When the `create` or `write` method receives an empty string for a date
or a datetime field, PostgreSQL will fail since this is not an accepted
value for this field type.
We fallback on `None` for falsy values.
opw-1819336
@KangOl : watch out when forward-porting, the signature of
`convert_to_column` has changed in saas-14.
- Go to 'Contact Us' page
- Edit, then try to change company data
- A dialog window asks if the user wants to edit the company data
- Confirm
It redirects to an unexisting page.
opw-1825662
Before this commit, when clicking on a event of a pinned calendar view
in the Dashboard app, nothing occurs.
The cursor turns into pointer type when hovering on an event, suggesting
that clicking on it should do something. Kanban and list views redirect
the user to the document's form on click, so a similar behaviour is
expected with calendar view.
This is indeed the case in v11, but not in v10. The reason that it works
in v11 for calendar is that when we click on a record of a pinned views
in dashboard, it performs a do_action to open the form view. In v10, however,
it performs a do_switch_view to the form view. Since there's only one view mode
when we pin something in dashboard, the processing of the click fails silently.
Kanban and list were working because the dashboard app overrides their
handlers functions when loading the views, which wasn't the case with calendar.
This commit solves the issue by also overriding the handler function
of calendar view, so that it performs a do_action to open a form instead
of performing a do_switch_view to the form view.
(Note: pivot and grid views work, because they use do_action)
opw-1817725
Properly override `_track_template` similarly to what is done for
`project.task`, so the method can accept a recordset.
Co-authored by: Nicolas Martinelli <nim@odoo.com>
Closes#23466
opw-1823244
In multi pages list view, the scroll position is reset to top when
the user switches between pages. This wasn't working if he first
reset the limit, and then switched between pages.
This rev. improves the way the scroll position is restored when
coming back to a view (e.g. open a kanban view, scroll, click on a
record to open it in a form view, go back to kanban using the
breadcrumbs):
- generalize the scroll position handling from web_enterprise to
web to make it available in the community webclient as well
- also restore left scroll position, not only top (especially
useful for grouped Kanban views with a lot of columns)
- handle the case where the scrolling area is a sub element of
the view (e.g. the grouped Kanban view in mobile).
Task 34037
Co-authored-by: Mohammed Shekha <msh@openerp.com>
Co-authored-by: Ankit Sathvara <asa@odoo.com>
In order to avoid people selecting a bank account not belonging to the partner's company, we now filter using a domain.
Original idea from PR #23480. Courtesy of Miquel Raich (Eficent)
Our positionning of the scan line (ligne de codage) was possibly wrong
depending on wkhtmltopdf.
In eg. chromium the font is configurable exactly but in wkhtmltopdf it
seems there is bigger limitation on giving eg. a decimal pixel number.
But this was necessary to have the same character positionning than
expected in BVR, and this line is read by scanner and must match.
This change:
- have an absolute positionning for each character in the scan line
- add two parameters "ISR scan line horizontal/vertical offset" that
will move the scan line to the choosen distance.
- changes some other CSS value to match better the ISR documents on
accounting on differences between wkhtmltopdf 0.1.2.1 and 0.1.4.1
- remove currency which should be on the BVR background.
opw-1813776
closes#23518
Given the following variables:
* Module A
* Module B
* Model M
* Field X of model M
If module A defines M.X and is installed, an xmlid for this field is
generated in the form of A.field_M_X
Before this commit:
If module B defines M.X as well and is installed after module A, no
xmlid is generated.
This means that if module A is uninstalled, the single xmlid pointing to
M.X will be deleted and thus, the field itself will be deleted as well,
therefore any views from module B referencing M.X will crash.
After this commit:
If module B (or any subsequent modules) define M.X, an xmlid will be
generated in the form of B.field_M_X.
If module A is uninstalled, the xmlid A.field_M_X will be deleted, but
B.field_M_X will remain and thus the field itself won't be deleted.
This system means that for a single actual field, there can be multiple
xmlids, each xmlid sharing the same field, thus the name "shared
fields".
Task ID 38016
Complements rev. 9b1009cd5a to fix the
handling of validation transactions for 3DS-enabled cards.
This handles a few issues:
- make sure to trigger the refund for validation transactions even if
the first feedback we get is the S2S feedback
- feedback URL called by the users' browser should not reset the payment
transaction to 'done' when the refund process has been initiated
- status 81 for "refund pending" should not end up with a transaction in
error. It may be that Ingenico will send a feedback transaction later
or not at all, but the refund is likely to succeed at that point.
Without this commit, validation transactions would never be refunded for
3DS cards.
Remaining issue: the return_url does not seem to be set for those
validation transactions, so the user ends up on the homepage after
completing the 3DS step.
* In account.journal model, the domain of bank_account_id field was incorrectly comparing the partner_id with a res.company object
* When modifying the company of a bank journal, the company of the related res.partner.bank was changed without checking if it had a company and also its partner (account holder) was not changed.
Was PR #23480. Courtesy of Miquel Raich (Eficent)
Before that, partial payments on open invoices were ignored by the query, due to the fact we used checked "reconciled=false" instead of "full_reconcile_id is not null".
Before that, partial payments of invoices were not shown into the partner ledger unless the option to show reconciled entries was activated. This was due to the fact we checked full reconciliation with the field "reconciled" instead of the full_reconcile_id, so the query did not return the partial payments (which have reconciled=True, but don't have any full_reconcile_id unless the invoice is fully paid).
From 'Accounting Dashboard', creating a new payment was raising an error 'Record does not exist or has been deleted.'.
That's because since cdca5d4751 the default_get() was expecting to be called directly from the account.invoice model, using 'active_ids' to compute default values. Since it was incorrect, we now also check for the active_model to avoid raising this error.
Was PR #23548
Was task: 1824893
Commit 42659dc70c recently done in saas-11.2 added performance test cases
in test_mail module allowing to cover more use cases. Since release of
saas-11.2 some optimizations already landed in master pre-saas-11.3 and
some features have been refactored.
This implies updating the performance counters. This is done in a separate
commit to distinguish previous-counters from current counters instead of
loosing it in a diff.
Most message-post related tests have been improved by some queries as
message creation has been speeded up at f727e9d9b6. Some other commits
like 9de5d41754 also slightly improved performances. Activities-related
performance have been improved at e899812315. Tests case involving
assignation notification perform worst than in saas-11.1 . It is linked to
the feature using more advanced email and templates as well as working for
Inbox too which is not the case in saas-11.2. This improvement has been done
at e9734f4975 .
This commit is related to task 1824965. Thanks to @KangOl for being
nice with people trying to make its forward-port more difficult.
This commit is a manual forward-port of saas-11.2's 42659dc70c .
In test_mail there are performance tests involving several followers and give
counters for some heavy real-life-like use cases. Purpose of this commit is to
have more basic performance tests for main mail features, like simple post,
simple subscription of one follower. It allows to have an idea of the basic
cost of various features.
Adding use cases for message_post includes
* posting without followers (aka, no notification)
* posting with a ping (by email or by inbox)
* logging a note with optimized method _message_log or with message_post
Adding use cases for activities includes setting an activity as done. This
action posts a message and is therefore interesting to evaluate.
Adding use cases for subscription includes
* adding and re-adding one follower, with default or specified subtypes
* updating responsible field triggering a simple tracking and an assignation
email or notification (not completely supported in saas 11.2 meaning this
counter will increase when forward-ported)
* note that some subscription tests have already been added at a01933c9b4
Finally some heavier tests are added for assignation and tracking based
on QWeb view.
This commit is related to task ID 1824965 . This one is an ongoing task
and several commits may be linked to that task.
This commit is a manual forward- port of saas-11.2's a01933c9b4 .
Purpose of this commit is to test existing behavior of followers subscription
as well as adding some query count tests about message_subscribe method. As
followers subscription technical implementation may change in a near future
in order to be optimized it is a good idea to have current behavior and query
count validated.
This commit adds
* test for followers update using message_subscribe API. Tests are added
with forced and unforced subtypes to ensure behavior will not change or
will be changed while knowing it;
* performance test about message_subscribe, about adding new followers,
and subscribing already-existing followers in force mode or not;
Query count performance test shows that message_subscribe could probably
be improved. It does several things that require queries (check of access
rights, check for existing subscriptions, ensure customers have no access
to internal subtypes, ...). However we feel it could be improved in order
to speed-up the subscription of followers.
This is linked to task 49265; it is only the first steps of it.
In test_mail there are performance tests involving several followers and give
counters for some heavy real-life-like use cases. Purpose of this commit is to
have more basic performance tests for main mail features, like simple post,
simple subscription of one follower. It allows to have an idea of the basic
cost of various features.
Adding use cases for message_post includes
* posting without followers (aka, no notification)
* posting with a ping (by email or by inbox)
* logging a note with optimized method _message_log or with message_post
Adding use cases for activities includes setting an activity as done. This
action posts a message and is therefore interesting to evaluate.
Adding use cases for subscription includes
* adding and re-adding one follower, with default or specified subtypes
* updating responsible field triggering a simple tracking and an assignation
email or notification (not completely supported in saas 11.2 meaning this
counter will increase when forward-ported)
* note that some subscription tests have already been added at a01933c9b4
Finally some heavier tests are added for assignation and tracking based
on QWeb view.
This commit is related to task ID 1824965 . This one is an ongoing task
and several commits may be linked to that task.
Revision ec96c0b3c2
attempt to display the VAT label according to the country
vat label.
This a very commendable effort, except that the
`vat_label` was not available under the variable
`company.country_id.vat_label`
Actually even `company.country_id` was undefined.
This revision does what it must be done in order
to read the countries `vat_label` and to make
it available through a variable for the bill receipt.
opw-1817333
- Set 'Round Globally'
- Create an excluded tax of 10 %
- Create an invoice for a product costing 34.55, and apply the tax.
The tax on the invoice is 3.46, while the tax on the tax line is 3.45.
When rounded in `compute_all`, the tax amount is 3.455, which is the
value expected. However, the `create` method won't round this value
before storing, leading to the inconsistency.
We make sure the currency is sent at saving, so the method
`convert_to_column` receives the appropriate values for rounding.
opw-1819902
The value is made by the computed field.
Setting one has no effect (no inverse method).
If you have no value on a purchase order, you end up in the confusing situation
where you can not save a new PO without setting a value to date_planned but,
after saving, the value is reset (no lines).
Do not block the creation of a new purchase order without lines
Fixes#23275
Before this commit, the twitter share (intents) would encode the URL twice.
The URL on the tweet would then be broken.
Eg: https%3A%2F%http://2Fwww.odoo.com%2Fforum...
The ChatManager has been refactored in saas-11.2 to make it fully
(and more easily) testable. This means that tests involving
messaging stuff written in previous versions need to be slightly
adapted when being forwardported to saas-11.2. In particular, the
3 tests adapted in this commit broke because of an include done in
the voip addon. Those tests have been added in 3809fc891.
Use case:
Have a user with access rights "See Own leads"
In the CRM settings check the "use leads" boolean
Before this commit:
This user couldn't create a lead directly nor qualify it as an opportunity
AND
the default sales team on the lead displayed as 'Unknown'
After this commit:
This user can read the sales team, even though he is not a member of them
He can create leads on the default sales team
And qualify them as opportunities
OPW 1816309
ref #22360
Make an invoice
Make a payment
Unreconcile them
Before this commit:
The invoice and the payment weren't display in the aged partner balance
After this commit:
Both payment and invoice *can* be included in the balance
OPW 1819359
This patches fixes the untested and broken draft of inetd and systemd
activation support in the threaded server.
This patch also introduces a change of behaviour in the `_reexec()`
function by keeping the environment when Odoo is respawning during the
following events:
- SIGHUP signal is received
- one click install has been triggered
- code reload needed when using `--dev=reload`
Actions loaded from the url are flagged with 'pushState: false', to
prevent them from pushing their state back to the url, thus
producing an infinite loop. However, if the state of a loaded
action changes in the future (e.g. load an action in kanban view,
then switch to a form view), this state should be pushed to update
the url. Before this rev., this wasn't the case.
Changing it is not needed and generated missmatch against existing
entries (created by l10n_generic_coa demo data, thus depending on module
install order).
This could (should?) be considered a refactoring, but this is actually
trying to restore lost functionality. In v10, the custom form widgets
were created with access to the node element that define them. We lost
that in v11, with the new views.
However, it is actually very useful for generic widgets. Since this is
not really a risky fix, I think that it can be done in 11.0.
Note: this feature was already reintroduced in master in commit
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/b7aa439826df6b3e442b3f60bb593ff28efc8679
As of v11, project tasks and project issues have been merged.
Issues used to be ordered by:
priority desc, create_date desc
whereas Tasks had the following historical ordering:
priority desc, sequence, date_start, name, id
(where `date_start` corresponds to the creation date of the task, or the
time where task work began)
After the merge, the Task order was kept, but it became difficult to
understand for users, especially for converted issues.
This commit modifies the default order to a more obvious common order:
priority desc, sequence, id desc
With the following goals in mind:
- the ordering does not change without obvious actions of the user
(starring a record moves it at the top, manually reordering records
reorders them within the same "stars category), and creating new
records adds them at the top, where they are visible
- the ordering is easy to grasp, based on stars and chronological
order, while still allowing manual reordering when really necessary
(by default all records will have the default sequence of 10)
- sorting by "id desc" is similar to the previous "create_date desc"
but it can be sorted more efficiently by the database
One could argue about sorting on chronological or reverse chronological
order. Like blogs and timelines, everyone has their preferences.
The latter option was selected because our UI for quickly adding records
is at the top of the kanban view, so it is more natural to see new
records at the top, instead of having them disappear at the bottom
immediately.
Hopefully this will not disrupt user workflows too much, and will remain
intuitive enough.
The validation transactions introduced in
7d428c871b were not working properly for
Ogone, due to several problems:
- The refund requests when being sent via the orderdirect.asp API, which
does not support refunding previous transactions, according to the
Ingenico helpdesk. It only support creating independent refund
transactions, which is something that requires special pre-approval
from the payment acquirer, and generally not permitted.
In order to cancel/refund a previous transaction, the direct
maintenance API must be used instead[1].
- Maintenance requests to refund a previous transaction fully should use
the RFS code, as explained in the API documentation [1], and should
always mention the PAYID of the refunded transaction.
- Such maintenance requests must always be SHA-signed, as usual.
- The various transaction status codes for refunded transactions need to
be taken into account as well (typically those beginning with 8)
This commit fixes these various problems.
[1]
https://payment-services.ingenico.com/int/en/ogone/support/guides/integration%20guides/directlink
(5.2 Direct Maintenance)
As of today, Ingenico platform 4.125 has non-uniform handling of the
PARAMPLUS parameters that can be passed as part of transaction metadata.
This parameter is documented as being parsed[1] as a series of
parameter-value pairs, to be passed as extra parameters to the feedback
transaction. Based on this, it seems that the PARAMPLUS value should not
be urlencoded globally, but each field value should be urlencoded, as
the Ingenico side will have to be able to parse and re-emit these
individual parameters.
In one case we were missing this urlencoding step, so this commit fixes
it.
Without this, the querydirect.asp API would return invalid XML data when
we retrieve the status of a transaction that used a PARAMPLUS value with
an '=' sign!
For example with PARAMPLUS passed as
return_url=/payment/confirm?tx_id=123
the value returned by querydirect.asp would contain the following:
(note the invalid extra quote character in the `return_url` param)
```
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<ncresponse
(...)
ED="1234"
return_url="/payment/confirm?tx_id="123"
SCORING=""
SCO_CATEGORY="G">
</ncresponse>
```
Url-encoding the value of the return_url in PARAMPLUS fixes this
nonsensical result.
However, the Ingenico API then fails to decode the parameter value when
passing it to the feedback URL, such as the ACCEPTURL we depend on.
As a workaround, since we only pass a single parameter inside
PARAMPLUS, we'll url-unquote it afterwards.
[1]
https://payment-services.ingenico.com/int/en/ogone/support/guides/integration%20guides/e-commerce#feedbackparameters_variablefeedbackparameters
Before this commit, a client action was simply a subclass of Widget.
This is quite simple, but not really enough for the ActionManager. The
ActionManager needs to handle client actions in a different way that
view actions. Sometimes, it needs to check if a method exists before
calling it.
With this commit, we introduce a new abstraction: the AbstractAction
class, which defines a common API for all actions managed by the web
client.
Note that the API proposed in this commit is just the beginning. We will
introduce other methods in the future, to manage the focus, or the
scroll position, for example.
Before this commit:
When editing a page URL through page properties it would redirect to that new
url afterward. If the url was not starting with '/' and had multiple level
before and after edition (eg: page/action to page/realaction) it would then
redirect to a wrong relative URL.
Now, we ensure that we redirect to the correct URL: the one slugified and
cleaned in the backend.
Step to reproduce:
- Create a page '/page/action'
- Go to that page and open Page Properties
- Edit the URL to 'page/someaction'
- You will be redirected to the incorrect relative URL /page/page/someaction
Nicolas Martinelli