Let's assume a one2many field (editable list) in a form view with
a many2many (e.g. many2many_tags), and an onchange on the one2many
such that, when a row is added to the relation, the server returns
update commands for (a subset of) the records being already in the
relation. For thoses updated records, the many2many field needs to
be read (the onchange only returns the ids in the relation).
Before this rev., the many2many field was read independently for
each record in the one2many. This could cause a performance issue
on large relations. For instance, this was the case on
account.invoice records with a lot of lines.
Issue 2027356
closesodoo/odoo#34785
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie (ged) <ged@openerp.com>
Scenario:
We have the following models:
class A:
submodel_1_ids = fields.One2Many(B)
submodel_2_ids = fields.One2Many(B)
class B:
parent_model = fields.many2one(A)
name = fields.Char()
and the following onchange on class A:
api.onchange(submodel_1_ids)
def onchange_submodel1(self):
// add newline to second o2m
submodel_2_ids = submodel_1_ids
api.onchange(submodel_2_ids)
def onchange_submodel2(self):
do_smth
In a form view containing both o2m fields (editable="bottom" lists):
1) add a line on first o2m -> the onchange adds the same line on
the other o2m
2) add a line on the second o2m
Before this rev., the line (added in (2)) wasn't added at the bottom
of the list, and the row in edition wasn't the newly created one.
The issue occurred because we couldn't retrieve the datapoint
corresponding to the other line (the one created by the onchange on
the first o2m), and we thus created another which was put at the
end of the list. Then, the BasicModel messed up the sort of the
records because it couldn't match the virtual id of that new record
with the ones in orderedResIds.
We fixed the issue by preventing the model from creating a new
datapoint after the onchange, by using 'ref' instead of 'res_id' to
retrieve the one that already exist.
closesodoo/odoo#34493
Signed-off-by: VincentSchippefilt <VincentSchippefilt@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: David Monjoie <dmo@odoo.com>
Let's assume a one2many field in a form view with a default value
with commands 4 (link to). Before this rev., when saving the record,
the BasicModel generated a command 4 and a command 1 (update) for
each record, with the values of the record (directly coming from DB).
This can cause an issue when the related record can't be edited
(e.g. a posted journal entry in accounting).
closesodoo/odoo#33797
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli (qdp) <qdp@openerp.com>
This commit merges the following models
* account.invoice and account.move
* account.invoice.line and account.move.line
* account.voucher and account.move
* account.voucher.line and account.move.line
It was the opportunity for a big cleanup of the code, so it also restructures the whole account module, its different models/fields, the tests etc. for a better world and a better code readability.
==== Rationale ====
The rationale of this huge change is that we want journal entries / invoices to be easily edited, and changes reflected in the other model. It's a HUGE feature and very strategic for the fiduciary companies. For example, changing the account of a journal entry needs to be automatically reflected on the related invoice.
The same reasoning applies to sale/purchase vouchers.
==== Changes made in features =====
When creating an invoice, you are now creating a journal entry directly.
--> The object account.invoice no longer exists.
In the same fashion when creating an invoice line, you're now adding journal items directly in the journal entry representing the invoice. If this invoice line has some tax, it may create additional journal items as well.
--> The models account.invoice.line & account.invoice.tax no longer exist
Identically, when creating a sale/purchase receipt with its lines, you are now creating a journal entry directly and there's no more usability difference between encoding a receipt or an invoice.
--> The object account.voucher no longer exists.
--> The object account.voucher.line no longer exists.
--> The whole account_voucher module no longer exists.
Positive side-effects coming from these changes are
* draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipts now create a draft accounting entry. Validate these objects now simply post its journal entry. That means that draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipt can straightforwardly be included in reporting or budgets.
* opening a journal entry in form view will now always open the correct view: if it's a sale/purchase journal entry we will have a customer invoice/vendor bill view or a sale/purchase receipt view, whatever the menu we're coming from.
* code & business logic simplification. It is also condensed in a single place instead of being partially duplicated on invoices, vouchers and journal entries.
There should be no feature loss, except the one allowing to group multiple journal items together based on the same product during the invoice validation.
==== Changes made in models =====
* account.invoice: model removed. Instead, now use account.move with following mapping
field (account.invoice) field (account.move)
----------------------- --------------------
name invoice_payment_ref
number name
reference ref
comment narration
user_id invoice_user_id
amount_ total_company_signed amount_total_signed
residual amount_residual
state state + invoice_payment_state /!\ selection changed
date_invoice invoice_date
date_due invoice_date_due
sent invoice_sent
origin invoice_origin
payment_term_id invoice_payment_term_id
partner_bank_id invoice_partner_bank_id
incoterm_id invoice_incoterm_id
vendor_bill_id invoice_vendor_bill_id
source_email invoice_source_email
vendor_display_name invoice_vendor_display_name
invoice_icon invoice_vendor_icon
cash_rounding_id invoice_cash_rounding_id
sequence_number_next invoice_sequence_number_next
sequence_number_next_prefix invoice_sequence_number_next_prefix
'invoices' subset of account.move can be accessed by using the selection field 'type' or one of the many helpers like is_invoice()
* account.move: now has a valid state 'cancel' that has to be excluded from all business logic
* account.move: field 'amount' renamed into 'amount_total'
* account.move: field 'reverse_entry_id' renamed into 'reversed_entry_id'
* account.move.line: now has a field 'display_type' that has to be excluded from all business logic, in order to support invoice layouting
* account.invoice.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping
field (account.invoice.line) field (account.move.line)
---------------------------- -------------------------
invoice_id move_id
uom_id product_uom_id
invoice_line_tax_ids tax_ids
account_analytic_id analytic_account_id
'invoice lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the boolean field 'exclude_from_invoice_tab'
* account.invoice.tax: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping
field (account.invoice.tax) field (account.move.line)
--------------------------- -------------------------
invoice_id move_id
account_analytic_id analytic_account_id
amount price_unit
base tax_base_amount
'tax lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the relational field 'tax_line_id'
* account.invoice.confirm: model removed. Instead, now use the 'post()' function of account.move
* account.invoice.refund: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.reversal to reverse the entries with the same options as we had for invoices
* account.voucher: model removed. Instead, now use account.move of type in ['out_receipt', 'in_receipt]
* account.voucher.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line
==== Changes made in functions ====
* on account.move, method _run_post_draft_to_post() renamed into _autopost_draft_entries()
* on account.move, method action_account_invoice_payment() renamed into action_invoice_register_payment()
* on account.move, method action_invoice_reconcile_to_check() renamed into action_open_matching_suspense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_domain_edition_mode_available() renamed into _get_domain_matching_supsense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_intrastat_country_id() renamed into _get_invoice_intrastat_country_id()
* on account.move.line, method _get_domain_for_edition_mode() renamed into _get_suspense_moves_domain()
* in account.bank.statement, contextual key 'edition_mode' renamed into 'suspense_moves_mode'
Was task 1917430
Add a new behavior to numeric fields, possibility to enter value manually or to use a simple arithmetic expression that will be evaluated.
Example: =20+3*2
In order for the computation of the arithmetic expression to be done, the value needs to starts with = and then an expression can be entered. We only support the basics mathematical operations + - * / ( ) ^
User locale and digits separator are taken into account. If the value entered can't be evaluated to a numeric, the field will be displayed in error.
closesodoo/odoo#34538
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
When uploading a file to a binary file, then clicking on the
"clear" button, then reuploading the same file...
Before this commit:
The actual input of the field was only changed on user input.
This means that the "clear" action didn't reset the actual value
of the input, and the browser's default behaviour when getting
the same path twice is not to change anything. In the use case,
you couldn't upload the same file until you uploaded another one.
After this commit:
The "clear" action now also clears the value, allowing reuploading
the same file over again.
closesodoo/odoo#33843
Signed-off-by: VincentSchippefilt <VincentSchippefilt@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit removes the field `datas_fname` from `ir.attachment` as
it was unnecessary and most of the time the duplicate of `name` or
`url`.
Task #1909865closesodoo/odoo#32976
Signed-off-by: Martin Geubelle (mge) <mge@openerp.com>
This commit adds a new parameter on fields for list view and one2many.
The parameter name is "optional" and its values are "hide" or "show".
Columns of the list view which have the optional parameter set are
listed in a dropdown that can be toggled from the last cell of the
table header. The ones with optional set to "hide" are hidden by
default.
User choice is stored in local storage. If no saved parameter can be
found in local storage then the default value from the view is used.
Due to the overflow behavior of the responsive table, we were forced
to wrap the table-responsive div in yet another div. We changed the
o_list_view class on the table to o_list_table in order to reuse
the more generic o_list_view class on the top-most div. CSS rules
and selectors had to be updated according to this change.
Task-1902765
This commit merges the following models
* account.invoice and account.move
* account.invoice.line and account.move.line
* account.voucher and account.move
* account.voucher.line and account.move.line
It was the opportunity for a big cleanup of the code, so it also restructures the whole account module, its different models/fields, the tests etc. for a better world and a better code readability.
==== Rationale ====
The rationale of this huge change is that we want journal entries / invoices to be easily edited, and changes reflected in the other model. It's a HUGE feature and very strategic for the fiduciary companies. For example, changing the account of a journal entry needs to be automatically reflected on the related invoice.
The same reasoning applies to sale/purchase vouchers.
==== Changes made in features =====
When creating an invoice, you are now creating a journal entry directly.
--> The object account.invoice no longer exists.
In the same fashion when creating an invoice line, you're now adding journal items directly in the journal entry representing the invoice. If this invoice line has some tax, it may create additional journal items as well.
--> The models account.invoice.line & account.invoice.tax no longer exist
Identically, when creating a sale/purchase receipt with its lines, you are now creating a journal entry directly and there's no more usability difference between encoding a receipt or an invoice.
--> The object account.voucher no longer exists.
--> The object account.voucher.line no longer exists.
--> The whole account_voucher module no longer exists.
Positive side-effects coming from these changes are
* draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipts now create a draft accounting entry. Validate these objects now simply post its journal entry. That means that draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipt can straightforwardly be included in reporting or budgets.
* opening a journal entry in form view will now always open the correct view: if it's a sale/purchase journal entry we will have a customer invoice/vendor bill view or a sale/purchase receipt view, whatever the menu we're coming from.
* code & business logic simplification. It is also condensed in a single place instead of being partially duplicated on invoices, vouchers and journal entries.
There should be no feature loss, except the one allowing to group multiple journal items together based on the same product during the invoice validation.
==== Changes made in models =====
* account.invoice: model removed. Instead, now use account.move with following mapping
field (account.invoice) field (account.move)
----------------------- --------------------
name invoice_payment_ref
number name
reference ref
comment narration
user_id invoice_user_id
amount_ total_company_signed amount_total_signed
residual amount_residual
state state + invoice_payment_state /!\ selection changed
date_invoice invoice_date
date_due invoice_date_due
sent invoice_sent
origin invoice_origin
payment_term_id invoice_payment_term_id
partner_bank_id invoice_partner_bank_id
incoterm_id invoice_incoterm_id
vendor_bill_id invoice_vendor_bill_id
source_email invoice_source_email
vendor_display_name invoice_vendor_display_name
invoice_icon invoice_vendor_icon
cash_rounding_id invoice_cash_rounding_id
sequence_number_next invoice_sequence_number_next
sequence_number_next_prefix invoice_sequence_number_next_prefix
'invoices' subset of account.move can be accessed by using the selection field 'type' or one of the many helpers like is_invoice()
* account.move: now has a valid state 'cancel' that has to be excluded from all business logic
* account.move: field 'amount' renamed into 'amount_total'
* account.move: field 'reverse_entry_id' renamed into 'reversed_entry_id'
* account.move.line: now has a field 'display_type' that has to be excluded from all business logic, in order to support invoice layouting
* account.invoice.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping
field (account.invoice.line) field (account.move.line)
---------------------------- -------------------------
invoice_id move_id
uom_id product_uom_id
invoice_line_tax_ids tax_ids
account_analytic_id analytic_account_id
'invoice lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the boolean field 'exclude_from_invoice_tab'
* account.invoice.tax: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping
field (account.invoice.tax) field (account.move.line)
--------------------------- -------------------------
invoice_id move_id
account_analytic_id analytic_account_id
amount price_unit
base tax_base_amount
'tax lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the relational field 'tax_line_id'
* account.invoice.confirm: model removed. Instead, now use the 'post()' function of account.move
* account.invoice.refund: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.reversal to reverse the entries with the same options as we had for invoices
* account.voucher: model removed. Instead, now use account.move of type in ['out_receipt', 'in_receipt]
* account.voucher.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line
==== Changes made in functions ====
* on account.move, method _run_post_draft_to_post() renamed into _autopost_draft_entries()
* on account.move, method action_account_invoice_payment() renamed into action_invoice_register_payment()
* on account.move, method action_invoice_reconcile_to_check() renamed into action_open_matching_suspense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_domain_edition_mode_available() renamed into _get_domain_matching_supsense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_intrastat_country_id() renamed into _get_invoice_intrastat_country_id()
* on account.move.line, method _get_domain_for_edition_mode() renamed into _get_suspense_moves_domain()
* in account.bank.statement, contextual key 'edition_mode' renamed into 'suspense_moves_mode'
Was task 1917430
When we open any x2m record (in a FormViewDialog), there is a "Remove"
button to delete/unlink the opened record from parent.
This button is placed besides "Discard" button and it creates little
confusion in some cases. For example, in list view, there's already a
bin / 'x' icon depending on the field type using which people are used
to delete/unlink the record. And when they open a record, they might
accidentally click "Remove" button instead of "Discard".
To avoid this, now we won't show "Remove" button when we open record from
x2many list view. However, we have to keep this button in case x2many of
kanban as there's no other way to remove the record.
task-1886913
closesodoo/odoo#34333
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
- icon displayed next to field if user haven't set timezone
- added relevant tooltip
- test case added for field not set alert
Task: #1916132Closes: #29448
Signed-off-by: VincentSchippefilt <VincentSchippefilt@users.noreply.github.com>
Before this rev., the datepicker was opened when a date(time) field
was focused (e.g. with keyboard navigation). We don't want this
behavior anymore, and we want the datepicker to open only when the
user clicks in the input. This rev. makes this change.
Moreover, this allowed to refined the keyboard navigation (ESC) in
editable list views: when a datepicker is opened, and the user
presses ESC, we close the datepicker, but we keep the row in
edition, whereas before this rev., the row was switched to readonly.
closesodoo/odoo#32408
Signed-off-by: Martin Geubelle (mge) <mge@openerp.com>
Assume an x2many editable list where the user edits a record (input
field), and then clicks on 'Add a line' (and keeps it pressed for a
while, before releasing the click).
When the 'mousedown' event occurs, the 'change' event is triggered
on the edited field, and (once potential onchanges have been
applied), the list is updated, i.e. all rows except for the one
being edited a re-rendered.
However, the 'Add a line' handler listens to the 'click' event,
which never occurs if we release the click after the rows have been
re-rendered.
This is an issue for every rows, not only 'Add a line', but for
data rows, the issue is already present in former versions, and is
not that easy to fix). The 'Add a line' case is a consequence of
the recent work on list views (see 234d92c4f0), so we can fix it
independently.
Task 1915702
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Go to any field Date
- Enter wrong date
Bug:
A traceback was raised.
Now a warning is raised and the wrong value is removed.
opw:1974747
closesodoo/odoo#33362
Signed-off-by: Simon Goffin (sig) <sig@openerp.com>
Before this commit when user want to add multiple record at that time
they only allow to add one record at a time.
After this commit user can add multiple record from search more wizard.
Added function _getSearchCreatePopupOptions so that it can be overridden
in FieldMany2ManyTags, options for FieldMany2ManyTags will differ, like
FieldMany2ManyTags SearchCreateDailog should have multi record selection,
Many2ManyTags' SelectCreateDialog should display record other than selected
This commit is related to task id: 1945912
closesodoo/odoo#32453
Signed-off-by: VincentSchippefilt <VincentSchippefilt@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Mohammed Shekha <msh@openerp.com>
The pdf_viewer widget fails to load file and hence shows error.
This is due to the wrong controller called(wrong URI passed),
while loading a file using pdfjs.
For files other than images, /web/content controller should
be called since since odoo/odoo#31811.
This is similar to the enterprise fix 793c76298a2b301a2
task-1932190
closesodoo/odoo#33354
Signed-off-by: Simon Lejeune (sle) <sle@openerp.com>
For signature field widget, we can set 'full_name' node option, which can be
used to auto fill the sign. However, current implementation for getting data
for field provided in 'full_name' (mainly, a string) has some flaws.
For example :
-In case of m2o fields, the string is not properly fetched due to different
structure than regular 'input' fields
- In case of x2m views inside a form view, field with same name can exist in
both parent record and child records. This is already the case with form view
of res.partner, where 'phone' field is there in both parent's form as well as
children's kanban view (for field 'child_ids'). With current implementation,
if we add signature on the form view, and set 'phone' as 'full_name' node
option, instead of form view, we will get phone number from 'child_ids'.
This commit improves the behavior by getting data from the 'recordData' instead
of searching them from the DOM. To have recordData in it's latest state, we've
set 'resetOnAnyFieldChange' flag to true.
task-1948364
closesodoo/odoo#33105
Signed-off-by: Martin Geubelle (mge) <mge@openerp.com>
Rev. a3489be33 removed this feature to fix a bug (when the single
line many2one, e.g. a product, is too long and displayed over
several lines). However, we (fp) still want this for res_partner
many2ones with show_adress.
This rev. re-introduced the feature without re-introducing the bug.
closesodoo/odoo#33139
Signed-off-by: VincentSchippefilt <VincentSchippefilt@users.noreply.github.com>
This rev. changes the layout of *editable* list views to a fixed
layout. This means that we are now responsible of the width of
each column. To do that, we associate with each field type a
factor, and the higher the factor is, the larger the column will
be (w.r.t. the others). This default value can be overriden in the
arch.
The fixed layout allows to remove the absolute positionning of
widgets inside editable lists (done in the next commit).
Part of task 1915702
Co-authored-by: Martin Geubelle <mge@odoo.com>
This rev. enables the editable feature in grouped list views.
Part of task 1915702
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Geubelle <mge@odoo.com>
On a form view:
- we open a modal form view
- in this modal we open a modal form view
- we close that second modal
=> the modal is closed and the first one is still opened, but on mobile
we can't scroll to above or below the modal.
This is because bootstrap remove .modal-open class on body when we close
the second modal, but this class is necessary to scroll (this is not
much an issue on desktop since scroll is often not necessary).
We already had a fix that was weakened in 02a063fd73.
With this changeset, we keep .modal-open as long as a modal is opened.
Without the change, added test failed with:
10. Modal is said opened (expected: true, result: false)
opw-1948423
closes#32106
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
The widget handle was displayed on x2m fields in form views, even when
the field was readonly, which makes no sense.
It is now correctly hidden.
Fixes#30580
opw-1937833
closesodoo/odoo#31743
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Jigar Patel