Display extra information on error messages:
- Access error based on ACLs: user, fields (if applies)
- Access error based on record rules: user, ids
- Missing error: model, operation, user, ids
closesodoo/odoo#33942
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Martinelli (nim) <nim@odoo.com>
Co-authored-by: jev-odoo <jev@odoo.com>
As snapshots are costly to compute, we now create exactly two snapshots:
one initial snapshot and one final snapshot. All intermediate checks
are done with respect to the initial snapshot.
Note also that checks are costly for x2many fields. Therefore, once a
field has changed, it will never be checked again. This optimization is
correct since, by contract, the onchanges of a field are processed at
most once. This guarantees the absence of cycles in onchange.
For instance, assume that field A modifies fields B and C, and that
field C modifies fields D, E and F:
- before: 7 snapshots (snapshot, process A, snapshot, process B,
snapshot, process C, snapshot, process D, snapshot, process E,
snapshot, process F, snapshot)
- after: 2 snapshots (snapshot, process A, process B, process C,
process D, process E, process F, snapshot)
closesodoo/odoo#31872
Signed-off-by: Raphael Collet (rco) <rco@openerp.com>
Reverts 2b1d3ff82d introduced in 10.0 via
It was relatively useful in Odoo 10.0 because in Python 2 the exception
was missing a root cause traceback. But Python 3 includes exception
chaining by default, so it comes for free.
See [PEP3134](https://legacy.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3134/)
On top of being redundant in P3, it can also break some testcases
by causing an extra ERROR log entry, even when the final exception is
expected and caught. So it's simpler to remove it.
closesodoo/odoo#31699
Signed-off-by: Olivier Dony (odo) <odo@openerp.com>
This commit introduced a regression in web_studio, discovered at opw-1947380
A fix in web_studio will be integrated too but the regression is the proof this
commit should not have been integrated in 11.0.
While the new behaviour introduced at d855e3911f makes more sense, it is still
a change of behaviour that should not target a stable version.
For the problem raised at opw-1887162 that d855e3911f was trying to fix, a
workaround should be used instead.
For instance, setting a widget='html_frame' allows to translate in the website
editor that handles this correctly.
In master, the new behaviour can be maintained and eventual regressions will be
investigated there.
closesodoo/odoo#31585
Signed-off-by: "Martin Trigaux (mat)" <mat@odoo.com>
[FIX] models: do not erase master version
For a translated field with a callable method (e.g. xml_translate), when
modifying the value of this field in another language than en_US, the master
version was lost.
Before this patch:
>>> record.arch = "<h1>Title</h1>"
>>> record.with_context(lang='fr_FR').arch = "<h1>Titre</h1>"
>>> record.with_context(lang='fr_FR').arch
"<h1>Titre</h1>"
>>> record.arch
"<h1>Titre</h1>" # lost English version
After this patch:
>>> record.arch = "<h1>Title</h1>"
>>> record.with_context(lang='fr_FR').arch = "<h1>Titre</h1>"
>>> record.with_context(lang='fr_FR').arch
"<h1>Title</h1>" # write had no effect
>>> record.arch
"<h1>Title</h1>"
When modifying a translated HTML field in English, a matching to detect the
difference and avoid losing the translations is done.
This is not supported for update in another language.
The main reason is the difficulty to detect changes in the architecture.
To update translations, the supported way is to go to the list of translations
and update them there.
Before this patch, the given value in another language was given to the SQL
query and made an update in database:
if single_lang or not (has_translation and field.translate is True)
-> True or not (True and False) -> True
If a field is callable, it should also be ignored, the same way than
translate=True fields
opw-1887162
closesodoo/odoo#31451
Before this, groups on non-stored inverse fields were not checked upon write.
The impact on existing fields is pretty small, since the inverse methods of
those fields are subject to access rights on the records they use.
closesodoo/odoo#30357
Before this, groups on non-stored inverse fields were not checked upon write.
The impact on existing fields is pretty small, since the inverse methods of
those fields are subject to access rights on the records they use.
closesodoo/odoo#30356
Before this patch, any exception raised by a constraint method that
were not of type `ValidationError` were hard to debug, because the
origin line was never logged.
Explicitly logging the error (with traceback) when we catch it
ensures proper contextual info, even in the absence of exception
chaining.
closesodoo/odoo#28612
The method `read()` may be very slow when reading relational fields and
computed fields, because the computed fields can be computed on a recordset
that is larger than expected.
The issue occurs on model 'res.partner' when reading fields 'child_ids' and
'purchase_order_count', for instance. Suppose we read those two fields on a
partner with 1000 contacts. First, the one2many field is read from the
database and stored to the cache; the latter adds the value ids to the
prefetching of 'res.partner'. Then, the fields are fetched from the cache.
When 'purchase_order_count' is accessed on the partner, the field is computed
on all its children as well...
closesodoo/odoo#29867
Commit a07a076c45 restricts the prefetching to
`self` when accessing the fields to return. This is too restrictive, as it
cancels prefetching of secondary records in computed fields. In this commit we
limit the scope of the restriction to `self`'s model only; this fixes the
original issue without impacting other models.
closesodoo/odoo#30133
instead of updating the cache by records.
We use `cr.fetchall()` and `zip` to get the values by field, which is more
convenient to be stored in cache.
Result of `cr.fetchall()`:
```
[
(3, 'Marc Demo', 'demo@example.com', '032'),
(1, 'Mitchell Admin', 'admin@example.com', '001'),
]
```
After being grouped by field:
```
[
[3, 1],
['Marc Demo', 'Mitchell Admin],
['demo@example.com', 'admin@example.com'],
['032', '001'],
]
```
That way we can update the cache of a field for all records at once, by calling
the builtin `update` method of `dict` with the `zip` of record ids and
corresponding values.
This significantly speeds up the storage of field values in the cache.
closesodoo/odoo#30817
Instead of iterating on self and then putting the values in the right place in
the `data` dict, iterate over data directly.
This removes the need of the indexing `data[record]`, which takes a significant
time when dealing with hundred of thousands of records.
Calling `len` on a long list and checking that its value is 1 is slower than
just unpacking the list. The point is to check whether there is just one item
in the list, and counting all items just for that is a bit overkill.
On a record with a large x2many, the web client does not load all the data of
the lines (because of paging). If a line is modified by an onchange, at some
point the client will determine whether lines are valid (all required fields
are provided). It is possible that the client cannot evaluate the validity of
the modified line because of missing fields. In order to avoid this situaion,
the server sends all fields on modified lines.
When changing the field `image` on `res.users`, the `write_date` of the user is
not updated because the field is inherited from `res.partner`.
Related to Issue : 1839603
A copy call cn be made with a specified value to an inherits value, e.g.:
self.env['product.product'].browse(42).copy({'product_tmpl_id': 1})
In such scenario, it is assumed the translations are already correct on the
specified related record and should not be used in the copy translation.
i.e. the translations of the product.template 1 must not be duplicated during
the copy call above
Same logic for One2many fields which should not recursively copy the
translations for user provided values
Closes#27108
- When a tracked field is modified, a mail.message is created.
When create is called its tries to fill missing values with "default
values".
It first tries to find the default values in the context, which may
occurs.
For example, modifying a tracked field on a subtask will add a key
"default_parent_id" in the context, which is the parent_id of the project.task.
Create will try to use "default_parent_id" for the mail.message
parent_id field, which make the SQL Request invalid.
Christophe Simonis