ALIAS_WRITEABLE_FIELDS is used to write alias fields with sudo
Steps to reproduce:
1. Create a user
1.1. Give rights Services -> Project-> Administartor
1.2. Not given rights Administration-> administartor
2. Project app -> open any project -> Action -> duplicate -> it give validation error.
---
opw-2506566
closesodoo/odoo#70414
X-original-commit: 7ae1b4622c6743e28deca12476d6e70375c9417e
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Ivan Yelizariev // IEL <yelizariev@users.noreply.github.com>
using inselect operator to inline sql in the search method and avoid ORM
to fetch multiple useless messages to check if there's one
closesodoo/odoo#70410
X-original-commit: 505c7b0946689d3ac1ac4dd2f59cf4d535c36cbb
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Give a coherent group as otherwise we could have access errors. Simple
case: an Admin Rights user goes into a mail message form which is only
available in debug mode which sets `group.no_one` into such user. This
model is only readeable by `base.group_sytem` so an AccessError will
raise.
closesodoo/odoo#70119
X-original-commit: 8930e08213d0b6805e6fc91fa07561107ef43acc
Signed-off-by: Simon Goffin (sig) <sig@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
* The result of `plaintext2html` is fully controlled and
markup-safe (the first thing we do is escape the input).
* For `append_content_to_html`, we assume the inputs are HTML and the
output is thus always properly HTML.
Alternatively, we may want to `Markup("%s%s") % ...` and require the
inputs to be properly marked? That seems like a good idea.
* In `_replace_local_links`, applying re.sub will strip out the markup
mark, so store it and reapply it on output if necessary.
That one is a big gnarly, because if the input to ustr is
markup-safe bytes (e.g. qweb rendering output) then the output is a
Markup object, but if the input is str then the output is str, so we
need to check before and after unless... we update ustr to check for
subclasses instead of exact type?
* In `_prepend_preview` the issue is similar to that of
`append_content_to_html`, though in this case we should *not* trust
the input, so we can flag the "parent document" as Markup and format
the preview bit in.
* And since we're marking mail's jinja output as safe, do the same for
web and iot.
Sadly there doesn't seem to be any hook for doing that at the
environment level of jinja, so every `Template.render` site has to
be marked.
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Try to export mail.message records
Bug:
A traceback was raised
Wrong forward-port of 69b27ac
opw:2514584
closesodoo/odoo#69912
X-original-commit: 9cf49ba3fa60c174abffc5c048616f91397f7b9d
Signed-off-by: Simon Goffin (sig) <sig@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Create a company whoose name ends with a dot like "Bidule Inc.", change
the company of the user to that new company, head to the Accouning
module and create a new journal of type purchase. Traceback because the
generated mail alias for that journal uses the company name and that the
local-part of an email cannot ends with a dot.
From the RFC standpoint, the local-part of an email address (the part
before the @, `john` in `"John Doe" <john@example.com>`, cannot begins
with, ends with or contain following dots.
The email sanitizing function have been updated so it takes care of the
above requirement.
See also #61811
opw-2448692
closesodoo/odoo#69864
X-original-commit: f0e840ae6db387e1dfc99cc21e09d84eb126e7b9
Signed-off-by: Julien Castiaux <Julien00859@users.noreply.github.com>
PURPOSE
Rename fields on mail_thread and wizard: ``no_auto_thread`` should be replaced
to ``reply_to_force_new`` to ease understanding and be prefixed by reply_to.
SPECIFICATIONS
For better understanding, this commit renames ``no_auto_thread`` field of
``mail.message`` model to ``reply_to_force_new``, to indicate that if the
field is checked (☑) replies should check gateway alias rules instead of
updating mailed threads.
It is also more coherent with reply_to namespacing used in various mail models
(notably new composer fields and ``reply_to_mode`` of mass mailing and mail
composer models)
LINKS
Task ID-2117639
COM PR odoo/odoo#40931
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#17941
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2419
PURPOSE
Right now, `reply_to` field on email template is misleading due to poor
explanation. This commit improves the placeholder and tooltip of the fields
to make the purpose of the field clearer especially for non technical users.
SPECIFICATIONS
Update reply-to field placeholder to "Preferred email address when sending
via mass mailing options".
Update reply-to field helper message to "Preferred email address when sending
via mass mailing options. <br> Only used when the answer is not added into
the original discussion.""
Update the no_auto_thread field label to "Reply to" in composer and introduce
a new radio button replacing the checkbox
* The original discussion (thread)
* Another email address (new)
Rename fields on mail_thread and wizard: ``no_auto_thread`` should be replaced
to ``reply_to_force_new`` to ease understanding and be prefixed by reply_to.
LINKS
Task ID-2117639
COM PR odoo/odoo#40931
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#17941
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2419
Before this commit
When someone tries to send a mail to a restricted alias (which can be
anywhere in 'To', 'CC' or 'BCC') and if the sender is not allowed to do
so, the mail bounces. However bounced mail shows info as if it bounced due
to address provided in 'To', even though it is not always the case.
Example you send a message to
* 'To': 'valid@gmail.com' (okay)
* 'Cc': 'myalias@odoo.com' (not allowed for you)
Mail bounces because you are not allowed to send a mail to alias provided
in 'Cc', but it shows the message that: `The following email sent to
valid@gmail.com cannot be accepted because [...]`.
After this commit
Boucing alias is shown in message body. Above example becomes `The following
email sent to myalias@odoo.com cannot be accepted [...].`
Note: Because the alias can be present in `Bcc` too (which will not available
in the message values we get in `message_route_verify` method), we simply use
display name of the alias instead of finding mail address matching with alias
from the message values.
Task ID-2390310
closesodoo/odoo#69788
X-original-commit: 15325b19c15a649041db75bacbe8409ae4c58df7
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Mail holds a "Pay Now" notification template holding notably customized
links to portal for records like sale orders or invoices. It allow to
give a more personalized button than a plain simple "View document" link.
Currently frontend / backend links are not always correctly computed in this
template. This commit fixes that behavior.
Task ID-2513724
COM PR #69607
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#17849closesodoo/odoo#69714closesodoo/odoo#69744closesodoo/odoo#69774
X-original-commit: c417ea6243cb968d17f5db0919ec8cd034f4cb5f
Related: odoo/enterprise#17889
Related: odoo/enterprise#17902
Related: odoo/enterprise#17916
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Go to Settings > Technical > Messages
- Select some records and export it
Bug:
A traceback was raised because
PS: When exporting data, the function export_date is called from web/controllers/main.py
with the attribute raw_data
opw:2504763
closesodoo/odoo#69308
X-original-commit: 69b27ac3f778b99a7d583ee6a9e8607a36d0a3b2
Signed-off-by: Simon Goffin (sig) <sig@openerp.com>
PURPOSE
Add some tests for ``mail.render.mixin`` in order to assert its base behavior.
SPECIFICATIONS
Add tests for
* jinja rendering tools;
* QWeb rendering tools;
* translation support;
Also add tests for jinja markers: block, variable and line statement markers
should be tested.
Also improve docstrings of tool methods. Add notably explanation of parameters
and better explain methods purpose.
LINKS
Task ID-2500615
Prepares Task ID-2484296 (improve markers use in Jinja)
Prepares Task ID-27033 (support QWeb in templates)
COM PR odoo/odoo#68874
X-original-commit: f3dba8e020a0be72321427ed839b80ad77386946
Before the commit, `_action_unfollow()` can be called by
`_message_receive_bounce()` and then multiple leave notifications
can be sent even if the partner has been removed from the channel,
when the partner is a follower of the channel and without a
valid email address.
Unfollow action should also remove the partner from the followers,
and only be processed if the partner is still a member of the channel.
Task id: 2456233
closesodoo/odoo#68314
X-original-commit: 5cf22425eb68f15d94a8b283c50198561bbc240a
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
add mail_tz to calendar_attendee model in order to make it easier to change the
timezone displayed in the mail template so that we can use it to make the
appointment time shown on the email reminder sent to the attendees consistent
with the time shown on the website page.
Change the invitation mail template and use the mail_tz field to display time
field instead of using the partner's timezone in order to make the time shown
in the invitation consistent with the time shown on the website page.
Remove the get_interval method in the calendar_event model and use standard
formatting tools instead, as this is more conveniant than having a custom
method for formatting dates, For this reason the format_time function located
in tools/misc.py has been modified to be capable of handling timezones in
order to be able to display time in the correct timezone, furthermore, this
function has been added to the rendering context provided in the
mail_render_mixin file to be used in email templates.
see: https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/16204
Task-2451154
closesodoo/odoo#65729
Related: odoo/enterprise#16204
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
- Connect with Admin
- Go to Contacts, edit himself by adding a Private Address
- Create an Internal User without "Access to Private Addresses" right (i.e. User X)
- Go to any app implementing chatter (i.e. Sales)
- Create a SO
- Add the created Private Address as follower
- Make sure User X can access the record (i.e. Sales: Administrator)
- Connect with User X and open the SO
An Access Error is raised while trying to fetch data about the followers.
This commit prevents to:
- add a private address as follower of a record
- add a private address as Recipient in full composer
- propose private addresses when adding a mention to a partner
opw-2428936
closesodoo/odoo#68493
Task-id: 2463622
X-original-commit: 20536e1bbeb641539c0de44364f8376e7cef651b
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Signed-off-by: Anh Thao PHAM <kitan191@users.noreply.github.com>
Current behavior before PR:
mail notification not sent when using the full composer.
Desired behavior after PR is merged:
mail notification will send when using the full composer.
LINKS:
PR https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/66421
Task-2446855
closesodoo/odoo#67933
X-original-commit: 349f07670ea4938e7fc3d9fa3a6fc5fae40dac65
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
When Odoo routes incoming emails it is looking for existing messages in
database using Message Ids which are coming from e-mail header
References.
In Odoo the message id looks pretty long like
743570479975566.1584086032.522504091262817-openerp-message-notify@ip-172-31-45-160
As it declared in [RFC2822] long header bodies can be "folded" using
CRLF+WSP. And some mail clients do that very thing. They split
References header body which contains Message Ids by "\n ". The example
of mail client where it can be reproduced is apps.rackspace.com We
created Sales Order in Odoo, sent this quotation to the client email. He
replied with e-mail, and this email can't be matched with any existing
message id and as result it's not attached to the Sales Order.
RFC2882: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2822#section-2.2.3closesodoo/odoo#68077
X-original-commit: 559f6cf62711ad45557eddec3af7c66616724eb5
Signed-off-by: Julien Castiaux <Julien00859@users.noreply.github.com>
The code from v13 used to look for partners in JS before making the RPC, which
was much faster, and also gave better results by returning partners that were
already known and therefore more likely to be selected.
The same logic is reintroduced here, and further improved to take into account
all known partners and sort them according to the likeliness they will be
selected based on various criteria.
task-2413776
closesodoo/odoo#68045
X-original-commit: 930e090ced8134c3819a5a87b9052467ba23e8e4
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Sébastien Theys <seb@odoo.com>
Now that recipients in notification process are always partners due to
simplification of MailFollower model we can safely simplify the structure
used to collect and propagate recipients information.
Before this task it was a dictionary with a list of partner related data and
a list of channel related data. It is now simply a list of partner related
data, leading to various code cleaning.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
Purpose of this commit is to make low-level API of subscribe process a bit
easier to understand and use. Notably some parameters are now defined as
named parameters in order to better understand calls.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
RATIONALE
Channel model is a mail.thread enabled model behaving strangely with followers,
notifications and discuss. Its code should however be simplified to be more
self contained and avoid unwanted side effects on other models.
PURPOSE
Remove channel ability to follow records as it mainly adds noise without a lot
of added value. Simplify channel notification flow by using directly members
and not a delegation through a channel self-following trick. Remove followers
being channels and posting with added listeners being channels.
SPECIFICATIONS
In this commit we force messages to belong to a single document using
``model`` / ``res_id`` pair. It is not possible anymore to link a message
to channels using ``channel_ids``. A message belongs to a document and
is displayed in that document's chatter.
This change implies modifying a lot of domains, notably in chatter. Indeed
discuss for channels does not use ``('channel_ids', 'in', [3])`` domains.
They now use ``('model', '=', 'mail.channel'), ('res_id', 'in', [3])`` like
other documents fetching their messages.
This commit also removes ``channel_message_ids`` field on ``mail.channel``
model. As channels are now considered as standard documents they will use
``message_ids`` field like all other documents. Linking a channel on a message
is possible only as a link in message from now on. It is not possible to push
it into a channel anymore (no more listener channels, no more channel link).
Finally a global cleaning also linked to all previous commits is done.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
RATIONALE
Channel model is a mail.thread enabled model behaving strangely with followers,
notifications and discuss. Its code should however be simplified to be more
self contained and avoid unwanted side effects on other models.
PURPOSE
Remove channel ability to follow records as it mainly adds noise without a lot
of added value. Simplify channel notification flow by using directly members
and not a delegation through a channel self-following trick. Remove followers
being channels and posting with added listeners being channels.
SPECIFICATIONS
In this commit we remove support of ``channel_ids`` parameter when posting
a message. This means we do not support notifying channels as side-part
of notification mechanism on a document. Either we post on a channel and
its members are notified, either we post on a business documents and its
followers are notified. There is no possibility to add channels as being
notified when posting a message.
This is done as a followup of removing followers being channel-based and
prepares ground to make channel use model / res_id as all other documents
inheriting form mail.thread.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
RATIONALE
Channel model is a mail.thread enabled model behaving strangely with followers,
notifications and discuss. Its code should however be simplified to be more
self contained and avoid unwanted side effects on other models.
PURPOSE
Remove channel ability to follow records as it mainly adds noise without a lot
of added value. Simplify channel notification flow by using directly members
and not a delegation through a channel self-following trick. Remove followers
being channels and posting with added listeners being channels.
SPECIFICATIONS
As there is no way to add channel-based follower anymore we can remove all
fields and code supporting this feature. Notably we can remove ``channel_id``
field on ``mail.follower`` model as well all code using it, notably compute
methods.
In this commit we also make ``partner_id`` field required as now followers
are always partners. Email, name and active fields are now simple related
fields on the partner.
Code computing data about subscription is also updated and simplified. As
we do not have channels anymore but only partners all custom SQL queries
are now simplified.
JS models for Discuss are also cleaned. Following python change, JS models
are simplified to match the backend models. Channel_id is removed, partner_id
is now required, and various code is updated according to the simplified
model.
Side note: we could probably get rid of specific index on ``partner_id``
field. However we have to ensure we never search for followers without being
in a model / res_id context. This will be done in another cleaning step to
be sure performance are not broken.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
RATIONALE
Channel model is a mail.thread enabled model behaving strangely with followers,
notifications and discuss. Its code should however be simplified to be more
self contained and avoid unwanted side effects on other models.
SPECIFICATIONS
Remove ``channel_ids`` field from ``ir.actions.server``. As we removed
support of (un)subscribing channel-based followers there is no need anymore
to have a field to add them through server actions. We can now safely remove
this field as it has no use anymore.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
RATIONALE
Channel model is a mail.thread enabled model behaving strangely with followers,
notifications and discuss. Its code should however be simplified to be more
self contained and avoid unwanted side effects on other models.
SPECIFICATIONS
Remove ``message_channel_ids`` field from ``mail.thread``. As we removed
support of (un)subscribing channel-based followers there is no need anymore
to have a field to access them. We can now safely remove this field as it
has no use anymore.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
RATIONALE
Channel model is a mail.thread enabled model behaving strangely with followers,
notifications and discuss. Its code should however be simplified to be more
self contained and avoid unwanted side effects on other models.
SPECIFICATIONS
Remove ``channel_ids`` argument and support from ``message_subscribe`` and
``message_unsubscribe`` API. Indeed we do not support adding channel-based
followers anymore. Only partners should be added or removed from followers.
It also allows to simplify API and understanding of both methods.
Various addons are updated to match the simplified (un)subscribe API. Some
enterprise addons may also be impacted.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
PURPOSE
Remove channel ability to follow records as it mainly adds noise without a lot
of added value. Simplify channel notification flow by using directly members
and not a delegation through a channel self-following trick. Remove followers
being channels and posting with added listeners being channels.
SPECIFICATIONS
Support mentioning partners on channels like done on other documents. When
there is an user input (comment or email) that mentions someone that specific
recipient is not notified. Its notification will be done in Inbox or email
depending on its choice or customer state.
This feature somehow replaces the follower-based support that is now removed
on channels. It allows to ping people and send them notifications. It is
less broad (limited to a post with ping) but already gives flexibility when
using channels.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
RATIONALE
Channel model is a mail.thread enabled model behaving strangely with followers,
notifications and discuss. Its code should however be simplified to be more
self contained and avoid unwanted side effects on other models.
SPECIFICATIONS
Channel now use only their members for notification purpose. Having followers
is redundant with members. Moreover as followers are not taken into account
for notification people may think followers mechanism is broken on channel.
Let us simply prevent from adding followers on channels and remove the widget.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
RATIONALE
Channel model is a mail.thread enabled model behaving strangely with followers,
notifications and discuss. Its code should however be simplified to be more
self contained and avoid unwanted side effects on other models..
PURPOSE
Remove channel ability to follow records as it mainly adds noise without a lot
of added value. Simplify channel notification flow by using directly members
and not a delegation through a channel self-following trick. Remove followers
being channels and posting with added listeners being channels.
SPECIFICATIONS
In this commit we remove the auto-follow mechanism on mail.channel. It is
used as a trick to have self-notifying channels. When posting on a channel
it listens itself. When a channel listens to a record its members are notified
depending on channel type. It means that a channel following itself notifies
its members in a magic way.
We decided to remove this magic and instead do a cleaner implementation of
this mechanism. ``_notify_compute_recipients`` method from ``mail.thread`` is
now overridden on channel model. It computes recipients to notify using a
custom SQL instead of the generic one given by ``mail.thread``. Some other
code adaptation is done to ensure notification on channel model is done as
intended on that specific model.
As channel model is somewhat different from classic mail.thread enabled
models let us implement its features in a more traditional way. More overrides
and less magic !
QUERY COUNTERS
Due to changes in ``channel_partner_ids`` fields being a computed inverse
searchable field there may be an additional query when performing a message
post as indicated by ``test_complete_message_post`` test. This is due notably
to message_format fetching channel_ids information. A call to ir rules on
channel is performed that uses ``channel_partner_ids`` as part its rule domain.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
RATIONALE
Channel model is a mail.thread enabled model behaving strangely with followers,
notifications and discuss. Its code should however be simplified to be more
self contained and avoid unwanted side effects on other models.
SPECIFICATIONS
Purpose of this commit is to better differentiate channel members technical
model from partner members in code :
* ``channel_partner_ids``: contacts member of a channel, filtering notably
on active and checking ACLs on res.partner business model. This one
should be used whenever we deal with members of a channel at business
level;
* ``channel_last_seen_partner_ids``: memberships of a channel and technical
model. This one should be used for internal processes and members
management;
Also containing
* clean naming or API of methods managing channel members. This should
not change anything functionally as only code renaming / cleaning is
performed;
* improve performances of channel member auto subscription by aggregating
all members to add and creating them at once;
* check the use of ``mail.channel.partner`` and ``res.partner`` records
through ``channel_last_seen_partner_ids`` and ``channel_partner_ids``
Channel fields;
Functionally nothing should change with this commit. It only cleans code
in order to prepare future modifications.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
RATIONALE
Channel model is a mail.thread enabled model behaving strangely with followers,
notifications and discuss. Its code should however be simplified to be more
self contained and avoid unwanted side effects on other models.
SPECIFICATION
Channel holds two fields computing current user's membership on channel.
``is_subscribed`` is a duplicate of ``is_member``. It is therefore removed
to keep a single field.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
RATIONALE
Channel model is a mail.thread enabled model behaving strangely with followers,
notifications and discuss. Its code should however be simplified to be more
self contained and avoid unwanted side effects on other models.
SPECIFICATIONS
Purpose is to prepare modifications in models by doing a preparatory cleaning
of some fields and model definitions. Notably
* move mail.channel.partner im_livechat override in its own file;
* slightly re-order member-related fields on channel or mail.channel.partner
models, and split long lines;
This commit should not change anything functionally as it contains is only some
code move and reordering.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
Purpose of this commit is to enforce model cleanliness by avoiding ugly
defined ``mail.channel.partner`` records.
``mail.channel.partner`` model is a decorated many2many relationship between
channels and partners (members). Both ``partner_id`` and ``channel_id`` fields
should be required. Members of a channel are always partners and belonging to
a channel is mandatory in that decorated m2m table.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
A context key is added allowing to bypass user / channel synchronization
when creating users. This is used notably in tests to avoid subscribing
new test users to "general" channel created as default data.
Purpose is to avoid interferences in query-based performance tests. It also
avoids unnecessary data creation and/or update when it is not necessary
especially in tests.
LINKS
Task ID-2070632 (main task)
Task ID-2419762 (followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#62859
ENT PR odoo/enterprise#15172
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2005
Before this commit:
When deleting/archiving any user, the user’s related chat changed name due to
losing one of its members.
After this commit:
Chat name should remain the same after archiving/deleting the user.
Reasoning:
The unsubscribe was meant to target channels of type channel specifically.
`test_channel_auto_unsubscribe_archived_or_deleted_users` has been reintroduced
after having been removed by mistake in eda542c82f84d7b5589846691b9cb6b7f1021947
task-2442235
closesodoo/odoo#67884
X-original-commit: cb4bd4cbc4a36276cc6c9cb68e51c260e7c0d761
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
When formatting a message, a message could be with an empty or obsolete
record_name field. It's better to rely on the relation between the message and
the thread and fetch the current thread name.
task-2411715
closesodoo/odoo#63000closesodoo/odoo#67549
X-original-commit: 51e962803d2048efeb0f7e96a9fe561ac49ee05a
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
Currently in init of mail.notification we search for a specific index
and create it if not found. This is easily replaced by a standard
CREATE IF NOT EXISTS allowing to simplify code.
LINKS
Task ID-2477444
Prepares Task ID-2377974 (trace management cleaning task)
Prepares Task ID-2070632 (channel members main task)
Prepares Task ID-2419762 (channel members followup task)
COM PR #67382
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2245
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
RATIONALE
A bit of history. Link between a message and its recipients has been added
at first mail refactoring towards a Chatter / Discuss feature. It was done
in v7 at d64f3c9783 with the base addition of mail notification model (lots
of commits follow that one but that's the first one about notification).
Due to some people thinking that it was unnecessary to keep a model for
notification it has been removed in v9 at 88b8cd0587. Notification table was
renamed from mail_notification to mail_message_res_partner_needaction_rel.
It was proven to be a mistake even if those "some people" were warned and
model made its way back to Odoo in v10 at 72dfcae2a4 . Table name mail_message
_res_partner_needaction_rel was kept to ease migration and backward
compatibility.
It is now time to complete the circle and rename it to mail_notification.
SPECIFICATIONS
Rename ``mail_message_res_partner_needaction_rel`` to ``mail_notification`` .
RIP JEM.
Never forget.
LINKS
Task ID-2477444
Prepares Task ID-2377974 (trace management cleaning task)
Prepares Task ID-2070632 (channel members main task)
Prepares Task ID-2419762 (channel members followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#67382
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2245
Co-Authored-By: Rémy Voet <ryv@odoo.com>
Co-Authored-By: Thibault Delavallée <tde@odoo.com>
As I was passing by I found some docstrings or helpers could be updated or
rephrased a bit more clearly. This is free as in free beers, without beers.
Some code about mail features (posting) may also be re-indented to ease
understanding of future modifications. Or just because we had to read
it and go through many files. Still free beers.
LINKS
Task ID-2477444
Prepares Task ID-2377974 (trace management cleaning task)
Prepares Task ID-2070632 (channel members main task)
Prepares Task ID-2419762 (channel members followup task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#67382
UPG PR odoo/upgrade#2245
* Reorganize and reword some of the fields for the activity form type view
* The fields `force_next` from `mail.activity.type` and its related
field from `mail.activity` are removed.
Instead, a new field `chaining_type`, which is a `selection` will
improve the readability of the activity_type form. (It is made more
obvious that the user has to choose between 2 modes :
- 'Trigger Next Activity': used when the user wants to specify the type of the
next activity, which will be triggered once the current activity is done
- 'Suggest Next Activity': used when the user wants to recommend the
next activity for the user to schedule once the current activity is done
* To be consistent with this change :
- The field `default_next_type_id` is renamed `triggered_next_type_id`
- The field `next_type_ids` is renamed `suggested_next_type_ids`
* The field `default_description` is renamed `default_note` to better match the
`note` field from `mail.activity`
* About the specific case of activity_type.category = 'upload_file' :
An activity which has this type's category is automatically marked as done as soon as
the file is uploaded. This prevents the user from choosing a "next activity type".
As such, an activity_type with this category can only make use of the
chaining_type = "trigger", to be part of an automated process.
An activity_type with this chaining_type should have the
triggered_next_type_id set (usually required in the Form).
But, since it does not make sense to set suggested_next_type_ids in this case :
- chaining_type will stay hidden in the Form
- triggered_next_type_id will always be shown and is not marked as required in the Form
- if triggered_next_type_id is not set, chaining_type will be "suggest"
Task ID : 2410217
PR : https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/63370
UPGRADE : https://github.com/odoo/upgrade/pull/2167
When genrating an attachment in a mail message (e.g. the pdf attached
to a confirmation email), the filename was not translated into the
language of the recipient (unlink the email content).
The variable `template` has the contact language in the context while
`self` contains the language of the user executing the action.
Fixesodoo/odoo#66420closesodoo/odoo#66498
X-original-commit: 6001e7584c28f8d028c782692caa644015c33e9c
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
- Send the new Inbox counter when marking as read, to guarantee the JS has the
correct value (instead of having to guess it which was impossible when an
arbitrary domain was given to the method).
NOTE: Manual increment is kept on receiving a new Inbox message because that
one was reliable and it would have been more tricky to compute the new counter
for each target partner (mark as read is one user doing an action for himself,
whereas new message is from another user to potentially many different users).
Generic counter for threads is also not sent on every change for similar
reasons.
- Refresh Inbox automatically when some messages are marked as read and there
are more message on the server than currently loaded.
- Remove confusing (and impossible to maintain) counter on non-origin threads
(in particular channel followers). This behavior in JS was not consistent with
the server which always counted only origin thread (model/res_id).
task-2446302
closesodoo/odoo#65842
X-original-commit: f9bc1f98ed8f76846697cde68a760217b3af2aaf
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
Currently, the subtype checked selection is not saved when the user adds and
removes subtypes. Indeed either an addition is performed, either a removal
but having both is not correctly taken into account when updating an existing
subscription.
How to reproduce
* click on the pencil icon to edit the subscription of the follower;
* as an example default "Discussions" will be the only one selected;
* check "Notes" and save;
* -> this works;
* click again on the pencil icon and uncheck "Notes" and check "Activities"
then save;
* -> this does not work as only removal is performed (Activities is not
checked);
The problem only occurs when you unchecked subtypes and checked other ones.
This commit fixes that behavior by taking into consideration both new
subtypes and subtypes to remove.
LINKS
Task ID-2205643
Task ID-2241688
COM PR #56775
X-Original-Commit odoo/odoo@d16b036638closesodoo/odoo#65605
X-original-commit: 18cb4f6d8120a30a7f5d05eef107ac1734dd1431
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: Thibault Delavallee <tde@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Shahista Pathan <sat@odoo.com>
Behavior before the commit
--------------------------
find_or_create define in mail module called
super if no partner is found based on the email_normalized
super call find_or_create define in base that make
a search again on the email before the creation
This cost two search every time a new partner should be created
and the search on email is less efficient than the search on
email_normalized
after the commit
----------------
Only the search on email_normalized is done before the creation
drawback: if a module that does not depends on mail module
override find_or_create the code will not be triggered anymore
the module should depends on mail module
closesodoo/odoo#65565
X-original-commit: 49d5b3813e57f2cd91d582de9b9bb534f05d2dc3
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
In case of bad translation that doesn't contain the placeholder
Context:
A bad Japanese translation was inserted
#. module: mail
#: code:addons/mail/models/mail_thread.py:0
#, python-format
msgid "Create new %(document)s"
msgstr "新しい%(ドキュメント)を作成する"
The translation has been corrected but use the 14.0 syntax of _ method
to include placeholders and fallback on the English source term in
case of bad translation
cf odoo/odoo#52155closesodoo/odoo#65586
X-original-commit: 48cc6b1f2b3208e8affd5f6a261751fe973c2091
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Currently, when new alias with an already used prefix is created, it shows the
warning stating "The e-mail alias is already used. Please enter another one."
It does not help much because the user do not know where the alias is used.
This commit improves the warning message by including the document name and
parent model name (if available) if the alias is linked to any model, or it
shows if alias is already used for handling bounce/catchall if that is the
case.
Task Id-2375552
closesodoo/odoo#62367
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Add the currency symbol for the monetary tracking field to better
represent the change of a monetary field.
The currency will be fetch from the currency defined in the
monetary field or on the record's company in case there is not.
For example, if we have a record with a monetary field displaying
"$ 500". If we modify the currency and the value to have "450 €",
the message containing the tracking values will display:
"500 € -> 450 €".
We only use one field to track the currency of a monetary field.
Indeed, in the case where the currency is changed with the value
of a monetary field, only the new currency is tracked. We focus
on the fact that the more important thing is the new value.
Furthermore, when modifying a currency of a monetary field, the
user can already see the new currency before saving the changes.
This allows him to adapt the value of the field if he needs it.
(N.B. we assume that this case will happen very rarely)
Using only one field takes also into account that there are
millions of record for this model and adding a new field would
take a lot of memory.
odoo/odoo#61999odoo/upgrade#2060
task-2387268
This mobile specific code does not work correctly because
`if channel in channel_previews` always returns false due to the dict having
channel ids as key and not channels.
A fix could be to look for id instead of record in the dict, but at the same
time this is dead code, there is no need for mobile specific channel info.
task-2412157
closesodoo/odoo#64945
X-original-commit: a27907e27fb99a523c7b2d58544c36073640511c
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Kühn (aku) <aku@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Theys (seb) <seb@odoo.com>
PURPOSE
Reorganize and lint mail.channel code. Purpose is to ease future modifications
linked to groups and channels in mail / Discuss.
SPECIFICATIONS
Some tools methods do not necessarily require to be public.
LINKS
Prepares Task ID-2070632 (Discuss channel task)
Prepares Task ID-2419762 (SM channel task)
COM PR odoo/odoo#64862
Ivan Yelizariev