Several addons try to use resource calendar to compute time allocation.
However defining and using calendar is currently unclear in Odoo.
Purpose of this merge is to set a resource.calendar as data and ensure
each company uses a calendar. Resource now always take a correct
calendar.
Future commits will aim to improve the use of resource calendar in
Odoo.
Purpose of this commit is to always have a default calendar for each
company and ensure it is correctly set on resources.
Some cleaning is also performed in resource models to remove unused
fields, improve labels and make views a bit more odoo-ish.
* [REF] res_company: add a m2o to the default calendar to use in the
company as well as a o2m linking all resource calendars used in the
company. Some code has been added to correctly update existing
companies when installing the module;
* [REF] resource_calendar
* [REM] manager field on resource.calendar: this field is never used
and is not necessary anyway
* [ADD] global_leave_ids: filter leaves on a calendar to see global
company leaves
* [IMP] better default company / calendar computation to ensure there
is always a calendar attached to a resource
* [IMP] improve resource and calendar views in order to look more like
other odoo views
Currently there is no default resource calendar. This leads to calendar
being rarely used as it is not clear how to define them and how to use
them. Moreover some code handle default-like calendar by trying to
use 8-16 work hours; this should be replaced by having a real default
calendar.
This commit replaces the demo calendar by a real data calendar. It will
soon be used as default everywhere a resource calendar can be defined.
Future improvements will come to make resource easier to use and clean
its API. This commit is only the beginning !
This commit cleans resource test code by removing unnecessary stuff
and simplifying code. Purpose is to lessen number of lines and improve
readability of tests. Some duplicated tests have been removed.
In commit 40bd4a2f05, the counter-part account is made selectable and
required when changing the price of a product.
However, the same wizard is reused for the "Compute from BOM" feature,
in module `product_extended`. This forces the user to set an account
even if the product valuation is not "Perpetual (automated)".
In this commit, the field becomes required only if the product valuation
is "Perpetual (automated)".
opw-697866
The hard coded limit dates back to a time where the browsers would crash
when using FileReader#readAsDataURL() on files of serveral dozens of Mb.
This limit is now obsolete and even IE Edge now supports the FileReader
api.
This commit removes the limit and turns it into an option so it's
possible to limit a particular binary field to a given amount from the
form views, eg:
<field name="image" widget="image" options='{"max_file_size": "200k"}'/>
Note: this feature only works when the FileReader api is available.
At time of writing, all major browsers supports this feature:
http://caniuse.com/#search=FileReader
When a PoS order is closed, the payment and the sales journal item are
not automatically reconciled. This potentially leaves a lot of
unreconciled entries for a customer, which will appear in his follow-up
report.
This introduces an auto-reconciliation process upon order closing. The
process restricts the reconciliation to an order individually, i.e. we
don't try to cross-reconcile several orders for a customer.
opw-697565
by default, if not the company's configured terms & Conditions will be applied.
Also change the placeholder of Terms & Conditions in the quotation template.
- create a report for payment to print a receipt. Simple report with the amount received and name of the partner header of the company
- add a new action in action menu for print receipt
- add a new button action menu to send the receipt by email : STRING of the button = Send Receipt
- default template of payment receipt like sales
- add chatter history same as sales object
- this report use for both ('customer payment' & 'vendor payment)
In some case (for example the one solved with b51d21c5) we can have
write done on a field text in read only mode.
With 98ed53ce if :
- such a case happened (in b51d21c5 the fix only worked after the given
field was written one time) or a similar instance,
- and the user was in debug mode,
- and the widget used was TextFieldHtmlSimple
this could lead to an issue with the code trying to toggle the code view
mode whilst the editor is closed.
When doing pivot table data visualization, the Unit Cost of several
lines are summed up but there has more meaning if they were averaged.
This will probably still not be perfect (such as averaging two line
with different quantities the quantities would not be taken into
accounts) but it is already slightly better.
opw-694068
Suppose the following usecase: you scan the first product of the
picking. A server onchange is then triggered. You scan the same product
a second time, before the first onchange has returned. You expect that
the first onchange is completely executed before running the second one.
This was not the case. Moreover, some onchanges were not be able to
work with the invalid state of the formview at some times, and crashed.
The previous implementation was wrong because id didn't run the main
barcode processing mechanism inside a Mutex. It was also wrong because
it didn't correctly wait for the onchange to execute (a previous barcode
onchanges or some classic ones) before setting the barcode field.
- add form and list view for rating
- better use in livechat rating
- better filters
- improve kanban rating view
- remove rating when uninstalling module
- ...
Automatically deleting a rating was not implemented
yet. We find 2 cases :
- when uninstalling a module, the same mecanism as
mail.follower is used, via a res_model_id field
pointing on ir.model. When this model does not
exist anymore, remove all related rating.
- when deleting a record, its rating should be
deleted too.
In rating module
- provide list and form view for rating
- better kanban view (remove js code, ellispsis
for long name, better feedback display, ...)
- provide more field on the mixin to cover
more case
- update res_name of rating when the ressource name
is changed (for consistency)
- make the rating web page, a correct html page (by
using web.layout template)
- some guidelines compliance
In rating_project and rating_project_issue:
- add filter for rated document
- some guidelines compliance
With 98ed53ce when a form view is saved when a html field is in code
view mode, the change is not lost.
This new backend tour check that when saving in or not in code view, the
content is saved effectively.
The test not in code view would ensure issues like #14381#14351#14394
are detected on runbot.
closes#14475
opw-693052
note: the old test system is used so this test is only for up to saas-11
The intended scenario when using the code view is the following:
1) click on code view button to use code view
2) make changes
3) click on code view button to get back to wysiwyg view
4) save from the wysiwyg view
If the 3rd step was not done:
- for the inline editor, we lose the changes that have been done in
code view,
- for the iframe editor, we lose the entirety of the content.
At one time the user was forced to go back to wysiwyg before being able
to save, but this have been removed hence the present usability issue.
With this fix, when the editor content is saved, if the user is in code
view he is automatically set back to wysiwyg view.
fixes#14648closes#14475
opw-678677
opw-693052
Fabien Pinckaers