* Remove filter tag
* Use color attribute on the view who add a filter/legend
* Filter is automatically added when 'avatar_field' option is used on a
field tag, and the default template display the avatar.
* Can overwrite the template (add tag template who contains qweb with
<t t-name="calendar-box">...</t>
This commit introduce a full redesign of all JS views. We started
basically from scratch. The goal was to unify all the various views
under a common framework, to make them testable, to make then usable in
different conditions (in studio, or in the frontend), and to make our
lives easier.
Some important points are:
- we introduced new coding guidelines (camelCase, 80 chars width, ...)
- we have a brand new testing framework (still QUnit based)
- kanban view moved to the web addon
- calendar view (formerly web_calender) moved to web as well
- the tree view was removed
- all new code should be documented
We hope that this code is the start of a new era for the Odoo web
client, we want to have a high quality codebase, well documented, well
tested, well designed.
Work done by the framework team: mostly aab, ged, chm, dmo, qsm
- As of v10, manifest files should be named `__manifest__.py`
- For backwards-compatibility, __openerp__.py manifest files
will still be supported for the time being
- Limited refactoring, to add support for the 2 different
naming conventions
- All textual references to __openerp_.py updated in
documentation and examples
Purpose:
Having the res_group defined in base and sales_team auto installed
with mail doens't make sense.
- Move the empty res_config class and the related view from
base_setup to sales_team (base_setup only contains the 'General Settings'
model and views
- Move the 'sale' related content from product to sale module (Access rights,
menuitems,...)
- Set sales_team at autoinstall False. The module is installed when needed by
crm or sale for example
- Set sales_team as a dependency of voip. (Access rights defined for configuration
purpose)
- Set sales_team ad a dependency of subscription (Access rights issue too)
[FIX] account: move some ir.model.access to sale module
[FIX] payment: Move some ir.rule to website_sale
[FIX] stock: move some ir.model.access rule to sale_stock
[FIX] project: Move some ir.model.access rules to crm_project_issue
[FIX] mrp: Move some ir.model.access rules to sale_mrp
[FIX] calendar: move some ir.model.access rules to crm
Rename xmlids accordingly. Example: 'base.group_sale_manager' becomes
sales_team.group_sale_manager.
[ADD] sales_team: See own documents => See only his sales team
Moved the "User: Own Leads Only", "User: All Leads" and "Manager" groups from sale and crm
into sales_team module. Add the record rules so that user can see only his Own Sales Team
if "See Own Leads" is sales right and can see all sales teams if he is having sales rights
of "See All Leads" or manager.
This branch need more testing instead of doing 10 fixes. A lot of issues are occuring
when installing modules in different orders.
This reverts commit fa6e415cdb.
Purpose:
Having the res_group defined in base and sales_team auto installed
with mail doens't make sense.
- Move the empty res_config class and the related view from
base_setup to sales_team (base_setup only contains the 'General Settings'
model and views
- Move the 'sale' related content from product to sale module (Access rights,
menuitems,...)
- Set sales_team at autoinstall False. The module is installed when needed by
crm or sale for example
- Set sales_team as a dependency of voip. (Access rights defined for configuration
purpose)
- Set sales_team ad a dependency of subscription (Access rights issue too)
Rename xmlids accordingly. Example: 'base.group_sale_manager' becomes
sales_team.group_sale_manager.
When using the inheritance spec `position="replace"`,
the framework will now support a text node exactly
equal to `$0` and will replace it with the node
that was matched by the inheritance locator.
Given an original view equal to this:
```
<div class="foo">
<p class="bar">the paragraph</p>
</div>
```
And an inherited view with the following inheritance spec:
```
<p class="bar" position="replace">
<div class="panel">
<div class="panel-header">The Title</div>
<div class="panel-body">
$0
</div>
</div>
</p>
```
The finalt result after inheritance would become:
```
<div class="foo">
<div class="panel">
<div class="panel-header">The Title</div>
<div class="panel-body">
<p class="bar">the paragraph</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
```
Also updated doc and tests accordingly.
Does not explicitly mention how static files are loaded. This will
confuse anyone who is using the documentation as a guide and not going
through the pet store example code. Feel free to edit however, as long
as it is mentioned somewhere.
fixes#9170
Christophe Matthieu