Commit Graph
1327 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Christophe Simonis cc3a2c1bf3 [MERGE] forward port branch 12.0 up to e11bacfe51 2019-05-09 21:07:44 +02:00
Nicolas Martinelli d809b47681 [FIX] web: month view drop
- Install the 'Maintenance' app
- Create a maintenance request, set a day and a duration of 6 hours
- Go the calendar view, month mode
- Move the maintenance request from one day to another

The duration is changed with a non-sense value.

In month mode, the hours are not represented in the calendar so it is
not possible to compute the `date_delay`. Moreover, when a record is
moved from one date to another (`_onDropRecord`) in month mode, there is
actually no point recomputing the duration; the `date_start` is enough.

Note that `date_delay` is used (at the time of writing) in 2 views and
absolutely not tested.

opw-1984637

closes odoo/odoo#33193

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
2019-05-06 15:59:13 +00:00
Lucas Perais (lpe) ddb8fc1f62 [FIX] web: checkbox in favorites menu: don't close on click
Following f4fbaf1efa
which changes the label/checkbox structure into:
```
<div class="custom-control custom-checkbox">
    <input type="checkbox" class="custom-control-input" id="customCheck1">
    <label class="custom-control-label" for="customCheck1">...</label>
</div>
```

So, before this commit, there may have been multiple input with the same Id.
The consequence is that, when clicking on a label, the browser would take the first Id it found
which was erroneous, because all checkboxes in Favorites menu had the same Id
In reality, the use case goes as:
- open a x2m,
- search more
- Favorites > Save current search
> click on one the two checkboxes
> The dropdown closed, without checking the box

After this commit, when clicking on the checkbox in the favorites menu
the checkbox is toggled and the dropdown stays. Also, the checkboxed have now unique ids

OPW 1974587

closes odoo/odoo#33032

Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
2019-05-06 15:33:48 +00:00
Christophe Simonis 62017de41e [MERGE] forward port branch 12.0 up to d7c0c5c127 2019-05-03 09:16:50 +02:00
Christophe Simonis 3ca58705c9 [MERGE] forward port branch saas-11.3 up to 2c68df0ab4 2019-05-02 13:16:27 +02:00
Christophe Simonis 2c68df0ab4 [MERGE] forward port branch 11.0 up to 82c901c937 2019-05-02 10:59:21 +02:00
Denis Ledoux b11930047f [MERGE] forward port branch 12.0 up to c9913152ec 2019-04-26 18:14:18 +02:00
Aaron Bohy 3c40d732bf [FIX] web: crash in editable lists with date field
Backport of 7bc53ac30e.

Assume an editable list view with a date(time) widget, click to
edit a line, focus the date field (the datepicker opens), press
ESC: there is a crash in the lib, and the datepicker remains open
forever.

This fix is twofold:
 - we added a check in the lib to prevent it from crashing (it is
 easily reproducible: it crashes when an opened datepicker is
 removed from the DOM).
 - we added an event handler of ESC keydown event to hide the
 datepicker before the field is removed from the DOM.

closes odoo/odoo#32647

Signed-off-by: Martin Geubelle (mge) <mge@openerp.com>
2019-04-23 06:58:16 +00:00
Nicolas Lempereur c1f354beb8 [FIX] web: date field in calendar no tz issue
The calendar should send to server:

- for an all day event (all_day field on view): the date in UTC (ie. if
we are on 22 august 2018 on UTC+2, not send 21 august 2018 22:00)
- for a datetime event not all day: the UTC datetime corresponding to
UTC (for 03:25 with UTC+5 timezone, we send 22:25 the day before)
- for a date event: the date in UTC (ie. same as all day)

The current code was alright for datetime, but there was a missing case
if the start_date was a Date field (eg. project task calendar view uses
a date_deadline Date field) and not a Datetime field.

This changeset apply the same behavior as an all_day event to a calendar
with a start date that is a Date field.

Note: the issue happen since 11.0's 03d74f4 (26th march 2019) that
solved a similar case but for datetime (a datetime event at 8:00 with
timezone UTC+9 would be moved the previous day when drag and dropped on
the month view).

opw-1969876
opw-1971106
opw-1971019
closes #32796

Signed-off-by: Adrien Dieudonné (adr) <adr@odoo.com>
2019-04-24 09:37:29 +00:00
Christophe Simonis 15b8d353c7 [MERGE] forward port branch 12.0 up to 2830b93a3a 2019-04-17 19:47:37 +02:00
Lucas Perais (lpe) 7bf25cc333 [FIX] web: search view handles JSON parsable domains
Before this commit, a domain that had been written in order to be
JSON parsable, would trigger a JS crash when activated in the UI
It happens when adding custom filters through the edition of the search view with studio

This was because, Odoo developers write, in the XML of a search view
domains python style: `[('field', '=', 'value')]`
When parsing the view in JS, this doesn't get altered by `xml_to_json`
Then, the search view code evaluates it python style
This commit considers that behavior fortunate, but not really clear or conceptually correct

But, when customizing a search view with studio, the domain is written by the code, in JS
JSON parsable format `[["field", "=", "value"]]`

This should be supported too, as so many customizations may have been done before hand

After this commit, both expressions are supported by the filters menu

OPW 1957297, 1960732, 1965649 (at least)

closes odoo/odoo#32690

Signed-off-by: Lucas Perais (lpe) <lpe@odoo.com>
2019-04-15 12:41:26 +00:00
Christophe Simonis af313858b4 [MERGE] forward port branch 12.0 up to c1c322dd40 2019-04-09 20:43:35 +02:00
Aaron Bohy 7d31b863ca [FIX] web: list: re-evalute modifiers depending on id
In an editable (main) list view with modifiers depending on the
record id, add a new record. While the record isn't created yet,
the modifiers were correctly evaluated. However, they weren't
re-evaluted when the record was saved (thus getting an id), and a
reload of the view was necessary for the modifiers to be correctly
applied. With this rev. they are now correctly re-evaluated when
the record is saved.

closes odoo/odoo#32483

Signed-off-by: Martin Geubelle (mge) <mge@openerp.com>
2019-04-08 11:32:18 +00:00
Aaron Bohy 8d34eb1328 [FIX] web: editable list: shift-tab and readonly fields
Before this rev., navigating with shift-tab didn't produce the
expected result when there were readonly fields on the way. For
instance, pressing shift-tab on a field:
- to the right of a readonly field: the focus was kept in the
  current field, whereas it should have been moved to the first
  editable field to the left of the readonly one
- in the editable first cell of a row, with a readonly field in
  the last column: the focus was moved to the previous line,
  which is ok, but on the first editable cell of it, whereas it
  should have been on the last editable cell.

@KangOl this commit needs to be forwardported up to saas-12.2, not
later (the code slightly changed in saas-12.3, and we did another
version of the fix).
2019-04-08 11:32:18 +00:00
Nicolas Lempereur 58c64558a9 [FIX] web: checkbox readonly is RO in list editable
Since f4fbaf1efa the structure of checkboxes has been improved, now we
have something like:

```
 <input type="checkbox" id="checkbox-18" class="custom-control-input">
 <label for="checkbox-18" class="custom-control-label">&#8203;</label>
```

With the first input invisible (whilst before it was visible and the
clickable element).

This cause an issue in an editable list view:

- we have a boolean readonly field in a cell
- we are on focused on a line (not in the boolean field cell)
- we click on the boolean field

=> the check mark is toggled

This is because when we switch cell, we try to activate the widget of
the other cell. Before f4fbaf1efa this issue did not happen since the
browser do not generate a click event when clicking a disabled checkbox.

With this changeset, a disabled FieldBoolean is not focusable as is the
case for other fields, so we can't "activate" it.

Without the fix, the added test fails with:

 [clicking disabled checkbox did not work]

opw-1958433
closes #32652

Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
2019-04-12 11:42:15 +00:00
Christophe Simonis d32420397d [MERGE] forward port branch 12.0 up to 251021796c 2019-04-04 11:20:03 +02:00
Lucas Lefèvre 663597b50f [FIX] web: Load correct form view for calendar popup
When creating a record from a calendar view,
the default form view is always used when using the popup mode,
ignoring the `form_view_id` attribute of the <calendar/> tag.

After this commit, the `form_view_id` is no longer ignored.

closes odoo/odoo#32379

Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie (ged) <ged@openerp.com>
2019-04-03 10:40:34 +00:00
Christophe Simonis 2a06f4dcf3 [MERGE] forward port branch 12.0 up to 09fb2469b4 2019-03-29 18:10:57 +01:00
Christophe Simonis 82f8c37f69 [MERGE] forward port branch saas-11.3 up to ec29b4d364 2019-03-29 16:10:42 +01:00
Christophe Simonis ec29b4d364 [MERGE] forward port branch 11.0 up to 4231103cc9 2019-03-28 18:17:20 +01:00
Nicolas Lempereur 03d74f4f76 [FIX] web: drag & drop month calendar->keep time
In fullcalendar, we have in f5b7ad80f fake moments date with UTC time
that are the local time, thus when we move an event to another day, we
need to set it as:

- the selected year-month-day
- the original utc hours (real local hours) -> local hours
- the original utc minutes (real local minutes) -> local minutes
- the original utc seconds (real local seconds) -> local seconds

When it is sent to server, timezone offset will be removed so we will
transfer to server the expected datetime in UTC.

With this changeset we send server the correct time when a fullcalendar
event is "all_day" but the original event was not (eg. drag and dropping
event on the month view).

Added test without change failed with:

 - 4. event moved to 27th nov 16h00 +40 hours timezone
      (expected "2016-11-29 08:00:00", result: "2016-11-27 16:00:00")
 - 5. expected: "event|6|11/27/2016|16:00:00"
      result: "event|1|12/09/2016|08:00:00"
 - 6. expected: "event|1|12/09/2016|08:00:00"
      result: "event|3|12/10/2016|23:55:05"

opw-1955281
closes #32136

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
2019-03-26 17:49:40 +00:00
Nicolas Lempereur 5838e47ab5 [FIX] web: modal in modal => no block mobile
On a form view:
- we open a modal form view
- in this modal we open a modal form view
- we close that second modal

=> the modal is closed and the first one is still opened, but on mobile
we can't scroll to above or below the modal.

This is because bootstrap remove .modal-open class on body when we close
the second modal, but this class is necessary to scroll (this is not
much an issue on desktop since scroll is often not necessary).

We already had a fix that was weakened in 02a063fd73.

With this changeset, we keep .modal-open as long as a modal is opened.

Without the change, added test failed with:
  10. Modal is said opened (expected: true, result: false)

opw-1948423
closes #32106

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
2019-03-25 16:58:06 +00:00
Christophe Simonis 6faf9b76cd [FIX] web: adapt new test to new version
Oversight of previous forward-port.
2019-03-19 17:40:56 +01:00
Christophe Simonis c50d7d6bc5 [MERGE] forward port branch 12.0 up to 82c4393fd0 2019-03-19 15:14:23 +01:00
Christophe Simonis 9b6e37a983 [MERGE] forward port branch 11.0 up to 7e33b54771 2019-03-18 16:51:57 +01:00
Christophe Simonis ff1bca32f3 [MERGE] forward port branch 12.0 up to a26496b6e7 2019-03-14 17:43:32 +01:00
Christophe Simonis ac4ef455c4 [FIX] web: correct view definition in new test 2019-03-14 15:01:09 +01:00
Christophe Simonis 9a4e84ae66 [MERGE] forward port branch saas-11.3 up to f5ab04ce50 2019-03-14 14:13:47 +01:00
Christophe Simonis f5ab04ce50 [FIX] web: adapt new test to extra rpc call made on view loading 2019-03-13 17:55:13 +01:00
Christophe Simonis afe8e97800 [MERGE] forward port branch 11.0 up to c23d1186e7 2019-03-13 16:52:40 +01:00
Martin Geubelle 170c7632f2 [FIX] web: hide handle on readonly x2m
The widget handle was displayed on x2m fields in form views, even when
the field was readonly, which makes no sense.

It is now correctly hidden.

Fixes #30580
opw-1937833

closes odoo/odoo#31743

Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
2019-03-13 09:31:37 +00:00
Lucas Perais (lpe) 6b676f6235 [FIX] web: record datapoint context without group_by or orderedBy
Have a list view, apply a group_by and a filter with a sort parameter

Click on one record to access the form view
Have a x2m within it

Before this commit, the x2m records were loaded with a context containing
the keys orderedBy and group_by
It seems harmless at first, but even conceptually those keys should not be here
- they apply on a list of records, and not to individual ones
- they may contain field names not existing in the x2m model
Hence, when accessing another list view through an action button, the list
will try to be orderedBy or group_by with the given context
Which is plain wrong in the first place and may cause crashes

After this commit, the context of a record datapoint (representing a single record)
is stripped from the keys

Read the opw for a concrete use case
OPW 1943583

closes odoo/odoo#31706

Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
2019-03-08 13:30:30 +00:00
Nicolas Lempereur ee5f1e277d [FIX] web: pivot no result no remove groupbys
Since f8b38f64d dictionaries "groupbys" are the same object between the
pivot model instance and the headers menu.

But this causes an issue in 12.0 since when there is no results, the
headers menu groupbys is truncated and now being the same object, the
pivot model instance is also truncated.

So succedding search that find results would possibly have lost the
groupbys which is unexpected and breaks some 12.0 tests not expecting
it.

With this changeset, the groupbys are not truncated anymore.

Without the change, the added test fails with:

 Column groupby not lost after reload after empty results
  expected: { "pivot_column_groupby": [ "customer" ],
              "pivot_measures": [ "__count" ], "pivot_row_groupby": [] }
  result:   { "pivot_column_groupby": [], "pivot_measures":
              [ "__count" ], "pivot_row_groupby": [] }
closes #31644

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
2019-03-06 17:02:35 +00:00
Christophe Simonis 3e54704e66 [MERGE] forward port branch 11.0 up to 27081bf6f5 2019-03-05 17:26:04 +01:00
Nicolas Lempereur b8d4fe6d38 [FIX] web: keep col group by on 2nd reload+after 0 result
In 11.0 f8b38f64d improved the column group by managment when reloading
several times by having the same "groupbys" dictionaries between the
pivot model instance and the header menu.

This has been reverted in 12.0 (with c6e7adfb95) because the following
pivot tests failed with the change:
- 'rendering of pivot view with comparison'
- 'export data in excel with comparison'

The failure is because now that the "groupbys" dictionaries are the same
object, the truncated dictionary of a header truncate the one of the
model instance.

So if we search something that has no results, then something with
results, the groupbys could be lost.

This behavior has no reason to be and is changed in 11.0 with #31644,
this commit is the forward-port of f8b38f64d and #31644.

closes #31627

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
2019-03-06 17:04:42 +00:00
Nicolas Lempereur f8b38f64d3 [FIX] web: keep col group by on 2nd reload
In 187c32c2 some improvements were made for conserving/restoring group
bys on the pivot view.

This introduced an issue on the column group by:

- before reload, if we set manually a column group by (+ icon in the
  header) it would be saved and not lost (unless a context or filter
  in the search view override it)

- after reload, the following manually set column group by are not saved
  anymore on subsequent reload (the column group by at the first reload
  are set back)

This behavior is not normal since the behavior (conserving or losing
column group bys) should be the same at first reload or second reload.

The issue was caused by the duplication of group bys that were not
synchronized (one on the column root header, one on the pivot model
instance).

Without the change, the added test failed with: "Column groupby not lost
after second reload" and product_id is hidding from the object
pivot_column_groupby dictionary (having only "customer").

Using _.clone on initialRowGroupBys was necessary change because without
duplication of "groupbys", the initialRowGroupBys would be changed on
expandHeader which is unexpected.

opw-1941095
closes #31407
2019-02-26 14:54:46 +00:00
Martin Geubelle dcf8c67fe3 [FIX] web: hide CopyClipboard widget button when pointless
The widget has been moved in rev. odoo/odoo@15f3bbe but was not very generic.

In particular, there was a traceback when clicking on the button if the field
had no value (the button was displayed for readonly fields in create mode).

The button is now only appended in readonly mode (a `button` inside an `input`
or a `textarea` is not very DOM friendly) if the field has a value.

Task 1941996

closes odoo/odoo#31635

Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
2019-03-06 16:11:33 +00:00
Christophe Simonis f1ff55bca1 [MERGE] forward port branch 11.0 up to de8cefcef4 2019-02-20 13:40:48 +01:00
Lucas Perais (lpe) de8cefcef4 [FIX] web: pivot unload filter, reset, load another filter
On a pivot view with a default filter which has column and row groupbys
Remove the filter
Collapse all columns and rows
Activate another Filter from favorite which has a column groupby at least

Before this commit, the columns were not displayed in the DOM, though RPC's
and internal data were actually correct
This was because we considered the changes had been done "in place"
taking the old tree to build the new one for the columns
when really, we should have recomputed the column tree

After this commit, the columns display the group we want

OPW 1935155

closes odoo/odoo#31247
2019-02-19 15:12:28 +00:00
Suraj ShuklaandMohammed Shekha 587e90fe18 [FIX] web: reload form after failing save
Let's assume a form view with a clickable statusbar, in readonly.
When the user clicks on a status, the change is saved directly.
When the save fails (e.g. access rights), the statusbar widget
is in an inconsistent state and must be reloaded.

This rev. reloads the whole record and re-render the form when
this happens.

Related to Issue: #1915391
closes #29519

Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>


Co-authored-by: Mohammed Shekha <msh@openerp.com>
2019-03-12 09:11:06 +00:00
Christophe Simonis 2b3296bbf8 [FIX] web: use stricter css selector in new test
It allow not matching the dropdowns of the search view.

closes odoo/odoo#31738

Signed-off-by: Christophe Simonis <chs@odoo.com>
2019-03-11 10:16:53 +00:00
Christophe Simonis 2c5c9b8342 [MERGE] forward port branch 12.0 up to c023d0784f 2019-03-08 17:56:14 +01:00
Martin Geubelle 1793d6d138 [FIX] web: update breadcrumbs when switching view
To reproduce:
 1. go on list view
 2. open record in form view
 3. come back on list view
 4. switch to kanban
 5. open record in form view
 6. click on breadcrumb

Before this rev. we were back on the list view, and not the kanban view.

This is due to the fact that the breadcrumb was not updated when switching view,
(if a controller was already existing) so the form view control panel breadcrumb
was still referencing the wrong (list) controller.

This bug appeared with the control panel refactoring, which is now managed by
the view itself (and not the action manager as previously).

Task 1932646

closes odoo/odoo#31598

Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
2019-03-06 10:28:01 +00:00
Martin Geubelle 8316c2d210 [FIX] web: correctly handle (no result) selection in search
In the recent control panel refactoring, selecting '(no result)' (when using the
autocomplete on a many2one for example) was no correctly handled and was leading
to a traceback.

It is now correctly handled and the search bar is correctly re-rendered.

Task 1936745

closes odoo/odoo#31438
2019-02-27 10:33:41 +00:00
Aaron Bohy 6a8e1b53e3 [FIX] web: search more in many2one: filter on ids
Let's assume a many2one field with a lot of possible values. The
user clicks on 'Search More...'. In the opened dialog, only 160
records are available (their ids have been obtained with a
name_search, with the optional text the user could have typed in
the many2one input).

Before 4cd379cf, that extra domain on ids was removed automatically
as soon as the user interacted with the search view in the dialog.
This was especially useful when there were more than 160 records.
However, this was rather an happy coincidence than a designed
feature.

From 4cd379cf, the ids selection was added to the initial domain
of the list, so they couldn't be removed from the domain
afterwards. The user was thus stucked with its preselected 160
records.

This rev. doesn't restore the former behavior, but rather improves
the current one, as follows:
 - when there is no text in the many2one input (i.e. no value to
   filter on), we bypass the name_search, s.t. all records are
   available in the dialog
 - when there is some text in the input, we perform a name_search (as
   before) to get a list of record ids, and we add a special filter
   to the search view in the dialog (the filter on those ids), s.t.
   the user can remove it if he wants to access the remaining records.
 - finally, the limit is now set to 320, to mitigate the problem

Issue reported on the saas-12.1 migration pad.

closes odoo/odoo#31232
2019-02-26 08:26:51 +00:00
Christophe Simonis 9332e25195 [FIX] web: remove extra test added by forward-port
As related patch hasn't been forward-ported, this extra test (that isn't
execute for unknown reason) can be removed.
2019-02-22 11:14:43 +01:00
Christophe Simonis 1d2b6f1bef [MERGE] forward port branch 12.0 up to 84143a34b3 2019-02-21 15:37:19 +01:00
Christophe Simonis db1c7765cb [MERGE] forward port branch saas-11.3 up to 2c495502aa 2019-02-20 17:37:22 +01:00
Mathieu Duckerts-Antoine 01c159fd9f [FIX] web: quotes and backslashes in search view
The commit 6d3ada178f
aimed to solve problems occuring whith (single or
double) quotes when creating new custom filters.
Unfortunately, the point was missed and bugs were
still present. The present commit solves the
orginial problem satisfactorily.
There was also a problem in the management of
backslashes. Type '\\' in the search bar would
lead to a domain like
[('...', 'ilike', '\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\')].
This has also been fixed. Note that it is
necessary to input "\\" if one is looking for a
backslash in db (as before).

A remark on the _formatAST function (py_utils.js):

We deescape only the chars `'`, `"`, and `\`
because it does not seem possible to produce a
string in the search view that would intend a
search for a line return or a tab for example.

A general remark:

Domains should always be in normalized form.
In that way they could be manipulated and combined
together without a tokenization/parsing!

closes odoo/odoo#29756
2019-02-12 12:45:51 +00:00
Lucas Perais (lpe) 6d5a993cf7 [FIX] web: control panel load/save filter sort param
Before this commit, the wrong semantics was implemented in the webclient
concerning the "sort" char field in ir.filter
Loading a filter with a sort with negative order made the webclient crash

This field holds a JSON string, representing a list of field names
If the order of the field is inverse, there should be a "-" before it
for legacy purposes

After this commit, the semantics have changed for consistency
that is, at save time the sql notation is preferred
We support the legacy notation too for backward compatibility

closes odoo/odoo#31102
2019-02-15 09:58:47 +00:00