* add latex support for exercise admonition
* latex freezes/crashes on {HEAVY WIDE-HEADED RIGHTWARDS ARROW} so
replace them by more manual arrows
* add some preamble configuration, may not even be necessary
* generate WS setup code only in HTML output. WS doc in latex still
isn't great as it displays all 4 languages one after the other,
ideally they should be tagged or something, so only one language at a
time is generated in non-HTML outputs
Doc pages used container() which is width-limited, works acceptably for
single-column content but WS page takes 2 columns with code, having as
much space as possible is a much better idea.
Mayhaps it should even use lg-column(2) instead of md-column(3)?
The delivery of a purchase order was not keeping the currency and cost price
from the purchase order for the reception. This was problematic for orders where
the invoice was generated from the picking (Invoicing Control: Based on incoming
shipments). The currency of the purchase order was kept while the cost was the
one in the company's currency.
It's better to keep the currency of the purchase order to make the invoice as
it's usually the one expected (and not convert everything to the currency of the
company). opw 615555
This rev. 06104ba553
Added the dirty flag on the o2m field when the editor of the editable list was enabled (meaning that the editable list has been altered)) because the dirty flag was not set correctly by the one2many during the edition, at the time.
It looks like this is now the case
Besides, as now, we valid all the editable list of the form, wether or not the editable list was altered, we must not set the o2m as dirty anymore.
First, name_search searches on default_code, then, if the limit is not reached, it searches on the product name
The results found from the default code search must be removed from the search domain when doing the search on the product name, to avoid having results already found by the search on the default_code
opw-618015
When a picking is confirmed, the generated account.move(.line) should take the
company, accounts, journals and period with the same company as the picking,
not the one of the current user.
This was problematic if a user in a company confirm a picking linked to
a purchase order done in another company.
For real time valuations, the generated accounting entries were mixing both
companies.
Fixes#3466
Now only validated allocation requests are taken into account
when computing the number of virtual remaining leaves (leaves
+ pending leaves). This avoid creating allocation request to
have virtual remaining leaves artificially added.
Jérome Maes