from 'edit' to 'readonly',
which shouldn't, as the baseMode's value should not be affected by
the modifiers.
This produced a bug when a field had a readonly modifier, as once
its value became true, the field was rendered in 'readonly', and
whatever the value of the modifier afterwards, it always remained
in 'readonly'.
The rev. ensures that the baseMode is no longer impacted by the
value of the readonly modifier.
Closes#22729
Before this rev., it might happen that the parent of BasicModel instances
wasn't correctly set to the Controller instance. It was actually set to the
ActionManager instance, which is never destroyed. So when this happened,
the BasicModel instance wasn't destroyed when it's controller was.
This is a small correction of odoo/odoo@3aad756 ; a traceback occured when ESC
was pressed in a list view with modifiers.
The `confirmChange` was done on the parent datapoint (of type list) which has no
attribute `evalModifiers`.
`confirmChange` is now called on the record datapoint. Note that for x2m, it
means that all modifiers linked to the parent record won't be re-evaluated (but
this wasn't probably intended as this is a bit overkill).
Closes#22718
A traceback was occuring when downloading the pivot view without data.
The export function expects the attribute `main_row` set on data, which
is defined in `_prepareData`. The latter wasn't called because of the `return`.
Closes#22728
With attribute 'on_create="quick_create"' on the arch's root node,
kanban views open the quick create widget in the first column when
the user clicks on 'Create' (in the control panel), if the view
is grouped and if there is at least one column. However, this
column may be folded.
Before this rev., the quick create was inserted into the folded
column, which didn't look amazing. This rev. first toggles the
column before inserting the quick create.
Before this rev., it crashed when the user used the quick create
to create several records (very quickly, or on a slow network),
e.g. on crm.lead (there must be a date field on the kanban record
to reproduce the crash).
The crash occurred when the 'read' RPCs for the created records
return misordered. For instance:
1) 'name_create' record 1 (called and returned)
2) call 'read' for record 1
3) 'name_create' record 2 (called and returned)
4) call 'read' for record 2
5) 'read' for record 2 returns
6) 'read' for record 1 returns
At step 5, the kanban column was updated with the new state, but
this state already contained record 1, which wasn't fetched yet.
This rev. ensures that the created records are added to the state
once they are fetched and ready to be displayed, not before.
Introduce back part of `formatBinary` that was reverted with 7813a8e7.
When an image is unset, the value was `false` which would end up with a
bin_size of `NaN Bytes` which would end up displaying an error image
with source ` Bytes`.
This commit get back a previous behavior so the bin_size when the
attachment does not exist is an empty string (so: '').
opw-805542
closes#22348
Revision on 41fe7f9d11
This commit intended to reduce the network load when reading records with
binary fields. This was made possible by enforcing the contextual key
`bin_size` to be set for records with binary fields.
However, it is causing some issues (see #22222, #22231) which are:
- write with bin_size:true generates a traceback
- read/search_read with bin_size:true breaks some images
on some views (e.g. base.view_partner_form)
Since the problems outweight the gain of these changes, we revert them.
Field widgets now have a key 'context' that let them
extend the context of the dataPoint (e.g. list).
In particular, widgets on binary fields enforce the contextual
item {bin_size: True}, so that the server gives the size of the
binary field as its value, instead of its content.
This change on binary fields reduces network load when accessing
a view with binary fields.
For kanban views with attribute 'on_create="quick_create' set on
their root node, clicking on 'Create' in the control panel should
open the quick create widget in the first column if the view is
grouped and if there is at least one column displayed.
It was working as expected, except when there were no record yet.
This was because the kanban controller used the 'state.count'
attribute of the state (which indicates the total number of records
in the group), whereas it should have used 'state.data.length'
(which is the number of columns).
Before this rev., when quick creating a record in a grouped kanban
view, the quick create widget wasn't automatically re-opened, which
didn't allow the user to quickly create several records in a row
(without clicking each time on the '+').
This desired behavior had been broken by rev. 1d34e26, which aimed
to properly reload the kanban column when a record was created
(e.g. column counter, progress bar...).
Two attempts of dealing with sorting (and resequencing) in tabbed (multi-pages)
x2many editable lists (see odoo/odoo@c2563db and odoo/odoo@983c7ae) have been
previously done, using a static attribute (`keepChangesUnsorted`) on the
datapoint.
This solution sadly only covers both cases separately, not if they are combined.
Morever, onchanges were not correctly managed in neither of these two cases.
A new approach is used here, by "freezing" and "unfreezing" the datapoint when
needed, which is more flexible.
Some modifications have been introduced:
- when ordering a x2many, all records are now considered (and not only the
records on the current page) ; an additional read is thus done on the sorted
field for all records in the x2many relation
- `setSort` is now asynchronous as a `read` might be needed
Before this rev., when a graph view was reloaded (e.g. by clicking
on the graph view switcher), the inital groupby was lost if it
didn't come from the searchview (i.e. if it came from the context
or from the arch). For instance, go to Sales > Reporting > Sales
(the view is grouped by 'date', and there are two groups), reload
by clicking on the graph view switcher: there is only one group
left.
The reload RPC was actually fine. What was wrong is the 'state'
object given to the renderer after the reload, as it didn't contain
the correct groupby, so the view wasn't correctly re-rendered.
There is a drawback in 12048bd6, if a kanban view with an
"Undefined" column (exist when a kanban view grouped on a relational
field and some record have this field unset) had a column resequenced a
traceback would happen if more than one column was displayed.
This happen because before we had a "undefined" ID for the "Undefined"
column and after 12048bd6 we get a framework unique ID which was not
managed.
note: this commit also adds `left`/`right` values in the dragAndDrop
test utility function so an element can be dropped at the right/left of
another element.
related to opw-782433
closes#21708
Before this commit, the way mode was handled was not optimal. The end
result was correct (the widget were properly created/displayed in
edit/readonly as required), but useless work was done. In particular,
if we have list/x2manys with widgets and modifiers, it could happen that
widgets were created in edit mode, then destroyed and recreated in
readonly mode.
This could happen in some important views, for example, any view with a
field many2many_tags with a readonly modifiers (pretty much all views
handling taxes)
In this commit, we add a 'editable' attribute to list renderer. This is
necessary, because the list renderer is not actually editable when it is
in a x2many in a form view which is in readonly mode. Also, we need to
manage the distinction between the fact that a list view is editable,
and the fact that some widgets are created in edit and other in readonly
mode, depending on modifiers, and on which line is being edited.
We also add a benchmark (courtesy of CHM) to be able to measure the
performance impact of edit/readonly/onchange in a larger form view.
Before this commit, running this form benchmark on my machine gave a
number of 0.4 op/sec, and after, it increases to 1.26 op/sec, so a
pretty large improvement.
This rev. introduces two helper functions for the tests: patch
and unpatch. Those function allow patching an Odoo Widget (e.g.
AbstractField), and unpatch it at the end of the test with the
guarantee that the Widget's prototype is exactly the same as it
was before the test.
This was necessary because the way it was done before was a little
bit too naive, and could lead to unexpected behavior. Indeed, doing
var someFunction = AbstractField.prototype.someFunction;
// test content
AbstractField.prototype.someFunction = someFunction;
is correct if someFunction is actually define (or overriden) in
AbstractField, as in that case, it really exists on its prototype.
Otherwise, it isn't correct if it is not directly defined on the
prototype before the test, as it will be after..
If a kanban view is grouped on a many2one, records with the field unset
are displayed in a column "Undefined" displayed first.
But the tab in mobile view doesn't respect this, so we can get:
columns: Undefined colA colB
tabs: colA colB Undefined
So we always get always on the wrong column wrong when clicking on a
tab: clicking on colB we get on colA, clicking on Undefined we get on
colB, ...
note: in this commit the "false" tab has been set to a translatable
"Undefined" name.
issue found when working on #21199
A kanban column has two identifiers:
- db_id: framework unique identifier for the column
- id: either the record res_id (grouped on x2o) or the value
The issue is that sometimes the value may be a any string which
would be source of issue unexpected for an ID (and there was one
issue in mobile renderer).
This code change this so "id" is either the record res_id or
`undefined` value, and when used in XML we use id or fallback on db_id
when we need an identifier.
So in the XML data-id on a colum is always either the ID of the record
the group is based on, or the db_id in the form.
opw-782433
closes#21199
Most field widgets are synchronous, but some of them have to do extra
work before being ready (for example, the pad widget, or widget which
needs to lazy load JS/CSS files). Because of that, the new views have
been well tested with synchronous widgets, but not completely with async
widgets.
Some code depended upon the fact that the widget was ready immediately
after being created. This was incorrect, and is fixed in this commit,
by adding a new hook that is called in (basic) views after a widget is
ready (meaning, start and willstart are done)
on pricelist, open a pricelist form
click on one country group [country group form opens]
click on a pricelist again
Before this commit, a traceback appeared, saying the pricelist record was null
YET the pricelist's form on which we clicked before opened.
After this commit, the form of the pricelist opens, and no traceback is thrown.
OPW 783896
[FIX] web: test circular many2many
closes#21148
Since odoo/odoo@da136d8 the modifiers in the widget attrs are parsed.
`stringify` thus needs be to used when displaying them in the debug tooltip (to
avoid to display [Object object]).
Aaron Bohy