After this fix, the field `partner.street` is correcly rendered,
but as the test shows the `street_name` and `street_number` fields
are not correct.
But as there are tests that validate that wrong use case, I
consider it a *feature* and not a bug.
opw-1896773
closesodoo/odoo#29520
- Buy on product on the eCommerce with a partner having a single address
- At address selection, edit the shipping address
The billing address is also modified.
From the Odoo PoV, this is expected since they point to the same
partner. But from a user PoV, this is totally unexpected and confusing.
Therefore, we only allow the edition of the shipping addresses which are
different from the billing address. Yet, if the user modifies the
billing address, it will change the corresponding shipping address as
well. However, the usual flow is to set the billing address, then the
shipping address. So that should cause less issues. In v12, a warning
message is added.
opw-1914185
closesodoo/odoo#29509
opw-1916148
The city, state and zip code are shown behind the street name and
street number, and not in a new line.
This only occurs in the read-only view.
This was changed to use the field 'street', which is a text of the
street name, number and door number in the street formatted in the
format of the partner's country. This only for the read-only view,
leaving the 3 fields separated for the edit.
closesodoo/odoo#29467
If the price section goes on two lines because of crossed
prices or many icons, then it would overlap with the product title.
See before/after on the PR.
opw 1913521
closesodoo/odoo#29388
Commit 5804246e0f introduced some improvements to speed up performances.
One of them was to check if a customize_show view was active or not but the
condition was on view.customize_show instead of view.active.
Thus, as that view is always a customize_show, the condition would always be
met.
closesodoo/odoo#29414
- The `_write` override on `sale.order` create a Next Activity for the
SO's salesperson when changing the SO `invoice_status` to upselling.
If the SO doesn't have a salesperson this code crashes since `user_id`
is required on Next Activities.
To avoid this crash we create the Next Activity only if a salesperson
is set on the SO.
OPW-1914087
The definition of `attachment_ids` on model `email_template.preview` is wrong,
because its table/columns refer to the model `mail.template`. As the field is
only used to preview a result in a wizard form, it does not need to be stored.
closesodoo/odoo#29349
used to fetch debit & credit recorded in Tax Cash Basis Journal Entries
Main
-
By allowing to change the `amount_mnt` var we will be able to change the
values recorded in Tax Cash Basis Journal Entries, i.e, debit & credit
values.
Explanation
-
We want to keep the `amount` just the way it has been computed because
that is right. We don't want to change that.
Our issue is the`rounded_amt` which is the value that is passed to the
debit and credit downwards.
We have only hooked a new method to allow us later inherit that method
and make our own computations regarding the `rounded_amt` which is the
main subject of this PR and later pass it down to the debit & credit
fields as need for localizations that could be facing the problem of
having the computation of taxes at date of invoicing instead of date of
payment.
`amount` var is used here:
`
'amount_currency': self.amount_currency and
line.currency_id.round(-line.amount_currency * amount / line.balance) or
0.0,`
and we are not intending to change that because the value written to the
`amount_currency` field is right.
What we intend is to compute the values for debit and credit fields
which were computed in this method at invoice date, some l18n need them
at payment date, e.g, l18n_mx.
Be aware
-
Do not be mislead by the fact that `rounded_amt` var is the one taken to
do those computations. It is just a mean to the final goal. Rounding is
not an issue and has never been.
Background
-
By allowing this merge to flow we will be able to address the following issues:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/issues/25057https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/17196https://github.com/odoo/odoo/issues/9972
Final Goal
-
Being able to perform the computation of the debits and credits
according to l10n_mx in odoo/enterprise#3137closesodoo/odoo#28991
When activating a filter on a list view,
the environment of the action contained a context with an orderedBy key
which was then used by every controller and model in the various
parallel flows, i.e. changing actions
After this commit, we prevent it by excluding the key when executing an action
OPW 1913190, 1914019
closes#29190
required: [('chart_template_id','!=',False)] doesn't work because you need to fill the chart_template_id
to install a chart of accounts for your company. Then, the transfer_account becomes required before its installation
and then, you are not able to install a chart of accounts for your company.
If installed along with `auth_signup`, it sends an email when creating a missing user authenticated through LDAP.
It is a confusing message that makes no sense, because the user is, from his POV, not actually creating a new user, but just authenticating with a new app with his known company-wide credentials.
Besides, that invitation leads the user to change his password in Odoo, although he probably doesn't want to do that and have a password for Odoo and another in the LDAP server.
The best option is to disable that email completely, which is what this commit does.
closesodoo/odoo#29243
The module `vatnumber` (which is not maintained anymore) uses an
incorrect validation method for Albanian VAT numbers. Therefore, we use
the library `stdnum`, on which `vatnumber` relies for most cases.
opw-1912680
closesodoo/odoo#29280
When analysing the code thanks to Pyflame it cames that the 'prefetch_fields()'
function was runing most of the time. In order to improve the global performance,
I change the context of the move_lines : 'prefetch_fields = False'. It permit to reduce the
time of computation of the prefetch_fields and to avoid the MemoryError.
N.B.: The database of the customer (on saas) contains 1.3 millions of entry and to reproduce the issue
I have to set the HardMemlimit to 0.9 Go and the SoftMemLimit to 0.5Go.
OPW-1910422
closesodoo/odoo#29231
In case there is a large amount of data to display, the 'Manual
Reconciliation' widget suffers from high CPU consumption, and therefore
slowness.
This is mainly due to the line rendering (function `_renderLines`).
Indeed, unlike the 'Bank Statement Reconciliation' widget which
retrieves the data partially, the 'Manual Reconciliation' widget
retrieves and renders all the data. No offset is implemented in this
case, neither for data retrieval nor rendering.
With this commit, we implement a partial rendering of the data
retrieved. This means that all data are fetched when loading the widget,
but only a part of it is rendered. We make use of the existing 'Load
More' mechanism to display more data. By default, 30 accounts or
partners are loaded.
By combining this with PR #28958, we aim to make the widget more usable
for large data volumes.
opw-1903575
closesodoo/odoo#28959
Recent works in the orm (see [1] for example) changed the behaviour of
the server in the case of onchanges: it tries to optimize Odoo by
sending a minimal diff to the web client in onchanges.
Concretely, this means that the web client receives commands 4 (link to)
instead of command 1 (update + record data). It also sends a minimal
diff in that case. This is a big issue for the web client, because it relied
on the knowledge of the data from the command 1 to be able to evaluate some
modifiers.
The good news is that we can mitigate the issue in one case: we do not
actually need to evaluate the modifiers in the case of a command 4
(comming from the server), because we can assume that the record is
valid. So, we simply bypass the check in that case.
Note that this should fix most of the problem, but a deeper problem
still remains: a crash can still happen when an onchange modifies a
record in a one2many (but in a different page), and we also have a
modifier which needs to be evaluated.
opw: #1904514
[1] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/29086closesodoo/odoo#29172closesodoo/odoo#29086
On a record with a large x2many, the web client does not load all the data of
the lines (because of paging). If a line is modified by an onchange, at some
point the client will determine whether lines are valid (all required fields
are provided). It is possible that the client cannot evaluate the validity of
the modified line because of missing fields. In order to avoid this situaion,
the server sends all fields on modified lines.
Set a BOM to create 10^k units of Product P, using n units of raw material R.
On R, put rounding to 1 unit.
Create a MO to produce 1 unit of P.
Since it needs n/10^k units and rounding is set to 1,
it sets 1 unit of R to consume.
Now "update" (quantity to produce) to 10^k'.
It correctly updates the quantity to consume.
However, since it doesn't update the unit_factor, when you "produce",
it will consume 10^k' units instead of 1.
We copy the way the unit_factor is initially computed when updating the lines.
opw 1903776
closesodoo/odoo#29067
The translation had wrongly `</ i>` which from a report broke some
initialization of some snippet of the website editor.
es_CO, es_DO, es_EC languages are not available in transifex so this
change is done manually for them.
opw-1907752
closes#29135
1. Update tax Groups with N07-2018
Restrict Tax groups just to the 5 available in Norma 07-2018:
* ITBIS
* ISR
* ISC
* Propina
* Otros Impuestos
2. Do not use 'none' to hide taxes
This affect taxes reports, as those reports evaluate the
type_tax_use field
3. Rename Taxes and Description for N07-2018
4. Change group taxes name and missing childrens
5. Add account groups to template and CoA
6. Add various missing data
opw-1912626
closesodoo/odoo#27172
Raphael Collet