currently widget selection is not working in m2o in editable list view and
to fix this issue it need a lots of changes to make it work properly,
i.e. make '_fetchSpecialRelation' use correct domain for each record,
batch requests as much as possible, also make all '_fetchSpecial...'
work in the list case.
So to avoid major changes remove supportedTypes from selection widget
so user can not tempted to apply selection widget on many2one field.
task-1871698
closesodoo/odoo#33485
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Assigning `check_company=True` to a field will
- set a default domain filtering the companies
- allow to call `_check_company` on the records to ensure the domain is
respected
Setting `_check_company_auto = True` on a model will ensure
`_check_company` is called at create and write, enforcing the multi
company domain.
Joint work with Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
task-1985992
This rev. makes the part of the progressbar corresponding to falsy
records 'alive': the user can now click on it to filter on records
whose value is false for the progressbar field.
Task 1952430
closesodoo/odoo#35100
Signed-off-by: Aaron Bohy (aab) <aab@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Mohammed Shekha <msh@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
Having two attributes for this was probably overkill. We now have
a single attribute 'width' which can specify either a fixed width
(e.g. '120px') or a factor (e.g. '2.5').
For some fields (especially employees) it is nice to see a picture of the model on the gantt row in order to quicly identify which record is concerned. This is obvious for employees where we display their avatar picture but might be handy for other models as well. This commit introduces this functionality.
In order to activate it you should declare a avatars attribute on the gantt arch.
It is a python dict which keys are the fields name for which a thumbnail should be displayed (ie: 'employee_id') and the values are the fields on that model that hold the image (ie: 'image_small).
If none is defined or the row isn't currently grouped by this field, nothing is displayed.
NB: it is expected that the field name (key) is a relational field to another model which has a *image* field.
related task 2009563, 2000719, 2024216
Provide documentation for the `form_view_id` attribute on gantt
view.
Task-2050019
closesodoo/odoo#35590
Signed-off-by: Jérome Maes (jem) <jem@openerp.com>
- many2one widget in mobile will open kanban view instead of listview when
records needs to be selected
- Add support of "kanban_view_ref" on many2x fields:
For many2one fields, this specific kanban view will be opened when you click
on this field. Note that in desktop, the behavior stay unchanged:
'Search More' will open the tree view.
For many2many fields, this specific kanban view will be opened when you add
a record in mobile.
- Add support "selection_mode" in kanban views.
This boolean is set to true when you want to use a kaban view to
select a record instead of open a record.
"selection_mode" is now passed in qweb_context to allow developers
to use t-if='selection_mode' in kanban views to show or hide elements;
buttons, dropdowns, anchor tags are not necessary when selection_mode
is enabled. So those elements can be hidden based on this condition.
Useful when kanban view is opened from m2o in mobile environment.
Task ID : 1924779
Improve design and introducing several usability improvements:
- Removed customization of an event card, just display event title.
- Added popover, popover consist of two sections:
1) Show the title, date and time of an event. Date and time are
automatically computed according to the user timing preferences,
language and event duration. Can be hidden with hide_date/hide_time
attribute respectively.
2) Display all the fields specified inside the <calendar/> element.
fields can be specified with a widget and its options.
e.g. <field name="name" string="Custom Name" widget="char" options="{}"/>
- Show avatar in popover for filters.
- Removed hide sidebar feature.
- Increase readability using a better color selection.
- Better UI in mobile.
And, Adapted test cases
Task 1919926
Co-authored-by: jat-odoo <jat@openerp.com>
Consider an action with a search view defined by the arch
<search>
<filter name="gb_foo" context="{'group_by':'foo'}"/>
<filter name="gb_bar" context="{'group_by':'bar'}"/>
</search>
If the action context is
{
search_defaults_gb_foo: true,
search_defaults_gb_bar: true,
}
the two groupbys will be activated at start but not necessarily in a suitable
order.
This commit allows to specify the order in which the default groupbys should be
activated by giving them a rank. For example
{
search_defaults_gb_foo: 2,
search_defaults_gb_bar: 1,
}
leads to group first by bar then by foo.
The rank number should be chosen between 1 and 99.
closesodoo/odoo#35538
Signed-off-by: Géry Debongnie (ged) <ged@openerp.com>
image_original => image_1920 (now resized to 1920)
image_big => image_1024
image_large => image_256
image_medium => image_128
image_small => image_64
image replaced by image_1920 (when writing) or by image_1024 (when displaying
what was previously the big size)
+ add new intermediate format:
image_512
PR: #34925
Changed the way some field types are displayed.
Before this commit, column width in a list were calculated according to
a given factor (integer), determining their weight.
Now, some specific fields have an hardcoded width instead. This task
also slightly tweaks some width factors, in order to try to have a
better layout in most list views
Task 1985916
closesodoo/odoo#35147
Signed-off-by: VincentSchippefilt <VincentSchippefilt@users.noreply.github.com>
The initial implementation of the special group by buttons in list
groups only supported the first level of groupby. So, if one grouped a
list view by field A, it worked (if A had a groupby defined). However,
if we want to group by B/A, this no longer works.
opw 2040725
closesodoo/odoo#35090
Signed-off-by: VincentSchippefilt <VincentSchippefilt@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit merges the following models
* account.invoice and account.move
* account.invoice.line and account.move.line
* account.voucher and account.move
* account.voucher.line and account.move.line
It was the opportunity for a big cleanup of the code, so it also restructures the whole account module, its different models/fields, the tests etc. for a better world and a better code readability.
==== Rationale ====
The rationale of this huge change is that we want journal entries / invoices to be easily edited, and changes reflected in the other model. It's a HUGE feature and very strategic for the fiduciary companies. For example, changing the account of a journal entry needs to be automatically reflected on the related invoice.
The same reasoning applies to sale/purchase vouchers.
==== Changes made in features =====
When creating an invoice, you are now creating a journal entry directly.
--> The object account.invoice no longer exists.
In the same fashion when creating an invoice line, you're now adding journal items directly in the journal entry representing the invoice. If this invoice line has some tax, it may create additional journal items as well.
--> The models account.invoice.line & account.invoice.tax no longer exist
Identically, when creating a sale/purchase receipt with its lines, you are now creating a journal entry directly and there's no more usability difference between encoding a receipt or an invoice.
--> The object account.voucher no longer exists.
--> The object account.voucher.line no longer exists.
--> The whole account_voucher module no longer exists.
Positive side-effects coming from these changes are
* draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipts now create a draft accounting entry. Validate these objects now simply post its journal entry. That means that draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipt can straightforwardly be included in reporting or budgets.
* opening a journal entry in form view will now always open the correct view: if it's a sale/purchase journal entry we will have a customer invoice/vendor bill view or a sale/purchase receipt view, whatever the menu we're coming from.
* code & business logic simplification. It is also condensed in a single place instead of being partially duplicated on invoices, vouchers and journal entries.
There should be no feature loss, except the one allowing to group multiple journal items together based on the same product during the invoice validation.
==== Changes made in models =====
* account.invoice: model removed. Instead, now use account.move with following mapping
field (account.invoice) field (account.move)
----------------------- --------------------
name invoice_payment_ref
number name
reference ref
comment narration
user_id invoice_user_id
amount_ total_company_signed amount_total_signed
residual amount_residual
state state + invoice_payment_state /!\ selection changed
date_invoice invoice_date
date_due invoice_date_due
sent invoice_sent
origin invoice_origin
payment_term_id invoice_payment_term_id
partner_bank_id invoice_partner_bank_id
incoterm_id invoice_incoterm_id
vendor_bill_id invoice_vendor_bill_id
source_email invoice_source_email
vendor_display_name invoice_vendor_display_name
invoice_icon invoice_vendor_icon
cash_rounding_id invoice_cash_rounding_id
sequence_number_next invoice_sequence_number_next
sequence_number_next_prefix invoice_sequence_number_next_prefix
'invoices' subset of account.move can be accessed by using the selection field 'type' or one of the many helpers like is_invoice()
* account.move: now has a valid state 'cancel' that has to be excluded from all business logic
* account.move: field 'amount' renamed into 'amount_total'
* account.move: field 'reverse_entry_id' renamed into 'reversed_entry_id'
* account.move.line: now has a field 'display_type' that has to be excluded from all business logic, in order to support invoice layouting
* account.invoice.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping
field (account.invoice.line) field (account.move.line)
---------------------------- -------------------------
invoice_id move_id
uom_id product_uom_id
invoice_line_tax_ids tax_ids
account_analytic_id analytic_account_id
'invoice lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the boolean field 'exclude_from_invoice_tab'
* account.invoice.tax: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping
field (account.invoice.tax) field (account.move.line)
--------------------------- -------------------------
invoice_id move_id
account_analytic_id analytic_account_id
amount price_unit
base tax_base_amount
'tax lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the relational field 'tax_line_id'
* account.invoice.confirm: model removed. Instead, now use the 'post()' function of account.move
* account.invoice.refund: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.reversal to reverse the entries with the same options as we had for invoices
* account.voucher: model removed. Instead, now use account.move of type in ['out_receipt', 'in_receipt]
* account.voucher.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line
==== Changes made in functions ====
* on account.move, method _run_post_draft_to_post() renamed into _autopost_draft_entries()
* on account.move, method action_account_invoice_payment() renamed into action_invoice_register_payment()
* on account.move, method action_invoice_reconcile_to_check() renamed into action_open_matching_suspense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_domain_edition_mode_available() renamed into _get_domain_matching_supsense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_intrastat_country_id() renamed into _get_invoice_intrastat_country_id()
* on account.move.line, method _get_domain_for_edition_mode() renamed into _get_suspense_moves_domain()
* in account.bank.statement, contextual key 'edition_mode' renamed into 'suspense_moves_mode'
Was task 1917430
In order for the map view to work properly:
- I moved scss property to a file only scoped to website module.
- moved the definiton of "partner_latitude" and "partner_longitude" from
base_geolocalise to base/res.partner
closesodoo/odoo#32487
Signed-off-by: VincentSchippefilt <VincentSchippefilt@users.noreply.github.com>
Those two decorators are removed/deprecated since recent commits but
some references remained in the documentation.
api.guess and api.noguess is deprecated and removed since c552fb7a61closesodoo/odoo#35332
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Breaks doc-building all the time, more advanced ES6 features are not
supported by the JS parsing library.
closesodoo/odoo#35288
Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
Christophe Simonis