This is done so that using owl features and functions is done using
the standard import syntax, instead of destructuring properties out
of the owl global object.
So instead of just:
`const { Component } = owl;`
inside an odoo-module, we now do:
`import { Component } from "@odoo/owl";`
Note that we haven't removed the global `owl` object so existing
code will work as is.
Furthermore, we also augmented the tsconfig.json that's generated
from the tsconfig subcommand to take into account the path
of owl.js.
Task-id: 3032274
Part-of: odoo/odoo#104260
When calling a `auth=none` route with a non-existing DB name, the server
redirects to `/web/database/selector`. Such a route can be called
without database, therefore it is expected to work if the database
doesn't exist as well.
Before the HTTP refactoring, the fallback was `_dispatch_nodb` [1]. We
roll back to the same behavior since there is no good reason to redirect
to `/web/database/selector`.
Commits 4b330f3173 and de4e67dcc529163 are reintroduced as well.
[1] https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/b3199e949ae70307e8181ba0d6237871d6d07af7/odoo/http.py#L1529closesodoo/odoo#104174
X-original-commit: 1565e85890f1d14e067edd1c198c7199ab536307
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Olivier Dony <odo@odoo.com>
Our current version is getting rather outdated. Replace by
the *legacy* bundle: pdfjs now provides a non-polyfilled version of
the library, which is probably faster though it doesn't save overly
much (for the entire bundle anyway). Use polyfilled version for
safety, though it's unclear whether non-chromium Edge is still
supported by Odoo. If not, we could just use the non-polyfilled
version.
The difference is quite large for pdf.js (+32.5%), however it is much
less consequential for the sandbox (+1%) or for the much larger
worker (+5.6%). The biggest difference is likely performances
but... who knows?
Notes:
- The main reason for this change is that automated vulnerability
scanner have apparently started scanning for `postMessage(..., '*')`
and the previous bundles includes a version of corejs polyfills
without zloirock/core-js#542), therefore triggering those scans. As
the PR notes this is almost certainly not a concern because of the
innocuous payload, but there is no reason to waste time on those
reports if we don't *have* to.
- The bundle now includes "standard fonts", those were removed as
they're heavy and may not be necessary for our usage (?).
- All the bitmap images were dropped and replaced by svgs, which is
nice.
- The local changes since the previous update were *not* impacted in
this, the entire thing was just reset to upstream. This means
changes which were backported (922c7c72, 6943714f) are superseded
but more odoo-specific changes will have to be reapplied in further
commits.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#100067
Probably since recent changes in the views architecture, and
because the test coverage was recently extended, this test
failed when l10n_mx_edit module was installed.
While verifying the current user has access to all the fields specified
in the settings view, we browse all the fields, including the ones in a sub-view:
<field name="x_ids">
<tree>
<field name="whatever">
</tree>
</field>
x_ids being a settings field, but not whatever, which made the test fail.
To fix this problem, we check the fields belong to the res.config.settings
model before trying to access it.
closesodoo/odoo#104119
X-original-commit: 60f22b71063eada039f59321722e794c653acbde
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
The initial bug report was the ability to disable all companies
at once and messing up the whole database when you do so.
However, forcing administrators to choose a new company for active users
before archiving a company seems relevant, and solve the
above reported issue in the same time.
closesodoo/odoo#104112
X-original-commit: 786ed3c7a688a662767abfb6e74e7f6dbc938f2e
Signed-off-by: Vincent Schippefilt (vsc) <vsc@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux (dle) <dle@odoo.com>
`__manifest__.py` was introduced in Odoo 10 and quickly migrated
to (c758e9043a fixed the last holdouts).
Deprecate old manifests. People who need the compatibility can just
add a symlink (or duplicate the file if they're working on FAT or an
old os where core.symlinks can't be set to `true`).
closesodoo/odoo#103952
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
Since #98551, groups have been moved from views fields to xml content
to harmonize the behavior of xml and view groups.
Nevertheless, this reduced the coverage of the test verifying settings user
are always able to open the settings view.
This commit brings back part of that coverage, checking for each application manager
group that the settings view can be opened and saved correctly.
closesodoo/odoo#103989
X-original-commit: bb067f894a5e5511370990b98981e739565d2f2a
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
See the explanation here:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/5069c8fd1cee063827873de0f6c2d9fe938337a9/odoo/addons/base/models/ir_ui_view.py#L1209-L1217
The strategy was to create a temporary
<t groups="..."> node which gets deleted after the postprocessing.
The deletion counted on the fact `groups` was the only attribute set
to delete this temporary technical node. In case
someone configured manually in a view architecture directly a t node
with a groups and something else.
But, studio adds another attribute to nodes with "groups=" in the
context of the studio edition (`studio=True` in the context)
https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/blob/7e66f89e1c85852908edc45e72706e51838960b0/web_studio/models/ir_ui_view.py#L53
and therefore another attribute was added on this temporary technical node,
which therefore didn't get deleted properly before being send to the
webclient.
So, we change the heuristic, instead of relying no the fact
`groups` was the only attribute, set a technical attribute on the node
to identify it comes directly from the postprocessing and it must
be deleted properly before being sent to the webclient.
closesodoo/odoo#103832
X-original-commit: 53c684a69bbe8894f05306631272bcf08c226f96
Related: odoo/enterprise#33096
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux (dle) <dle@odoo.com>
Since odoo/odoo#95729
nodes with a `groups=` are completely removed from the views when
the user is not part of the group, instead of being made invisible.
In that PR, views have been adapted to add back fields, with invisible="1",
when they were required, for instance when they were used in a domain
of another field which was still there despite the user is not part
of the given group.
As `tree` views having `multi_edit="1"` where not considered
as editable views, the domain of fields in these views were not
validated:
- https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/1fb8fa16ab7dc298d54f089d7163fb556dbc5fcc/odoo/addons/base/models/ir_ui_view.py#L1460
- https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/1fb8fa16ab7dc298d54f089d7163fb556dbc5fcc/odoo/addons/base/models/ir_ui_view.py#L1321-L1322
while they are well required for the web client,
in `multi_edit="1"` this is possible to edit relational/many2one field,
and therefore it will do `name_search` calls using the domain of the
field, and therefore the fields used in these domains must always
be present in the views. Without it, a crash in the web client occurs
when attempting to edit the relational/many2one field.
This revision targets to consider the `multi_edit="1"` tree views
as editable, to make the field domains validated as they should be.
Hence, views are adapted to add back fields with `invisible="1"`
when they are required in domains of other fields.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#103790
It was not always set (e.g. in the generate_email call of
mail.template) and it executes methods like _render_qweb_html where
data was already optional.
closesodoo/odoo#103840
X-original-commit: ddb2bf9f9cb6ea3a4bbdc4fb68c7fbcb0e66aa43
Signed-off-by: Martin Trigaux (mat) <mat@odoo.com>
The arguments for the method `fields_get` are `allfields` and
`attributes`, but this model is overriding it with different name,
provoking the error:
TypeError: fields_get() got an unexpected keyword argument 'allfields'
This commits fixes it renamign the argument to the correct one.
TT40013
closesodoo/odoo#103771
X-original-commit: 3884136b73b1efe4de6a28b9447a72a5d257666c
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux (dle) <dle@odoo.com>
When looking to fetch grouped data from the database, `read_group`
should work(-ish), especially with support for `array_agg`. This also
means this need should be more or less solved around RPC: client can
either `read_group` or group on the client side.
This leaves a glaring hole in the fabric: there's no convenient tools
to apply grouping to recordsets. `itertools.groupby` exists, but it
requires that the input be grouped by the key function, and it yields
an iterable of items which is not the most convenient for recordsets.
This here utility:
- is exclusive to recordsets
- returns a mapping of grouping keys to subsets of the input recordset
- keeps the prefetching of the source recordset
- allows grouping on a field, or an arbitrary (callable) key
- should work even on "new records" (aka should be suitable for
onchanges / arbitrary compute functions)
While the method is RPC-compatible, it's not especially designed for
that, it is likely a much better idea for the client to `read` the
data they need then group that client side on whatever criteria they
are interested in, or `read_group` the aggregated information they
need directly if that's an option.
Part-of: odoo/odoo#101522
Since the recent css change the text of the description field was no taking all the place he could, so it was impossible to read, thanks to the colspan it's now the way it was intended
closesodoo/odoo#103634
X-original-commit: 93d29540ff6a6756a84d904047d4e9554d6d9ad7
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli <qdp@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Maximilien La Barre (malb) <malb@odoo.com>
The Owl web client does not suppress GTK-style mnemonics, so these
should be removed, as otherwise they are explicitly displayed.
Following GTK rules, the old GTK client would use the `_` letter
prefix in labels to underline the letter and use the corresponding
character as accelerator/mnemonic for activating the
control (https://docs.gtk.org/gtk4/ctor.Label.new_with_mnemonic.html).
The web client "supported" this feature by just ignoring and dropping
the `_` it found in labels, even after it gained support for keyboard
accelerators (= hotkeys).
The new Owl form just ignores GTK-style mnemonics entirely, not
performing that preprocessing on widget labels. As a result, the
mnemonic marker (`_`) now appears literally in some labels, and needs
to be removed.
closesodoo/odoo#103563
X-original-commit: ca80632a1045b26927f72d93f4ec58e7a58b5654
Signed-off-by: Xavier Morel (xmo) <xmo@odoo.com>
The same override of `_get_view` was done in `res.partner` and `crm.lead`
in order to call `_view_get_address`, to change the address format
of the partner and lead form.
The definition of `_view_get_address` was already shared between these
two models through the `format.address.mixin` mixin.
So, why not share the override of `_get_view` also in this mixin,
so only one override needs to be written, instead of two.
In addition to merge the code of the `_get_view` override
in `format.address.mixin`, also set the `_get_view_cache_key`,
so the partner and lead form are correctly cached by company,
in case multiple companies in a same db use different address views.
Before this revision, this wasn't the case for `crm.lead`,
which therefore leaded to a bug when two companies where
using different address view, and one company accessed the lead
form before the other, therefore caching its own view version
in the cache, re-used later by the second company when fetching
its own lead form.
This revision takes the opportunity to add a unit test for crm.lead,
to assert the expected form according to the company address.
There was already a test for res.partner, but not for crm.lead.
To avoid copy/pasting the unit for both models,
a common test class is created, re-used to test both res.partner
and crm.lead.
closesodoo/odoo#103438
X-original-commit: 7e4a8b77024af663c5555c6d56557e2c6136b24b
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux (dle) <dle@odoo.com>
This allows launching Odoo with "python -m odoo".
This manner of launching python applications is now widespread.
In particular it makes it easier to configure an IDE debugger to run with the correct python version.
closesodoo/odoo#81864
Signed-off-by: Vincent Schippefilt (vsc) <vsc@odoo.com>
Followup of: odoo/enterprise@b58637f1ab
That completely removed the firebase_admin library support, making this warning
ignore line not necessary.
Task-3000338
closesodoo/odoo#103474
Signed-off-by: Thibault Delavallee (tde) <tde@openerp.com>
Ducplicating a company is not allowed (see copy override in
base/res_company.py), therefore removing the button from the view
altogether can avoid user confusion.
Task-3000228
closesodoo/odoo#103250
Signed-off-by: Bouvy Damien (dbo) <dbo@odoo.com>
classic layout issue due to the group that cause a wrong alignment
closesodoo/odoo#103205
X-original-commit: 2f5b96639c8bb7975696c507c11d57d164e52cbb
Signed-off-by: Morgane Demesmaeker <edm@odoo.com>
To be able to create easily a jsonb column in database,
we create a Json type Field. Currently, it is quite limited
field:
- We cannot modified the value in-place, we need to always set
the entire jsonify value.
- No domain operator is done to work with jsonb. Now, it works as a
text field.
closesodoo/odoo#103097
X-original-commit: 7eeba9d205d2dace571b5d0895ddba6290a512db
Related: odoo/enterprise#32729
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli <qdp@odoo.com>
The `analytic_distribution` field is a Json.
It was stored temporarily as a char.
Search is not available yet, so we do queries by hand when we need to search on keys.
Also added a constraint on account_analytic_distribution_model,
so we don't have models with accounts specific to a company when the model has no company or another company.
It would cause an issue when looking at the models from another company.
X-original-commit: 7064c95aa04e5138bb12ae97acfee04ebb67cc0e
Part-of: odoo/odoo#103097
Commit [1] and [2] introduced an assets pregeneration to speed up the
testing suite on runbot.
It seems like it was chosen to always pregenerate the assets when a
module was installed/upgraded. This was done in the `test_assetsbundle`
module to only impact the tests flows, but it was not correct as it was
not only impacting the tests flows but also regular runbot usage.
Indeed, any `all` runbot (the default one) will have that module
installed.
It means that any module operation through regular flow in those DB will
trigger the assets pregeneration.
One of the problem is then that during a theme switch through the
website builder (or configurator), assets would be pregenerated, adding
~40 seconds to the processing time.
Since that theme install was already taking ~30 seconds on `all` runbot,
it sometimes now total over 60 seconds, triggering the `CPU Time Limit`.
You can find some benchmark and metrics on this commit PR.
Obviously, that's not fine because runbot, despite being our testing
tool/platform, is also one of our main demo tool.
That's especially true around the OXP period, where people are recording
video on it but will also use it to show demo to the customers.
Finally, there is no reason to not limit this assets pregeneration to
the test mode anyway.
Note that sometimes, the theme install is failing and responding with a
502 error after a long time, this is yet unsure if this was the cause
but it was during this investigation that this commit fix was found.
It is probably the cause though.
[1]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/c764c38d7caf300dce7509e87d2bd268eee0161d
[2]: https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/d47cf37b688117d6b2514b9b620787aa66312c61closesodoo/odoo#103105
X-original-commit: 5e77961e4768ef2d3d40f1600dd76a633a0e231b
Signed-off-by: Romain Derie (rde) <rde@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Smetz (qsm) <qsm@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: Xavier-Do <xdo@odoo.com>
Previously, the context passed in onchanges calls after a o2m modification in the form view were the one of the parent object, whereas it should have been the context defined on the o2m field itself
closesodoo/odoo#103081
X-original-commit: 31ee570d17db2f5e3e2ff6877a7634ab9be12492
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli <qdp@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
Translated fields are stored as jsonb columns. Since jsonb columns don't have
size, the size attribute for Char field doesn't work. Setting the size attribute
for a Char fild should raise an error
closesodoo/odoo#103031
X-original-commit: 763fbb1c68385f202f5118fac5bc8b23b8760220
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet <rco@odoo.com>
For non-translated field, when search(['name', 'in', list_right])
The behavior of False and the behavior of None in list_right should be the same.
Translated fields need customized process for 'in' operator
X-original-commit: a9a3c666f08c5612432dba40a69c7cfdc54ba96e
Part-of: odoo/odoo#103031
The trigram index function jsonb_path_query_array("column_name", '$.*')::text
uses all translations' representations to build the indexed text. So the
original text needs to be JSON-escaped correctly to match it.
X-original-commit: 7547df664945dddcb839e4903068f7f25ecfc08c
Part-of: odoo/odoo#103031
make searching translated field language dependent
add an extra filter using trigram index to speed up '=' and 'like' search
X-original-commit: 5b6f0a9e5f9d60735e306709a3e7d7ac46a586be
Part-of: odoo/odoo#103031
Before: while upgrading to 16.0, the PO file is loaded before migrating
ir_translate. As a result, old translations from ir_translation
override the new translations imported by new PO files.
After: translations imported by the PO file take priority over the
translations migrated from the ir_translation table.
X-original-commit: 178270eff48221537a4efba1ad8fa0b53a1516f2
Part-of: odoo/odoo#103031
Since o_form_view class was not placed on the right element, as the
form is displayed in a dialog, some styles were not applied in x2Many
dialogs using a form view. Now, the selector matches all cases and
dialogs will be stylized as expected, since the class is placed on the
dialog container instead of the first div.
Now, we are consistent both for dialogs and standard form views.
Tests have been adapted to work as expected.
closesodoo/odoo#102953
X-original-commit: af67305b43d51e1669df19d376d9bda7418ba863
Signed-off-by: Michaël Mattiello <mcm@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Vitali <luvi@odoo.com>
Instead of having a dedicated module for all-things dark mode related,
this commit moves the (S)CSS files into their respecting modules and
uses `web` and `web_enterprise` to provide the base infrastructure for
the dark mode (cf. dedicated assets bundle).
Note:
Don't forget that you have to handle 2 cases:
1: SCSS variables must be placed BEFORE bright ones
2: CSS variables must be placed AFTER
task-2710677
Part-of: odoo/odoo#102868
This commit adapts several components in order to correctly handle
color-scheme variations.
It also allows user_menu to handle switch entries
task-2710677
Part-of: odoo/odoo#102868
The recent switch from tables to css grids for form views `group` nodes
has introduced several inconsistencies/issues with several views accross
modules - these will not be the last fixes.
closesodoo/odoo#102174
X-original-commit: 836568dfd59886a6d52f15e0e2109709903b6803
Related: odoo/enterprise#32295
Signed-off-by: Bouvy Damien (dbo) <dbo@odoo.com>
* clean and improve docstrings in orm
* fix typos found with codespell
* rely on the Environment class docstring instead of doc content (and
therefore move part of the doc inside the class docstring)
closesodoo/odoo#102969
X-original-commit: 8250cd4b210005d223a4cdb8afa4014425ca6fa3
Related: odoo/documentation#2803
Signed-off-by: Victor Feyens (vfe) <vfe@odoo.com>
Using patcher.start() can easily lead to incorrect cleanup.
-> after a copy paste, patcher is working, but stop is forgotten
-> stop is present, but won't be called if something fails during the
test
This commit add an utility `start(patcher)` to always have the add
cleanup.
Using a standard way to start the patcher with an automated addCleanup
should prevent this kind of mistake. This is why this commit also
replaces all valid patch.start() (followed immediately by a addCleanup)
closesodoo/odoo#102873
X-original-commit: 7d5a193d86316965a0908c65cfacfb607dc3f3ad
Related: odoo/enterprise#32618
Signed-off-by: Christophe Monniez (moc) <moc@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Xavier Dollé (xdo) <xdo@odoo.com>
It is technically nearly impossible to delete a company
when it actually dealed with customers
(emitted invoices, received payments, ...).
Hence, if you want to get rid of a company,
for instance because you closed one of your subsidiaries,
giving the possibility to archive your company,
thanks to an active field, would be the best way to go.
We are hesitating to do a related field to the
`partner_id.active`, but we are a bit afraid
some people archive the partner linked to their company
for other valid reasons than get rid of their subsidiary
(such as avoid changing the address of their company
by mistake through the Contacts app),
while still wanting the company itself to be active.
So, we make it an independant column at the moment,
so we have the actual stored column in case we need it,
and will do a related stored to the partner
later on if we change our mind.
Manual forward-port of #102801closesodoo/odoo#102586
Signed-off-by: Olivier Dony <odo@odoo.com>
Before this commit the neutralize system introduced in v16 was using ORM
methods in order to change appropriate records. Although flexible, this approach
could lead to call some methods with side effects while neutralizing
(eg: overloads of write).
This patch converts the neutralize system to a safer "inert" SQL based approach
by migrating the generic method _neutralize to SQL files exposed in the
data folder.
Task id: 2961687closesodoo/odoo#102792
X-original-commit: e5dbded9bb363351feff7ca8a56c7f8a6860f492
Related: odoo/enterprise#32580
Signed-off-by: Fabien Meghazi <fme@odoo.com>
Only kanban, tree and form implements onchanges.
Therefore, on calendar, graph, pivot, ..., putting `on_change="1"`
is useless and is a waste of resources and KB.
e.g. CRM lead pivot view
Before:
```xml
<pivot string="Pipeline Analysis" sample="1">
<field name="create_date" interval="month" type="row"/>
<field name="stage_id" type="col" on_change="1"/>
<field name="expected_revenue" type="measure"/>
<field name="color" modifiers="{"invisible": true}"/>
<field name="automated_probability" modifiers="{"invisible": true}"/>
<field name="message_bounce" modifiers="{"invisible": true}"/>
<field name="probability" on_change="1" modifiers="{"invisible": true}"/>
</pivot>
```
After:
```xml
<pivot string="Pipeline Analysis" sample="1">
<field name="create_date" interval="month" type="row"/>
<field name="stage_id" type="col"/>
<field name="expected_revenue" type="measure"/>
<field name="color" modifiers="{"invisible": true}"/>
<field name="automated_probability" modifiers="{"invisible": true}"/>
<field name="message_bounce" modifiers="{"invisible": true}"/>
<field name="probability" modifiers="{"invisible": true}"/>
</pivot>
```
I would have like something smarter, like using the `editable` concept
for instance, but it's not that easy.
e.g. kanban is not considered as editable, while it does support
onchanges when grouping record by a field and drag and dropping
record from one column to another.
However, if we change the kanban view to make it editable,
the view validation will start validating the fields domain:
https://github.com/odoo/odoo/blob/45d4ac14f65c53dcde56592715d50169bde116ad/odoo/addons/base/models/ir_ui_view.py#L1439-L1442
causing issues:
- If a field used in the domain is not in the view, it will need to be
added in the view,
- while it will not be used, as you cannot do a search in related fields
in kanban views anyway.
e.g.
```
odoo.tools.convert.ParseError: while parsing /data/build/odoo/addons/analytic/views/analytic_line_views.xml:120
Error while validating view near:
<kanban class="o_kanban_mobile" __validate__="1">
<field name="date"/>
<field name="name"/>
Field 'company_id' used in domain of field 'account_id' ([('company_id', 'in', [company_id, False])]) must be present in view but is missing.
```
In addition, the kanban doesn't need the readonly and required
attributes on the field nodes, as other editable views (tree and forms)
do.
In addition, the tree list is currently considered as "editable" only
when it has `editable="bottom" or `editable="top"`, while
a tree without this editable attribute can still trigger onchange,
for instance when using `widget="handle"` or `widget="boolean_toggle"`.
We should therefore making the tree list editable whatever the case,
leading to the same issues than listed for the kanban above,
or make an exception for field in non-editable tree views using a
widget..
So, as the smarter way seems difficult and risky, for a limited gain
I choose the easy way by separating the concept "editable" and
"onchange-able" and to not set `on_change="1"` on views not considered
as "onchange-able".
closesodoo/odoo#102788
X-original-commit: aeb65ee536b1611c1cb829c91906f327f8e331c7
Signed-off-by: Denis Ledoux (dle) <dle@odoo.com>
Joseph Caburnay