Allow sharing records between company
* accounts
* taxes
* fiscal positions
* products
* ...and some related models
These records can be read and used in children companies.
This can be used to
* have different branding for different businesses
* allow more complex security rules
* consolidate branches differently
* manage different tax reports with different tax ids in the same
country
task-3371677
closesodoo/odoo#125642
Related: odoo/enterprise#43215
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli <qdp@odoo.com>
When creating a Vendor Bill, the default Sales Team & Person of the company is
assigned to the Vendor Bill. The field isn't even displayed, it's hidden, you
can only display it with Studio and can't even change it.
The fact is : purchases and sales are two completely different roles and
business in companies. This has the indirect consequence that any user that
follows the default Sales Team will get notified of any new Vendor Bill created
in Accounting, which he very likely does not need/want to see.
This PR correct that by adding a condition on the filling of these fields. These
fields will be filled when the move is a sale document.
closesodoo/odoo#120628
Task-id: 3279233
Related: odoo/enterprise#44034
Signed-off-by: Florian Gilbert (flg) <flg@odoo.com>
In this pr, we have improved the l10n_hu localization by adding a Tax rounding
(global) by default.
Also, a lot of localization will need a delivery date on invoices. We added a
field in account that can be overridden if needed. In this pr, we did an
override on l10n_sa and l10n_hu.
When creating a sale order and that the effective date is fill, we take this
value for the delivery date.
The delivery date field will always be displayed in the other info tab, and if
there is a delivery data, the field is also display in the header of the form
view. Exception for l10n_sa and l10n_hu where the delivery date is always
present.
Also for l10n_sa company there was a problem with the vat number, it was not in
the right format.
Task-id: 3191530
Part-of: odoo/odoo#116643
The bank statement & transaction demo data has problems:
1. the statement doesn't have a name
2. the creation of the statement lines are postponed causing the opening/closing balances to be invalid (as the order of the statement lines is important)
This is due to the _load_data method in account, which defers the creation of records to ensure that related records are created before they are referenced in relational fields.
This commit adds a condition to avoid deferring fields that have a list of ORM create commands, and fixes the statement name and balances.
closesodoo/odoo#120975
X-original-commit: 1d219de36944685153a77aeeb72920b06728383e
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Ayob Habib (ayh) <ayh@odoo.com>
If there are no default taxes on product or account, or
predictive guess, there should be no default taxes on a new aml.
So the `account_sale_tax_id` (and `account_purchase_tax_id`)
field only concern new products (as specified in the tooltip
of the field).
In Argentina, there is a constraint so all lines should have
a tax. So, we need to add default tax on their demo products.
We also add it to the products in account demo to have taxes
by default on demo invoices for all localizations.
task-3045026
Part-of: odoo/odoo#115222
v16.0 introduced a new payment term view and the possibility of an early payment discount.
However, this view and the underlying behaviour can be simplified.
- Changed the payment term view and the report invoice view to better display the installment
- Removed the balance field from payment terms, replacing it with percentage
- Simplified the due date configuration in the payment terms
- Simplified early payment discount by only enabling it on one-line payment term, so it's user-friendlier
- Moved the early payment computation on the payment term rather than the company
task-3090382
See :
Enterprise : https://github.com/odoo/enterprise/pull/36046closesodoo/odoo#110274
Upgrade: https://github.com/odoo/upgrade/pull/4349
Related: odoo/enterprise#36046
Related: odoo/upgrade#4349
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <las@odoo.com>
Rewrite the whole chart template mechanism, removing the templates
stored in the database. The new format will mainly use CSV.
Speed up install time
---------------------
* About half of the time of installing a localization for the first time is
taken by creating the template records. This new in code format gets
completely rid of this.
* Creating the template records could often not be done in batch because
of parent/children relations.
* The instanciation of the accounts on the company has been entirely
reworked too, by
- optimizing the order of creation of records to avoid UPDATE queries
- using precomputed fields to avoid UPDATE queries
- updating the translation in batch
- deactivating logging in the chatter
- avoiding access rights checks by checking the rights at the start
Overall, when installing a chart template for the first time, it is 4
times faster because half of the time spent on saving the template in
the database is not done at all anymore, and the instanciation on the
company is more than twice as fast.
Reduce technical debt
---------------------
There is no need to synchronize the templates with the real records
anymore. No need to use hooks to copy the data from one to the other.
It is easier to change a template in a stable version, which can often
be necessary due to legal reasons (i.e. a change of tax rates, reporting
tags,...)
Two modules have been removed:
* `l10n_generic_coa`: since there is nothing left datawise in this
module, it can be integrated in `account` for free. It is just code
and CSV.
* `l10n_multilang`: the fields that this module modified to be
translatable are now always translatable:
- there was an issue when updating modules that deleted all the
translations because the fields were not translatable at some point
during the loading of the registry, then they because translatable
again but lost all translations because of the column type change.
- most devs are not able to understand all the languages needed for
all the localization available. Therefore, english has been added in
the sources in most localization to understand better issues while
debugging.
- no need to call post init hooks anymore, doing the sync with the
templates.
- more: see "Translations" section
Because most of the data is now in CSV, it is also easier for product
owners to edit, audit, modify files themselves, removing one layer
during trivial development processes when only data should be changed.
More flexibility for declaration
--------------------------------
The data declaration can now be done easily in python or CSV.
A nice feature is that you can declare everything at once, even for some
more complex chart of accounts:
* if you have to set default taxes on accounts, would need to
- declare the accounts because accounts are required on the taxes
- declare the taxes
- declare the taxes to put on the accounts
This would lead to scatter information in multiple files. Now,
everything can be declared in the same place and the loading of the
chart of accounts will do the 3 steps automatically.
* if you have a relation of child/parent, you would first need to
declare the parents then the children, and the loading would not be
efficient because done one by one. Now, everything is done in batch
automatically without having to think about it.
It is also easier to update fields on records where there was no field
for that on the templates, like
* setting a restriction for journals on accounts
* setting specific values on the company
* modifying journals and linking them easily by using the xml_id instead
of having to compute it manually
Translations
------------
Some countries have multiple languages (i.e. Belgium uses officially
French, Dutch and German, and the CoA also has an official English
version) and we must support the languages in all these countries.
All these translations are known, and hard coded without using out
translation platform (Transifex). We also like to have the English
version (even if an official one doesn't exist) so that support can be
done more easily in databases using chart templates in other languages
(especially using a non roman alphabet).
Because the translations were not on Transifex for these records, it was
really hard to maintain: the translation templates (`.pot` files) were
not easy to extract as the automatic export would give values mixing
both the CoA and the menuitmes, the fields' strings,... But we don't
want to translate the CoA as we already know the value.
Managing the translations in the `.po` files was also annoying:
- it is easy to forget that the translations need an update too
- it requires a special editor, special terminal commands that everyone
is not familiar with
- it is easy to make mistakes in the source string
The new format is the following: `field@en_US` where `field` is the
translatable field (usually `name`) and `en_US` is the locale code.
This allows to have the whole declaration on one line, everything in one
file. It also makes the process easier when debugging: instead of
searching for the translation in the `.po` files, it directly appears
next to the configuration of the account/tax/... .
Update of the code
------------------
The code can be updated using this script
https://github.com/william-andre/transform_coa
Forward ports can be managed too by stashing/resetting/checkout the new
modules or the changes in the modules updated in the same PR.
task-2687567
Part-of: odoo/odoo#110016
There's a demo vendor bill that is fixed on the 2018, while it
sure should be set at more than an year ago, but not in a fixed
point in time that keeps getting further away from the present moment.
Task link: https://www.odoo.com/web#id=2732449&model=project.taskclosesodoo/odoo#107112
Signed-off-by: Quentin De Paoli <qdp@odoo.com>
Analytic distributions that contain mandatory plans should be blocked from posting.
However, automatic flows (for example subscription invoices) should not be blocked.
For this reason, the context is used to determine whether the distribution should be validated.
closesodoo/odoo#102720
X-original-commit: 7b11af76598c0782ac2097d3cbeb718962be2537
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
In order to better display the functionalities, we will change how
the demo data for bank statement are created. There will now be one
bank statement and multiple bank transactions not linked to a statement.
Also rewords one error to be clearer.
closesodoo/odoo#101466
X-original-commit: 5e14b28905fc00bad2c2ccd40328c676d049917d
Signed-off-by: William André (wan) <wan@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Viseur <vin@odoo.com>
Bank statements are now optional in accounting. The users add statements directly and can assign statements for control reasons.
The users can enter end date and end balance real for the statements and attach the bank statement scan.
The system checks if there is a gap (lines without statement) before current statement and warns the user
with decoration, also we check if the ending balance match the accumulated balance of the last line.
Bank statement lines now show an accumulated balance and can be sorted by drag and drop in the same date, if the user drags a line
to a position with lines of another date, it simply doesn't have any effect.
Rename accumulated balance to cumulative balance, a better name
closesodoo/odoo#99092
Task: 2879904
Related: odoo/upgrade#3906
Related: odoo/enterprise#30824
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <las@odoo.com>
This commit improves the payment terms by:
- making the payment terms lines editable on-the-fly removing the need for a wizard
- refactoring the computation of the payment terms
- adds new demo data for payment terms
- adds an example section where the user can test and preview the due dates and amount of its payment terms
- adding a new parameter "Display terms on invoice". If set, the payment deadlines and respective due amounts will be detailed on invoices.
The refactoring:
- adds a field `months` (months to add after the invoice date)
- adds a field `end_month` (if True, switch to the end of the month after having added months or days)
- renames the field `day_of_the_month` to `days_after` (days to be added after the switching to the end of the month, only if `end_month` is set)
- deletes the field `option` which was too restrictive
- modifies the calculation of the payments terms taking into account these new fields
This allows some combinations that were not possible before.
Example: The French payment terms "30 jours fin de mois le 10" (which should be interpreted as "10 days after the end of the next month") can be encoded as
```
months = 1
days = 0
end_month = True
days_after = 10
```
Task id 2852814
closesodoo/odoo#91490
Related: odoo/enterprise#29661
Related: odoo/upgrade#3524
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <las@odoo.com>
Improve the demo data for bank statement in account by formatting the
payment_ref amounts using the company currency, and fixing the due
amount in one payment_ref to match the statement line amount.
Task id #2855485closesodoo/odoo#98510
X-original-commit: 4b23d11184be9bac5ef9790cc7f38bc4d637b47a
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <las@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Viseur <vin@odoo.com>
TLDR:
* invoices are implemented using computed methods instead of onchange
* the synchronization only happens when switching tabs in the Form view
to improve perfs.
_______________________________________________________________________
The whole engine of the synchronization of Invoices to the Journal
Entries has been refactored
* by using computed fields instead of onchange functions
* by synchronizing only from invoice to journal entry in `create` and
`write`
* by saving when switching tabs on the Invoice form, to synchronize
before showing the values
This comes with numerous advantages:
* no need to call the onchange methods manually
* no need to use the Form emulator to build invoices (i.e. EDI, OCR,
intercompany, ...)
* the performance for invoices with many lines improves drastically, going
from 2 minutes to 4 seconds to create an invoice with 500 lines
* the model is more declarative, we can now see how the values are computed
instead of having the values being copied from various places.
* remove the hack in `onchange` that disabled the recursivity of it,
which was unexpected and needed to be managed manually in all the
onchange methods
This means that:
* Some fields need to be exclusively computed on journal entries values
or invoice values, more specifically the Tax Summary widget.
It is now
- computed from entry lines, when opening the view
- computed from invoice lines when changing those, because the tax lines
will need to be recomputed anyways, erasing previously set values
- set with an inverse function when saving; after the sync has been done
* Some possible operations previously possible have been dropped.
(i.e. look at the removed test test_in_invoice_line_onchange_accounting_fields_1)
This is because such a behavior was undefined (how is changing the balance going
to affect the unit price? How is the amount currency going to affect it?)
_______________________________________________________________________
Implementation Details
----------------------
The "dynamic lines", meaning the payment terms and the tax lines are now
only created in the `create` and `write` functions.
In order to reduce code duplication, it has been implemented using
context managers used in both `account.move` and `account.move.line`
These context managers help comparing the values before/after, acting
like a local `onchange`, but getting benefit from the dirty flags from
the `compute` dependences.
This is relying on computed fields on the move (`needed_terms`) and on
the lines (`compute_all_tax`) which contain the values needed for the
related move.
Depending on the needed values and the existing values (`term_key` and
`tax_key`, respectively) the context manager will determine what needs
to be created/updated/deleted.
Some related changes are to produce a `dict` instead of a `str` for the
`tax_totals` (previously `tax_totals_json`) fields, by simplicity to
reduce the complexity of IO, and simplicity of debugging, because the
logic of the field needed to change (cannot be computed at the same time
anymore since it needed the lines to be synced)
By simplicity, and also because it makes more sense, some boolean fields
have been merged into `display_type`:
* `is_rounding_line`
* `exclude_from_invoice_tab`
* `is_anglo_saxon_line`
The `price_unit`, `quantity` and other "invoice fields" are now not set
anymore on lines that are not product lines since it didn't make any
sense to have it.
Performances
------------
You have to keep in mind that a simple `create` didn't compute a lot of
fields, for instance not taxes were set, no payment terms,...
Now it does.
```python
import random
from timeit import timeit
from odoo import Command
domain = [('company_id', 'in', (False, self.env.company.id))]
products = self.env['product.product'].search(domain).ids
partners = self.env['res.partner'].search(domain).ids
taxes = self.env['account.tax'].search(domain).ids
def create(nmove, nline):
self.env['account.move'].create([
{
'move_type': 'out_invoice',
'partner_id': random.choice(partners),
'invoice_line_ids': [
Command.create({
'name': f'line{i}',
'product_id': random.choice(products),
'tax_ids': [Command.set([random.choice(taxes)])],
})
for i in range(nline)
]
}
for j in range(nmove)
])
# After | Before
print(timeit("create(1, 1)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 0.11 | 0.09
print(timeit("create(100, 1)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 2.76 | 2.50
print(timeit("create(500, 1)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 14.56 | 12.34
print(timeit("create(1, 100)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 1.03 | 5.52
print(timeit("create(1, 500)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 3.99 | 125.02
print(timeit("create(50, 50)", globals=globals(), number=1)) # 19.44 | 79.55
```
Another metric that can be used is running the test suite with
`--test-tags=/account` (only `account` installed)
* before: 404s, 267127 queries (366 tests)
* after: 318s, 232125 queries (362 tests)
Why this commit title?
----------------------
Someone told me that this was the perfect way of naming your commits.
c04065abd8
task-2711317
closesodoo/odoo#96134
Related: odoo/upgrade#3715
Related: odoo/enterprise#29758
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <las@odoo.com>
Task: 2856281
- Remove user_type_id, account.account.type model, internal_type
- Add account_type that is a simple selection field
- Move internal_group and include_initial_balance to account.account
- Because of these changes, type_control_ids on account.journal is also removed
closesodoo/odoo#93212
Related: odoo/documentation#2223
Related: odoo/upgrade#3595
Related: odoo/enterprise#28205
Signed-off-by: Cedric Snauwaert <csn@odoo.com>
The demo data created by account did not call _onchange_price_subtotal
on the created account_lines, making the total debit
and credit not matching the state of the lines.
closesodoo/odoo#85188
X-original-commit: 403939ea7b460b95cc31993613f5cba5f5fefcfa
Related: odoo/enterprise#24651
Signed-off-by: Olivier Colson <oco@odoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Viseur <vin@odoo.com>
The test is running in sudo mode, so we need to specify the company in
the search.
Also do not load the demo data when installing as we would do the work
twice for most localization.
closesodoo/odoo#67235
Signed-off-by: Laurent Smet <smetl@users.noreply.github.com>
Task 2124952
Extract all the demo data from `l10n_generic_coa` to a new way of
generating the demo data for accounting modules.
Because the data needs to be created multiple times, and right after the
chart template instanciation, it cannot be done the usual way. Instead,
we use python generators to declare the data. It allows us to reference
data that was not created yet at the start of the creation of the demo.
An xml_id is given, prefixed with the id of the company it is created
for (just like the instanciation of the chart template)
To find the correct accounts, a helper method has been added to
`account.account`. It will look for an account with the correct xml_id
(which is the one of the l10n_generic_coa, that we have to put on the
other l10n modules too, in the future). If it didn't find the xml_id, it
will look for an account with the correct type. If it still didn't find
one, just take any account.
- This commit moves the Payment Term "End of Following Month" from
demo data to data and adds two new Payment Terms: "21 Days" and
"30% Now, Balance 60 Days".
It allows the customer to define less Payment Terms
task-2032586
Purpose of the task is some demo data values are not matching with the products
mentioned so update the demo data values with matching product.
Task: 1892754
closesodoo/odoo#28573
* Replace payment term lines options 'last_day_following_month' and 'last_day_current_month' by two new less specific ones allowing choosing the day directly, and thus not limited to the last one anymore (semantically different).
* Rename payment term line option value 'fix_day_following_month' into 'after_invoice_month' for more clarity (no semantic change).
Was task 24239. Was PR #15487
Account demo data try to add lines to payment terms. However when
reinitializing the module similar lines are added and a constraint
raises as there should not have duplicates. This commit voids
payment terms before refilling them.
With multiple companies defined, ensure consistency in demo data in case a localization reusing the ones defined in account module is installed. Before that, the demo data used several hardcoded values to reference the company, but some models relied on the default company, which lead to crash when the active company was not the one hardcoded in demo data and such a new localization got installed.
In details:
* account.operation.template object renamed into account.reconcile.model
* account.reconcile.model.template object created
* added some records for l10n_be
Was PR 11230
Numbering of statements is not anymore automated, sequence of the journal is now only used for the numbering of account.move (for consistancy with payments). Name of statements now appears as 'reference'.
Cancelling of a statement line keeps in memory the old move's name to reuse it in the same fashion as for account.invoice (avoiding gaps in numbering).
Cancelling of a payment now keeps in memory the old move's name to reuse it in the same fashion as for account.invoice (avoiding gaps in numbering)
[IMP] account: d'ont create journal items for invoice lines with quantity 0 (not amount because of tax)
[IMP] crm: usability kanban view and schedule an activity
[FIX] crm: schedule an activity bug when no activity yet
[IMP] website: app for website (not a menu in website admin)
Remaining products :
- product_product_0 becomes service_order_01
- product_product_1b becomes service_cost_01
- product_product_43 becomes product_order_01
- product_product_47 becomes product_delivery_01
- prodcut_product becomes product_delivery_02
- Replace product_product_56 by service_delivery
- Replace product_product_59 by consu_delivery_01
- Replace product_product_58 by consu_delivery_02
- Replace product_product_57 by consu_delivery_03
Removed products :
- product_product_53, product_product_57, product_product_55, product_product_54, product_product_52,
product_product_51, product_product_50, product_product_48, product_product_46, product_product_32,
product_product_33, product_product_28, product_product_38, product_product_39, product_product_40,
product_product_41, product_product_34, product_product_29, product_product_30, product_product_44,
product_product_31, product_product_35, product_product_36, product_product_37, product_product_42,
product_product_45, product_product_49, product_product_26, product_product_14, product_product_15,
product_product_18, product_product_19, product_product_21, product_product_23
Removed corresponding binaries.
Removed all Bill of Materials demo data, that were ridiculous and replace them by 2 bom: A complete
computer, and a kit computer. Rewritten the tests accordingly.
Fixed tests :
- sale_mrp/test/cancellation_propagated.yml : The yaml ref function return a id, not a dictionnary
- sale_stock/tests/test_sale_stock.py : The service product invoiced on the delivered quantity was
in fact not invoiced on delivery on the test. As we are in sale_stock, Without timesheet, we
manually set the delivered qty for the product serv_del. If we don't do this, the invoice will
never be fully invoiced.
- The pricelist rules choice is not based on the sequence anymore (Seems to be a bug, reported to
online). By the way, I changed the product to avoid the overlap.
- sale_mrp/test/sale_mrp.yml: The yaml ref function return a id, not a dictionnary
- mrp : Rewritten the tests to be coherent with the new bom data
The invoice date of demo data is changed to match the current
month/year. The original issue is the following:
- install accounting, keep default configuration (company currency: USD)
- add a payment for Agrolait in USD (e.g. $10,000)
- go to customer invoice demo_invoice_2 (which is in EUR)
- the system proposes you to add a outstanding payment to pay the
invoice -> do it
The invoice is not shown as fully paid, but on the other hand if you
click again to add an outstanding payment, nothing happens.
The reason of this bug is because for this specific bill, the currency
rate has changed between the invoice date and the payment date. The
amount used to pay the bill: this is the price in USD, at the rate
corresponding to the date of the invoice (i.e., what you were supposed
to pay at the time of invoicing). The fact that is does not mark your
bill as paid is also correct: the payment is written with the rate at
the date of the payment, and in this case, the invoice is not fully
paid. You should therefore reconcile the invoice and create a write-off
afterwards to register the exchange rate difference.
This unusual situation (pay an invoice in a different currency, and
moreover the rate has changed) has not been taken into account for v9,
and there is no clean solution which can be foreseen for a stable
version.
However, since this situation arises right away with the demo data, this
can be very misleading for a new user. The fix simply changes the date
of the invoices, so that there will be no rate change between the
invoice date and the payment date with the demo data.
opw-657151
Major changes:
- No use of UoS anymore
- No analytic journal (journal_id) on account move lines
Reason: complete rewrite of the Sale module.
Responsible: fp, dbo, nim
- [REM] account_budget: removal of field 'validating _user_id' on account.crossovered.budget, which is now replaced by inheritance with mail.thread
- [REM] account_budget: removal of field 'code' of account.crossovered.budget, which was not used and redondant with its name
- [REM] account_asset: removal of field 'note' of account.asset.category, which was not used and redondant with its name
- [REM] account: removal of field 'to_check' of account.move, which was redondant with state == 'draft'
- [REM] account_voucher: removal of field 'audit' of account.voucher, which was a fields.related on move_id.to_check
code improvement
code improvement
payment_method to payment_method_id
writeoff_account to writeoff_account_id
property_account_receivable to property_account_receivable_id
property_account_payable to property_account_payable_id
property_account_expense_categ to property_account_expense_categ_id
property_account_income_categ to property_account_income_categ_id
property_account_expense to property_account_expense_id
property_account_income to property_account_income_id
property_account_expense_categ fix
sale_tax to sale_tax_id and default_sale_tax to default_sale_tax_id
purchase_tax to purchase_tax_id and default_purchase_tax to default_purchase_tax_id
ref_companies to ref_companies_ids
property_account_position to property_account_position_id
property_payment_term to property_payment_term_id
property_supplier_payment_term to property_supplier_payment_term_id
bank_accounts_id to bank_accounts_ids
payment_method fix after rebase
user_type after rebase
payment_method fix after rebase
after rebase
invoice to invoice_id
fix payment_method_id after rebase
code improvement
[IMP]user_type to user_type_id
[IMP]property_stock_account_input_categ, property_stock_account_output_categ to _id
[IMP]improve after rebase
[IMP]fix type
[IMP]Account: code improvement