The purpose of this commit is to expose SEPA Direct Debit acquirer to
the Odoo community edition. The dedicated module, though, is restricted
to the enterprise edition.
Minor changes in following modules:
- base: added ir.module.module record
- payment:
- added data to expose the new payment acquirer.
- added 'to_buy' field to track whether the payment acquirer is
restricted to enterprise users.
- allow multi word payment acquirer name. It was breaking on the first
underscore.
task-1870363
closesodoo/odoo#26427
When the many2xxx field relates to a model where company_id is required, set
this domain [('company_id','=',company_id.id)]
When the company_id field of the related model is not required, set this domain
['|',('company_id','=',company_id.id),('company_id','=',False)]
When setting the domain on a field which is in the treeview of a xxx2many field
evaluate against the company_id of the 'parent'.
Some constraints have been added on sereval models. Take a look at the complete
specification for more details.
TaskID: 2024446
Closes: #35266
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
Replace website_published and environment by a generic state on
payment.acquirer
Payment acquirers aren't enabled by default. When setting their state to 'enabled' or 'test', it is verified the required fields for the provider are set.
This attribute is misleading as it is insufficient to correctly upgrade
the database. It only renames the column in the database, but other
operations are needed, like updating the corresponding `ir.model.fields`
record (and its xmlid). The default values and the translations are also
lost during the upgrade.
Moreover, this feature was misused. It was:
- left on fields during multiple versions.
- used on reports (SQL views). This would be ok if the feature was
complete, but, as is, it was useless.
- kept unchanged after a second renaming of the field (which can happen
versions later the first rename).
- used, even when the meaning of the field changed. i.e. the field
`archived` has been renamed to the classic `active`, but the value
in the database should be switched.
The big images are probably never going to be used for the following models:
- pos category
- fleet brand
- livechat channel
- mail channel
- payment acquirer
And if big images are needed some day the model should use image.mixin instead.
PR: #34925
image_original => image_1920 (now resized to 1920)
image_big => image_1024
image_large => image_256
image_medium => image_128
image_small => image_64
image replaced by image_1920 (when writing) or by image_1024 (when displaying
what was previously the big size)
+ add new intermediate format:
image_512
PR: #34925
Using api.constrains should be used instead
Simply leave a warning in case a model uses a non-empty attribute
`_constraints`.
closesodoo/odoo#34679
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
Multi is the default api for methods, it is not necessary to explicitly
decorate methods with it, adds clutter and most people use it because
they see that the rest of the code uses it.
Done with `find . -type f -name '*.py' | xargs sed -i '/@api.multi/d'`
Same reason as: 4ba4d61903
Some messages from payment are displayed on the frontend (eg. when the
transaction is being done on the ecommerce), but only translations of
module matching a given domain (computed with the method of ir.http
model: _get_translation_frontend_modules_domain) are made available on
the frontend.
With this changeset, payment is added in the domain (which can be done
since payment depends on account, account on portal, and portal in
http_routing that declares the method).
opw-2033528
closes#34712
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Lempereur (nle) <nle@odoo.com>
This commit merges the following models
* account.invoice and account.move
* account.invoice.line and account.move.line
* account.voucher and account.move
* account.voucher.line and account.move.line
It was the opportunity for a big cleanup of the code, so it also restructures the whole account module, its different models/fields, the tests etc. for a better world and a better code readability.
==== Rationale ====
The rationale of this huge change is that we want journal entries / invoices to be easily edited, and changes reflected in the other model. It's a HUGE feature and very strategic for the fiduciary companies. For example, changing the account of a journal entry needs to be automatically reflected on the related invoice.
The same reasoning applies to sale/purchase vouchers.
==== Changes made in features =====
When creating an invoice, you are now creating a journal entry directly.
--> The object account.invoice no longer exists.
In the same fashion when creating an invoice line, you're now adding journal items directly in the journal entry representing the invoice. If this invoice line has some tax, it may create additional journal items as well.
--> The models account.invoice.line & account.invoice.tax no longer exist
Identically, when creating a sale/purchase receipt with its lines, you are now creating a journal entry directly and there's no more usability difference between encoding a receipt or an invoice.
--> The object account.voucher no longer exists.
--> The object account.voucher.line no longer exists.
--> The whole account_voucher module no longer exists.
Positive side-effects coming from these changes are
* draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipts now create a draft accounting entry. Validate these objects now simply post its journal entry. That means that draft invoices/bills/sale or purchase receipt can straightforwardly be included in reporting or budgets.
* opening a journal entry in form view will now always open the correct view: if it's a sale/purchase journal entry we will have a customer invoice/vendor bill view or a sale/purchase receipt view, whatever the menu we're coming from.
* code & business logic simplification. It is also condensed in a single place instead of being partially duplicated on invoices, vouchers and journal entries.
There should be no feature loss, except the one allowing to group multiple journal items together based on the same product during the invoice validation.
==== Changes made in models =====
* account.invoice: model removed. Instead, now use account.move with following mapping
field (account.invoice) field (account.move)
----------------------- --------------------
name invoice_payment_ref
number name
reference ref
comment narration
user_id invoice_user_id
amount_ total_company_signed amount_total_signed
residual amount_residual
state state + invoice_payment_state /!\ selection changed
date_invoice invoice_date
date_due invoice_date_due
sent invoice_sent
origin invoice_origin
payment_term_id invoice_payment_term_id
partner_bank_id invoice_partner_bank_id
incoterm_id invoice_incoterm_id
vendor_bill_id invoice_vendor_bill_id
source_email invoice_source_email
vendor_display_name invoice_vendor_display_name
invoice_icon invoice_vendor_icon
cash_rounding_id invoice_cash_rounding_id
sequence_number_next invoice_sequence_number_next
sequence_number_next_prefix invoice_sequence_number_next_prefix
'invoices' subset of account.move can be accessed by using the selection field 'type' or one of the many helpers like is_invoice()
* account.move: now has a valid state 'cancel' that has to be excluded from all business logic
* account.move: field 'amount' renamed into 'amount_total'
* account.move: field 'reverse_entry_id' renamed into 'reversed_entry_id'
* account.move.line: now has a field 'display_type' that has to be excluded from all business logic, in order to support invoice layouting
* account.invoice.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping
field (account.invoice.line) field (account.move.line)
---------------------------- -------------------------
invoice_id move_id
uom_id product_uom_id
invoice_line_tax_ids tax_ids
account_analytic_id analytic_account_id
'invoice lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the boolean field 'exclude_from_invoice_tab'
* account.invoice.tax: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line with following mapping
field (account.invoice.tax) field (account.move.line)
--------------------------- -------------------------
invoice_id move_id
account_analytic_id analytic_account_id
amount price_unit
base tax_base_amount
'tax lines' subset of all account.move.line from a journal entry can be accessed by using the relational field 'tax_line_id'
* account.invoice.confirm: model removed. Instead, now use the 'post()' function of account.move
* account.invoice.refund: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.reversal to reverse the entries with the same options as we had for invoices
* account.voucher: model removed. Instead, now use account.move of type in ['out_receipt', 'in_receipt]
* account.voucher.line: model removed. Instead, now use account.move.line
==== Changes made in functions ====
* on account.move, method _run_post_draft_to_post() renamed into _autopost_draft_entries()
* on account.move, method action_account_invoice_payment() renamed into action_invoice_register_payment()
* on account.move, method action_invoice_reconcile_to_check() renamed into action_open_matching_suspense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_domain_edition_mode_available() renamed into _get_domain_matching_supsense_moves()
* on account.move, method _get_intrastat_country_id() renamed into _get_invoice_intrastat_country_id()
* on account.move.line, method _get_domain_for_edition_mode() renamed into _get_suspense_moves_domain()
* in account.bank.statement, contextual key 'edition_mode' renamed into 'suspense_moves_mode'
Was task 1917430
In case the partner has no language (not a required field), the fallback on the
payment transaction was 'en_US'
en_US may however be an invalid choice for partner_lang field as it is
a selection field that only has the activated languages (result of the call to
self.env['res.lang'].get_installed())
A database created in a different language does not have en_US activated
Fallback on user language instead of False as the partner_lang is expected by
some payment providers and may produce an error is empty
Fixesodoo/odoo#33750closesodoo/odoo#33870
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
The goal is to be coherent with the user property.
Actually, company_id and company_ids on the environment are no fields.
Calling env.company_id returns a browse record, not an id.
This commit will correctly check for a custom payment.transaction create method
on 'self' instead of the acquirer's provider before calling it.
closesodoo/odoo#33033
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Purpose
=======
Allow the user to select the allowed companies for which he wants to see records
on top of selecting his current company.
It is confusing for users to see the records from the company he is connected to
and the records of the children companies.
Instead of using the hierarchy of companies to access records across companies,
the user can now select (from his set of allowed companies) the companies for
which he wants to access records.
/!\ This means that the user will interact with records from company A when in
company B.
Example: a SO has been created and confirmed in A. When in B, I create the
invoice from it.
Specifications
==============
1/ Deprecate the parent/children hierarchy on the res.company model. The fields are
kept on the res.company model to ensure the retro-compatibility, but won't be used
accross the standard code anymore. The only functional usage for this mechanism
was to allow to see records from several companies by creating a virtual parent
company, which will be possible with the new mechanism.
2/ By default, a user will only see the records of the company he is connected
to (or records without a company). (It is still editable by the user if needed).
For that, put this information in the user context, to allow having different
configurations on different browser tabs. Instead of having domains like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'child_of', user.company_id.id)]
you'll have something like
['|',
('company_id', '=', False),
('company_id', 'in', company_ids)]
Note that the 'company_ids' is a value that is passed in the evaluation
context on the record rule, as we already have user, or time.
company_ids is a list of the ids of all the enabled companies in the
user's context.
3/ Out of the generic improvements brought by this task, this will illustrate
issues that could exist since several versions. For example, it should not be
possible to create a scrap order for the company A with a package of the company
B, or it should not be possible to create an invoice on the company A with
payment terms from the company B. Before the version 12.0, it was easy to
encounter this kind of issues as the admin was the SUPERUSER_ID. A positive side
effect of the fact that the SUPERUSER_ID has become an inactive user was to
make it more difficult to introduce mismatch on the records, but haven't solved
the issue, as it was still possible to do it with parent companies
configuration. Some of these issues have been fixed in this commit, but all the
business flows should be re-tested to check if an ir.rule should be introduced
(eg: a multi company rule for stock.quand.package), if the company of a record
is correctly transfered to another record created from the first record (eg:
From a SO, create an invoice and a payment, the company of the sales order
should be transfered on the invoice and the payment, even if the company of the
sales order is A and I'm logged into the company B with the company A enabled.
4/ Currently, if I click on a button on a notification email (example 'View
Task'), I face a traceback if I'm not logged into the company of the record.
Now, if you click on a button and if you have access to the record, the correct
company will be automatically set.
5/ If I display a kanban view with several records from several companies (and
an image), all the images should be displayed.
6/ Currently if you copy paste an url, this will crash if you're not in the
correct company. This won't be fixed because it's quite impossible to do it in
a clean way. This task brings a workaround. Copy/Paste -> Traceback -> Log into
the correct company, re-copy/paste -> Ok.
7/ 2 property methods have been added on the environment to retrieve the company
on which the user is logged in and the companies the user enabled, on a specific
tab.
That way, when creating a record, instead of doing
default=lambda self: self.env.user.company_id
do
default=lambda self: self.env.company_id
On the other hand, to retrieve the enabled companies, do
companies = self.env.company_ids
8/ Modify the Company Switcher widget to allow to log into another company
WITHOUT writing on the res.users (and thus bringing cache invalidation issues
and so on). Also allow to enable several companies and see records from several
companies, and independantly of the other browser's tabs.
9/ When focusing on a tab, save the current company configuration on the local
storage. That way, when doing 'CTRL+T' or a middle click, the context is
propagated to the new tab.
10/ Improve the error message in case of multi company access errors. Now, when
the user is in debug mode, display the related names of the records and the name
of the user who brings the issue.
11/ Remove the context erasing when writing on a res.users
This is probably coming from the migration to new API of the base module.
The context was not propagated at this moment, which was a common mistake at
that time. When migrating the module, probably by using the 'black box' method,
as the context was not propagated, it was erased on the new version. This is
now an issue because the context (i.e. the enabled companies) was erased when
writing on a res.users, leading to tracebacks.
See: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/7eab8e26d3d46c53f4be924d6a34e80a66e74960#diff-4c2e738ee8f64f11806c889ea097b5e7R624
12/ Fix the crash manager on redirect warnings. The issue is the following
- Create an invoice on a company without a configured CoA.
- Set a partner
- On the onchange_partner_id, a redirect warning is raised to propose you
to configure a CoA
- Click on 'Go to the configuration panel'
- A generic warning says something like 'Do you want to discard your changes?'
- Click on yes, the page refreshes, but not on the redirect action.
Now, set correctly the action on the hash, and reload instead. The breadcrumb is
lost for example, but you reach the correct action at least.
13/ Introduce a res.group to enable/disable the multi company per tab
feature.
14/ To help the users to know which tab is in which company, add the
possibility to have a favicon per company. When creating a company,
the classical 'O' icon is colored by default in a random color.
15/ Remove the company switcher on the frontend. This was mainly there
to allow a user to swicth to the company linked to the website.
This behavior is now transparent to the user. If the website A is
activated, then the company set on the context is the company of the
website.
16/ Deprecated the _company_default_get method on the res.company
model. Remove the method _get_company on the res.users model.
17/ Add 'allowed_company_ids' and 'current_company_id' on the pyeval
context. You can now use those variables on domains in the views to
access directly to the activated company.ies on the current tab.
TaskID: 1960971
closesodoo/odoo#32341
Signed-off-by: Yannick Tivisse (yti) <yti@odoo.com>
This prevent the uninstallation of all payment provider through the
NOT NULL constraint. There is no reason for this field to be explicitely
required - it will fail if the template is wrong anyway.
closesodoo/odoo#33170
Signed-off-by: Damien Bouvy (dbo) <dbo@odoo.com>
Currently, when some add token for s2s payment, dummy transaction of
1 unit was performed and it was frautrating for customer.
So added option on acquirer's settings that check if you want's
to validate the transaction or not.
If 'verify Card validity' is ticked on payment acquirer then and then
it will verify with dummy transaction otherwise it will not going to verify
the card details.
Task-1903170
closesodoo/odoo#29595
Signed-off-by: Damien Bouvy (dbo) <dbo@odoo.com>
* = hr, im_livechat, mail, payment, purchase, web, web_editor, web_unsplash,
website_profile, website_slides
Since the merge of all image tools into one function, the intermediary functions
are not needed anymore.
task-1958000
PR: #31811
Suppose that a payment transaction cannot be reconciled for any reason.
Then _cron_post_process_after_done will try to process it every 10 minutes until
the end of time.
Moreover, if the user takes some manual action before
_cron_post_process_after_done,
even if in principle it would have been able to go through,
then it is likely to fail, e.g. on invoice_open.
Meaning that a transaction that could have been processed will become
an undead transaction.
To avoid that situation we set an arbitrary retry_limit_date set to 2 days,
which seems a reasonnable compromise.
It gives some time for the transaction to go through, but not exaggeratedly so.
opw 1945953
closesodoo/odoo#31791
Signed-off-by: Toufik Benjaa (tbe) <tbe@odoo.com>
Render from payment//payment_acquirer.py promises:
All templates will receive:
'feedback_url', 'return_url', 'cancel_url', 'error_url'
However they are all in -> FIXME.
After 6 years in FIXME, this promise is still a lie.
It is unfortunate since the Adyen payment provider requires 'return_url' to work.
Before, this function was called by _get_shop_payment_values,
which provided a value for it.
We copy the value that was given there directly as a default in render,
so that it doesn't crash no matter what method calls it.
opw 1928918
opw 1944142
closesodoo/odoo#31814
Signed-off-by: Nans Lefebvre (len) <len@odoo.com>
Currently when the payment is initiated there is a message in
sale order for waiting for confirmation.
But when the payment returns an error there is no message on
sales order so it's not clear for the end user that payment
is still pending.
Related Task ID : 58741
- The method `_get_available_payment_input` that returns the available
payments acquirers and the payments tokens for a specific user never
returns the payments tokens linked to a non s2s payment acquirers.
This is wrong, the payments tokens should always appears no matter
what are the acquirers' payment flow.
The payment flow is used only to specify where the customer should
input his credit cards details, either on Odoo or on the payment
acquirer's website (or popup).
Once a token is created, it is safe to process it since no credits cards
details are stored on the Odoo database.
closesodoo/odoo#30258
The field partner id is not a required field in payment transaction, and
we try to read its value in the dictionnary given to the create
function, so if a transaction is created without the partner_id, it will
raise a KeyError.
So to fix it, we only complete the pratner values on the payment
transaction if a partner_id is given.
- The payment transaction processing cron retrieves all the transactions
that need to be processed.
In some cases, it can causes issues when trying to process payments
that are being process by the payment polling page after returning
from the payment acquirer.
To avoid this concurrency issues, the cron will only process payments
that have been validated for at least 10 minutes.
closesodoo/odoo#29317
- When a payment is done through a `payment.transaction` the
communication should be the transaction's reference instead of its
invoices reference.
closesodoo/odoo#29187
Purpose is to clean the use of tracking parameters on fields. Parameters are
merged and is now tracking=<int> or tracking=True.
This commit is linked to task ID 1903814 and PR #28430.
Check that it makes custom binary fields into attachment as that's the
main reason for the change: when users create binary fields via Studio,
they're necessarily db-stored (as the interface doesn't allow altering
the attachment attribute and it's unclear how we'd handle users
switching it on/off every time), which significantly bloats their
database (and burns storage & backup space), especially as the primary
use case for binary fields is adding images and documents to records.
* check that binary fields are properly created as attachment=True
* add attachment=False on fields where that seems relevant (most but not
all of the fields previously using the default)
* remove occurrences of attachment=True
closesodoo/odoo#29308
Purpose of the task is when extra fee is activated on the payment acquirer,
the customer is no warned about extra cost when choosing the payment acquirer.
so display the extra fees on payment acquirer when doing the payment.
Related Task ID : 1845815
Closes : #31730
Johan Demaret Rivarola