stage_id is comptued and based on stage_ids
The default value should be put on stage_ids, not stage_id, it has the same
effect but avoids an unecessary chain update.
The account.move has already self.date for the date field (cf the method
`_prepare_reconciliation_move`). As the field date on the account.move.line is
a related, it makes useless updates to write it here.
Same issue for journal_id field
ref is a related set on the account.move. Writting on the line set the same
reference for all the lines and the parent move (the one of the last line).
Instead put it on the move if there is only one reference or do not put a wrong
one if we can't determine one.
Avoid setting a value for a related field as it will trigger onchange update.
This code was relevant when the date was different on the move and the line but
is no longer needed.
Remove all the `if vals.get(mandatory_field)` to simplify this method and remove
dead code or condition always true.
The field journal_id and date are both required on account.move and are stored
related on account.move.line.
Setting the required on the account.move.line allows to make it required in the
views or for the ORM but in practice it will be same as it's required on the
parent.
Making it required is a performance killer as it forces to specify a value for
the create which will retrigger an update on the parent move.
This means that adding a line with a date value on an account.move with already
10 lines will trigger 11 updates (date of the new line -> date of the move ->
date on the 10 existing lines), even if the value has not changed.
Currently some customers receive the automatic notification 'Quotation
viewed by customer'. This should not be the case as this notifciation
is purely internal and should only be sent to the quote responsible.
Notification is now a note with the responsible being directly in the
recipients.
Commit 933949085d added the odoo variable
definition in the iframe template so the condition which checked if
odoo.define is available had to be adapted.
The nocontent message was never there when the kanban had no content
in grouped mode and the create button was muted even if no column can
be added. Also it was wrongly displayed in ungrouped mode.
Workflows are removed and replaced by python code directly embeded in model
files. There are several reasons to do this
* most of workflows are simple state machines. They simple go from state to
state under simple conditions. Short circuits exist allowing to bypass
part of the flow, like cancelling a record. However it is easier to
understand a flow composed of several simple methods than having to
understand the workflow in a separate xml file
* workflows are hard to debug and modify. Each modification require a small
migration. Moreover ensuring records are not blocked or that there does
not exist unreachable states is hard to do.
* having all business code in models helps understanding the business code.
* most of our flows are quite simple and does not require a complex machinery
to reflect it
Workflow engine itself is kept. Lot of people use it and it can be very
useful in some cases, notably in modeling more complex flows. Removing it
is therefore not planned in this task.
Commit 744cd64b53 re-added the removed
col system in the title snippet but did not respect the odoo structure
which is section > .container [> .row > .col-*] and put the container
class directly on the section. With this method, when changing the
background of the snippet, only the container part is filled
with background.
* On firefox, you had to click twice on a link to be able to start
typing text
* When selecting text which contained a <br/>, you were not able to
replacing it correctly (you had to click again before starting typing)
* When replacing a whole paragraph content which was below a title,
the text was not replaced and you had to click again and the title
transformed into a paragraph.
* ...
Note that to copy the workflow, just after creating the state is updated
to draft. The 'New' state is not used anymore in the flow. It could
probably be cleaned. However in this task we only remove the workflows
without changing their behavior to avoid unwanted side effects.
This report is too advanced and/or complex to be a single menuitem. Furthermore the model was a mess and a horn of plenty for bugs.
The class ProjectTaskHistoryCumulative inherits from the class ProjectTaskHistory, and create a view based on the same model.The orginal class defines a compute field 'end_date' which calls a compute method '_compute_end_date' that will either make a simple assignment or a SQL request if the columns is always opened or folded.
As ProjectTaskHistoryCumulative is declare with '_auto=False' the compute method will try to write on this table, which is obviously wrong because we are trying to write on a view.
This leads to erors when trying to edit a project stage like:
OperationalError: cannot update view "project_task_history_cumulative"
DETAIL: Views that do not select from a single table or view are not automatically updatable.
HINT: To enable updating the view, provide an INSTEAD OF UPDATE trigger or an unconditional ON UPDATE DO INSTEAD rule.
or when trying to delete a column which already contains some tasks.
So we removed this these models and view and replaced them by a simple favorite filter in the Tasks Reports
When the purchase model is installed, there are two checkbox with
label 'Can be Purchased'. This error is due the rev https://github.com/odoo/odoo/commit/e945b86d5a61e53a9104ab6cc4ed4a1c060587e4
where we moved purchase related fields from module product to an
inherited view in purchase module.
To fix this, we removed the 'purchase_ok' field that was left in
the product_template view.
Barcode, default_code (Internal Reference), standard_price,
volume, weight fields are not saved when we create a new product.
This is due to the fact that these fields need the product_variant_ids
field to be set, in order to compute their values.
Due to migration in rev https://github.com/odoo-dev/odoo/commit/1aa5bc0fdfa402ac7cccbc3a7203ec5050f6339b
This commit improves the tokenization process, allowing users
to set the acquirer to save payment data never, always or letting
the customer decide (only implemented in ecommerce for now).
Support for tokenization is improved for Ogone and Authorize.net
This commits also factorizes advanced payment features support
(authorization, tokenization, fees computation) in a generic method
overriden by every provider to specifiy which features are supported.
This process can be used in views to hide/show fields depending on
feature support or in constraint checks.
This commit add s2s communication to the Authorize.net payment
provider, allowing the user to:
- Create a payment token
- Charge a payment token
- Authorize/capture transactions
Since the creates overrides needs some information that do not end up
in the final record, let's avoid warning by removing all non-model
fields from the call to super.
Martin Trigaux