The `upgrade_boolean` widget should display an `Enterprise` label next to it.
There is however an issue when a `label` is specified for this field. In this case,
the `Enterprise` label should be placed next to the field label (and not the field
itself).
The easiest solution would have been to instantiate the field widget with its label,
but this can't work because the field widget is instantiated before its label.
We thus re-render the widget after its label creation.
When a stock user want to create a lot an exception is raised saying
that he cannot modify a product.
This is caused by the field 'product_uom_id' on the model
'stock.production.lot' that is a related to 'product.product' and not
set as readonly in the 'stock.production.lot' view.
So by setting it as readonly, we don't set the uom to the server, and so
don't try to re-write it on the product
KanbanColumn instances are saved in an array in the renderer. The quick
create widget is always put in the first column found in this array.
Unfortunately, the array elements' order was broken after some
operations where column(s) are rerendered (like moving records).
The move line view when the option no suggest is checked doesn't work
because it hasen't been adapted during the refactoring of stock module.
So to avoid having differences between the view in no suggest and in
suggest, we use the same tree view that we reference. Because the views
shouldn't be different if we are either in suggest or no suggest
The server postproccess the view to add attributes on many2one fields, i.e.
`can_create` and `can_write`, according to access rights.
These attributes are parsed by the client as string but should also be parsed by
the many2one when evaluating them.
The mock server has also been adapted to set these attributes.
When have more than one company, for all companies, the cash
basis journal set in accounting configuration will be
always the related to first company.
This issue cause the followiong error trying to validate an
invoice for a company different to fisrt one:
'Cannot create moves for different companies.'
Because exist a 'cross-configuration' in the cash basis
journal.
The solution to this issue is include the company in domain
that does the search for cash basis journal.
Steps to reproduce the bug:
-Let's consider a company A in the currency MXN
-Let's consider two invoices for customer C in USD one of 150$ and one of 50$
-Create a payment P of 180$ for customer C
-Reconcile P with the first invoice of 150$(with button add on the invoice)
-Go to the other invoice of 50$
Bug:
The residual amount of 30$ is not suggested.
Fix:
The residual amount is set in amount_residual_currency, that's why it
was not detected by the domain. Now the residual amounts in other currency
are also detected for the reconciliation.
opw:769090
Custory reading seems to denote that field names are probably already
text in the normal case, and thus should not need decoding? It only
blows up in a tour so...
Move a record from one column to another in a kanban grouped by a selection field
leads to a traceback.
A selection field value is composed of a tuple ('value', 'String') and the write
command must send the `value` and not the `String` as it was done before this rev.
Clicking on a cell that contains a button (but not ON the button) leads to
a traceback (see "Scrap" button in Stock Operation for example).
This is due to the fact that a button is not registered as a widget so it can't
be activated.
This commit ensures that the next line is selected if the last column is a
buttton.
When a move is set to done and a backorder should be create, we get a
traceback saying that we cannot set the quantity done on a move with
multiple move move_lines.
This occurs, when the stock move has multiple move lines with quantity
done set to 0;
Because the new move only contains move lines having quantity done 0, we
remove the useless line that set the quantity done on the move
When registring a supplier invoice, if no sequence exists for code "account.payment.supplier.invoice"
then it failed for the creation of the counterpart lines because a name is required to create an
account move line.
ps: check function "_get_liquidity_move_line_vals" for the condition.
opw:767224
Steps to reproduce the bug:
-Go to the shop
-Add an item to card
-Checkout
-Insert address info
-Click proceed
-Enable "Accept Terms & Conditions"
-With the HTML Editor, remove the attribute checked="checked" in template Accept Terms & Conditions
Bug:
-Pay Now button is clickable but the Policy and Procedures box was not checked.
opw:771418
* gitignore pycache folders (apparently appear for some)
* update xlwt requirement: 1.1.2 does not work with Python 3.6, 1.2 should work, 1.3 officially supports it
Before this commit, the invoice analysis report summed the amount of invoices regardless of whether they were in or out,
as if it were an absolute sum.
This commit corrects the behavior back to v9's, where in_invoice have the minus sign and are hence subtracted
opw 769409. Was PR #19413
Echoes commit c255342e8f
Before this commit, the image that was fetched for the quotes was the static one, preventing it to be changed
Now, the image is dynamically fetched
OPW 769701
closes#19417
When running action_assign on a mts move bypassing the reservation,
we always created a new stock move line with the quantity of the move.
This proved to be too naive when running recheck availability.
Exemple: Let’s say I have a reserved move of quantity 5.
If I edit the initial demand to 7 and click on recheck availability,
I end up with a move line of 5 and a move line of 7. We adadapt the
code in a similar way that what’s done in _update_reserved_quantity,
by looking for a candidate move line and only increasing the reserved
quantity by what still needs to be reserved.
The id is useful to update existing events but sometimes we are getting some
ids that are not accepted by Google
Getting an error:
odoo.addons.google_account.models.google_service: Bad google request : {
"error": {
"errors": [
{
"domain": "global",
"reason": "invalid",
"message": "Invalid resource id value."
}
],
"code": 400,
"message": "Invalid resource id value."
}
}
Looks like existing events can have a _ in their id but new one, no longer.
It seems that these events are created by outlook calendar when synchronized
with Google Calendar.
opw-749752
opw-751294
opw-751348
-Make a return picking from a SO, and condigure the items to be refunded on SO(in the wizard)
-Copy the return picking.
-Validate it.
Without this fix, it would just keep decreasing the delivered value on SO.
opw:767429
- Go to Accounting > Configuration > Journals.
- In the form view of a journal, click on Action > Voucher Entries
- Click on Create => traceback
opw-771415
- Create 2 companies:
- Company A and check VIES VAT Check
- Company B and do not check VIES VAT Check
- Set current company of admin to Company A and do not allow Company B
- Create a demo user on Company B and give him Adviser group in
Accounting.
- Log in with the demo user.
- Create a Customer A as a company with:
Country = Spain
TIN = ES85847955H
- Create a contact on Customer A: "Contact Sample"
- Create a Customer invoice on "Contact Sample" partner
- Through the menu Accounting/Payments, create a new payment on "Contact
Sample" partner with the total amount of the invoice.
- Open the menu Manual Payments and invoicing matching. The invoice and
the payment should be proposed for reconciliation. Do CTRL+ENTER.
An error message appears: 'The VAT number [ES85847955H] for partner
[Contact Sample] either failed the VIES VAT validation check or did not
respect the expected format ESA12345674.'
This message should not appear as the current user is on Company B which
doesn't have the flag "VIES VAT Check" checked.
The issue comes from the `sudo` in `mark_as_reconciled`, which will lead
to `self.env.user` to be the admin in the VAT check, and therefore
`self.env.user.company_id` will be Company A.
Closes#19274
opw-770018
When selecting a partner in the reconciliation widget, using the SelectCreateDialog
(Search More), the partner wasn't correctly displayed.
This was due to a difference between the change format of the many2one ; when using
the dialog, only the `id` is sent (while the `id` and `display_name` are sent when
using the many2one dropdown).
These two behaviours are now standardized and both now send `id` and `display_name`.
It has the advantage of sparing some `name_get`s called by the model because the
`display_name` was missing.
This change implies some refactoring where the SelectCreateDialog was used.
qsm-odoo