Before this commit, the payment providers (e.g., Stripe, Adyen...)
available for payment were displayed on the payment forms. The customer
had to select one to process their payment. After that, the customer had
to select their preferred payment method (e.g., Credit Card,
Bancontact...) from a list of payment methods supported by the selected
provider over which the website administrator had close to no control.
This was making the payment forms confusing because the payment methods
were displayed sometimes more than once, if at all, in a non-controlled
order, and behind the selection of a payment provider that customers
should not have to deal with.
As the payment method was selected in an iframe or directly on the
provider's website, the information on the selection payment method was
not available in Odoo. This posed many problems, among which were the
impossibility of assessing whether a specific feature (e.g.,
tokenization, refunds, manual capture...) was available, not being able
to easily identify payment tokens through the payment method logo,
listing available payment methods on the website, sorting and
fine-grained configuration of the available payment method, subpar
payment method-specific display on the payment form (e.g., PayPal that
requires displaying a "Pay with PayPal" button), etc.
In this commit, the payment providers are thus replaced by the payment
methods on the payment forms. All contextually available (depending on
the country, currency, requested feature...) payment methods are
displayed one after the other on a single-level list and in the order
configured by the website administrator. Each payment method is
"powered by" (i.e., linked) to a single payment provider: the first one,
by model order, to support it. This allows, for example, offering the
PayPal payment method through Mollie, which charges low processing fees,
while also offering Klarna through Stripe, which supports more payment
methods but charges higher processing fees.
While doing so, the two different payment forms, "Checkout" and
"Manage", are also merged together in a new, configurable case-by-case,
payment form that is entirely redesigned to offer a better user
experience.
After payment, the information on the selected payment method is saved
on the transaction and eventual payment record and updated with the
information received from the provider.
task-2882677
closesodoo/odoo#120446
Related: odoo/upgrade#5103
Related: odoo/documentation#5717
Related: odoo/enterprise#40666
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Anita (anko) <anko@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Brieuc-brd <brd@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Valeriya (vchu) <vchu@odoo.com>
Before this commit, it was not possible to partially capture a
transaction from Odoo, and doing so in the provider backend would often
result in a full capture in Odoo when capture was supported.
With this commit, partial captures are made available in Odoo directly
from the sales order or invoice, for providers that support them.
Provider can either only support full capture or also support partial
ones. It also optionally managed the automatic void of the remaining
amount at the user request when multiple captures are supported by the
provider.
As of now, the only acquirer allowing partial capture is Adyen.
task-2728768
closesodoo/odoo#87251
Related: odoo/enterprise#35205
Related: odoo/documentation#2063
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Some providers require additional allowed states due to their refund or
transaction process justifying it. Until now, these extra states were
specified in the `payment` module, which was not ideal as it allowed
every provider in every flow to accept these additional states.
With this commit, additional states are now specified only in the
coresponding flow of a provider that requires them.
task-2869678
closesodoo/odoo#107110
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Currently, the name's fields to send to Authorize when the partner is a company are:
* firstName
* lastName
if we consider following name `Company Duck Inc`:
the code is sending:
* firstName: ''
* lastName: 'Duck'
Only it sends the `lastName` with the second word found in the name,
due to the new validations in Authorize.Net, this kind of transactions
are marked as suspicious and it's not confirming the transactions, leave them
as pending, this commit is sending the full name in `lastName`
instead of only second word to meet with the validation in Authorize.Net
Also, we are sending the fields `firstName` and `lastName`, with the
maximum length allowed by Authorize.
closesodoo/odoo#112977
X-original-commit: 77d83b327fd99ed090194ec0d3a771c9afc47115
Signed-off-by: Morgane Demesmaeker <edm@odoo.com>
Before this commit, the lists of supported currencies by payment
provider were hard-coded in the Python scripts, which made them
unavailable to the users.
With this commit, the implemented initial lists of supported currencies
are displayed on the form view and are editable, because Odoo lists may
not be up-to-date. Empty lists do not trigger any filtering on the
payment providers to access payment methods.
For Authorize.net and Asiapay payment providers, the specific
`(authorize,asiapay)_currency_id` are removed and the generic payment
provider field `available_currency_ids` is restricted to a single-item
list when one of those providers is enabled.
task-2926016
closesodoo/odoo#101018
Related: odoo/enterprise#34158
Related: odoo/documentation#2788
Related: odoo/upgrade#4069
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Before this commit the neutralize system introduced in v16 was using ORM
methods in order to change appropriate records. Although flexible, this approach
could lead to call some methods with side effects while neutralizing
(eg: overloads of write).
This patch converts the neutralize system to a safer "inert" SQL based approach
by migrating the generic method _neutralize to SQL files exposed in the
data folder.
Task id: 2961687closesodoo/odoo#102792
X-original-commit: e5dbded9bb363351feff7ca8a56c7f8a6860f492
Related: odoo/enterprise#32580
Signed-off-by: Fabien Meghazi <fme@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce:
- install payment_authorize module;
- complete a credit card payment using Authorize.net with a partner name of almost 50 characters;
- confirm the payment.
Issues:
An error message appears.
Causes:
The Authorize.net API define the max length of information.
It is possible that some information exceeds the maximum length.
(https://apitest.authorize.net/xml/v1/schema/AnetApiSchema.xsd)
Solutions:
Truncate information if the number of character is too large.
opw-2990762
closesodoo/odoo#101496
X-original-commit: 9da8882e0b218e95f2662a9c7f980b17b72fe7be
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Lefebvre Thomas (thle) <thle@odoo.com>
*: adyen, authorize, demo, razorpay, stripe.
The param `create_refund_transaction` from `_send_refund_request` became
useless following this commit:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/e4c63126b45854b10f08ab14dee5eb1d4ed98bb0
It was only used for Authorize.net, which now works without calling this
param.
task-2869910
closesodoo/odoo#101105
X-original-commit: 6855d65df7a83037ee5e2202966fa4e67dae7d5a
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Changing the name of model payment.acquirer to payment.provider
and everything that it touches. It is technically incorrect to
use the term "acquirer" for systems that only provide a service
of payment.
After this commit the model payment.acquirer and all related to
it will be renamed to payment.provider.
Task - 2842088
closesodoo/odoo#90899
Related: odoo/upgrade#3542
Related: odoo/documentation#1981
Related: odoo/enterprise#27131
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
Before this commit, tokens were prefixed with usually 12 X’s. To improve
readability, modernity and to shorten the length, this commit changes
token prefixes to a standard of •••• 1111.
task-2832669
closesodoo/odoo#94978
Related: odoo/upgrade#3738
Related: odoo/enterprise#29190
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Before this commit, zombie payment tokens (= tokens linked to disabled
acquirers) could still
1) be used by internal users and
2) reactivated when the acquirer’s state changed to ‘test’ or ‘enabled’.
This is not desirable because zombie tokens should neither be used,
nor reactivated.
After this commit, all tokens related to an acquirer are unassigned
from linked documents and archived as soon as the acquirer’s state is
changed to ‘disabled’. Creating a payment with an archived token is
prohibited. In addition, archived tokens cannot be un-archived anymore.
task-2649806
closesodoo/odoo#93774
Related: odoo/enterprise#28661
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Users can now ask for a refund from Odoo for their transactions done
through Authorize.net. A refund will be triggered from Odoo when
necessary.
Only full refunds are possible.
Note that unsettled transactions will be voided as they cannot be
refunded.
Task - 2678757
closesodoo/odoo#92279
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Computing the fields instead of storing them allows to implement the
feature for each provider more easily, without needing a migration
script.
task-2841744
closesodoo/odoo#91961
Related: odoo/enterprise#27618
Related: odoo/upgrade#3535
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
When setting up an acquirer there is sensible information to
be supplied.
There was inconsistency on what was obfuscated and what not.
Now sensible information as passwords and keys is obfuscated
and public information as names and addresses is visible.
Task - 2694139
closesodoo/odoo#81211
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Before this commit, most acquirers needed to run several successive
searches for the transaction whose reference was received by a
controller in notification data. This is because the security checks
run on the notification data require access to the acquirer through the
transaction record which was immediately discarded.
Starting with this commit, all `*_feedback_data` method are no longer
decorated with `api.model` and can use the transaction record they're
called on if provided. They are also renamed to `*_notification_data`.
task-2737144
closesodoo/odoo#83850
Related: odoo/enterprise#23938
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
An overridable model method was added in a previous commit in order to
neutralize a database.
This commit introduce the implementation of this method for the payment
modules.
Also, a `_neutralize_fields` helper method is added on the
PaymentAcquirer model to simplify the neutralization of the various
payment modules.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#67825
createTransactionRequests can return responses like this:
{'messages': {'message': [{'code': 'E00027',
'text': 'The transaction was unsuccessful.'}],
'resultCode': 'Error'},
'transactionResponse': {'SupplementalDataQualificationIndicator': 0,
'accountNumber': 'XXXXXXXX',
'accountType': 'eCheck',
'authCode': '',
'avsResultCode': 'P',
'cavvResultCode': '',
'cvvResultCode': '',
'errors': [{'errorCode': '33',
'errorText': 'Bill To Address is '
'required.'},
{'errorCode': '33',
'errorText': 'Bill To State/Province is '
'required.'}],
'refTransID': '',
'responseCode': '3',
'testRequest': '0',
'transHash': '',
'transHashSha2': 'xxx',
'transId': '0'}}
_make_request() threw out the detailed errors ("Bill To Address is
required" and "Bill to State/Province is required") and only returned:
{
'err_code': 'E00027',
'err_msg': 'The transaction was unsuccessful.'
}
which results in the following vague error on an SO:
The transaction with reference SO1111/1111111 for US$ 100.00
encountered an error (Authorize.net). Error: Authorize.Net: Received
data with status code "3" and error code "The transaction was
unsuccessful."
This commit extracts the transaction errors and appends them to
'err_msg'. After this commit the above response results in this chatter:
The transaction with reference SO1111/1111111 for $ 100.00
encountered an error (Authorize.net). Error: Authorize.Net: Received
data with status code "3" and error code "The transaction was
unsuccessful. Bill To Address is required. Bill To State/Province is
required."
Ideally the error handling logic would be rewritten so that
_make_request() doesn't handle specific errors like this. But changing
it is too high risk in a stable release.
opw-2718318
closesodoo/odoo#82443
X-original-commit: c7b292f7b86679b11527a68093ed70b36dc2fd1a
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
A company name >50 chars leads to:
Authorize.Net: Received data with status code "3" and error code "The
'AnetApi/xml/v1/schema/AnetApiSchema.xsd:company' element is invalid -
The value XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX is
invalid according to its datatype 'String' - The actual length is
greater than the MaxLength value."
This limits the company name to the specified 50 chars [1][2]. Cutting
off the company name should be fine for the same reasons as outlined in
64b86f36264c2e655681c7b6bed69e89891107bf.
[1] https://developer.authorize.net/api/reference/index.html#payment-transactions-charge-a-credit-card
[2] https://api.authorize.net/xml/v1/schema/AnetApiSchema.xsd
opw-2725246
closesodoo/odoo#82171
X-original-commit: 412e50290524ed0edc0317b141a296a883b173d3
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
The logs for payments contain the transaction reference whenever possible.
Before logs for transactions contained the reference or the id of the
transaction in an inconsitent way. No transactions are identified by
reference whenever possible.
The logs for payments for the same function on different acquirers should
have the same format. Same flow step for different acquirers had
information passed in different formats. Now at each step of a transaction
flow log messages have the same format regardless of the acquirer.
Overall the payment logs should have an uniform format. Hopefully
understanding log messages related to transactions should be easier, as
now log format is independent of the acquirer and transaction are easily
identified by reference.
Task - 2545450
closesodoo/odoo#79547
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
- This replaces the name of `refund_amount` to `amount_to_refund`
for a variable that was renamed elsewhere, which caused a traceback.
- Adyen and authorized `_send_refund_request` now have their return,
as their parent.
- When a refund is initiated from Adyen, it's now easier to change
the merchant reference, thus, we can't count on it anymore to get
the source transaction.
- Fix the automatic refund for authorize.net with the manual capture
task-2634184
closesodoo/odoo#77916
X-original-commit: 747dbf44f37407fd415af645dac652199ac7fa6b
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
It's possible for a payment.acquirer to charge tokens when it's
disabled via the subscription app (_cron_recurring_create_invoice()).
Before this patch it would use the production endpoint. It's
unexpected and can cause accidental charges in a database meant for
testing.
opw-2637659
closesodoo/odoo#76820
X-original-commit: 7316413261ca8294ceffa212d6b5079b6e35daf6
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <anv@odoo.com>
Before 660dc0ebaf it was possible to use Authorize to pay via your bank
account using the "Redirection to payment acquirer" option. Since the
refactor removed the redirect it was no longer possible. This commit
reintroduces that feature.
It does so by adding new form elements that accept bank account
information. Additionally it reintroduces the `billTo` and `customer`
parameters that Authorize requires when processing ACH payments.
task-2628318
closesodoo/odoo#75289
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <AntoineVDV@users.noreply.github.com>
Before this commit, it was not possible to refund a payment from Odoo.
Users had to go through the payment acquirer's backend and update the
payment accordingly in Odoo.
With this commit, refunds are made available in Odoo directly from the
payment form, for acquirers that support them. Acquirer can either only
support full refunds or also support partial refunds.
As of now, the only acquirer allowing refunds is Adyen, with partial
refund support.
task-2527891
closesodoo/odoo#70881
Related: odoo/upgrade#2689
Related: odoo/enterprise#19829
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <AntoineVDV@users.noreply.github.com>
Fix two issues:
The search of suitable payment token was searching on the journal_id
field of the payment acquirer that is no longer stored.
Change it to now search on the acquirer_id directly, since we have
this information.
The _inverse_journal_id method on payment acquirers would create
new payment line with the manual payment method when no provider
are given to an acquirer, or no payment method is existing for
a given provider. This would cause issues with the creation of
multiple line with the same name on a same journal, which would
trigger the constrains blocking that.
closesodoo/odoo#74990
X-original-commit: a3a2fcb0b299fafbf359ec9015da5c85cdb57b3a
Related: odoo/enterprise#20193
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <smetl@users.noreply.github.com>
Before this commit, the validation flow with verification (payment of a
small amount with immediate refund) was performed with the use of
validation routes: after payment, the customer was redirected to the
validation route stored on the transaction to trigger the refund. This
implementation had an issue: if the customer never reached the
validation route, they were not refunded their validation amount. This
could happen if the customer closed the tab after paying with an
acquirer offering payments with redirection, or if the validation
payment was asynchronously confirmed through a webhook notification.
This commit gets rid of validation routes and requires acquirers to
immediately refund the validation amount when the payment is confirmed.
This way, a payment confirmation coming from a webhook can trigger the
refund too.
As the only acquirer that implements the validation with verification
flow, Authorize.net now voids validation transactions as soon as they
are authorized.
While we're at it, the logging of processing values is adapted to only
log specific rendering values if a redirect form is rendered.
task-2612977
closesodoo/odoo#74707
Related: odoo/enterprise#20060
Related: odoo/upgrade#2710
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <AntoineVDV@users.noreply.github.com>
As validation transactions are authorized rather than captured, they are
refunded with a void request. Before this commit, a voided validation
transaction was mistakenly flagged as canceled while it should have been
confirmed.
This commit makes the distinction between a voided regular transaction
and a validation transaction.
task-2612977
closesodoo/odoo#74581
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <AntoineVDV@users.noreply.github.com>
_prepare_transaction_request() introduced in
35a6c1867d8edc9b58c002a6ff6a63c35a0fc708 is only used for
'authOnlyTransaction' and 'authCaptureTransaction' transaction
types. capture(), void() and refund() still build their own request
parameters. Make this clearer by renaming _prepare_transaction_request()
to _prepare_authorization_transaction_request().
closesodoo/odoo#73373
X-original-commit: da00ae85f69cfde217d09b93113f8b7821aabff2
Signed-off-by: Olivier Dony (odo) <odo@openerp.com>
This makes it possible to patch only _prepare_transaction_request in
case parameters need to be added.
closesodoo/odoo#73215
X-original-commit: 35a6c1867d8edc9b58c002a6ff6a63c35a0fc708
Signed-off-by: Antoine Vandevenne (anv) <AntoineVDV@users.noreply.github.com>
Users may want to be able to have transactions coming from multiple
payment acquirers to be registered in the same journal.
This will allows that.
Task id #2414749closesodoo/odoo#67331
Related: odoo/upgrade#2500
Related: odoo/enterprise#17258
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
This commit also drops the payment with redirection flow in favor of
the direct payment flow only, while preserving the currently used APIs.
See the merge commit for more details.
task-2333030
Co-authored-by: Adrien Horgnies <aho@odoo.com>
We can have payment.transaction references of >20 characters. This
happens automatically if you have long sale.{order,subscription}
sequences (especially through website_payment because it adds multiple
suffixes, e.g. SO2020/1234567 could turn into
SO2020/1234567-12-1-1-1). We POST the full reference via the
x_invoice_num variable. Unfortunately Authorize specifies a maximum
length of 20 for this field [1]. So when Authorize POSTs back to
/payment/authorize/return it only specifies the first 20 characters in
x_invoice_num. E.g. when POSTing
{
...
'x_invoice_num': 'SO2020/1234567-12-1-1-1',
...
}
we receive back in /payment/authorize/return:
{
...
'x_invoice_num': 'SO2020/1234567-12-1-',
...
}
This causes _authorize_form_get_tx_from_data() to not find the
transaction which results in a ValidationError.
To fix this also pass the reference in the x_description field. It has
a more generous 255 character limit [1]. Then search using both.
We can't get rid of x_invoice_num entirely because we cannot assume
the payment_authorize.authorize_form will be updated (even more so
because it's a noupdate="1" template). By still using it in
_authorize_form_get_tx_from_data() we ensure that everything keeps
working regardless of whether or not x_description is included in the
template.
[1] p39 in https://www.authorize.net/content/dam/anet-redesign/documents/AIM_guide.pdf
opw-2373433
closesodoo/odoo#61449
X-original-commit: 3a220d3ad2999a21d54924940574ba96a9c07154
Signed-off-by: jorenvo <jorenvo@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
This commit fixes all issues detected by the new pylint
gettext-variable test.
It converts some calls to the new syntax
_("Foo %s", bar)
to progressively migrate the code to the new syntax.
A few calls were not technically incorrect but still detected by the
linter.
_("Foo" +
"Bar")
has been converted to
_("Foo"
"Bar")
as it has the same effect and make sure the argument is of type
asteroid.Const instead of BinOp).
closesodoo/odoo#53683
Related: odoo/enterprise#11467
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
Set the transaction to the state 'error' when Authorize.net responds
with that status, as it will display a message to the customer to detail
the problem.
opw-2231276
X-original-commit: 005607fce4a22394a9f67cc4eaa52f8bf89780f0
With this commit, Selection fields with `required=True` which are
extended via `selection_add` are given proper ondelete policies to
ensure the cleanup of records containing these extended options during
uninstall of the extending module.
This commit also cleans up leftover uninstall hooks that were being used
to handle the same set of problems prior to the ondelete mechanism being
implemented for Selection fields.
closesodoo/odoo#46325
Related: odoo/enterprise#9117
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
It is possible to define required fields from the Authorize.net backend
without which no customer profile can be created. These fields include
data that Odoo sometimes does not have at all (fax number, anyone?);
however including the phone number is a meaningful option.
Before this commit, if the 'phone number' was required by the
Authorize.net configuration and was correctly set in Odoo, this still
did not work because we did not include the phone number with the
customer profile creation request payload.
We do now.
opw-2215332
closesodoo/odoo#48420
X-original-commit: 034c04efa4ccecd40f657eae97ef2b04934d570c
Signed-off-by: Damien Bouvy (dbo) <dbo@odoo.com>
- Select 'capture manually' in Authorize.net Payment acquirer
- Do an online transaction
- Click on the Capture button at Payment transaction windows.
An error message is returned:
The element 'transactionRequest' in namespace
'AnetApi/xml/v1/schema/AnetApiSchema.xsd' has invalid child element
'amount' in namespace 'AnetApi/xml/v1/schema/AnetApiSchema.xsd'. List
of possible elements expected: 'splitTenderId, order, lineItems...'.
This because the keys `amount` and `refTransId` are inverted in
`createTransactionRequest`:
https://developer.authorize.net/api/reference/index.html#payment-transactions-capture-a-previously-authorized-amount
A simple fix is to swtich them. Indeed, the Odoo 13.0 requirements is
Python 3.6+, in which the keys order at iteration is the insertion
order. Although this was officially part of the specification in 3.7,
the change is already available in 3.6.
Closes#45891
opw-2201667
closesodoo/odoo#46206
X-original-commit: ae3885295795f8c150bd40af266004016fd300c5
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
We cannot assume reading the value of a monetary field has the
decimals specified by the currency in decimal_places.
Right after creating a record with a monetary field it may have a
different amount of decimals.
To reproduce this:
>>> tx = env['payment.transaction'].create({
'amount': 10.87,
'acquirer_id': env['payment.acquirer'].search([], limit=1).id,
'currency_id': env.ref('base.USD').id,
'reference': 'test'
})
>>> tx.id
130
>>> tx.amount
10.870000000000001
<Restart odoo>
>>> env['payment.transaction'].browse(130).amount
10.87
Authorize requires us to send a correctly rounded amount. The
following response is returned when sending 10.870000000000001:
{'messages': {'message': [{'code': 'E00027',
'text': 'The transaction was unsuccessful.'}],
'resultCode': 'Error'},
'transactionResponse': {'SupplementalDataQualificationIndicator': 0,
'accountNumber': '',
'accountType': '',
'authCode': '',
'avsResultCode': 'P',
'cavvResultCode': '',
'cvvResultCode': '',
'errors': [{'errorCode': '5',
'errorText': 'A valid amount is '
'required.'}],
'refTransID': '',
'responseCode': '3',
'testRequest': '0',
'transHash': '',
'transHashSha2': '',
'transId': '0'}}
To work around the issue always round when we read amount.
Lower level solutions were considered in #45248 but for now we'll
stick with this higher level and lower risk patch.
opw-2188889
closesodoo/odoo#45362
X-original-commit: 7485927f0eb152086efcaaf4a30260e503267c41
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Makes debugging possible without having to run the db locally and
manually adding _loggers everywhere.
Parts of the error are logged already, leading to messages like:
...payment_authorize.models.payment: The transaction was unsuccessful
Unfortunately they don't show the reason. The entire response is
something like:
{'messages': {'message': [{'code': 'E00027',
'text': 'The transaction was unsuccessful.'}],
'resultCode': 'Error'},
'transactionResponse': {'SupplementalDataQualificationIndicator': 0,
'accountNumber': '',
'accountType': '',
'authCode': '',
'avsResultCode': 'P',
'cavvResultCode': '',
'cvvResultCode': '',
'errors': [{'errorCode': '5',
'errorText': 'A valid amount is '
'required.'}],
'refTransID': '',
'responseCode': '3',
'testRequest': '0',
'transHash': '',
'transHashSha2': '',
'transId': '0'}}
Since we log the full request above, let's also log the full response.
PS. this was present before but was lost with 26f3d8465d.
opw-2188889
closesodoo/odoo#45259
X-original-commit: d269bba3b9f4f4fa567a2a7084396bdf08422fa4
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Fine-tunning of 937b5c076e7175bec664ed0cf4b77505e342f1e2
Have a multiwebsite setup
have a payment installed for one of the two websites
Make an order on that website and try to pay
Before this commit, the transaction doesn't come back to odoo's
payment success controller
This was because the return url was set to the web base url ICP
After this commit, the payment success page is opened as we took
the request's url as the return url
opw-2080352
closesodoo/odoo#39643
X-original-commit: a9fb15b33fd041ee420581a5ba450017db06e0c7
Signed-off-by: Jorge Pinna Puissant (jpp) <jpp@odoo.com>
Replace website_published and environment by a generic state on
payment.acquirer
Payment acquirers aren't enabled by default. When setting their state to 'enabled' or 'test', it is verified the required fields for the provider are set.
add accept js of authorize.net to make s2s flow pci compliance
after clicking on pay now button, one popup display with card inputs
popup is provided by a authorize with all validation facilities
After submitting details, payment flow is
- get the temp token information from authorize
- create a token with that temp token information in odoo
- make a request to authorize for charge
- after successful request, payment will be charged for that card
task- 2025821
- convert XML format request to JSON
- remove refund method from the request, as there is no use of it,
we will never validate card as authorize.net validate card by itself,
so there is no case for the refund
- verify token while creating it
- make verify validity field invisible in case of authorize
task- 2025821
