Expense report has custom code to add people as followers. This code has
several issues, notably in some cases it could try to add several times
same people, leading to crash and issues.
As auto subscription has been cleaned let us clean the code in hr expense.
Using _message_auto_subscribe_followers it is now simpler to automatically
add follower to expense reports. It is not necessary to add hackish custom
code in create and write.
One change is done in this commit. Some people are set as follower after
record creation and not before. However this was necessary when tracking
messages were not correctly triggered or auto subscription done after
tracking. As process is now 1/ create 2/ auto subscribe 3/ tracking, messages
linked to tracking will be correctly push to recipients automatically added
as followers.
This commit refactors mail.thread message_auto_subscribe method. Purpose
of this method is to automatically subscribe people to documents in several
scenarios
* followers from an umbrella record to sub-records, like followers of project
added to tasks;
* responsible of documents, in addition to sending notifications to newly
added responsibles;
* some specific use case depending on some applications like managers
for expense reports;
New auto subscription now uses the recently introduced method optimized to
compute new or to-update followers. It is also rewritten so that overriding
it is easier. Indeed simply overriding _message_auto_subscribe_followers is
now sufficient to add new followers to a record, depending on some updated
values. It is also now possible to specify a template to use for some
specific notification, if requested.
Fetching auto-subscription data in subtype is also optimized. It is now done
in a single SQL query. All data related to parent (like project) and child
(like task) as well as default and internal-only data is prepared in a single
query and given back to auto subscription process. This allows to gain
queries in auto subscription based on subtype like project / task use case.
This commit has a great impact on performance counters. Complex use cases
involving tracking and responsible notifications gain about 30 queries which
is about 15% of their total query count.
This commit refactors mail.thread message_subscribe method. It is done for two
purposes. First one is to optimize performance by using the new followers
computation methods introduced recently. Second purpose is to clean the API
of message_subscribe to make it simpler to use.
This commit splits message_subscribe in two main parts :
* _message_subscribe is a private method calling the follower new
subscription methods and updating the record set;
* message_subscribe is a public wrapper on _message_subscribe that adds
access rights checks;
Simplification comes by removing message_subscribe_users that was a
shortcut to message_subscribe. Having a method to subscribe partners and
channels is sufficient as we would like to avoid bloating the public API
of mail.thread. A force parameter is also removed from message_subscribe
as this implementation detail can be induced in the computation.
Various addons using the removed methods are updated in order to use the new
subscription API. They have the same functional behavior.
This commit has a great impact when subscribing several followers. In a more
general way all code using message_post is also optimized as posting a message
generally implies subscribing followers. It also improves activity use as
posting a message and subscribing new followers are common process in
activities.
Override of create in mail.thread now uses the recently introduced
_add_default_followers to add the record's creator in the followers.
It allows to save one query when creating new records. It means for simple
models we approach the bottom limit in term of generated queries which is
quite a good news.
This commit adds new methods to add or update followers to documents. Purpose
is to have new optimized methods that perform less queries. It is based on
experience and use cases of various addons in Odoo using it.
Technically two main methods are given on mail.followers model
* _add_followers: this method generates values required to create new
followers or update existing one. It takes several parameter controlling
how to deal with existing followers. This is used notably when auto
subscription should not erase existing subscriptions;
* _insert_followers: this method creates or updates followers for a given
set of documents. It uses result from _add_followers;
Performance gain come from the use of a SQL query to fetch followers data
as well as less use of record sets. Code can be more low-level in some
places. Purpose is to avoid browse and prefetch and just fetch data once
and use it in various computation.
New implementation is equivalent to the old one. It offers more flexibility
as caller can either receive values for followers or directly have records
created and updated. Various parameter allow to tune computation depending
on each specific call to the new follower methods.
Future commits will gradually replace the use of old _add_follower_command
by the new methods. Purpose is to replace them one by one in order to see
the gain in term of performance one replacement at a time.
Move zoom next the original picture
Disable it if same img and max size with ratio < 1.5
Allow to enable zoom automatically
...
Task-33499
Co-authored-by: Jérémy Kersten <jke@odoo.com>
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Set your user in multi company
- Set a default analytic account A for product P with your company
- Create a PO with P and deliver it
- Generate the invoice.
Bug:
The analytic account A was not set on the line.
opw:1831998
Before this commit, some breaking spaces were present in the js code.
Such spaces are misinterpreted and worked by luck.
This has become a problem with exported js bunldes (e.g. the
external_lib bundle in im_livechat).
This commit replaces breaking spaces by regular spaces.
In the normal course of saving-action, readonly fields are stripped
out when sending data to the server. The SSF would reuse the same code
when "saving" O2M lines to the parent record however that is not
correct and would lead to misbehaving views as readonly (non-stored)
fields used as "transients" (storing data within the extent of a
record's edition session) would not behave properly.
Fix by overriding the O2M Form's save so that readonly fields are
kept and stored in the parent record.
Closes#23620
This rev. extracts two rendering parameters for the groups
corresponding to the default col value to apply (for inner and for
outer groups). This allows to easily override those default values
in extentions of the FormRenderer (for instance, in the renderer
of the new Dashboard view).
This rev. refactors the way the view's arch is parsed in BasicView,
so that it can be extended specifications of the BasicView to
handle other tagnames that 'field' (which is basically the only
one handled in BasicView).
This rev. extracts the part of the rendering that renders outer
groups (i.e. groups that contain groups) in its own function. This
allows extentions of the FormRenderer to use it (for instance, the
renderer of the new Dashboard view).
This rev. introduces an option to doAction (keepSearchView). If set
to true, the searchView of the current action will be kept and used
by the new action (this only works if there is already an action
with a searchView, and if the new action is stacked over that one).
This is necessary for the new dashboard view.
A better solution would have been to export the state of the
existing searchView, and import it to the new one, but the current
implementation of the searchView doesn't allow to do that easily.
This will be done as soon as the searchView will be rewrote.
This rev. allows to add or remove filters to the SearchView from
the outside, and to make it display this new domain. This can be
used by views that trigger domain changes (e.g. this is the case
of the new DashboardView).
The graph view uses the nv(d3) lib to render the graph. This lib
requires that the rendering is done directly into the DOM (so that
it can correctly compute positions). However, the views are always
rendered in fragments, and appended to the DOM once ready (to
prevent them from flickering).
Before this rev., the graph view circumvented this by performing
the rendering in a setTimeout(0), letting the framework append the
widget to the DOM first.
This rev. removes this hack and uses the on_attach_callback hook
instead, which is called when the widget is attached to the DOM.
This ensures that the rendering is always done in the DOM, and we
keep the rendering part synchronous.
Correct account invoice line form view so studio doesn't fail on
something that doesn't seem really correct (and somehow worked thanks
to pyeval implementation or the override from another view type).
opw-1826254
opw-1830171
closes#23997
On 'My attendance', do some check-in/out operations
while on the server side, everything was ok, the display had some issues:
On Chrome, that worked well whereas in Safari, it did not
since the Date() implementation only accepts ISO date strings
We take the opportunity of this fix to handle dates with moment.js, which accepts non-ISO formats
OPW 1831555
closes#23962
When creating sales/purchase receipt for a journal having a secondary currency, an error was raised as the amount_currency had the wrong sign (compared to the debit/credit).
Was Issue #1819396. Was PR #23768
Steps to reproduce the issue in 11.0 Enterprise:
- Go to the language English
- Remove from the time format the seconds
- Refresh the page
- Go to sales
- Create a sales order;
Bug:
- You get the warning message
closes#23596closes#22027
opw:1829577
When creating a timesheet, several fields need to be recomputed:
- `currency_id`
- `group_id`
- `department_id`
- `is_timesheet`
- `validated`
When `validated` is computed before the other fields, the recomputation
will lead to an `AccessError` because of the rule
`hr_timesheet.timesheet_line_rule_user`.
Since the test `test_timesheet_validation_user` expects an
`AccessError`, the test succeeds. However, from time to time,
`validated` is computed last => the `AccessError` is not raised.
Actually, a `ValidationError` should be raised in this case (from the
`create` override in `timesheet_grid`).
Before this commit:
Clicking on 'unstar all' button removes all messages from starred channel
but it only decreases the counter as many as there are displayed messages
on screen.
For example, if there are 40 messages starred, only 30 messages
are on screen (default limit) but unstar all will decrease counter
only for those messages instead of 40.
After this commit:
clicking on 'unstar all' button will correctly take in account all
fetched messages and not only displayed messages.
So now, after clicking on 'unstar all' button will update the starred
counter to 0.
task-ID: 33958
Previously, the ISR reference was computed from the iban number but it seems some banks (for example UBS) use arbitrary ISR references that needs to be manually set.
Was task: 40975
Was PR #22931
After this rev., in Discuss, messages are automatically loaded when
the user scrolls to the top of the channel.
Task 33958
Co-authored-by: Aaron Bohy <aab@odoo.com>
The code in res config that enabled or disabled internal operation type
did not take into account that active_test is set to False inside this
type of code since c2e259d8.
Thus a picking type of an archived warehouse would possibly unexpectedly
be enabled after saving the settings.
opw-1826196
closes#23956
The state of the JS documentation was quite sad, not updated in a long
time. With this commit, we rework a lot of the JS doc. Most notably,
we add a section 'Javascript Cheatsheet' (help on some common
customization tasks) and rewrite the 'Javascript Reference' totally.
Note that the JS reference page also contains a reference on all field
widgets.
This work is just the beginning, it is probably not complete, but at
least we will have a foundation.
The caller of `read_group` can now provide the aggregating function to use for
a given field:
# set aggregating operator for fields 'foo' and 'bar'
model.read_group(domain, ['foo:sum', 'bar:avg'], ...)
One can also aggregate the same field several times, by giving a specific
output name for each:
# aggregate 'foo' with both 'min' and 'max'
model.read_group(domain, ['foomin:min(foo)', 'foomax:max(foo)'], ...)
With project_issue installed, and when deleting an analytic account, a search
is done to check if there is linked issues. When the current user has no access on
the project.issue model, an error is raised. This check should be done as an admin.
Before this commit, when accessing the payment page with arbitrary amount
(/website_payment/pay?reference=Testinvoice&amount=150.0¤cy_id=6&country_id=)
A traceback was thrown because the keys concerning the partner were not present in the dictionary
that prepares the values for the form that we send to Stripe
Considering that those info are not mandatory for stripe (although not very good practice -- the more info the better to verify an identity)
we ignore them if not present
After this commit, the public route works fine
OPW 1832164
closes#23948
Before this commit, the smart button on the SO was computed
with only the SO's name field
In a multicompany setting, it could give up invoices from other companies
After this commit, only the invoices of the same company as the order are accounted for
OPW 1831551
closes#23925
To be able to retrieve the base amount of cash basis taxes lines, additional journal items are created for the base as well in the journal entry generated by the payment.
However, these additional journal items debitting and creditting the same account are considered as pollution in reports.
This module and hook allow to move these additional lines to an another account, if needed.
-task: https://www.odoo.com/web#id=35605&view_type=form&model=project.task&action=333&active_id=967&menu_id=4720
Was PR #23349
Steps to reproduce the bug:
-Create a tax of 21% tax included but don't select the "affect base" checkbox.
-Create another tax of 5.2% (no tax include)
-Create a sale order with a line that has a unit price of 121 and both taxes.
Notice that the total amount is: 126.2 (100 base amount + 21 from 21% tax + 5.2 from 5.2 tax)
-Click on "Print the proforma invoice"
Bug:
The total amount was still 126.2 and base=100, however taxes were wrong, there were 21 for the 21% tax
and 6.29 instead of 5.2 for the 5.2 tax.
Back-port of this commit: f50a08bc3d
Forward up to saas-15
opw:1819882
Thibault Delavallée